Haskell 98 vs. Glasgow Haskell: language non-compliance GHC vs the Haskell 98 language Haskell 98 language vs GHC This section lists Glasgow Haskell infelicities in its implementation of Haskell 98. See also the “when things go wrong” section () for information about crashes, space leaks, and other undesirable phenomena. The limitations here are listed in Haskell-Report order (roughly). Lexical syntax The Haskell report specifies that programs may be written using Unicode. GHC only accepts the ISO-8859-1 character set at the moment. Certain lexical rules regarding qualified identifiers are slightly different in GHC compared to the Haskell report. When you have module.reservedop, such as M.\, GHC will interpret it as a single qualified operator rather than the two lexemes M and .\. Context-free syntax GHC doesn't do fixity resolution on the left hand side of a binding before deciding which symbol is the function symbol. For example, the following fails, because GHC makes the assumption that the function symbol is |-: infix 5 |- infix 9 := data Equal = Char := Int 0 |- x:=y = 1 |- x:=y -- XXX fails here GHC doesn't do fixity resolution in expressions during parsing. For example, according to the Haskell report, the following expression is legal Haskell: let x = 42 in x == 42 == True and parses as: (let x = 42 in x == 42) == True because according to the report, the let expression extends as far to the right as possible. Since it can't extend past the second equals sign without causing a parse error (== is non-fix), the let-expression must terminate there. GHC simply gobbles up the whole expression, parsing like this: (let x = 42 in x == 42 == True) The Haskell report is arguably wrong here, but nevertheless it's a difference between GHC & Haskell 98. Expressions and patterns Very long String constants: May not go through. If you add a “string gap” every few thousand characters, then the strings can be as long as you like. Bear in mind that string gaps and the -cpp option option don't mix very well (see ). Single quotes in module names: It might work, but it's just begging for trouble. Declarations and bindings None known. Module system and interface files Namespace pollution Several modules internal to GHC are visible in the standard namespace. All of these modules begin with Prel, so the rule is: don't use any modules beginning with Prel in your program, or you will be comprehensively screwed. Numbers, basic types, and built-in classes Unchecked arithmetic: Arguably not an infelicity, but… Bear in mind that operations on Int, Float, and Double numbers are unchecked for overflow, underflow, and other sad occurrences. (note, however that some architectures trap floating-point overflow and loss-of-precision and report a floating-point exception, probably terminating the program)floating-point exceptions. Use Integer, Rational, etc., numeric types if this stuff keeps you awake at night. Multiply-defined array elements—not checked: This code fragment should elicit a fatal error, but it does not: main = print (array (1,1) [(1,2), (1,3)]) In Prelude support The Char type Charsize of The Haskell report says that the Char type holds 16 bits. GHC follows the ISO-10646 standard a little more closely: maxBound :: Char in GHC is 0x10FFFF. Arbitrary-sized tuples: Tuples are currently limited to size 61. HOWEVER: standard instances for tuples (Eq, Ord, Bounded, Ix Read, and Show) are available only up to 5-tuples. These limitations are easily subvertible, so please ask if you get stuck on them.