GHC_PROG=$(odir)/ghc-$(ProjectVersion)
endif
-ifneq "$(stage)" "2"
+ifeq "$(stage)" "1"
HS_PROG = $(GHC_PROG)
endif
@echo "cHscIfaceFileVersion = \"$(HscIfaceFileVersion)\"" >> $(CONFIG_HS)
@echo "cGhcWithNativeCodeGen = \"$(GhcWithNativeCodeGen)\"" >> $(CONFIG_HS)
@echo "cGhcUnregisterised = \"$(GhcUnregisterised)\"" >> $(CONFIG_HS)
+ @echo "cGhcEnableTablesNextToCode = \"$(GhcEnableTablesNextToCode)\"" >> $(CONFIG_HS)
@echo "cLeadingUnderscore = \"$(LeadingUnderscore)\"" >> $(CONFIG_HS)
@echo "cRAWCPP_FLAGS = \"$(RAWCPP_FLAGS)\"" >> $(CONFIG_HS)
@echo "cGCC = \"$(WhatGccIsCalled)\"" >> $(CONFIG_HS)
@echo "#define HOST_VENDOR \"$(TargetVendor_CPP)\"" >> $@
@echo "#define TARGET_VENDOR \"$(TargetVendor_CPP)\"" >> $@
@echo >> $@
-ifeq "$(GhcWithTablesNextToCode)" "YES"
- @echo "#define TABLES_NEXT_TO_CODE 1" >> $@
-endif
- @echo >> $@
@echo "#endif /* __PLATFORM_H__ */" >> $@
@echo "Done."
# SRC_HC_OPTS += -DGHCI -DBREAKPOINT -package template-haskell
PKG_DEPENDS += template-haskell
+# Should GHCI be building info tables in the TABLES_NEXT_TO_CODE style
+# or not?
+ifeq "$(GhcEnableTablesNextToCode) $(GhcUnregisterised)" "YES NO"
+SRC_HC_OPTS += -DGHCI_TABLES_NEXT_TO_CODE
+endif
+
# Use threaded RTS with GHCi, so threads don't get blocked at the prompt.
SRC_HC_OPTS += -threaded
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Building the GHC package
-# The GHC package is made from the stage 2 build. Fortunately the
-# package build system framework more or less does the right thing for
-# us here.
-
-# All this section is stage-2 only!
-ifeq "$(stage)" "2"
+# The GHC package is made from the stage 2 build and later.
+# Fortunately the package build system framework more or less does the
+# right thing for us here.
+ifneq "$(findstring $(stage), 2 3)" ""
PACKAGE = ghc
HIERARCHICAL_LIB = NO
VERSION = $(ProjectVersion)