- All the optimisations that GHC 0.29 used to do are back in, with
- the exception of specialisation. It ought to be the case that
- GHC 2.02 outperforms GHC 0.29, because it has a much better
- handle on cross-module inlining, but there's a good chance that
- there are performance "holes" lurking. We have yet to make
- a systematic comparison. (Please send us programs where 2.02
- does noticeably worse than 0.29.)
+ All the optimisations that GHC 0.29 used to do are back in, with
+ the exception of specialisation. It ought to be the case that
+ GHC 2.02 outperforms GHC 0.29, because it has a much better
+ handle on cross-module inlining, but there's a good chance that
+ there are performance "holes" lurking. We have yet to make
+ a systematic comparison. (Please send us programs where 2.02
+ does noticeably worse than 0.29.)