+ ; return (dm_binds `unionBags` unionManyBags inst_binds_s) }
+\end{code}
+
+See Note [Default methods and instances]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+The default method Ids are already in the type environment (see Note
+[Default method Ids and Template Haskell] in TcTyClsDcls), BUT they
+don't have their InlinePragmas yet. Usually that would not matter,
+because the simplifier propagates information from binding site to
+use. But, unusually, when compiling instance decls we *copy* the
+INLINE pragma from the default method to the method for that
+particular operation (see Note [INLINE and default methods] below).
+
+So right here in tcInstDecl2 we must re-extend the type envt with
+the default method Ids replete with their INLINE pragmas. Urk.
+
+\begin{code}
+
+tcInstDecl2 :: InstInfo Name -> TcM (LHsBinds Id)
+ -- Returns a binding for the dfun
+tcInstDecl2 (InstInfo { iSpec = ispec, iBinds = ibinds })
+ = recoverM (return emptyLHsBinds) $
+ setSrcSpan loc $
+ addErrCtxt (instDeclCtxt2 (idType dfun_id)) $
+ do { -- Instantiate the instance decl with skolem constants
+ ; (inst_tyvars, dfun_theta, inst_head) <- tcSkolSigType skol_info (idType dfun_id)
+ ; let (clas, inst_tys) = tcSplitDFunHead inst_head
+ (class_tyvars, sc_theta, _, op_items) = classBigSig clas
+ sc_theta' = substTheta (zipOpenTvSubst class_tyvars inst_tys) sc_theta
+ n_ty_args = length inst_tyvars
+ n_silent = dfunNSilent dfun_id
+ (silent_theta, orig_theta) = splitAt n_silent dfun_theta
+
+ ; silent_ev_vars <- mapM newSilentGiven silent_theta
+ ; orig_ev_vars <- newEvVars orig_theta
+ ; let dfun_ev_vars = silent_ev_vars ++ orig_ev_vars
+
+ ; (sc_binds, sc_dicts, sc_args)
+ <- mapAndUnzip3M (tcSuperClass n_ty_args dfun_ev_vars) sc_theta'
+
+ -- Check that any superclasses gotten from a silent arguemnt
+ -- can be deduced from the originally-specified dfun arguments
+ ; ct_loc <- getCtLoc ScOrigin
+ ; _ <- checkConstraints skol_info inst_tyvars orig_ev_vars $
+ emitConstraints $ listToBag $
+ [ WcEvVar (WantedEvVar sc ct_loc)
+ | sc <- sc_dicts, isSilentEvVar sc ]
+
+ -- Deal with 'SPECIALISE instance' pragmas
+ -- See Note [SPECIALISE instance pragmas]
+ ; spec_info <- tcSpecInstPrags dfun_id ibinds
+
+ -- Typecheck the methods
+ ; (meth_ids, meth_binds)
+ <- tcExtendTyVarEnv inst_tyvars $
+ -- The inst_tyvars scope over the 'where' part
+ -- Those tyvars are inside the dfun_id's type, which is a bit
+ -- bizarre, but OK so long as you realise it!
+ tcInstanceMethods dfun_id clas inst_tyvars dfun_ev_vars
+ inst_tys spec_info
+ op_items ibinds
+
+ -- Create the result bindings
+ ; self_dict <- newEvVar (ClassP clas inst_tys)
+ ; let class_tc = classTyCon clas
+ [dict_constr] = tyConDataCons class_tc
+ dict_bind = mkVarBind self_dict dict_rhs
+ dict_rhs = foldl mk_app inst_constr $
+ map HsVar sc_dicts ++ map (wrapId arg_wrapper) meth_ids
+ inst_constr = L loc $ wrapId (mkWpTyApps inst_tys)
+ (dataConWrapId dict_constr)
+ -- We don't produce a binding for the dict_constr; instead we
+ -- rely on the simplifier to unfold this saturated application
+ -- We do this rather than generate an HsCon directly, because
+ -- it means that the special cases (e.g. dictionary with only one
+ -- member) are dealt with by the common MkId.mkDataConWrapId
+ -- code rather than needing to be repeated here.
+
+ mk_app :: LHsExpr Id -> HsExpr Id -> LHsExpr Id
+ mk_app fun arg = L loc (HsApp fun (L loc arg))
+
+ arg_wrapper = mkWpEvVarApps dfun_ev_vars <.> mkWpTyApps (mkTyVarTys inst_tyvars)
+
+ -- Do not inline the dfun; instead give it a magic DFunFunfolding
+ -- See Note [ClassOp/DFun selection]
+ -- See also note [Single-method classes]
+ dfun_id_w_fun
+ | isNewTyCon class_tc
+ = dfun_id `setInlinePragma` alwaysInlinePragma { inl_sat = Just 0 }
+ | otherwise
+ = dfun_id `setIdUnfolding` mkDFunUnfolding dfun_ty (sc_args ++ meth_args)
+ `setInlinePragma` dfunInlinePragma
+ meth_args = map (DFunPolyArg . Var) meth_ids
+
+ main_bind = AbsBinds { abs_tvs = inst_tyvars
+ , abs_ev_vars = dfun_ev_vars
+ , abs_exports = [(inst_tyvars, dfun_id_w_fun, self_dict,
+ SpecPrags [] {- spec_inst_prags -})]
+ , abs_ev_binds = emptyTcEvBinds
+ , abs_binds = unitBag dict_bind }
+
+ ; return (unitBag (L loc main_bind) `unionBags`
+ unionManyBags sc_binds `unionBags`
+ listToBag meth_binds)
+ }
+ where
+ skol_info = InstSkol -- See Note [Subtle interaction of recursion and overlap]
+ dfun_ty = idType dfun_id
+ dfun_id = instanceDFunId ispec
+ loc = getSrcSpan dfun_id
+
+------------------------------
+tcSuperClass :: Int -> [EvVar] -> PredType -> TcM (LHsBinds Id, Id, DFunArg CoreExpr)
+tcSuperClass n_ty_args ev_vars pred
+ | Just (ev, i) <- find n_ty_args ev_vars
+ = return (emptyBag, ev, DFunLamArg i)
+ | otherwise
+ = ASSERT2( isEmptyVarSet (tyVarsOfPred pred), ppr pred)
+ do { sc_dict <- newWantedEvVar pred
+ ; loc <- getCtLoc ScOrigin
+ ; ev_binds <- simplifyTop (unitBag (WcEvVar (WantedEvVar sc_dict loc)))
+ ; let ev_wrap = WpLet (EvBinds ev_binds)
+ sc_bind = mkVarBind sc_dict (noLoc $ (wrapId ev_wrap sc_dict))
+ ; return (unitBag sc_bind, sc_dict, DFunConstArg (Var sc_dict)) }
+ -- It's very important to solve the superclass constraint *in isolation*
+ -- so that it isn't generated by superclass selection from something else
+ -- We then generate the (also rather degenerate) top-level binding:
+ -- sc_dict = let sc_dict = <blah> in sc_dict
+ -- where <blah> is generated by solving the implication constraint
+ where
+ find _ [] = Nothing
+ find i (ev:evs) | pred `tcEqPred` evVarPred ev = Just (ev, i)
+ | otherwise = find (i+1) evs
+
+------------------------------
+tcSpecInstPrags :: DFunId -> InstBindings Name
+ -> TcM ([Located TcSpecPrag], PragFun)
+tcSpecInstPrags _ (NewTypeDerived {})
+ = return ([], \_ -> [])
+tcSpecInstPrags dfun_id (VanillaInst binds uprags _)
+ = do { spec_inst_prags <- mapM (wrapLocM (tcSpecInst dfun_id)) $
+ filter isSpecInstLSig uprags
+ -- The filter removes the pragmas for methods
+ ; return (spec_inst_prags, mkPragFun uprags binds) }
+\end{code}
+
+Note [Silent Superclass Arguments]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Consider the following (extreme) situation:
+ class C a => D a where ...
+ instance D [a] => D [a] where ...
+Although this looks wrong (assume D [a] to prove D [a]), it is only a
+more extreme case of what happens with recursive dictionaries.
+
+To implement the dfun we must generate code for the superclass C [a],
+which we can get by superclass selection from the supplied argument!
+So we’d generate:
+ dfun :: forall a. D [a] -> D [a]
+ dfun = \d::D [a] -> MkD (scsel d) ..
+
+However this means that if we later encounter a situation where
+we have a [Wanted] dw::D [a] we could solve it thus:
+ dw := dfun dw
+Although recursive, this binding would pass the TcSMonadisGoodRecEv
+check because it appears as guarded. But in reality, it will make a
+bottom superclass. The trouble is that isGoodRecEv can't "see" the
+superclass-selection inside dfun.
+
+Our solution to this problem is to change the way ‘dfuns’ are created
+for instances, so that we pass as first arguments to the dfun some
+``silent superclass arguments’’, which are the immediate superclasses
+of the dictionary we are trying to construct. In our example:
+ dfun :: forall a. (C [a], D [a] -> D [a]
+ dfun = \(dc::C [a]) (dd::D [a]) -> DOrd dc ...
+
+This gives us:
+
+ -----------------------------------------------------------
+ DFun Superclass Invariant
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ In the body of a DFun, every superclass argument to the
+ returned dictionary is
+ either * one of the arguments of the DFun,
+ or * constant, bound at top level
+ -----------------------------------------------------------
+
+This means that no superclass is hidden inside a dfun application, so
+the counting argument in isGoodRecEv (more dfun calls than superclass
+selections) works correctly.
+
+The extra arguments required to satisfy the DFun Superclass Invariant
+always come first, and are called the "silent" arguments. DFun types
+are built (only) by MkId.mkDictFunId, so that is where we decide
+what silent arguments are to be added.
+
+This net effect is that it is safe to treat a dfun application as
+wrapping a dictionary constructor around its arguments (in particular,
+a dfun never picks superclasses from the arguments under the dictionary
+constructor).
+
+In our example, if we had [Wanted] dw :: D [a] we would get via the instance:
+ dw := dfun d1 d2
+ [Wanted] (d1 :: C [a])
+ [Wanted] (d2 :: D [a])
+ [Derived] (d :: D [a])
+ [Derived] (scd :: C [a]) scd := scsel d
+ [Derived] (scd2 :: C [a]) scd2 := scsel d2
+
+And now, though we *can* solve:
+ d2 := dw
+we will get an isGoodRecEv failure when we try to solve:
+ d1 := scsel d
+ or
+ d1 := scsel d2
+
+Test case SCLoop tests this fix.
+
+Note [SPECIALISE instance pragmas]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Consider
+
+ instance (Ix a, Ix b) => Ix (a,b) where
+ {-# SPECIALISE instance Ix (Int,Int) #-}
+ range (x,y) = ...
+
+We do *not* want to make a specialised version of the dictionary
+function. Rather, we want specialised versions of each method.
+Thus we should generate something like this:
+
+ $dfIx :: (Ix a, Ix x) => Ix (a,b)
+ {- DFUN [$crange, ...] -}
+ $dfIx da db = Ix ($crange da db) (...other methods...)
+
+ $dfIxPair :: (Ix a, Ix x) => Ix (a,b)
+ {- DFUN [$crangePair, ...] -}
+ $dfIxPair = Ix ($crangePair da db) (...other methods...)
+
+ $crange :: (Ix a, Ix b) -> ((a,b),(a,b)) -> [(a,b)]
+ {-# SPECIALISE $crange :: ((Int,Int),(Int,Int)) -> [(Int,Int)] #-}
+ $crange da db = <blah>
+
+ {-# RULE range ($dfIx da db) = $crange da db #-}
+
+Note that
+
+ * The RULE is unaffected by the specialisation. We don't want to
+ specialise $dfIx, because then it would need a specialised RULE
+ which is a pain. The single RULE works fine at all specialisations.
+ See Note [How instance declarations are translated] above
+
+ * Instead, we want to specialise the *method*, $crange
+
+In practice, rather than faking up a SPECIALISE pragama for each
+method (which is painful, since we'd have to figure out its
+specialised type), we call tcSpecPrag *as if* were going to specialise
+$dfIx -- you can see that in the call to tcSpecInst. That generates a
+SpecPrag which, as it turns out, can be used unchanged for each method.
+The "it turns out" bit is delicate, but it works fine!
+
+\begin{code}
+tcSpecInst :: Id -> Sig Name -> TcM TcSpecPrag
+tcSpecInst dfun_id prag@(SpecInstSig hs_ty)
+ = addErrCtxt (spec_ctxt prag) $
+ do { let name = idName dfun_id
+ ; (tyvars, theta, clas, tys) <- tcHsInstHead hs_ty
+ ; let (_, spec_dfun_ty) = mkDictFunTy tyvars theta clas tys
+
+ ; co_fn <- tcSubType (SpecPragOrigin name) (SigSkol SpecInstCtxt)
+ (idType dfun_id) spec_dfun_ty
+ ; return (SpecPrag dfun_id co_fn defaultInlinePragma) }
+ where
+ spec_ctxt prag = hang (ptext (sLit "In the SPECIALISE pragma")) 2 (ppr prag)
+
+tcSpecInst _ _ = panic "tcSpecInst"
+\end{code}
+
+%************************************************************************
+%* *
+ Type-checking an instance method
+%* *
+%************************************************************************
+
+tcInstanceMethod
+- Make the method bindings, as a [(NonRec, HsBinds)], one per method
+- Remembering to use fresh Name (the instance method Name) as the binder
+- Bring the instance method Ids into scope, for the benefit of tcInstSig
+- Use sig_fn mapping instance method Name -> instance tyvars
+- Ditto prag_fn
+- Use tcValBinds to do the checking
+
+\begin{code}
+tcInstanceMethods :: DFunId -> Class -> [TcTyVar]
+ -> [EvVar]
+ -> [TcType]
+ -> ([Located TcSpecPrag], PragFun)
+ -> [(Id, DefMeth)]
+ -> InstBindings Name
+ -> TcM ([Id], [LHsBind Id])
+ -- The returned inst_meth_ids all have types starting
+ -- forall tvs. theta => ...
+tcInstanceMethods dfun_id clas tyvars dfun_ev_vars inst_tys
+ (spec_inst_prags, prag_fn)
+ op_items (VanillaInst binds _ standalone_deriv)
+ = mapAndUnzipM tc_item op_items
+ where
+ ----------------------
+ tc_item :: (Id, DefMeth) -> TcM (Id, LHsBind Id)
+ tc_item (sel_id, dm_info)
+ = case findMethodBind (idName sel_id) binds of
+ Just user_bind -> tc_body sel_id standalone_deriv user_bind
+ Nothing -> tc_default sel_id dm_info
+
+ ----------------------
+ tc_body :: Id -> Bool -> LHsBind Name -> TcM (TcId, LHsBind Id)
+ tc_body sel_id generated_code rn_bind
+ = add_meth_ctxt sel_id generated_code rn_bind $
+ do { (meth_id, local_meth_id) <- mkMethIds clas tyvars dfun_ev_vars
+ inst_tys sel_id
+ ; let prags = prag_fn (idName sel_id)
+ ; meth_id1 <- addInlinePrags meth_id prags
+ ; spec_prags <- tcSpecPrags meth_id1 prags
+ ; bind <- tcInstanceMethodBody InstSkol
+ tyvars dfun_ev_vars
+ meth_id1 local_meth_id meth_sig_fn
+ (mk_meth_spec_prags meth_id1 spec_prags)
+ rn_bind
+ ; return (meth_id1, bind) }
+
+ ----------------------
+ tc_default :: Id -> DefMeth -> TcM (TcId, LHsBind Id)
+ tc_default sel_id GenDefMeth -- Derivable type classes stuff
+ = do { meth_bind <- mkGenericDefMethBind clas inst_tys sel_id
+ ; tc_body sel_id False {- Not generated code? -} meth_bind }
+
+ tc_default sel_id NoDefMeth -- No default method at all
+ = do { warnMissingMethod sel_id
+ ; (meth_id, _) <- mkMethIds clas tyvars dfun_ev_vars
+ inst_tys sel_id
+ ; return (meth_id, mkVarBind meth_id $
+ mkLHsWrap lam_wrapper error_rhs) }
+ where
+ error_rhs = L loc $ HsApp error_fun error_msg
+ error_fun = L loc $ wrapId (WpTyApp meth_tau) nO_METHOD_BINDING_ERROR_ID
+ error_msg = L loc (HsLit (HsStringPrim (mkFastString error_string)))
+ meth_tau = funResultTy (applyTys (idType sel_id) inst_tys)
+ error_string = showSDoc (hcat [ppr loc, text "|", ppr sel_id ])
+ lam_wrapper = mkWpTyLams tyvars <.> mkWpLams dfun_ev_vars
+
+ tc_default sel_id (DefMeth dm_name) -- A polymorphic default method
+ = do { -- Build the typechecked version directly,
+ -- without calling typecheck_method;
+ -- see Note [Default methods in instances]
+ -- Generate /\as.\ds. let self = df as ds
+ -- in $dm inst_tys self
+ -- The 'let' is necessary only because HsSyn doesn't allow
+ -- you to apply a function to a dictionary *expression*.
+
+ ; self_dict <- newEvVar (ClassP clas inst_tys)
+ ; let self_ev_bind = EvBind self_dict $
+ EvDFunApp dfun_id (mkTyVarTys tyvars) dfun_ev_vars
+
+ ; (meth_id, local_meth_id) <- mkMethIds clas tyvars dfun_ev_vars
+ inst_tys sel_id
+ ; dm_id <- tcLookupId dm_name
+ ; let dm_inline_prag = idInlinePragma dm_id
+ rhs = HsWrap (mkWpEvVarApps [self_dict] <.> mkWpTyApps inst_tys) $
+ HsVar dm_id
+
+ meth_bind = L loc $ VarBind { var_id = local_meth_id
+ , var_rhs = L loc rhs
+ , var_inline = False }
+ meth_id1 = meth_id `setInlinePragma` dm_inline_prag
+ -- Copy the inline pragma (if any) from the default
+ -- method to this version. Note [INLINE and default methods]
+
+ bind = AbsBinds { abs_tvs = tyvars, abs_ev_vars = dfun_ev_vars
+ , abs_exports = [( tyvars, meth_id1, local_meth_id
+ , mk_meth_spec_prags meth_id1 [])]
+ , abs_ev_binds = EvBinds (unitBag self_ev_bind)
+ , abs_binds = unitBag meth_bind }
+ -- Default methods in an instance declaration can't have their own
+ -- INLINE or SPECIALISE pragmas. It'd be possible to allow them, but
+ -- currently they are rejected with
+ -- "INLINE pragma lacks an accompanying binding"
+
+ ; return (meth_id1, L loc bind) }
+
+ ----------------------
+ mk_meth_spec_prags :: Id -> [LTcSpecPrag] -> TcSpecPrags
+ -- Adapt the SPECIALISE pragmas to work for this method Id
+ -- There are two sources:
+ -- * spec_inst_prags: {-# SPECIALISE instance :: <blah> #-}
+ -- These ones have the dfun inside, but [perhaps surprisingly]
+ -- the correct wrapper
+ -- * spec_prags_for_me: {-# SPECIALISE op :: <blah> #-}
+ mk_meth_spec_prags meth_id spec_prags_for_me
+ = SpecPrags (spec_prags_for_me ++
+ [ L loc (SpecPrag meth_id wrap inl)
+ | L loc (SpecPrag _ wrap inl) <- spec_inst_prags])
+
+ loc = getSrcSpan dfun_id
+ meth_sig_fn _ = Just ([],loc) -- The 'Just' says "yes, there's a type sig"
+ -- But there are no scoped type variables from local_method_id
+ -- Only the ones from the instance decl itself, which are already
+ -- in scope. Example:
+ -- class C a where { op :: forall b. Eq b => ... }
+ -- instance C [c] where { op = <rhs> }
+ -- In <rhs>, 'c' is scope but 'b' is not!
+
+ -- For instance decls that come from standalone deriving clauses
+ -- we want to print out the full source code if there's an error
+ -- because otherwise the user won't see the code at all
+ add_meth_ctxt sel_id generated_code rn_bind thing
+ | generated_code = addLandmarkErrCtxt (derivBindCtxt sel_id clas inst_tys rn_bind) thing
+ | otherwise = thing
+
+
+tcInstanceMethods dfun_id clas tyvars dfun_ev_vars inst_tys
+ _ op_items (NewTypeDerived coi _)
+
+-- Running example:
+-- class Show b => Foo a b where
+-- op :: a -> b -> b
+-- newtype N a = MkN (Tree [a])
+-- deriving instance (Show p, Foo Int p) => Foo Int (N p)
+-- -- NB: standalone deriving clause means
+-- -- that the contex is user-specified
+-- Hence op :: forall a b. Foo a b => a -> b -> b
+--
+-- We're going to make an instance like
+-- instance (Show p, Foo Int p) => Foo Int (N p)
+-- op = $copT
+--
+-- $copT :: forall p. (Show p, Foo Int p) => Int -> N p -> N p
+-- $copT p (d1:Show p) (d2:Foo Int p)
+-- = op Int (Tree [p]) rep_d |> op_co
+-- where
+-- rep_d :: Foo Int (Tree [p]) = ...d1...d2...
+-- op_co :: (Int -> Tree [p] -> Tree [p]) ~ (Int -> T p -> T p)
+-- We get op_co by substituting [Int/a] and [co/b] in type for op
+-- where co : [p] ~ T p
+--
+-- Notice that the dictionary bindings "..d1..d2.." must be generated
+-- by the constraint solver, since the <context> may be
+-- user-specified.
+
+ = do { rep_d_stuff <- checkConstraints InstSkol tyvars dfun_ev_vars $
+ emitWanted ScOrigin rep_pred
+
+ ; mapAndUnzipM (tc_item rep_d_stuff) op_items }
+ where
+ loc = getSrcSpan dfun_id
+
+ inst_tvs = fst (tcSplitForAllTys (idType dfun_id))
+ Just (init_inst_tys, _) = snocView inst_tys
+ rep_ty = fst (coercionKind co) -- [p]
+ rep_pred = mkClassPred clas (init_inst_tys ++ [rep_ty])
+
+ -- co : [p] ~ T p
+ co = substTyWith inst_tvs (mkTyVarTys tyvars) $
+ case coi of { IdCo ty -> ty ;
+ ACo co -> mkSymCoercion co }
+
+ ----------------
+ tc_item :: (TcEvBinds, EvVar) -> (Id, DefMeth) -> TcM (TcId, LHsBind TcId)
+ tc_item (rep_ev_binds, rep_d) (sel_id, _)
+ = do { (meth_id, local_meth_id) <- mkMethIds clas tyvars dfun_ev_vars
+ inst_tys sel_id
+
+ ; let meth_rhs = wrapId (mk_op_wrapper sel_id rep_d) sel_id
+ meth_bind = VarBind { var_id = local_meth_id
+ , var_rhs = L loc meth_rhs
+ , var_inline = False }
+
+ bind = AbsBinds { abs_tvs = tyvars, abs_ev_vars = dfun_ev_vars
+ , abs_exports = [(tyvars, meth_id,
+ local_meth_id, noSpecPrags)]
+ , abs_ev_binds = rep_ev_binds
+ , abs_binds = unitBag $ L loc meth_bind }
+
+ ; return (meth_id, L loc bind) }
+
+ ----------------
+ mk_op_wrapper :: Id -> EvVar -> HsWrapper
+ mk_op_wrapper sel_id rep_d
+ = WpCast (substTyWith sel_tvs (init_inst_tys ++ [co]) local_meth_ty)
+ <.> WpEvApp (EvId rep_d)
+ <.> mkWpTyApps (init_inst_tys ++ [rep_ty])
+ where
+ (sel_tvs, sel_rho) = tcSplitForAllTys (idType sel_id)
+ (_, local_meth_ty) = tcSplitPredFunTy_maybe sel_rho
+ `orElse` pprPanic "tcInstanceMethods" (ppr sel_id)
+
+----------------------
+mkMethIds :: Class -> [TcTyVar] -> [EvVar] -> [TcType] -> Id -> TcM (TcId, TcId)
+mkMethIds clas tyvars dfun_ev_vars inst_tys sel_id
+ = do { uniq <- newUnique
+ ; let meth_name = mkDerivedInternalName mkClassOpAuxOcc uniq sel_name
+ ; local_meth_name <- newLocalName sel_name
+ -- Base the local_meth_name on the selector name, becuase
+ -- type errors from tcInstanceMethodBody come from here
+
+ ; let meth_id = mkLocalId meth_name meth_ty
+ local_meth_id = mkLocalId local_meth_name local_meth_ty
+ ; return (meth_id, local_meth_id) }
+ where
+ local_meth_ty = instantiateMethod clas sel_id inst_tys
+ meth_ty = mkForAllTys tyvars $ mkPiTypes dfun_ev_vars local_meth_ty
+ sel_name = idName sel_id
+
+----------------------
+wrapId :: HsWrapper -> id -> HsExpr id
+wrapId wrapper id = mkHsWrap wrapper (HsVar id)
+
+derivBindCtxt :: Id -> Class -> [Type ] -> LHsBind Name -> SDoc
+derivBindCtxt sel_id clas tys _bind
+ = vcat [ ptext (sLit "When typechecking the code for ") <+> quotes (ppr sel_id)
+ , nest 2 (ptext (sLit "in a standalone derived instance for")
+ <+> quotes (pprClassPred clas tys) <> colon)
+ , nest 2 $ ptext (sLit "To see the code I am typechecking, use -ddump-deriv") ]
+
+-- Too voluminous
+-- , nest 2 $ pprSetDepth AllTheWay $ ppr bind ]
+
+warnMissingMethod :: Id -> TcM ()
+warnMissingMethod sel_id
+ = do { warn <- doptM Opt_WarnMissingMethods
+ ; warnTc (warn -- Warn only if -fwarn-missing-methods
+ && not (startsWithUnderscore (getOccName sel_id)))
+ -- Don't warn about _foo methods
+ (ptext (sLit "No explicit method nor default method for")
+ <+> quotes (ppr sel_id)) }