-- because the latter is part of a knot, whereas the former is not.
mkNewTyConRhs tycon_name tycon con
= do { co_tycon_name <- newImplicitBinder tycon_name mkNewTyCoOcc
- ; let co_tycon = mkNewTypeCoercion co_tycon_name tycon tvs rhs_ty
- cocon_maybe
- | all_coercions || isRecursiveTyCon tycon
- = Just co_tycon
- | otherwise
- = Nothing
- ; return (NewTyCon { data_con = con,
+ ; let co_tycon = mkNewTypeCoercion co_tycon_name tycon etad_rhs
+ cocon_maybe | all_coercions || isRecursiveTyCon tycon
+ = Just co_tycon
+ | otherwise
+ = Nothing
+ ; return (NewTyCon { data_con = con,
+ nt_rhs = rhs_ty,
+ nt_etad_rhs = etad_rhs,
nt_co = cocon_maybe,
-- Coreview looks through newtypes with a Nothing
-- for nt_co, or uses explicit coercions otherwise
- nt_rhs = rhs_ty,
- nt_etad_rhs = eta_reduce tvs rhs_ty,
nt_rep = mkNewTyConRep tycon rhs_ty }) }
where
- -- if all_coercions is True then we use coercions for all newtypes
+ -- If all_coercions is True then we use coercions for all newtypes
-- otherwise we use coercions for recursive newtypes and look through
-- non-recursive newtypes
all_coercions = True
-- Instantiate the data con with the
-- type variables from the tycon
- eta_reduce [] ty = ([], ty)
- eta_reduce (a:as) ty | null as',
- Just (fun, arg) <- splitAppTy_maybe ty',
+ etad_rhs :: ([TyVar], Type)
+ etad_rhs = eta_reduce (reverse tvs) rhs_ty
+
+ eta_reduce :: [TyVar] -- Reversed
+ -> Type -- Rhs type
+ -> ([TyVar], Type) -- Eta-reduced version (tyvars in normal order)
+ eta_reduce (a:as) ty | Just (fun, arg) <- splitAppTy_maybe ty,
Just tv <- getTyVar_maybe arg,
tv == a,
not (a `elemVarSet` tyVarsOfType fun)
- = ([], fun) -- Successful eta reduction
- | otherwise
- = (a:as', ty')
- where
- (as', ty') = eta_reduce as ty
+ = eta_reduce as fun
+ eta_reduce tvs ty = (reverse tvs, ty)
+
mkNewTyConRep :: TyCon -- The original type constructor
-> Type -- The arg type of its constructor
-> Type -- Chosen representation type