-
-%************************************************************************
-%* *
-\subsection{Checking for a decent instance type}
-%* *
-%************************************************************************
-
-@scrutiniseInstanceHead@ checks the type {\em and} its syntactic constraints:
-it must normally look like: @instance Foo (Tycon a b c ...) ...@
-
-The exceptions to this syntactic checking: (1)~if the @GlasgowExts@
-flag is on, or (2)~the instance is imported (they must have been
-compiled elsewhere). In these cases, we let them go through anyway.
-
-We can also have instances for functions: @instance Foo (a -> b) ...@.
-
-\begin{code}
-scrutiniseInstanceConstraint pred
- = getDOptsTc `thenTc` \ dflags -> case () of
- ()
- | dopt Opt_AllowUndecidableInstances dflags
- -> returnNF_Tc ()
-
- | Just (clas,tys) <- getClassTys_maybe pred,
- all isTyVarTy tys
- -> returnNF_Tc ()
-
- | otherwise
- -> addErrTc (instConstraintErr pred)
-
-scrutiniseInstanceHead clas inst_taus
- = getDOptsTc `thenTc` \ dflags -> case () of
- ()
- | -- CCALL CHECK
- -- A user declaration of a CCallable/CReturnable instance
- -- must be for a "boxed primitive" type.
- (clas `hasKey` cCallableClassKey
- && not (ccallable_type dflags first_inst_tau))
- ||
- (clas `hasKey` cReturnableClassKey
- && not (creturnable_type first_inst_tau))
- -> addErrTc (nonBoxedPrimCCallErr clas first_inst_tau)
-
- -- Allow anything for AllowUndecidableInstances
- | dopt Opt_AllowUndecidableInstances dflags
- -> returnNF_Tc ()
-
- -- If GlasgowExts then check at least one isn't a type variable
- | dopt Opt_GlasgowExts dflags
- -> if all isTyVarTy inst_taus
- then addErrTc (instTypeErr clas inst_taus
- (text "There must be at least one non-type-variable in the instance head"))
- else returnNF_Tc ()
-
- -- WITH HASKELL 1.4, MUST HAVE C (T a b c)
- | not (length inst_taus == 1 &&
- maybeToBool maybe_tycon_app && -- Yes, there's a type constuctor
- not (isSynTyCon tycon) && -- ...but not a synonym
- all isTyVarTy arg_tys && -- Applied to type variables
- length (varSetElems (tyVarsOfTypes arg_tys)) == length arg_tys
- -- This last condition checks that all the type variables are distinct
- )
- -> addErrTc (instTypeErr clas inst_taus
- (text "the instance type must be of form (T a b c)" $$
- text "where T is not a synonym, and a,b,c are distinct type variables")
- )
-
- | otherwise
- -> returnNF_Tc ()
-
- where
- (first_inst_tau : _) = inst_taus
-
- -- Stuff for algebraic or -> type
- maybe_tycon_app = splitTyConApp_maybe first_inst_tau
- Just (tycon, arg_tys) = maybe_tycon_app
-
- ccallable_type dflags ty = isFFIArgumentTy dflags False {- Not safe call -} ty
- creturnable_type ty = isFFIResultTy ty
-\end{code}
+ ------------------------------
+ Inlining dfuns unconditionally
+ ------------------------------
+
+The code above unconditionally inlines dict funs. Here's why.
+Consider this program:
+
+ test :: Int -> Int -> Bool
+ test x y = (x,y) == (y,x) || test y x
+ -- Recursive to avoid making it inline.
+
+This needs the (Eq (Int,Int)) instance. If we inline that dfun
+the code we end up with is good:
+
+ Test.$wtest =
+ \r -> case ==# [ww ww1] of wild {
+ PrelBase.False -> Test.$wtest ww1 ww;
+ PrelBase.True ->
+ case ==# [ww1 ww] of wild1 {
+ PrelBase.False -> Test.$wtest ww1 ww;
+ PrelBase.True -> PrelBase.True [];
+ };
+ };
+ Test.test = \r [w w1]
+ case w of w2 {
+ PrelBase.I# ww ->
+ case w1 of w3 { PrelBase.I# ww1 -> Test.$wtest ww ww1; };
+ };
+
+If we don't inline the dfun, the code is not nearly as good:
+
+ (==) = case PrelTup.$fEq(,) PrelBase.$fEqInt PrelBase.$fEqInt of tpl {
+ PrelBase.:DEq tpl1 tpl2 -> tpl2;
+ };
+
+ Test.$wtest =
+ \r [ww ww1]
+ let { y = PrelBase.I#! [ww1]; } in
+ let { x = PrelBase.I#! [ww]; } in
+ let { sat_slx = PrelTup.(,)! [y x]; } in
+ let { sat_sly = PrelTup.(,)! [x y];
+ } in
+ case == sat_sly sat_slx of wild {
+ PrelBase.False -> Test.$wtest ww1 ww;
+ PrelBase.True -> PrelBase.True [];
+ };
+
+ Test.test =
+ \r [w w1]
+ case w of w2 {
+ PrelBase.I# ww ->
+ case w1 of w3 { PrelBase.I# ww1 -> Test.$wtest ww ww1; };
+ };
+
+Why doesn't GHC inline $fEq? Because it looks big:
+
+ PrelTup.zdfEqZ1T{-rcX-}
+ = \ @ a{-reT-} :: * @ b{-reS-} :: *
+ zddEq{-rf6-} _Ks :: {PrelBase.Eq{-23-} a{-reT-}}
+ zddEq1{-rf7-} _Ks :: {PrelBase.Eq{-23-} b{-reS-}} ->
+ let {
+ zeze{-rf0-} _Kl :: (b{-reS-} -> b{-reS-} -> PrelBase.Bool{-3c-})
+ zeze{-rf0-} = PrelBase.zeze{-01L-}@ b{-reS-} zddEq1{-rf7-} } in
+ let {
+ zeze1{-rf3-} _Kl :: (a{-reT-} -> a{-reT-} -> PrelBase.Bool{-3c-})
+ zeze1{-rf3-} = PrelBase.zeze{-01L-} @ a{-reT-} zddEq{-rf6-} } in
+ let {
+ zeze2{-reN-} :: ((a{-reT-}, b{-reS-}) -> (a{-reT-}, b{-reS-})-> PrelBase.Bool{-3c-})
+ zeze2{-reN-} = \ ds{-rf5-} _Ks :: (a{-reT-}, b{-reS-})
+ ds1{-rf4-} _Ks :: (a{-reT-}, b{-reS-}) ->
+ case ds{-rf5-}
+ of wild{-reW-} _Kd { (a1{-rf2-} _Ks, a2{-reZ-} _Ks) ->
+ case ds1{-rf4-}
+ of wild1{-reX-} _Kd { (b1{-rf1-} _Ks, b2{-reY-} _Ks) ->
+ PrelBase.zaza{-r4e-}
+ (zeze1{-rf3-} a1{-rf2-} b1{-rf1-})
+ (zeze{-rf0-} a2{-reZ-} b2{-reY-})
+ }
+ } } in
+ let {
+ a1{-reR-} :: ((a{-reT-}, b{-reS-})-> (a{-reT-}, b{-reS-})-> PrelBase.Bool{-3c-})
+ a1{-reR-} = \ a2{-reV-} _Ks :: (a{-reT-}, b{-reS-})
+ b1{-reU-} _Ks :: (a{-reT-}, b{-reS-}) ->
+ PrelBase.not{-r6I-} (zeze2{-reN-} a2{-reV-} b1{-reU-})
+ } in
+ PrelBase.zdwZCDEq{-r8J-} @ (a{-reT-}, b{-reS-}) a1{-reR-} zeze2{-reN-})
+
+and it's not as bad as it seems, because it's further dramatically
+simplified: only zeze2 is extracted and its body is simplified.