import PprCore ( pprParendExpr, pprCoreExpr )
import CoreUnfold ( mkUnfolding, callSiteInline, CallCtxt(..) )
import CoreUtils
+import CoreArity ( exprArity )
import Rules ( lookupRule, getRules )
import BasicTypes ( isMarkedStrict )
import CostCentre ( currentCCS )
; (env', rhs')
<- if not (doFloatFromRhs top_lvl is_rec False body2 body_env2)
then -- No floating, just wrap up!
- do { rhs' <- mkLam tvs' (wrapFloats body_env2 body2)
+ do { rhs' <- mkLam env tvs' (wrapFloats body_env2 body2)
; return (env, rhs') }
else if null tvs then -- Simple floating
else -- Do type-abstraction first
do { tick LetFloatFromLet
; (poly_binds, body3) <- abstractFloats tvs' body_env2 body2
- ; rhs' <- mkLam tvs' body3
+ ; rhs' <- mkLam env tvs' body3
; let env' = foldl (addPolyBind top_lvl) env poly_binds
; return (env', rhs') }
where
is_val = n_val_args > 0 -- There is at least one arg
-- ...and the fun a constructor or PAP
- && (isDataConWorkId fun || n_val_args < idArity fun)
+ && (isConLikeId fun || n_val_args < idArity fun)
go _ env other
= return (False, env, other)
\end{code}
= return (addNonRecWithUnf env new_bndr new_rhs unfolding wkr)
where
unfolding | omit_unfolding = NoUnfolding
- | otherwise = mkUnfolding (isTopLevel top_lvl) new_rhs
+ | otherwise = mkUnfolding (isTopLevel top_lvl) new_rhs
old_info = idInfo old_bndr
occ_info = occInfo old_info
wkr = substWorker env (workerInfo old_info)
addNonRecWithUnf env new_bndr rhs unfolding wkr
= ASSERT( isId new_bndr )
WARN( new_arity < old_arity || new_arity < dmd_arity,
- (ppr final_id <+> ppr old_arity <+> ppr new_arity <+> ppr dmd_arity) $$ ppr rhs )
+ (ptext (sLit "Arity decrease:") <+> ppr final_id <+> ppr old_arity
+ <+> ppr new_arity <+> ppr dmd_arity) $$ ppr rhs )
+ -- Note [Arity decrease]
final_id `seq` -- This seq forces the Id, and hence its IdInfo,
-- and hence any inner substitutions
addNonRec env final_id rhs
final_id = new_bndr `setIdInfo` final_info
\end{code}
+Note [Arity decrease]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Generally speaking the arity of a binding should not decrease. But it *can*
+legitimately happen becuase of RULES. Eg
+ f = g Int
+where g has arity 2, will have arity 2. But if there's a rewrite rule
+ g Int --> h
+where h has arity 1, then f's arity will decrease. Here's a real-life example,
+which is in the output of Specialise:
+
+ Rec {
+ $dm {Arity 2} = \d.\x. op d
+ {-# RULES forall d. $dm Int d = $s$dm #-}
+
+ dInt = MkD .... opInt ...
+ opInt {Arity 1} = $dm dInt
+
+ $s$dm {Arity 0} = \x. op dInt }
+
+Here opInt has arity 1; but when we apply the rule its arity drops to 0.
+That's why Specialise goes to a little trouble to pin the right arity
+on specialised functions too.
%************************************************************************
simplLam env bndrs body cont
= do { (env', bndrs') <- simplLamBndrs env bndrs
; body' <- simplExpr env' body
- ; new_lam <- mkLam bndrs' body'
+ ; new_lam <- mkLam env' bndrs' body'
; rebuild env' new_lam cont }
------------------
Just unfolding -- There is an inlining!
-> do { tick (UnfoldingDone var)
; (if dopt Opt_D_dump_inlinings dflags then
- pprTrace ("Inlining done" ++ showSDoc (ppr var)) (vcat [
+ pprTrace ("Inlining done: " ++ showSDoc (ppr var)) (vcat [
text "Before:" <+> ppr var <+> sep (map pprParendExpr args),
text "Inlined fn: " <+> nest 2 (ppr unfolding),
text "Cont: " <+> ppr call_cont])
LiberateCase gets to see it.)
-Historical note [no-case-of-case]
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-We *used* to suppress the binder-swap in case expressoins when
--fno-case-of-case is on. Old remarks:
- "This happens in the first simplifier pass,
- and enhances full laziness. Here's the bad case:
- f = \ y -> ...(case x of I# v -> ...(case x of ...) ... )
- If we eliminate the inner case, we trap it inside the I# v -> arm,
- which might prevent some full laziness happening. I've seen this
- in action in spectral/cichelli/Prog.hs:
- [(m,n) | m <- [1..max], n <- [1..max]]
- Hence the check for NoCaseOfCase."
-However, now the full-laziness pass itself reverses the binder-swap, so this
-check is no longer necessary.
-
-Historical note [Suppressing the case binder-swap]
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-There is another situation when it might make sense to suppress the
-case-expression binde-swap. If we have
-
- case x of w1 { DEFAULT -> case x of w2 { A -> e1; B -> e2 }
- ...other cases .... }
-
-We'll perform the binder-swap for the outer case, giving
-
- case x of w1 { DEFAULT -> case w1 of w2 { A -> e1; B -> e2 }
- ...other cases .... }
-
-But there is no point in doing it for the inner case, because w1 can't
-be inlined anyway. Furthermore, doing the case-swapping involves
-zapping w2's occurrence info (see paragraphs that follow), and that
-forces us to bind w2 when doing case merging. So we get
-
- case x of w1 { A -> let w2 = w1 in e1
- B -> let w2 = w1 in e2
- ...other cases .... }
-
-This is plain silly in the common case where w2 is dead.
-
-Even so, I can't see a good way to implement this idea. I tried
-not doing the binder-swap if the scrutinee was already evaluated
-but that failed big-time:
-
- data T = MkT !Int
-
- case v of w { MkT x ->
- case x of x1 { I# y1 ->
- case x of x2 { I# y2 -> ...
-
-Notice that because MkT is strict, x is marked "evaluated". But to
-eliminate the last case, we must either make sure that x (as well as
-x1) has unfolding MkT y1. THe straightforward thing to do is to do
-the binder-swap. So this whole note is a no-op.
\begin{code}
-- case e of t { (a,b) -> ...(case t of (p,q) -> p)... }
-- ==> case e of t { (a,b) -> ...(a)... }
-- Look, Ma, a is alive now.
- zap_occ_info | isDeadBinder case_bndr' = \ident -> ident
- | otherwise = zapIdOccInfo
+ zap_occ_info = zapCasePatIdOcc case_bndr'
addBinderUnfolding :: SimplEnv -> Id -> CoreExpr -> SimplEnv
addBinderUnfolding env bndr rhs
addBinderOtherCon :: SimplEnv -> Id -> [AltCon] -> SimplEnv
addBinderOtherCon env bndr cons
= modifyInScope env (bndr `setIdUnfolding` mkOtherCon cons)
+
+zapCasePatIdOcc :: Id -> Id -> Id
+-- Consider case e of b { (a,b) -> ... }
+-- Then if we bind b to (a,b) in "...", and b is not dead,
+-- then we must zap the deadness info on a,b
+zapCasePatIdOcc case_bndr
+ | isDeadBinder case_bndr = \ pat_id -> pat_id
+ | otherwise = \ pat_id -> zapIdOccInfo pat_id
\end{code}
; simplExprF env' rhs cont }
knownAlt env scrut the_args bndr (DataAlt dc, bs, rhs) cont
- = do { let dead_bndr = isDeadBinder bndr -- bndr is an InId
- n_drop_tys = length (dataConUnivTyVars dc)
- ; env' <- bind_args env dead_bndr bs (drop n_drop_tys the_args)
+ = do { let n_drop_tys = length (dataConUnivTyVars dc)
+ ; env' <- bind_args env bs (drop n_drop_tys the_args)
; let
-- It's useful to bind bndr to scrut, rather than to a fresh
-- binding x = Con arg1 .. argn
; env'' <- simplNonRecX env' bndr bndr_rhs
; simplExprF env'' rhs cont }
where
- -- Ugh!
- bind_args env' _ [] _ = return env'
+ zap_occ = zapCasePatIdOcc bndr -- bndr is an InId
- bind_args env' dead_bndr (b:bs') (Type ty : args)
+ -- Ugh!
+ bind_args env' [] _ = return env'
+
+ bind_args env' (b:bs') (Type ty : args)
= ASSERT( isTyVar b )
- bind_args (extendTvSubst env' b ty) dead_bndr bs' args
+ bind_args (extendTvSubst env' b ty) bs' args
- bind_args env' dead_bndr (b:bs') (arg : args)
+ bind_args env' (b:bs') (arg : args)
= ASSERT( isId b )
- do { let b' = if dead_bndr then b else zapIdOccInfo b
+ do { let b' = zap_occ b
-- Note that the binder might be "dead", because it doesn't
-- occur in the RHS; and simplNonRecX may therefore discard
-- it via postInlineUnconditionally.
-- Nevertheless we must keep it if the case-binder is alive,
-- because it may be used in the con_app. See Note [zapOccInfo]
; env'' <- simplNonRecX env' b' arg
- ; bind_args env'' dead_bndr bs' args }
+ ; bind_args env'' bs' args }
- bind_args _ _ _ _ =
+ bind_args _ _ _ =
pprPanic "bind_args" $ ppr dc $$ ppr bs $$ ppr the_args $$
text "scrut:" <+> ppr scrut
\end{code}
mkDupableCont env cont@(StrictBind {})
= return (env, mkBoringStop, cont)
- -- See Note [Duplicating strict continuations]
+ -- See Note [Duplicating StrictBind]
-mkDupableCont env cont@(StrictArg {})
- = return (env, mkBoringStop, cont)
- -- See Note [Duplicating strict continuations]
+mkDupableCont env (StrictArg fun cci ai cont)
+ -- See Note [Duplicating StrictArg]
+ = do { (env', dup, nodup) <- mkDupableCont env cont
+ ; (env'', fun') <- mk_dupable_call env' fun
+ ; return (env'', StrictArg fun' cci ai dup, nodup) }
+ where
+ mk_dupable_call env (Var v) = return (env, Var v)
+ mk_dupable_call env (App fun arg) = do { (env', fun') <- mk_dupable_call env fun
+ ; (env'', arg') <- makeTrivial env' arg
+ ; return (env'', fun' `App` arg') }
+ mk_dupable_call _ other = pprPanic "mk_dupable_call" (ppr other)
+ -- The invariant of StrictArg is that the first arg is always an App chain
mkDupableCont env (ApplyTo _ arg se cont)
= -- e.g. [...hole...] (...arg...)
True -> $j s
(the \v alone is enough to make CPR happy) but I think it's rare
-Note [Duplicating strict continuations]
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-Do *not* duplicate StrictBind and StritArg continuations. We gain
-nothing by propagating them into the expressions, and we do lose a
-lot. Here's an example:
- && (case x of { T -> F; F -> T }) E
+Note [Duplicating StrictArg]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+The original plan had (where E is a big argument)
+e.g. f E [..hole..]
+ ==> let $j = \a -> f E a
+ in $j [..hole..]
+
+But this is terrible! Here's an example:
+ && E (case x of { T -> F; F -> T })
Now, && is strict so we end up simplifying the case with
an ArgOf continuation. If we let-bind it, we get
-
- let $j = \v -> && v E
+ let $j = \v -> && E v
in simplExpr (case x of { T -> F; F -> T })
(ArgOf (\r -> $j r)
And after simplifying more we get
-
- let $j = \v -> && v E
+ let $j = \v -> && E v
in case x of { T -> $j F; F -> $j T }
Which is a Very Bad Thing
+What we do now is this
+ f E [..hole..]
+ ==> let a = E
+ in f a [..hole..]
+Now if the thing in the hole is a case expression (which is when
+we'll call mkDupableCont), we'll push the function call into the
+branches, which is what we want. Now RULES for f may fire, and
+call-pattern specialisation. Here's an example from Trac #3116
+ go (n+1) (case l of
+ 1 -> bs'
+ _ -> Chunk p fpc (o+1) (l-1) bs')
+If we can push the call for 'go' inside the case, we get
+call-pattern specialisation for 'go', which is *crucial* for
+this program.
+
+Here is the (&&) example:
+ && E (case x of { T -> F; F -> T })
+ ==> let a = E in
+ case x of { T -> && a F; F -> && a T }
+Much better!
+
+Notice that
+ * Arguments to f *after* the strict one are handled by
+ the ApplyTo case of mkDupableCont. Eg
+ f [..hole..] E
+
+ * We can only do the let-binding of E because the function
+ part of a StrictArg continuation is an explicit syntax
+ tree. In earlier versions we represented it as a function
+ (CoreExpr -> CoreEpxr) which we couldn't take apart.
+
+Do *not* duplicate StrictBind and StritArg continuations. We gain
+nothing by propagating them into the expressions, and we do lose a
+lot.
+
+The desire not to duplicate is the entire reason that
+mkDupableCont returns a pair of continuations.
+
+Note [Duplicating StrictBind]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Unlike StrictArg, there doesn't seem anything to gain from
+duplicating a StrictBind continuation, so we don't.
+
The desire not to duplicate is the entire reason that
mkDupableCont returns a pair of continuations.
-The original plan had:
-e.g. (...strict-fn...) [...hole...]
- ==>
- let $j = \a -> ...strict-fn...
- in $j [...hole...]
Note [Single-alternative cases]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
projects / ghc-hetmet.git / blobdiff