% TODO:
%
-% o I think it would be worth making the connection with CPS explicit.
+% o I (ADR) think it would be worth making the connection with CPS explicit.
% Now that we have explicit activation records (on the stack), we can
% explain the whole system in terms of CPS and tail calls --- with the
% one requirement that we carefuly distinguish stack-allocated objects
% from heap-allocated objects.
-
% \documentstyle[preprint]{acmconf}
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\oddsidemargin 0.1 in % Note that \oddsidemargin = \evensidemargin
\marginparsep 0 in
\sloppy
+%\usepackage{epsfig}
+
\newcommand{\note}[1]{{\em Note: #1}}
% DIMENSION OF TEXT:
\textheight 8.5 in
\begin{document}
\newcommand{\ToDo}[1]{{{\bf ToDo:}\sl #1}}
+\newcommand{\Note}[1]{{{\bf Note:}\sl #1}}
\newcommand{\Arg}[1]{\mbox{${\tt arg}_{#1}$}}
\newcommand{\bottom}{bottom} % foo, can't remember the symbol name
\title{The STG runtime system (revised)}
\author{Simon Peyton Jones \\ Glasgow University and Oregon Graduate Institute \and
+Simon Marlow \\ Glasgow University \and
Alastair Reid \\ Yale University}
\maketitle
\tableofcontents
\newpage
-\section{Introduction}
+\part{Introduction}
+\section{Overview}
This document describes the GHC/Hugs run-time system. It serves as
a Glasgow/Yale/Nottingham ``contract'' about what the RTS does.
size of update frames, and eliminates
``stack-stubbing'' instructions.)
+\item The ``return in registers'' return convention has been dropped
+because it was complicated and doesn't work well on register-poor
+architectures. It has been partly replaced by unboxed tuples
+(section~\ref{sect:unboxed-tuples}) which allow the programmer to
+explicitly state where results should be returned in registers (or on
+the stack) instead of on the heap.
+
+\item
+
+Lazy black-holing has been replaced by eager black-holing. The
+problem with lazy black-holing is that it leaves slop in the heap
+which conflicts with the use of a mostly-copying collector.
+
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Wish list}
\begin{description}
\item[@SEQUENTIAL@] No concurrency or parallelism support.
This configuration might not support interrupt recovery.
+
+ \note{There's probably not much point in supporting this option. If
+ we've gone to the effort of supporting concurency, we don't gain
+ much by being able to turn it off.}
+
\item[@CONCURRENT@] Support for concurrency but not for parallelism.
\item[@CONCURRENT@+@GRANSIM@] Concurrency support and simulated parallelism.
\item[@CONCURRENT@+@PARALLEL@] Concurrency support and real parallelism.
only anticipate one, however.
\end{itemize}
-\subsection{Terminology}
+\subsection{Glossary}
+
+\ToDo{This terminology is not used consistently within the document.
+If you find something which disagrees with this terminology, fix the
+usage.}
\begin{itemize}
\item A {\em pointer} is (at least) 32 bits and big enough to hold a
function pointer or a data pointer.
+\item A {\em boxed} type is one whose elements are heap allocated.
+
+\item An {\em unboxed} type is one whose elements are {\em not} heap allocated.
+
+\item A {\em pointed} type is one that contains $\bot$. Variables with
+pointed types are the only things which can be lazily evaluated. In
+the STG machine, this means that they are the only things that can be
+{\em entered} or {\em updated} and it requires that they be boxed.
+
+\item An {\em unpointed} type is one that does not contain $\bot$.
+Variables with unpointed types are never delayed --- they are always
+evaluated when they are constructed. In the STG machine, this means
+that they cannot be {\em entered} or {\em updated}. Unpointed objects
+may be boxed (like @Array#@) or unboxed (like @Int#@).
+
\item A {\em closure} is a (representation of) a value of a {\em pointed}
- type. It may be in HNF or it may be unevaluated --- in either case, you can
- try to evaluate it again.
+type. It may be in HNF or it may be unevaluated --- in either case, you can
+try to evaluate it again.
\item A {\em thunk} is a (representation of) a value of a {\em pointed}
- type which is {\em not} in HNF.
+type which is {\em not} in HNF.
+
+\item A {\em value} is an object in HNF. It can be pointed or unpointed.
\end{itemize}
% More terminology to mention.
% unboxed, unpointed
-There are a few other system invariants which need to be mentioned ---
-though not necessarily here:
+\subsection{Subtle Dependencies}
+
+Some decisions have very subtle consequences which should be written
+down in case we want to change our minds.
\begin{itemize}
performing heap overflow checks by assuming that the amount added to
the old generation is no bigger than the current new generation.
+\item
+
+If the garbage collector is allowed to shrink the stack of a thread,
+we cannot omit the stack check in return continuations
+(section~\ref{sect:heap-and-stack-checks}).
+
+\item
+
+When we return to the scheduler, the top object on the stack is a closure.
+The scheduler restarts the thread by entering the closure.
+
+Section~\ref{sect:hugs-return-convention} discusses how Hugs returns an
+unboxed value to GHC and how GHC returns an unboxed value to Hugs.
+
+\item
+
+When we return to the scheduler, we need a few empty words on the stack
+to store a closure to reenter. Section~\ref{sect:heap-and-stack-checks}
+discusses who does the stack check and how much space they need.
+
+\item
+
+Heap objects never contain slop --- this is required if we want to
+support mostly-copying garbage collection.
+
+This is a big problem when updating since the updatee is usually
+bigger than an indirection object. The fix is to overwrite the end of
+the updatee with ``slop objects'' (described in
+section~\ref{sect:slop-objects}).
+This is hard to arrange if we do \emph{lazy} blackholing
+(section~\ref{sect:lazy-black-holing}) so we currently plan to
+blackhole an object when we push the update frame.
+
+
+
+\item
+
+Info tables for constructors contain enough information to decide which
+return convention they use. This allows Hugs to use a single piece of
+entry code for all constructors and insulates Hugs from changes in the
+choice of return convention.
+
\end{itemize}
+\section{Source Language}
-\section{The Scheduler}
+\subsection{Explicit Allocation}\label{sect:explicit-allocation}
+
+As in the original STG machine, (almost) all heap allocation is caused
+by executing a let(rec). Since we no longer support the return in
+registers convention for data constructors, constructors now cause heap
+allocation and so they should be let-bound.
+
+For example, we now write
+@
+> cons = \ x xs -> let r = (:) x xs in r
+@
+instead of
+@
+> cons = \ x xs -> (:) x xs
+@
+
+
+\subsection{Unboxed tuples}\label{sect:unboxed-tuples}
+
+Functions can take multiple arguments as easily as they can take one
+argument: there's no cost for adding another argument. But functions
+can only return one result: the cost of adding a second ``result'' is
+that the function must construct a tuple of ``results'' on the heap.
+The assymetry is rather galling and can make certain programming
+styles quite expensive. For example, consider a simple state transformer
+monad:
+@
+> type S a = State -> (a,State)
+> bindS m k s0 = case m s0 of { (a,s1) -> k a s1 }
+> returnS a s = (a,s)
+> getS s = (s,s)
+> setS s _ = ((),s)
+@
+Here, every use of @returnS@, @getS@ or @setS@ constructs a new tuple
+in the heap which is instantly taken apart (and becomes garbage) by
+the case analysis in @bind@. Even a short state-transformer program
+will construct a lot of these temporary tuples.
+
+Unboxed tuples provide a way for the programmer to indicate that they
+do not expect a tuple to be shared and that they do not expect it to
+be allocated in the heap. Syntactically, unboxed tuples are just like
+single constructor datatypes except for the annotation @unboxed@.
+@
+> data unboxed AAndState# a = AnS a State
+> type S a = State -> AAndState# a
+> bindS m k s0 = case m s0 of { AnS a s1 -> k a s1 }
+> returnS a s = AnS a s
+> getS s = AnS s s
+> setS s _ = AnS () s
+@
+Semantically, unboxed tuples are just unlifted tuples and are subject
+to the same restrictions as other unpointed types.
+
+Operationally, unboxed tuples are never built on the heap. When
+unboxed tuples are returned, they are returned in multiple registers
+or multiple stack slots. At first sight, this seems a little strange
+but it's no different from passing double precision floats in two
+registers.
+
+Notes:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item
+Unboxed tuples can only have one constructor and that
+thunks never have unboxed types --- so we'll never try to update an
+unboxed constructor. The restriction to a single constructor is
+largely to avoid garbage collection complications.
+
+\item
+The core syntax does not allow variables to be bound to
+unboxed tuples (ie in default case alternatives or as function arguments)
+and does not allow unboxed tuples to be fields of other constructors.
+However, there's no harm in allowing it in the source syntax as a
+convenient, but easily removed, syntactic sugar.
+
+\item
+The compiler generates a closure of the form
+@
+> c = \ x y z -> C x y z
+@
+for every constructor (whether boxed or unboxed).
+
+This closure is normally used during desugaring to ensure that
+constructors are saturated and to apply any strictness annotations.
+They are also used when returning unboxed constructors to the machine
+code evaluator from the bytecode evaluator and when a heap check fails
+in a return continuation for an unboxed-tuple scrutinee.
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+\subsection{STG Syntax}
+
+\ToDo{Insert STG syntax with appropriate changes.}
+
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\part{System Overview}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+This part is concerned with defining the external interfaces of the
+major components of the system; the next part is concerned with their
+inner workings.
+
+The major components of the system are:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item The scheduler
+\item The storage manager
+\item The evaluators
+\item The loader
+\item The compilers
+\end{itemize}
+
+\ToDo{Insert diagram showing all components underneath the scheduler
+and communicating only with the scheduler}
+
+\section{Scheduler}
The Scheduler is the heart of the run-time system. A running program
consists of a single running thread, and a list of runnable and
-blocked threads. The running thread returns to the scheduler when any
-of the following conditions arises:
+blocked threads. All threads consist of a stack and a few words of
+status information. Except for the running thread, all threads have a
+closure on top of their stack; the scheduler restarts a thread by
+entering an evaluator which performs some reduction and returns.
+
+\subsection{The scheduler's main loop}
+
+The scheduler consists of a loop which chooses a runnable thread and
+invokes one of the evaluators which performs some reduction and
+returns.
+
+The scheduler also takes care of system-wide issues such as heap
+overflow or communication with other processors (in the parallel
+system) and thread-specific problems such as stack overflow.
+
+\subsection{Creating a thread}
+
+Threads are created:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+
+\item
+
+When the scheduler is first invoked.
+
+\item
+
+When a message is received from another processor (I think). (Parallel
+system only.)
+
+\item
+
+When a C program calls some Haskell code.
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+
+\subsection{Restarting a thread}
+
+The evaluators can reduce almost all types of closure except that only
+the machine code evaluator can reduce GHC-compiled closures and only
+the bytecode evaluator can reduce Hugs-compiled closures.
+Consequently, the scheduler may use either evaluator to restart a
+thread unless the top closure is a @BCO@ or contains machine code.
+
+However, if the top of the stack contains a constructor, the scheduler
+should use the machine code evaluator to restart the thread. This
+allows the bytecode evaluator to return a constructor to a machine
+code return address by pushing the constructor on top of the stack and
+returning to the scheduler. If the return address under the
+constructor is @HUGS_RET@, the entry code for @HUGS_RET@ will
+rearrange the stack so that the return @BCO@ is on top of the stack
+and return to the scheduler which will then call the bytecode
+evaluator. There is little point in trying to shorten this slightly
+indirect route since it will happen very rarely if at all.
+
+\subsection{Returning from a thread}
+
+The evaluators return to the scheduler when any of the following
+conditions arise:
\begin{itemize}
\item A heap check fails, and a garbage collection is required
-\item Compiled code needs to switch to interpreted code, and vice
-versa.
+\item Compiled code needs to switch to interpreted code, and vice versa.
+\item The evaluator needs to perform an ``unsafe'' C call.
\item The thread becomes blocked.
\item The thread is preempted.
+\item The thread terminates.
+\end{itemize}
+
+Except when the thread terminates, the thread always terminates with a
+closure on the top of the stack.
+
+\subsection{Preempting a thread}
+
+Strictly speaking, threads cannot be preempted --- the scheduler
+merely sets a preemption request flag which the thread must arrange to
+test on a regular basis. When an evaluator finds that the preemption
+request flag is set, it pushes an appropriate closure onto the stack
+and returns to the scheduler.
+
+In the bytecode interpreter, the flag is tested whenever we enter a
+closure. If the preemption flag is set, it leaves the closure on top
+of the stack and returns to the scheduler.
+
+In the machine code evaluator, the flag is only tested when a heap or
+stack check fails. This is less expensive than testing the flag on
+entering every closure but runs the risk that a thread will enter an
+infinite loop which does not allocate any space. If the flag is set,
+the evaluator returns to the scheduler exactly as if a heap check had
+failed.
+
+\subsection{``Safe'' and ``unsafe'' C calls}
+
+There are two ways of calling C:
+
+\begin{description}
+
+\item[``Safe'' C calls]
+are used if the programer is certain that the C function will not
+do anything dangerous such as calling a Haskell function or an
+operating system call which blocks the thread for a long period of time.
+\footnote{Warning: this use of ``safe'' and ``unsafe'' is the exact
+opposite of the usage for functions like @unsafePerformIO@.}
+Safe C calls are faster but must be hand-checked by the programmer.
+
+Safe C calls are performed by pushing the arguments onto the C stack
+and jumping to the C function's entry point. On exit, the result of
+the function is in a register which is returned to the Haskell code as
+an unboxed value.
+
+\item[``Unsafe'' C calls] are used if the programmer suspects that the
+thread may do something dangerous like blocking or calling a Haskell
+function. Unsafe C calls are relatively slow but are less problematic.
+
+Unsafe C calls are performed by pushing the arguments onto the Haskell
+stack, pushing a return continuation and returning a \emph{C function
+descriptor} to the scheduler. The scheduler suspends the Haskell thread,
+spawns a new operating system thread which pops the arguments off the
+Haskell stack onto the C stack, calls the C function, pushes the
+function result onto the Haskell stack and informs the scheduler that
+the C function has completed and the Haskell thread is now runnable.
+
+\end{description}
+
+The bytecode evaluator will probably treat all C calls as being unsafe.
+
+\ToDo{It might be good for the programmer to indicate how the program is
+unsafe. For example, if we distinguish between C functions which might
+call Haskell functions and those which might block, we could perform a
+safe call for blocking functions in a single-threaded system or, perhaps, in a multi-threaded system which only happens to have a single thread at the moment.}
+
+
+\section{The Evaluators}
+
+All the scheduler needs to know about evaluation is how to manipulate
+threads and how to find the closure on top of the stack. The
+evaluators need to agree on the representations of certain objects and
+on how to return from the scheduler.
+
+\subsection{Returning to the Scheduler}
+\label{sect:switching-worlds}
+
+The evaluators return to the scheduler under three circumstances:
+\begin{itemize}
+
+\item
+
+When they enter a closure built by the other evaluator. That is, when
+the bytecode interpreter enters a closure compiled by GHC or when the
+machine code evaluator enters a BCO.
+
+\item
+
+When they return to a return continuation built by the other
+evaluator. That is, when the machine code evaluator returns to a
+continuation built by Hugs or when the bytecode evaluator returns to a
+continuation built by GHC.
+
+\item
+
+When a heap or stack check fails or when the preemption flag is set.
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+In all cases, they return to the scheduler with a closure on top of
+the stack. The mechanism used to trigger the world switch and the
+choice of closure left on top of the stack varies according to which
+world is being left and what is being returned.
+
+\subsubsection{Leaving the bytecode evaluator}
+\label{sect:hugs-to-ghc-switch}
+
+\paragraph{Entering a machine code closure}
+
+When it enters a closure, the bytecode evaluator performs a switch
+based on the type of closure (@AP@, @PAP@, @Ind@, etc). On entering a
+machine code closure, it returns to the scheduler with the closure on
+top of the stack.
+
+\paragraph{Returning a constructor}
+
+When it enters a constructor, the bytecode evaluator tests the return
+continuation on top of the stack. If it is a machine code
+continuation, it returns to the scheduler with the constructor on top
+of the stack.
+
+\note{This is why the scheduler must enter the machine code evaluator
+if it finds a constructor on top of the stack.}
+
+\paragraph{Returning an unboxed value}
+
+\note{Hugs doesn't support unboxed values in source programs but they
+are used for a few complex primops.}
+
+When it enters a constructor, the bytecode evaluator tests the return
+continuation on top of the stack. If it is a machine code
+continuation, it returns to the scheduler with the unboxed value and a
+special closure on top of the stack. When the closure is entered (by
+the machine code evaluator), it returns the unboxed value on top of
+the stack to the return continuation under it.
+
+The runtime system (or GHC?) provides one of these closures for each
+unboxed type. Hugs cannot generate them itself since the entry code is
+really very tricky.
+
+\paragraph{Heap/Stack overflow and preemption}
+
+The bytecode evaluator tests for heap/stack overflow and preemption
+when entering a BCO and simply returns with the BCO on top of the
+stack.
+
+\subsubsection{Leaving the machine code evaluator}
+\label{sect:ghc-to-hugs-switch}
+
+\paragraph{Entering a BCO}
+
+The entry code for a BCO pushes the BCO onto the stack and returns to
+the scheduler.
+
+\paragraph{Returning a constructor}
+
+We avoid the need to test return addresses in the machine code
+evaluator by pushing a special return address on top of a pointer to
+the bytecode return continuation. Figure~\ref{fig:hugs-return-stack}
+shows the state of the stack just before evaluating the scrutinee.
+
+\begin{figure}[ht]
+\begin{center}
+@
+| stack |
++----------+
+| bco |--> BCO
++----------+
+| HUGS_RET |
++----------+
+@
+%\input{hugs_return1.pstex_t}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Stack layout for evaluating a scrutinee}
+\label{fig:hugs-return-stack}
+\end{figure}
+
+This return address rearranges the stack so that the bco pointer is
+above the constructor on the stack (as shown in
+figure~\ref{fig:hugs-boxed-return}) and returns to the scheduler.
+
+\begin{figure}[ht]
+\begin{center}
+@
+| stack |
++----------+
+| con |--> Constructor
++----------+
+| bco |--> BCO
++----------+
+@
+%\input{hugs_return2.pstex_t}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Stack layout for entering a Hugs return address}
+\label{fig:hugs-boxed-return}
+\end{figure}
+
+\paragraph{Returning an unboxed value}
+
+We avoid the need to test return addresses in the machine code
+evaluator by pushing a special return address on top of a pointer to
+the bytecode return continuation. This return address rearranges the
+stack so that the bco pointer is above the unboxed value (as shown in
+figure~\ref{fig:hugs-entering-unboxed-return}) and returns to the scheduler.
+
+\begin{figure}[ht]
+\begin{center}
+@
+| stack |
++----------+
+| 1# |
++----------+
+| I# |
++----------+
+| bco |--> BCO
++----------+
+@
+%\input{hugs_return2.pstex_t}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Stack layout for returning an unboxed value}
+\label{fig:hugs-entering-unboxed-return}
+\end{figure}
+
+\paragraph{Heap/Stack overflow and preemption}
+
+\ToDo{}
+
+\subsection{Shared Representations}
+
+We share @AP@s, @PAP@s, constructors, indirections, selectors(?) and
+update frames. These are described in section~\ref{sect:heap-objects}.
+
+
+\section{The Storage Manager}
+
+The storage manager is responsible for managing the heap and all
+objects stored in it. Most objects are just copied in the normal way
+but a number receive special treatment by the storage manager:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item
+
+Indirections are shorted out.
+
+\item
+
+Weak pointers and stable pointers are treated specially.
+
+\item
+
+Thread State Objects (TSOs) and the stacks within them are treated specially.
+In particular:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item
+
+Update frames pointing to unreachable objects are squeezed out.
+
+\item
+
+Adjacent update frames (for different closures) are compressed to a
+single update frame pointing to a single black hole.
+
+\item
+
+If the stack contains a large amount of free space, the storage
+manager may shrink the stack. If it shrinks the stack, it guarantees
+never to leave less than @MIN_SIZE_SHRUNKEN_STACK@ empty words on the
+stack when it does so.
+
+\ToDo{Would it be useful for the storage manager to enlarge the stack?}
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+\item
+
+Very large objects (eg large arrays and TSOs) are not moved if
+possible.
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+
+\section{The Compilers}
+
+Need to describe interface files, format of bytecode files, symbols
+defined by machine code files.
+
+\subsection{Interface Files}
+
+Here's an example - but I don't know the grammar - ADR.
+@
+_interface_ Main 1
+_exports_
+Main main ;
+_declarations_
+1 main _:_ IOBase.IO PrelBase.();;
+@
+
+\subsection{Bytecode files}
+
+(All that matters here is what the loader sees.)
+
+\subsection{Machine code files}
+
+(Again, all that matters is what the loader sees.)
+
+
+\subsection{Bytecode files}
+
+(All that matters here is what the loader sees.)
+
+\subsection{Machine code files}
+
+(Again, all that matters is what the loader sees.)
+
+
+\section{The Loader}
+
+\ToDo{Is it ok to load code when threads are running?}
+
+In a batch mode system, we can statically link all the modules
+together. In an interactive system we need a loader which will
+explicitly load and unload individual modules (or, perhaps, blocks of
+mutually dependent modules) and resolve references between modules.
+
+While many operating systems provide support for dynamic loading and
+will automatically resolve cross-module references for us, we generally
+cannot rely on being able to load mutually dependent modules.
+
+A portable solution is to perform some of the linking ourselves. Each module
+should provide three global symbols:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item
+An initialisation routine. (Might also be used for finalisation.)
+\item
+A table of symbols it exports.
+Entries in this table consist of the symbol name and the address of the
+names value.
+\item
+A table of symbols it imports.
+Entries in this table consist of the symbol name and a list of references
+to that symbol.
+\end{itemize}
+
+On loading a group of modules, the loader adds the contents of the
+export lists to a symbol table and then fills in all the references in the
+import lists.
+
+References in import lists are of two types:
+\begin{description}
+\item[ References in machine code ]
+
+The most efficient approach is to patch the machine code directly, but
+this will be a lot of work, very painful to port and rather fragile.
+
+Alternatively, the loader could store the value of each symbol in the
+import table for each module and the compiled code can access all
+external objects through the import table. This requires that the
+import table be writable but does not require that the machine code or
+info tables be writable.
+
+\item[ References in data structures (SRTs and static data constructors) ]
+
+Either we patch the SRTs and constructors directly or we somehow use
+indirections through the symbol table. Patching the SRTs requires
+that we make them writable and prevents us from making effective use
+of virtual memories that use copy-on-write policies. Using an
+indirection is possible but tricky.
+
+Note: We could avoid patching machine code if all references to
+eternal references went through the SRT --- then we just have one
+thing to patch. But the SRT always contains a pointer to the closure
+rather than the fast entry point (say), so we'd take a big performance
+hit for doing this.
+
+\end{description}
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\part{Internal details}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+This part is concerned with the internal details of the components
+described in the previous part.
+
+The major components of the system are:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item The scheduler
+\item The storage manager
+\item The evaluators
+\item The loader
+\item The compilers
\end{itemize}
-A world-switch (i.e. when compiled code encounters interpreted code,
-and vice-versa) can happen in six ways:
+\section{The Scheduler}
+
+\section{The Storage Manager}
+\label{sect:storage-manager-internals}
+
+\ToDo{Fix this picture}
+
+\begin{figure}
+\begin{center}
+\input{closure}
+\end{center}
+\caption{A closure}
+\label{fig:closure}
+\end{figure}
+
+Every {\em heap object} is a contiguous block
+of memory, consisting of a fixed-format {\em header} followed
+by zero or more {\em data words}.
+
+\ToDo{I absolutely do not believe that every heap object has a header
+like this - ADR. I believe that they all have an info pointer but I
+see no readon why stack objects and unpointed heap objects would have
+an entry count since this will always be zero.}
+
+The header consists of the following fields:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item A one-word {\em info pointer}, which points to
+the object's static {\em info table}.
+\item Zero or more {\em admin words} that support
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Profiling (notably a {\em cost centre} word).
+ \note{We could possibly omit the cost centre word from some
+ administrative objects.}
+\item Parallelism (e.g. GranSim keeps the object's global address here,
+though GUM keeps a separate hash table).
+\item Statistics (e.g. a word to track how many times a thunk is entered.).
+
+We add a Ticky word to the fixed-header part of closures. This is
+used to indicate if a closure has been updated but not yet entered. It
+is set when the closure is updated and cleared when subsequently
+entered.
+
+NB: It is {\em not} an ``entry count'', it is an
+``entries-after-update count.'' The commoning up of @CONST@,
+@CHARLIKE@ and @INTLIKE@ closures is turned off(?) if this is
+required. This has only been done for 2s collection.
+
+\end{itemize}
+\end{itemize}
+
+Most of the RTS is completely insensitive to the number of admin words.
+The total size of the fixed header is @FIXED_HS@.
+
+Many heap objects contain fields allowing them to be inserted onto lists
+during evaluation or during garbage collection. The lists required by
+the evaluator and storage manager are as follows.
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item 2 lists of threads: runnable threads and sleeping threads.
+
+\item The {\em static object list} is a list of all statically
+allocated objects which might contain pointers into the heap.
+(Section~\ref{sect:static-objects}.)
+
+\item The {\em updated thunk list} is a list of all thunks in the old
+generation which have been updated with an indirection.
+(Section~\ref{sect:IND_OLDGEN}.)
+
+\item The {\em mutables list} is a list of all other objects in the
+old generation which might contain pointers into the new generation.
+Most of the object on this list are ``mutable.''
+(Section~\ref{sect:mutables}.)
+
+\item The {\em Foreign Object list} is a list of all foreign objects
+ which have not yet been deallocated. (Section~\ref{sect:FOREIGN}.)
+
+\item The {\em Spark pool} is a doubly(?) linked list of Spark objects
+maintained by the parallel system. (Section~\ref{sect:SPARK}.)
+
+\item The {\em Blocked Fetch list} (or
+lists?). (Section~\ref{sect:BLOCKED_FETCH}.)
+
+\item For each thread, there is a list of all update frames on the
+stack. (Section~\ref{sect:data-updates}.)
+
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+\ToDo{The links for these fields are usually inserted immediately
+after the fixed header except ...}
+
+\subsection{Info Tables}
+
+An {\em info table} is a contiguous block of memory, {\em laid out
+backwards}. That is, the first field in the list that follows
+occupies the highest memory address, and the successive fields occupy
+successive decreasing memory addresses.
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|c|}
+ \hline Parallelism Info
+\\ \hline Profile Info
+\\ \hline Debug Info
+\\ \hline Tag / Static reference table
+\\ \hline Storage manager layout info
+\\ \hline Closure type
+\\ \hline entry code
+\\ \vdots
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+An info table has the following contents (working backwards in memory
+addresses):
+\begin{itemize}
+\item The {\em entry code} for the closure.
+This code appears literally as the (large) last entry in the
+info table, immediately preceded by the rest of the info table.
+An {\em info pointer} always points to the first byte of the entry code.
+
+\item A one-word {\em closure type field}, @INFO_TYPE@, identifies what kind
+of closure the object is. The various types of closure are described
+in Section~\ref{sect:closures}.
+In some configurations, some useful properties of
+closures (is it a HNF? can it be sparked?)
+are represented as high-order bits so they can be tested quickly.
+
+\item A single pointer or word --- the {\em storage manager info field},
+@INFO_SM@, contains auxiliary information describing the closure's
+precise layout, for the benefit of the garbage collector and the code
+that stuffs graph into packets for transmission over the network.
+
+\item A one-word {\em Tag/Static Reference Table} field, @INFO_SRT@.
+For data constructors, this field contains the constructor tag, in the
+range $0..n-1$ where $n$ is the number of constructors. For all other
+objects it contains a pointer to a table which enables the garbage
+collector to identify all accessible code and CAFs. They are fully
+described in Section~\ref{sect:srt}.
+
+\item {\em Profiling info\/}
+
+\ToDo{The profiling info is completely bogus. I've not deleted it
+from the document but I've commented it all out.}
+
+% change to \iftrue to uncomment this section
+\iffalse
+
+Closure category records are attached to the info table of the
+closure. They are declared with the info table. We put pointers to
+these ClCat things in info tables. We need these ClCat things because
+they are mutable, whereas info tables are immutable. Hashing will map
+similar categories to the same hash value allowing statistics to be
+grouped by closure category.
+
+Cost Centres and Closure Categories are hashed to provide indexes
+against which arbitrary information can be stored. These indexes are
+memoised in the appropriate cost centre or category record and
+subsequent hashes avoided by the index routine (it simply returns the
+memoised index).
+
+There are different features which can be hashed allowing information
+to be stored for different groupings. Cost centres have the cost
+centre recorded (using the pointer), module and group. Closure
+categories have the closure description and the type
+description. Records with the same feature will be hashed to the same
+index value.
+
+The initialisation routines, @init_index_<feature>@, allocate a hash
+table in which the cost centre / category records are stored. The
+lower bound for the table size is taken from @max_<feature>_no@. They
+return the actual table size used (the next power of 2). Unused
+locations in the hash table are indicated by a 0 entry. Successive
+@init_index_<feature>@ calls just return the actual table size.
+
+Calls to @index_<feature>@ will insert the cost centre / category
+record in the @<feature>@ hash table, if not already inserted. The hash
+index is memoised in the record and returned.
+
+CURRENTLY ONLY ONE MEMOISATION SLOT IS AVILABLE IN EACH RECORD SO
+HASHING CAN ONLY BE DONE ON ONE FEATURE FOR EACH RECORD. This can be
+easily relaxed at the expense of extra memoisation space or continued
+rehashing.
+
+The initialisation routines must be called before initialisation of
+the stacks and heap as they require to allocate storage. It is also
+expected that the caller may want to allocate additional storage in
+which to store profiling information based on the return table size
+value(s).
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|}
+ \hline Hash Index
+\\ \hline Selected
+\\ \hline Kind
+\\ \hline Description String
+\\ \hline Type String
+\\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+\begin{description}
+\item[Hash Index] Memoised copy
+\item[Selected]
+ Is this category selected (-1 == not memoised, selected? 0 or 1)
+\item[Kind]
+One of the following values (defined in CostCentre.lh):
+
+\begin{description}
+\item[@CON_K@]
+A constructor.
+\item[@FN_K@]
+A literal function.
+\item[@PAP_K@]
+A partial application.
+\item[@THK_K@]
+A thunk, or suspension.
+\item[@BH_K@]
+A black hole.
+\item[@ARR_K@]
+An array.
+\item[@ForeignObj_K@]
+A Foreign object (non-Haskell heap resident).
+\item[@SPT_K@]
+The Stable Pointer table. (There should only be one of these but it
+represents a form of weak space leak since it can't shrink to meet
+non-demand so it may be worth watching separately? ADR)
+\item[@INTERNAL_KIND@]
+Something internal to the runtime system.
+\end{description}
+
+
+\item[Description] Source derived string detailing closure description.
+\item[Type] Source derived string detailing closure type.
+\end{description}
+
+\fi % end of commented out stuff
+
+\item {\em Parallelism info\/}
+\ToDo{}
+
+\item {\em Debugging info\/}
+\ToDo{}
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+
+%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+\subsection{Kinds of Heap Object}
+\label{sect:closures}
+
+Heap objects can be classified in several ways, but one useful one is
+this:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item
+{\em Static closures} occupy fixed, statically-allocated memory
+locations, with globally known addresses.
+
+\item
+{\em Dynamic closures} are individually allocated in the heap.
+
+\item
+{\em Stack closures} are closures allocated within a thread's stack
+(which is itself a heap object). Unlike other closures, there are
+never any pointers to stack closures. Stack closures are discussed in
+Section~\ref{sect:stacks}.
+
+\end{itemize}
+A second useful classification is this:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item
+{\em Executive objects}, such as thunks and data constructors,
+participate directly in a program's execution. They can be subdivided into
+three kinds of objects according to their type:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item
+{\em Pointed objects}, represent values of a {\em pointed} type
+(<.pointed types launchbury.>) --i.e.~a type that includes $\bottom$ such as @Int@ or @Int# -> Int#@.
+
+\item {\em Unpointed objects}, represent values of a {\em unpointed} type --i.e.~a type that does not include $\bottom$ such as @Int#@ or @Array#@.
+
+\item {\em Activation frames}, represent ``continuations''. They are
+always stored on the stack and are never pointed to by heap objects or
+passed as arguments. \note{It's not clear if this will still be true
+once we support speculative evaluation.}
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+\item {\em Administrative objects}, such as stack objects and thread
+state objects, do not represent values in the original program.
+\end{itemize}
+
+Only pointed objects can be entered. All pointed objects share a
+common header format: the ``pointed header''; while all unpointed
+objects share a common header format: the ``unpointed header''.
+\ToDo{Describe the difference and update the diagrams to mention
+an appropriate header type.}
+
+This section enumerates all the kinds of heap objects in the system.
+Each is identified by a distinct @INFO_TYPE@ tag in its info table.
+
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|}
+\hline
+
+closure kind & Section \\
+
+\hline
+{\em Pointed} \\
+\hline
+
+@CONSTR@ & \ref{sect:CONSTR} \\
+@CONSTR_STATIC@ & \ref{sect:CONSTR} \\
+@CONSTR_STATIC_NOCAF@ & \ref{sect:CONSTR} \\
+
+@FUN@ & \ref{sect:FUN} \\
+@FUN_STATIC@ & \ref{sect:FUN} \\
+
+@THUNK@ & \ref{sect:THUNK} \\
+@THUNK_STATIC@ & \ref{sect:THUNK} \\
+@THUNK_SELECTOR@ & \ref{sect:THUNK_SEL} \\
+
+@BCO@ & \ref{sect:BCO} \\
+@BCO_CAF@ & \ref{sect:BCO} \\
+
+@AP@ & \ref{sect:AP} \\
+@PAP@ & \ref{sect:PAP} \\
+
+@IND@ & \ref{sect:IND} \\
+@IND_OLDGEN@ & \ref{sect:IND} \\
+@IND_PERM@ & \ref{sect:IND} \\
+@IND_OLDGEN_PERM@ & \ref{sect:IND} \\
+@IND_STATIC@ & \ref{sect:IND} \\
+
+\hline
+{\em Unpointed} \\
+\hline
+
+@ARR_WORDS@ & \ref{sect:ARR_WORDS1},\ref{sect:ARR_WORDS2} \\
+@ARR_PTRS@ & \ref{sect:ARR_PTRS} \\
+@MUTVAR@ & \ref{sect:MUTVAR} \\
+@MUTARR_PTRS@ & \ref{sect:MUTARR_PTRS} \\
+@MUTARR_PTRS_FROZEN@ & \ref{sect:MUTARR_PTRS_FROZEN} \\
+
+@FOREIGN@ & \ref{sect:FOREIGN} \\
+
+@BH@ & \ref{sect:BH} \\
+@MVAR@ & \ref{sect:MVAR} \\
+@IVAR@ & \ref{sect:IVAR} \\
+@FETCHME@ & \ref{sect:FETCHME} \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+Activation frames do not live (directly) on the heap --- but they have
+a similar organisation.
+
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|}\hline
+closure kind & Section \\ \hline
+@RET_SMALL@ & \ref{sect:activation-records} \\
+@RET_VEC_SMALL@ & \ref{sect:activation-records} \\
+@RET_BIG@ & \ref{sect:activation-records} \\
+@RET_VEC_BIG@ & \ref{sect:activation-records} \\
+@UPDATE_FRAME@ & \ref{sect:activation-records} \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+There are also a number of administrative objects.
+
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|}\hline
+closure kind & Section \\ \hline
+@TSO@ & \ref{sect:TSO} \\
+@STACK_OBJECT@ & \ref{sect:STACK_OBJECT} \\
+@STABLEPTR_TABLE@ & \ref{sect:STABLEPTR_TABLE} \\
+@SPARK_OBJECT@ & \ref{sect:SPARK} \\
+@BLOCKED_FETCH@ & \ref{sect:BLOCKED_FETCH} \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+\ToDo{I guess the parallel system has something like a stable ptr
+table. Is there any opportunity for sharing code/data structures
+here?}
+
+
+\subsection{Predicates}
+
+\ToDo{The following is a first attempt at defining a useful set of
+predicates. Some (such as @isWHNF@ and @isSparkable@) may need their
+definitions tweaked a little.}
+
+The runtime system sometimes needs to be able to distinguish objects
+according to their properties: is the object updateable? is it in weak
+head normal form? etc. These questions can be answered by examining
+the @INFO_TYPE@ field of the object's info table.
+
+We define the following predicates to detect families of related
+info types. They are mutually exclusive and exhaustive.
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item @isCONSTR@ is true for @CONSTR@s.
+\item @isFUN@ is true for @FUN@s.
+\item @isTHUNK@ is true for @THUNK@s.
+\item @isBCO@ is true for @BCO@s.
+\item @isAP@ is true for @AP@s.
+\item @isPAP@ is true for @PAP@s.
+\item @isINDIRECTION@ is true for indirection objects.
+\item @isBH@ is true for black holes.
+\item @isFOREIGN_OBJECT@ is true for foreign objects.
+\item @isARRAY@ is true for array objects.
+\item @isMVAR@ is true for @MVAR@s.
+\item @isIVAR@ is true for @IVAR@s.
+\item @isFETCHME@ is true for @FETCHME@s.
+\item @isSLOP@ is true for slop objects.
+\item @isRET_ADDR@ is true for return addresses.
+\item @isUPD_ADDR@ is true for update frames.
+\item @isTSO@ is true for @TSO@s.
+\item @isSTABLE_PTR_TABLE@ is true for the stable pointer table.
+\item @isSPARK_OBJECT@ is true for spark objects.
+\item @isBLOCKED_FETCH@ is true for blocked fetch objects.
+\item @isINVALID_INFOTYPE@ is true for all other info types.
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+The following predicates detect other interesting properties:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+
+\item @isPOINTED@ is true if an object has a pointed type.
+
+If an object is pointed, the following predicates may be true
+(otherwise they are false). @isWHNF@ and @isUPDATEABLE@ are
+mutually exclusive.
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item @isWHNF@ is true if the object is in Weak Head Normal Form.
+Note that unpointed objects are (arbitrarily) not considered to be in WHNF.
+
+@isWHNF@ is true for @PAP@s, @CONSTR@s, @FUN@s and some @BCO@s.
+
+\ToDo{Need to distinguish between whnf BCOs and non-whnf BCOs in their
+@INFO_TYPE@}
+
+\item @isBOTTOM@ is true if the object is known to be $\bot$. It is
+true of @BH@s. \note{I suspect we'll want to add other kinds of
+infotype which are known to be bottom later.}
+
+\item @isUPDATEABLE@ is true if the object may be overwritten with an
+ indirection object.
+
+@isUPDATEABLE@ is true for @THUNK@s, @AP@s and @BH@s.
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+It is possible for a pointed object to be neither updatable nor in
+WHNF. For example, indirections.
+
+\item @isUNPOINTED@ is true if an object has an unpointed type.
+All such objects are boxed since only boxed objects have info pointers.
+
+It is true for @ARR_WORDS@, @ARR_PTRS@, @MUTVAR@, @MUTARR_PTRS@,
+@MUTARR_PTRS_FROZEN@, @FOREIGN@ objects, @MVAR@s and @IVAR@s.
+
+\item @isACTIVATION_FRAME@ is true for activation frames of all sorts.
+
+It is true for return addresses and update frames.
+\begin{itemize}
+\item @isVECTORED_RETADDR@ is true for vectored return addresses.
+\item @isDIRECT_RETADDR@ is true for direct return addresses.
+\end{itemize}
+
+\item @isADMINISTRATIVE@ is true for administrative objects:
+@TSO@s, the stable pointer table, spark objects and blocked fetches.
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+\begin{itemize}
+
+\item @isSTATIC@ is true for any statically allocated closure.
+
+\item @isMUTABLE@ is true for objects with mutable pointer fields:
+ @MUT_ARR@s, @MUTVAR@s, @MVAR@s and @IVAR@s.
+
+\item @isSparkable@ is true if the object can (and should) be sparked.
+It is true of updateable objects which are not in WHNF with the
+exception of @THUNK_SELECTOR@s and black holes.
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+As a minor optimisation, we might use the top bits of the @INFO_TYPE@
+field to ``cache'' the answers to some of these predicates.
+
+An indirection either points to HNF (post update); or is result of
+overwriting a FetchMe, in which case the thing fetched is either
+under evaluation (BH), or by now an HNF. Thus, indirections get NoSpark flag.
+
+
+\iffalse
+@
+#define _NF 0x0001 /* Normal form */
+#define _NS 0x0002 /* Don't spark */
+#define _ST 0x0004 /* Is static */
+#define _MU 0x0008 /* Is mutable */
+#define _UP 0x0010 /* Is updatable (but not mutable) */
+#define _BM 0x0020 /* Is a "primitive" array */
+#define _BH 0x0040 /* Is a black hole */
+#define _IN 0x0080 /* Is an indirection */
+#define _TH 0x0100 /* Is a thunk */
+
+
+
+SPEC
+SPEC_N SPEC | _NF | _NS
+SPEC_S SPEC | _TH
+SPEC_U SPEC | _UP | _TH
+
+GEN
+GEN_N GEN | _NF | _NS
+GEN_S GEN | _TH
+GEN_U GEN | _UP | _TH
+
+DYN _NF | _NS
+TUPLE _NF | _NS | _BM
+DATA _NF | _NS | _BM
+MUTUPLE _NF | _NS | _MU | _BM
+IMMUTUPLE _NF | _NS | _BM
+STATIC _NS | _ST
+CONST _NF | _NS
+CHARLIKE _NF | _NS
+INTLIKE _NF | _NS
+
+BH _NS | _BH
+BH_N BH
+BH_U BH | _UP
+
+BQ _NS | _MU | _BH
+IND _NS | _IN
+CAF _NF | _NS | _ST | _IN
+
+FM
+FETCHME FM | _MU
+FMBQ FM | _MU | _BH
+
+TSO _MU
+
+STKO
+STKO_DYNAMIC STKO | _MU
+STKO_STATIC STKO | _ST
+
+SPEC_RBH _NS | _MU | _BH
+GEN_RBH _NS | _MU | _BH
+BF _NS | _MU | _BH
+INTERNAL
+
+@
+\fi
+
+
+\subsection{Pointed Objects}
+
+All pointed objects can be entered.
+
+\subsubsection{Function closures}\label{sect:FUN}
+
+Function closures represent lambda abstractions. For example,
+consider the top-level declaration:
+@
+ f = \x -> let g = \y -> x+y
+ in g x
+@
+Both @f@ and @g@ are represented by function closures. The closure
+for @f@ is {\em static} while that for @g@ is {\em dynamic}.
+
+The layout of a function closure is as follows:
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em Pointers} & {\em Non-pointers} \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+The data words (pointers and non-pointers) are the free variables of
+the function closure.
+The number of pointers
+and number of non-pointers are stored in the @INFO_SM@ word, in the least significant
+and most significant half-word respectively.
+
+There are several different sorts of function closure, distinguished
+by their @INFO_TYPE@ field:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item @FUN@: a vanilla, dynamically allocated on the heap.
+
+\item $@FUN_@p@_@np$: to speed up garbage collection a number of
+specialised forms of @FUN@ are provided, for particular $(p,np)$ pairs,
+where $p$ is the number of pointers and $np$ the number of non-pointers.
+
+\item @FUN_STATIC@. Top-level, static, function closures (such as
+@f@ above) have a different
+layout than dynamic ones:
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em Static object link} \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+Static function closures have no free variables. (However they may refer to other
+static closures; these references are recorded in the function closure's SRT.)
+They have one field that is not present in dynamic closures, the {\em static object
+link} field. This is used by the garbage collector in the same way that to-space
+is, to gather closures that have been determined to be live but that have not yet
+been scavenged.
+\note{Static function closures that have no static references, and hence
+a null SRT pointer, don't need the static object link field. Is it worth
+taking advantage of this? See @CONSTR_STATIC_NOCAF@.}
+\end{itemize}
+
+Each lambda abstraction, $f$, in the STG program has its own private info table.
+The following labels are relevant:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item $f$@_info@ is $f$'s info table.
+\item $f$@_entry@ is $f$'s slow entry point (i.e. the entry code of its
+info table; so it will label the same byte as $f$@_info@).
+\item $f@_fast_@k$ is $f$'s fast entry point. $k$ is the number of arguments
+$f$ takes; encoding this number in the fast-entry label occasionally catches some nasty
+code-generation errors.
+\end{itemize}
+
+\subsubsection{Data Constructors}\label{sect:CONSTR}
+
+Data-constructor closures represent values constructed with
+algebraic data type constructors.
+The general layout of data constructors is the same as that for function
+closures. That is
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em Pointers} & {\em Non-pointers} \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+The SRT pointer in a data constructor's info table is used for the
+constructor tag, since a constructor never has any static references.
+
+There are several different sorts of constructor:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item @CONSTR@: a vanilla, dynamically allocated constructor.
+\item @CONSTR_@$p$@_@$np$: just like $@FUN_@p@_@np$.
+\item @CONSTR_INTLIKE@.
+A dynamically-allocated heap object that looks just like an @Int@. The
+garbage collector checks to see if it can common it up with one of a fixed
+set of static int-like closures, thus getting it out of the dynamic heap
+altogether.
+
+\item @CONSTR_CHARLIKE@: same deal, but for @Char@.
+
+\item @CONSTR_STATIC@ is similar to @FUN_STATIC@, with the complication that
+the layout of the constructor must mimic that of a dynamic constructor,
+because a static constructor might be returned to some code that unpacks it.
+So its layout is like this:
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em Pointers} & {\em Non-pointers} & {\em Static object link}\\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+The static object link, at the end of the closure, serves the same purpose
+as that for @FUN_STATIC@. The pointers in the static constructor can point
+only to other static closures.
+
+The static object link occurs last in the closure so that static
+constructors can store their data fields in exactly the same place as
+dynamic constructors.
+
+\item @CONSTR_STATIC_NOCAF@. A statically allocated data constructor
+that guarantees not to point (directly or indirectly) to any CAF
+(section~\ref{sect:CAF}). This means it does not need a static object
+link field. Since we expect that there might be quite a lot of static
+constructors this optimisation makes sense. Furthermore, the @NOCAF@
+tag allows the compiler to indicate that no CAFs can be reached
+anywhere {\em even indirectly}.
+
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+For each data constructor $Con$, two
+info tables are generated:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item $Con$@_info@ labels $Con$'s dynamic info table,
+shared by all dynamic instances of the constructor.
+\item $Con$@_static@ labels $Con$'s static info table,
+shared by all static instances of the constructor.
+\end{itemize}
+
+\subsubsection{Thunks}
+\label{sect:THUNK}
+\label{sect:THUNK_SEL}
+
+A thunk represents an expression that is not obviously in head normal
+form. For example, consider the following top-level definitions:
+@
+ range = between 1 10
+ f = \x -> let ys = take x range
+ in sum ys
+@
+Here the right-hand sides of @range@ and @ys@ are both thunks; the former
+is static while the latter is dynamic.
+
+The layout of a thunk is the same as that for a function closure,
+except that it may have some words of ``slop'' at the end to make sure
+that it has
+at least @MIN_UPD_PAYLOAD@ words in addition to its
+fixed header.
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em Pointers} & {\em Non-pointers} & {\em Slop} \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+The @INFO_SM@ word contains the same information as for function
+closures; that is, number of pointers and number of non-pointers (excluding slop).
+
+A thunk differs from a function closure in that it can be updated.
+
+There are several forms of thunk:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item @THUNK@: a vanilla, dynamically allocated thunk.
+The garbage collection code for thunks whose
+pointer + non-pointer words is less than @MIN_UPD_PAYLOAD@ differs from
+that for function closures and data constructors, because the GC code
+has to account for the slop.
+\item $@THUNK_@p@_@np$. Similar comments apply.
+\item @THUNK_STATIC@. A static thunk is also known as
+a {\em constant applicative form}, or {\em CAF}.
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em Pointers} & {\em Non-pointers} & {\em Slop} & {\em Static object link}\\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+\item @THUNK_SELECTOR@ is a (dynamically allocated) thunk
+whose entry code performs a simple selection operation from
+a data constructor drawn from a single-constructor type. For example,
+the thunk
+@
+ x = case y of (a,b) -> a
+@
+is a selector thunk. A selector thunk is laid out like this:
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em Selectee pointer} \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+The @INFO_SM@ word contains the byte offset of the desired word in
+the selectee. Note that this is different from all other thunks.
+
+The garbage collector ``peeks'' at the selectee's
+tag (in its info table). If it is evaluated, then it goes ahead and do
+the selection, and then behaves just as if the selector thunk was an
+indirection to the selected field.
+If it is not
+evaluated, it treats the selector thunk like any other thunk of that
+shape. [Implementation notes.
+Copying: only the evacuate routine needs to be special.
+Compacting: only the PRStart (marking) routine needs to be special.]
+\end{itemize}
+
+
+The only label associated with a thunk is its info table:
+\begin{description}
+\item[$f$@_info@] is $f$'s info table.
+\end{description}
+
+
+\subsubsection{Byte-Code Objects}
+\label{sect:BCO}
+
+A Byte-Code Object (BCO) is a container for a a chunk of byte-code,
+which can be executed by Hugs. The byte-code represents a
+supercombinator in the program: when hugs compiles a module, it
+performs lambda lifting and each resulting supercombinator becomes a
+byte-code object in the heap.
+
+There are two kinds of BCO: a standard @BCO@ which has an arity of one
+or more, and a @BCO_CAF@ which takes no arguments and can be updated.
+When a @BCO_CAF@ is updated, the code is thrown away!
+
+The semantics of BCOs are described in Section
+\ref{sect:hugs-heap-objects}. A BCO has the following structure:
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|}
+\hline
+\emph{Fixed Header} & \emph{Layout} & \emph{Offset} & \emph{Size} &
+\emph{Literals} & \emph{Byte code} \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+\noindent where:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item The entry code is a static code fragment/info table that
+returns to the scheduler to invoke Hugs (Section
+\ref{sect:ghc-to-hugs-switch}).
+\item \emph{Layout} contains the number of pointer literals in the
+\emph{Literals} field.
+\item \emph{Offset} is the offset to the byte code from the start of
+the object.
+\item \emph{Size} is the number of words of byte code in the object.
+\item \emph{Literals} contains any pointer and non-pointer literals used in
+the byte-codes (including jump addresses), pointers first.
+\item \emph{Byte code} contains \emph{Size} words of non-pointer byte
+code.
+\end{itemize}
+
+\subsubsection{Partial applications (PAPs)}\label{sect:PAP}
+
+A partial application (PAP) represents a function applied to too few arguments.
+It is only built as a result of updating after an argument-satisfaction
+check failure. A PAP has the following shape:
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em No of arg words} & {\em Function closure} & {\em Arg stack} \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+The ``arg stack'' is a copy of the chunk of stack above the update
+frame; ``no of arg words'' tells how many words it consists of. The
+function closure is (a pointer to) the closure for the function whose
+argument-satisfaction check failed.
+
+There is just one standard form of PAP with @INFO_TYPE@ = @PAP@.
+There is just one info table too, called @PAP_info@.
+Its entry code simply copies the arg stack chunk back on top of the
+stack and enters the function closure. (It has to do a stack overflow test first.)
+
+PAPs are also used to implement Hugs functions (where the arguments are free variables).
+PAPs generated by Hugs can be static.
+
+\subsubsection{@AP@ objects}
+\label{sect:AP}
+
+@AP@ objects are used to represent thunks built by Hugs. The only distintion between
+an @AP@ and a @PAP@ is that an @AP@ is updateable.
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}
+\hline
+\emph{Fixed Header} & {\em No of arg words} & {\em Function closure} & {\em Arg stack} \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+The entry code pushes an update frame, copies the arg stack chunk on
+top of the stack, and enters the function closure. (It has to do a
+stack overflow test first.)
+
+The ``arg stack'' is a block of (tagged) arguments representing the
+free variables of the thunk; ``no of arg words'' tells how many words
+it consists of. The function closure is (a pointer to) the closure
+for the thunk. The argument stack may be empty if the thunk has no
+free variables.
+
+
+\subsubsection{Indirections}
+\label{sect:IND}
+\label{sect:IND_OLDGEN}
+
+Indirection closures just point to other closures. They are introduced
+when a thunk is updated to point to its value.
+The entry code for all indirections simply enters the closure it points to.
+
+There are several forms of indirection:
+\begin{description}
+\item[@IND@] is the vanilla, dynamically-allocated indirection.
+It is removed by the garbage collector. It has the following
+shape:
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em Target closure} \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+\item[@IND_OLDGEN@] is the indirection used to update an old-generation
+thunk. Its shape is like this:
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em Mutable link field} & {\em Target closure} \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+It contains a {\em mutable link field} that is used to string together
+all old-generation indirections that might have a pointer into
+the new generation.
+
+
+\item[@IND_PERMANENT@ and @IND_OLDGEN_PERMANENT@.]
+for lexical profiling, it is necessary to maintain cost centre
+information in an indirection, so ``permanent indirections'' are
+retained forever. Otherwise they are just like vanilla indirections.
+\note{If a permanent indirection points to another permanent
+indirection or a @CONST@ closure, it is possible to elide the indirection
+since it will have no effect on the profiler.}
+\note{Do we still need @IND@ and @IND_OLDGEN@
+in the profiling build, or can we just make
+do with one pair whose behaviour changes when profiling is built?}
+
+\item[@IND_STATIC@] is used for overwriting CAFs when they have been
+evaluated. Static indirections are not removed by the garbage
+collector; and are statically allocated outside the heap (and should
+stay there). Their static object link field is used just as for
+@FUN_STATIC@ closures.
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}
+\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em Target closure} & {\em Static object link} \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+\end{description}
+
+\subsubsection{Activation Records}
+
+Activation records are parts of the stack described by return address
+info tables (closures with @INFO_TYPE@ values of @RET_SMALL@,
+@RET_VEC_SMALL@, @RET_BIG@ and @RET_VEC_BIG@). They are described in
+section~\ref{sect:activation-records}.
+
+
+\subsubsection{Black holes, MVars and IVars}
+\label{sect:BH}
+\label{sect:MVAR}
+\label{sect:IVAR}
+
+Black hole closures are used to overwrite closures currently being
+evaluated. They inform the garbage collector that there are no live
+roots in the closure, thus removing a potential space leak.
+
+Black holes also become synchronization points in the threaded world.
+They contain a pointer to a list of blocked threads to be awakened
+when the black hole is updated (or @NULL@ if the list is empty).
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}
+\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em Mutable link} & {\em Blocked thread link} \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+The {\em Blocked thread link} points to the TSO of the first thread
+waiting for the value of this thunk. All subsequent TSOs in the list
+are linked together using their @TSO_LINK@ field.
+
+When the blocking queue is non-@NULL@, the black hole must be added to
+the mutables list since the TSOs on the list may contain pointers into
+the new generation. There is no need to clutter up the mutables list
+with black holes with empty blocking queues.
+
+\ToDo{MVars}
+
+
+\subsubsection{FetchMes}\label{sect:FETCHME}
+
+In the parallel systems, FetchMes are used to represent pointers into
+the global heap. When evaluated, the value they point to is read from
+the global heap.
+
+\ToDo{Describe layout}
+
+Because there may be offsets into these arrays, a primitive array
+cannot be handled as a FetchMe in the parallel system, but must be
+shipped in its entirety if its parent closure is shipped.
+
+
+
+\subsection{Unpointed Objects}
+
+A variable of unpointed type is always bound to a {\em value}, never to a {\em thunk}.
+For this reason, unpointed objects cannot be entered.
+
+A {\em value} may be:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item {\em Boxed}, i.e.~represented indirectly by a pointer to a heap object (e.g.~foreign objects, arrays); or
+\item {\em Unboxed}, i.e.~represented directly by a bit-pattern in one or more registers (e.g.~@Int#@ and @Float#@).
+\end{itemize}
+All {\em pointed} values are {\em boxed}.
+
+\subsubsection{Immutable Objects}
+\label{sect:ARR_WORDS1}
+\label{sect:ARR_PTRS}
+
+\begin{description}
+\item[@ARR_WORDS@] is a variable-sized object consisting solely of
+non-pointers. It is used for arrays of all
+sorts of things (bytes, words, floats, doubles... it doesn't matter).
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
+\hline
+{\em Fixed Hdr} & {\em No of non-pointers} & {\em Non-pointers\ldots} \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+\item[@ARR_PTRS@] is an immutable, variable sized array of pointers.
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
+\hline
+{\em Fixed Hdr} & {\em Mutable link} & {\em No of pointers} & {\em Pointers\ldots} \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+The mutable link is present so that we can easily freeze and thaw an
+array (by changing the header and adding/removing the array to the
+mutables list).
+
+\end{description}
+
+\subsubsection{Mutable Objects}
+\label{sect:mutables}
+\label{sect:ARR_WORDS2}
+\label{sect:MUTVAR}
+\label{sect:MUTARR_PTRS}
+\label{sect:MUTARR_PTRS_FROZEN}
+
+Some of these objects are {\em mutable}; they represent objects which
+are explicitly mutated by Haskell code through the @ST@ monad.
+They're not used for thunks which are updated precisely once.
+Depending on the garbage collector, mutable closures may contain extra
+header information which allows a generational collector to implement
+the ``write barrier.''
+
+\begin{description}
+
+\item[@ARR_WORDS@] is also used to represent {\em mutable} arrays of
+bytes, words, floats, doubles, etc. It's possible to use the same
+object type because even generational collectors don't need to
+distinguish them.
+
+\item[@MUTVAR@] is a mutable variable.
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
+\hline
+{\em Fixed Hdr} & {\em Mutable link} & {\em Pointer} \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+\item[@MUTARR_PTRS@] is a mutable array of pointers.
+Such an array may be {\em frozen}, becoming an @SM_MUTARR_PTRS_FROZEN@, with a
+different info-table.
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
+\hline
+{\em Fixed Hdr} & {\em Mutable link} & {\em No of ptrs} & {\em Pointers\ldots} \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+\item[@MUTARR_PTRS_FROZEN@] is a frozen @MUTARR_PTRS@ closure.
+The garbage collector converts @MUTARR_PTRS_FROZEN@ to @ARR_PTRS@ as it removes them from
+the mutables list.
+
+\end{description}
+
+
+\subsubsection{Foreign Objects}\label{sect:FOREIGN}
+
+Here's what a ForeignObj looks like:
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}
+\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em Data} & {\em Free Routine} & {\em Foreign object link} \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+The @FreeRoutine@ is a reference to the finalisation routine to call
+when the @ForeignObj@ becomes garbage. If @freeForeignObject@ is
+called on a Foreign Object, the @FreeRoutine@ is set to zero and the
+garbage collector will not attempt to call @FreeRoutine@ when the
+object becomes garbage.
+
+The Foreign object link is a link to the next foreign object in the
+list. This list is traversed at the end of garbage collection: if an
+object is about to be deallocated (e.g.~it was not marked or
+evacuated), the free routine is called and the object is deleted from
+the list.
+
+
+The remaining objects types are all administrative --- none of them may be entered.
+
+\subsection{Other weird objects}
+\label{sect:SPARK}
+\label{sect:BLOCKED_FETCH}
+
+\begin{description}
+\item[@BlockedFetch@ heap objects (`closures')] (parallel only)
+
+@BlockedFetch@s are inbound fetch messages blocked on local closures.
+They arise as entries in a local blocking queue when a fetch has been
+received for a local black hole. When awakened, we look at their
+contents to figure out where to send a resume.
+
+A @BlockedFetch@ closure has the form:
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & link & node & gtid & slot & weight \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+\item[Spark Closures] (parallel only)
+
+Spark closures are used to link together all closures in the spark pool. When
+the current processor is idle, it may choose to speculatively evaluate some of
+the closures in the pool. It may also choose to delete sparks from the pool.
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em Spark pool link} & {\em Sparked closure} \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+\item[Slop Objects]\label{sect:slop-objects}
+
+Slop objects are used to overwrite the end of an updatee if it is
+larger than an indirection. Normal slop objects consist of an info
+pointer a size word and a number of slop words.
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|}\hline
+{\em Info Pointer} & {\em Size} & {\em Slop Words} \\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+This is too large for single word slop objects which consist of a
+single info table.
+
+Note that slop objects only contain an info pointer, not a standard
+fixed header. This doesn't cause problems because slop objects are
+always unreachable --- they can only be accessed by linearly scanning
+the heap.
+
+\end{description}
+
+\subsection{Thread State Objects (TSOs)}\label{sect:TSO}
+
+\ToDo{This is very out of date. We now embed a single stack object
+within the TSO. TSOs include an ID number which can be used to
+generate a hash value. The gransim, profiling and ticky info is
+surely bogus.}
+
+In the multi-threaded system, the state of a suspended thread is
+packed up into a Thread State Object (TSO) which contains all the
+information needed to restart the thread and for the garbage collector
+to find all reachable objects. When a thread is running, it may be
+``unpacked'' into machine registers and various other memory locations
+to provide faster access.
+
+Single-threaded systems don't really {\em need\/} TSOs --- but they do
+need some way to tell the storage manager about live roots so it is
+convenient to use a single TSO to store the mutator state even in
+single-threaded systems.
+
+Rather than manage TSOs' alloc/dealloc, etc., in some {\em ad hoc}
+way, we instead alloc/dealloc/etc them in the heap; then we can use
+all the standard garbage-collection/fetching/flushing/etc machinery on
+them. So that's why TSOs are ``heap objects,'' albeit very special
+ones.
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|}
+ \hline {\em Fixed header}
+\\ \hline @TSO_LINK@
+\\ \hline @TSO_WHATNEXT@
+\\ \hline @TSO_WHATNEXT_INFO@
+\\ \hline @TSO_STACK@
+\\ \hline {\em Exception Handlers}
+\\ \hline {\em Ticky Info}
+\\ \hline {\em Profiling Info}
+\\ \hline {\em Parallel Info}
+\\ \hline {\em GranSim Info}
+\\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+The contents of a TSO are:
+\begin{itemize}
+
+\item A pointer (@TSO_LINK@) used to maintain a list of threads with a similar
+ state (e.g.~all runnable, all sleeping, all blocked on the same black
+ hole, all blocked on the same MVar, etc.)
+
+\item A word (@TSO_WHATNEXT@) which is in suspended threads to record
+ how to awaken it. This typically requires a program counter which is stored
+ in the pointer @TSO_WHATNEXT_INFO@
+
+\item A pointer (@TSO_STACK@) to the top stack block.
+
+\item Optional information for ``Ticky Ticky'' statistics: @TSO_STK_HWM@ is
+ the maximum number of words allocated to this thread.
+
+\item Optional information for profiling:
+ @TSO_CCC@ is the current cost centre.
+
+\item Optional information for parallel execution:
+\begin{itemize}
+
+\item The types of threads (@TSO_TYPE@):
+\begin{description}
+\item[@T_MAIN@] Must be executed locally.
+\item[@T_REQUIRED@] A required thread -- may be exported.
+\item[@T_ADVISORY@] An advisory thread -- may be exported.
+\item[@T_FAIL@] A failure thread -- may be exported.
+\end{description}
+
+\item I've no idea what else
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+\item Optional information for GranSim execution:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item locked
+\item sparkname
+\item started at
+\item exported
+\item basic blocks
+\item allocs
+\item exectime
+\item fetchtime
+\item fetchcount
+\item blocktime
+\item blockcount
+\item global sparks
+\item local sparks
+\item queue
+\item priority
+\item clock (gransim light only)
+\end{itemize}
+
+
+Here are the various queues for GrAnSim-type events.
+@
+Q_RUNNING
+Q_RUNNABLE
+Q_BLOCKED
+Q_FETCHING
+Q_MIGRATING
+@
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+\subsection{Stack Objects}
+\label{sect:STACK_OBJECT}
+\label{sect:stacks}
+
+These are ``stack objects,'' which are used in the threaded world as
+the stack for each thread is allocated from the heap in smallish
+chunks. (The stack in the sequential world is allocated outside of
+the heap.)
+
+Each reduction thread has to have its own stack space. As there may
+be many such threads, and as any given one may need quite a big stack,
+a naive give-'em-a-big-stack-and-let-'em-run approach will cost a {\em
+lot} of memory.
+
+Our approach is to give a thread a small stack space, and then link
+on/off extra ``chunks'' as the need arises. Again, this is a
+storage-management problem, and, yet again, we choose to graft the
+whole business onto the existing heap-management machinery. So stack
+objects will live in the heap, be garbage collected, etc., etc..
+
+A stack object is laid out like this:
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|}
+\hline
+{\em Fixed header}
+\\ \hline
+{\em Link to next stack object (0 for last)}
+\\ \hline
+{\em N, the payload size in words}
+\\ \hline
+{\em @Sp@ (byte offset from head of object)}
+\\ \hline
+{\em @Su@ (byte offset from head of object)}
+\\ \hline
+{\em Payload (N words)}
+\\ \hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+\ToDo{Are stack objects on the mutable list?}
+
+The stack grows downwards, towards decreasing
+addresses. This makes it easier to print out the stack
+when debugging, and it means that a return address is
+at the lowest address of the chunk of stack it ``knows about''
+just like an info pointer on a closure.
+
+The garbage collector needs to be able to find all the
+pointers in a stack. How does it do this?
+
+\begin{itemize}
+
+\item Within the stack there are return addresses, pushed
+by @case@ expressions. Below a return address (i.e. at higher
+memory addresses, since the stack grows downwards) is a chunk
+of stack that the return address ``knows about'', namely the
+activation record of the currently running function.
+
+\item Below each such activation record is a {\em pending-argument
+section}, a chunk of
+zero or more words that are the arguments to which the result
+of the function should be applied. The return address does not
+statically
+``know'' how many pending arguments there are, or their types.
+(For example, the function might return a result of type $\alpha$.)
+
+\item Below each pending-argument section is another return address,
+and so on. Actually, there might be an update frame instead, but we
+can consider update frames as a special case of a return address with
+a well-defined activation record.
+
+\ToDo{Doesn't it {\em have} to be an update frame? After all, the arg
+satisfaction check is @Su - Sp >= ...@.}
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+The game plan is this. The garbage collector
+walks the stack from the top, traversing pending-argument sections and
+activation records alternately. Next we discuss how it finds
+the pointers in each of these two stack regions.
+
+
+\subsubsection{Activation records}\label{sect:activation-records}
+
+An {\em activation record} is a contiguous chunk of stack,
+with a return address as its first word, followed by as many
+data words as the return address ``knows about''. The return
+address is actually a fully-fledged info pointer. It points
+to an info table, replete with:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item entry code (i.e. the code to return to).
+\item @INFO_TYPE@ is either @RET_SMALL/RET_VEC_SMALL@ or @RET_BIG/RET_VEC_BIG@, depending
+on whether the activation record has more than 32 data words (\note{64 for 8-byte-word architectures}) and on whether
+to use a direct or a vectored return.
+\item @INFO_SM@ for @RET_SMALL@ is a bitmap telling the layout
+of the activation record, one bit per word. The least-significant bit
+describes the first data word of the record (adjacent to the fixed
+header) and so on. A ``@1@'' indicates a non-pointer, a ``@0@''
+indicates
+a pointer. We don't need to indicate exactly how many words there
+are,
+because when we get to all zeros we can treat the rest of the
+activation record as part of the next pending-argument region.
+
+For @RET_BIG@ the @INFO_SM@ field points to a block of bitmap
+words, starting with a word that tells how many words are in
+the block.
+
+\item @INFO_SRT@ is the Static Reference Table for the return
+address (Section~\ref{sect:srt}).
+\end{itemize}
+
+The activation record is a fully fledged closure too.
+As well as an info pointer, it has all the other attributes of
+a fixed header (Section~\ref{sect:fixed-header}) including a saved cost
+centre which is reloaded when the return address is entered.
+
+In other words, all the attributes of closures are needed for
+activation records, so it's very convenient to make them look alike.
+
+
+\subsubsection{Pending arguments}
+
+So that the garbage collector can correctly identify pointers
+in pending-argument sections we explicitly tag all non-pointers.
+Every non-pointer in a pending-argument section is preceded
+(at the next lower memory word) by a one-word byte count that
+says how many bytes to skip over (excluding the tag word).
+
+The garbage collector traverses a pending argument section from
+the top (i.e. lowest memory address). It looks at each word in turn:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item If it is less than or equal to a small constant @MAX_STACK_TAG@
+then
+it treats it as a tag heralding zero or more words of non-pointers,
+so it just skips over them.
+
+\item If it points to the code segment, it must be a return
+address, so we have come to the end of the pending-argument section.
+
+\item Otherwise it must be a bona fide heap pointer.
+\end{itemize}
+
+
+\subsection{The Stable Pointer Table}\label{sect:STABLEPTR_TABLE}
+
+A stable pointer is a name for a Haskell object which can be passed to
+the external world. It is ``stable'' in the sense that the name does
+not change when the Haskell garbage collector runs---in contrast to
+the address of the object which may well change.
+
+A stable pointer is represented by an index into the
+@StablePointerTable@. The Haskell garbage collector treats the
+@StablePointerTable@ as a source of roots for GC.
+
+In order to provide efficient access to stable pointers and to be able
+to cope with any number of stable pointers (eg $0 \ldots 100000$), the
+table of stable pointers is an array stored on the heap and can grow
+when it overflows. (Since we cannot compact the table by moving
+stable pointers about, it seems unlikely that a half-empty table can
+be reduced in size---this could be fixed if necessary by using a
+hash table of some sort.)
+
+In general a stable pointer table closure looks like this:
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|}
+\hline
+{\em Fixed header} & {\em No of pointers} & {\em Free} & $SP_0$ & \ldots & $SP_{n-1}$
+\\\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+The fields are:
+\begin{description}
+
+\item[@NPtrs@:] number of (stable) pointers.
+
+\item[@Free@:] the byte offset (from the first byte of the object) of the first free stable pointer.
+
+\item[$SP_i$:] A stable pointer slot. If this entry is in use, it is
+an ``unstable'' pointer to a closure. If this entry is not in use, it
+is a byte offset of the next free stable pointer slot.
+
+\end{description}
+
+When a stable pointer table is evacuated
+\begin{enumerate}
+\item the free list entries are all set to @NULL@ so that the evacuation
+ code knows they're not pointers;
+
+\item The stable pointer slots are scanned linearly: non-@NULL@ slots
+are evacuated and @NULL@-values are chained together to form a new free list.
+\end{enumerate}
+
+There's no need to link the stable pointer table onto the mutable
+list because we always treat it as a root.
+
+
+
+\section{The Bytecode Evaluator}
+
+This section describes how the Hugs interpreter interprets code in the
+same environment as compiled code executes. Both evaluation models
+use a common garbage collector, so they must agree on the form of
+objects in the heap.
+
+Hugs interprets code by converting it to byte-code and applying a
+byte-code interpreter to it. Wherever possible, we try to ensure that
+the byte-code is all that is required to interpret a section of code.
+This means not dynamically generating info tables, and hence we can
+only have a small number of possible heap objects each with a statically
+compiled info table. Similarly for stack objects: in fact we only
+have one Hugs stack object, in which all information is tagged for the
+garbage collector.
+
+There is, however, one exception to this rule. Hugs must generate
+info tables for any constructors it is asked to compile, since the
+alternative is to force a context-switch each time compiled code
+enters a Hugs-built constructor, which would be prohibitively
+expensive.
+
+We achieve this simplicity by forgoing some of the optimisations used
+by compiled code:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item
+
+Whereas compiled code has five different ways of entering a closure
+(section~\ref{sect:entering-closures}), interpreted code has only one.
+The entry point for interpreted code behaves like slow entry points for
+compiled code.
+
+\item
+
+We use just one info table for {\em all\/} direct returns.
+This introduces two problems:
+\begin{enumerate}
+\item How does the interpreter know what code to execute?
+
+Instead of pushing just a return address, we push a return BCO and a
+trivial return address which just enters the return BCO.
+
+(In a purely interpreted system, we could avoid pushing the trivial
+return address.)
+
+\item How can the garbage collector follow pointers within the
+activation record?
+
+We could push a third word ---a bitmask describing the location of any
+pointers within the record--- but, since we're already tagging unboxed
+function arguments on the stack, we use the same mechanism for unboxed
+values within the activation record.
+
+\ToDo{Do we have to stub out dead variables in the activation frame?}
+
+\end{enumerate}
+
+\item
+
+We trivially support vectored returns by pushing a return vector whose
+entries are all the same.
+
+\item
+
+We avoid the need to build SRTs by putting bytecode objects on the
+heap and restricting BCOs to a single basic block.
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+\subsection{Hugs Info Tables}
+
+Hugs requires the following info tables and closures:
+\begin{description}
+\item [@HUGS_RET@].
+
+Contains both a vectored return table and a direct entry point. All
+entry points are the same: they rearrange the stack to match the Hugs
+return convention (section~\label{sect:hugs-return-convention}) and return
+to the scheduler. When the scheduler restarts the thread, it will
+find a BCO on top of the stack and will enter the Hugs interpreter.
+
+\item [@UPD_RET@].
+
+This is just the standard info table for an update frame.
+
+\item [Constructors].
+
+The entry code for a constructor jumps to a generic entry point in the
+runtime system which decides whether to do a vectored or unvectored
+return depending on the shape of the constructor/type. This implies that
+info tables must have enough info to make that decision.
+
+\item [@AP@ and @PAP@].
+
+\item [Indirections].
+
+\item [Selectors].
+
+Hugs doesn't generate them itself but it ought to recognise them
+
+\item [Complex primops].
+
+Some of the primops are too complex for GHC to generate inline.
+Instead, these primops are hand-written and called as normal functions.
+Hugs only needs to know their names and types but doesn't care whether
+they are generated by GHC or by hand. Two things to watch:
+
+\begin{enumerate}
+\item
+Hugs must be able to enter these primops even if it is working on a
+standalone system that does not support genuine GHC generated code.
+
+\item The complex primops often involve unboxed tuple types (which
+Hugs does not support at the source level) so we cannot specify their
+types in a Haskell source file.
+
+\end{enumerate}
+
+\end{description}
+
+\subsection{Hugs Heap Objects}
+\label{sect:hugs-heap-objects}
+
+\subsubsection{Byte-Code Objects}
+
+Compiled byte code lives on the global heap, in objects called
+Byte-Code Objects (or BCOs). The layout of BCOs is described in
+detail in Section \ref{sect:BCO}, in this section we will describe
+their semantics.
+
+Since byte-code lives on the heap, it can be garbage collected just
+like any other heap-resident data. Hugs arranges that any BCO's
+referred to by the Hugs symbol tables are treated as live objects by
+the garbage collector. When a module is unloaded, the pointers to its
+BCOs are removed from the symbol table, and the code will be garbage
+collected some time later.
+
+A BCO represents a basic block of code - all entry points are at the
+beginning of a BCO, and it is impossible to jump into the middle of
+one. A BCO represents not only the code for a function, but also its
+closure; a BCO can be entered just like any other closure. Hugs
+performs lambda-lifting during compilation to byte-code, and each
+top-level combinator becomes a BCO in the heap.
+
+\ToDo{The phrase "all entry points..." suggests that BCOs have multiple
+entry points. If so, we need to say a lot more about it...}
+
+\subsubsection{Thunks and partial applications}
+
+A thunk consists of a code pointer, and values for the free variables
+of that code. Since Hugs byte-code is lambda-lifted, free variables
+become arguments and are expected to be on the stack by the called
+function.
+
+Hugs represents updateable thunks with @AP@ objects applying a closure
+to a list of arguments. (As for @PAP@s, unboxed arguments should be
+preceded by a tag.) When it is entered, it pushes an update frame
+followed by its payload on the stack, and enters the first word (which
+will be a pointer to a BCO). The layout of @AP@ objects is described
+in more detail in Section \ref{sect:AP}.
+
+Partial applications are represented by @PAP@ objects, which are
+non-updatable.
+
+\ToDo{Hugs Constructors}.
+
+\subsection{Calling conventions}
+\label{sect:hugs-calling-conventions}
+\label{sect:standard-closures}
+
+The calling convention for any byte-code function is straightforward:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Push any arguments on the stack.
+\item Push a pointer to the BCO.
+\item Begin interpreting the byte code.
+\end{itemize}
+
+In a system containing both GHC and Hugs, the bytecode interpreter
+only has to be able to enter BCOs: everything else can be handled by
+returning to the compiled world (as described in
+Section~\ref{sect:hugs-to-ghc-switch}) and entering the closure
+there.
+
+This would work but it would obviously be very inefficient if
+we entered a @AP@ by switching worlds, entering the @AP@,
+pushing the arguments and function onto the stack, and entering the
+function which, likely as not, will be a byte-code object which we
+will enter by \emph{returning} to the byte-code interpreter. To avoid
+such gratuitious world switching, we choose to recognise certain
+closure types as being ``standard'' --- and duplicate the entry code
+for the ``standard closures'' in the bytecode interpreter.
+
+A closure is said to be ``standard'' if its entry code is entirely
+determined by its info table. \emph{Standard Closures} have the
+desirable property that the byte-code interpreter can enter
+the closure by simply ``interpreting'' the info table instead of
+switching to the compiled world. The standard closures include:
+
+\begin{description}
+\item[Constructor]
+To enter a constructor, we simply return (see Section
+\ref{sect:hugs-return-convention}).
+
+\item[Indirection]
+To enter an indirection, we simply enter the object it points to
+after possibly adjusting the current cost centre.
+
+\item[@AP@]
+
+To enter an @AP@, we push an update frame, push the
+arguments, push the function and enter the function.
+(Not forgetting a stack check at the start.)
+
+\item[@PAP@]
+
+To enter a @PAP@, we push the arguments, push the function and enter
+the function. (Not forgetting a stack check at the start.)
+
+\item[Selector]
+To enter a selector, we test whether the selectee is a value. If so,
+we simply select the appropriate component; if not, it's simplest to
+treat it as a GHC-built closure --- though we could interpret it if we
+wanted.
+
+\end{description}
+
+The most obvious omissions from the above list are @BCO@s (which we
+dealt with above) and GHC-built closures (which are covered in Section
+\ref{sect:hugs-to-ghc-switch}).
+
+
+\subsection{Return convention}
+\label{sect:hugs-return-convention}
+
+When Hugs pushes a return address, it pushes both a pointer to the BCO
+to return to, and a pointer to a static code fragment @HUGS_RET@ (this
+is described in Section \ref{sect:ghc-to-hugs-switch}). The
+stack layout is shown in Figure \ref{fig:hugs-return-stack}.
+
+\begin{figure}[ht]
+\begin{center}
+@
+| stack |
++----------+
+| bco |--> BCO
++----------+
+| HUGS_RET |
++----------+
+@
+%\input{hugs_ret.pstex_t}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Stack layout for a Hugs return address}
+\label{fig:hugs-return-stack}
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{figure}[ht]
+\begin{center}
+@
+| stack |
++----------+
+| con |--> CON
++----------+
+@
+%\input{hugs_ret2.pstex_t}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Stack layout on enterings a Hugs return address}
+\label{fig:hugs-return2}
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{figure}[ht]
+\begin{center}
+@
+| stack |
++----------+
+| 3# |
++----------+
+| I# |
++----------+
+@
+%\input{hugs_ret2.pstex_t}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Stack layout on entering a Hugs return address with an unboxed value}
+\label{fig:hugs-return-int}
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{figure}[ht]
+\begin{center}
+@
+| stack |
++----------+
+| ghc_ret |
++----------+
+| con |--> CON
++----------+
+@
+%\input{hugs_ret3.pstex_t}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Stack layout on enterings a GHC return address}
+\label{fig:hugs-return3}
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{figure}[ht]
+\begin{center}
+@
+| stack |
++----------+
+| ghc_ret |
++----------+
+| 3# |
++----------+
+| I# |
++----------+
+| restart |--> id_Int#_closure
++----------+
+@
+%\input{hugs_ret2.pstex_t}
+\end{center}
+\caption{Stack layout on enterings a GHC return address with an unboxed value}
+\label{fig:hugs-return-int}
+\end{figure}
+
+When a Hugs byte-code sequence enters a closure, it examines the
+return address on top of the stack.
+
+\begin{itemize}
+
+\item If the return address is @HUGS_RET@, pop the @HUGS_RET@ and the
+bco for the continuation off the stack, push a pointer to the constructor onto
+the stack and enter the BCO with the current object pointer set to the BCO
+(Figure \ref{fig:hugs-return2}).
+
+\item If the top of the stack is not @HUGS_RET@, we need to do a world
+switch as described in Section \ref{sect:hugs-to-ghc-switch}.
+
+\end{itemize}
+
+\ToDo{This duplicates what we say about switching worlds
+(section~\ref{sect:switching-worlds}) - kill one or t'other.}
+
+
+\ToDo{This was in the evaluation model part but it really belongs in
+this part which is about the internal details of each of the major
+sections.}
+
+\subsection{Addressing Modes}
+
+To avoid potential alignment problems and simplify garbage collection,
+all literal constants are stored in two tables (one boxed, the other
+unboxed) within each BCO and are referred to by offsets into the tables.
+Slots in the constant tables are word aligned.
+
+\ToDo{How big can the offsets be? Is the offset specified in the
+address field or in the instruction?}
+
+Literals can have the following types: char, int, nat, float, double,
+and pointer to boxed object. There is no real difference between
+char, int, nat and float since they all occupy 32 bits --- but it
+costs almost nothing to distinguish them and may improve portability
+and simplify debugging.
+
+\subsection{Compilation}
+
+
+\def\is{\mbox{\it is}}
+\def\ts{\mbox{\it ts}}
+\def\as{\mbox{\it as}}
+\def\bs{\mbox{\it bs}}
+\def\cs{\mbox{\it cs}}
+\def\rs{\mbox{\it rs}}
+\def\us{\mbox{\it us}}
+\def\vs{\mbox{\it vs}}
+\def\ws{\mbox{\it ws}}
+\def\xs{\mbox{\it xs}}
+
+\def\e{\mbox{\it e}}
+\def\alts{\mbox{\it alts}}
+\def\fail{\mbox{\it fail}}
+\def\panic{\mbox{\it panic}}
+\def\ua{\mbox{\it ua}}
+\def\obj{\mbox{\it obj}}
+\def\bco{\mbox{\it bco}}
+\def\tag{\mbox{\it tag}}
+\def\entry{\mbox{\it entry}}
+\def\su{\mbox{\it su}}
+
+\def\Ind#1{{\mbox{\it Ind}\ {#1}}}
+\def\update#1{{\mbox{\it update}\ {#1}}}
+
+\def\next{$\Longrightarrow$}
+\def\append{\mathrel{+\mkern-6mu+}}
+\def\reverse{\mbox{\it reverse}}
+\def\size#1{{\vert {#1} \vert}}
+\def\arity#1{{\mbox{\it arity}{#1}}}
+
+\def\AP{\mbox{\it AP}}
+\def\PAP{\mbox{\it PAP}}
+\def\GHCRET{\mbox{\it GHCRET}}
+\def\GHCOBJ{\mbox{\it GHCOBJ}}
+
+To make sense of the instructions, we need a sense of how they will be
+used. Here is a small compiler for the STG language.
+
+@
+> cg (f{a1, ... am}) = do
+> pushAtom am; ... pushAtom a1
+> pushVar f
+> SLIDE (m+1) |env|
+> ENTER
+> cg (let{x1=rhs1; ... xm=rhsm in e) = do
+> ALLOC x1 |rhs1|, ... ALLOC xm |rhsm|
+> build x1 rhs1, ... build xm rhsm
+> cg e
+> cg (case e of alts) = do
+> PUSHALTS (cgAlts alts)
+> cg e
+
+> cgAlts { alt1; ... altm } = cgAlt alt1 $ ... $ cgAlt altm pmFail
+>
+> cgAlt (x@C{xs} -> e) fail = do
+> TEST C fail
+> HEAPCHECK (heapUse e)
+> UNPACK xs
+> cg e
+
+> build x (C{a1, ... am}) = do
+> pushUntaggedAtom am; ... pushUntaggedAtom a1
+> PACK x C
+> build x ({v1, ... vm} \ {}. e) = do
+> pushVar vm; ... pushVar v1
+> PUSHBCO (cgRhs ({v1, ... vm} \ {}. e))
+> MKAP x m
+> build x ({v1, ... vm} \ {x1, ... xm}. e) = do
+> pushVar vm; ... pushVar v1
+> PUSHBCO (cgRhs ({v1, ... vm} \ {x1, ... xm}. e))
+> MKPAP x m
+
+> cgRhs (vs \ xs. e) = do
+> ARGCHECK (xs ++ vs) -- can be omitted if xs == {}
+> STACKCHECK min(stackUse e,heapOverflowSlop)
+> HEAPCHECK (heapUse e)
+> cg e
+
+> pushAtom x = pushVar x
+> pushAtom i# = PUSHINT i#
+
+> pushVar x = if isGlobalVar x then PUSHGLOBAL x else PUSHLOCAL x
+
+> pushUntaggedAtom x = pushVar x
+> pushUntaggedAtom i# = PUSHUNTAGGEDINT i#
+
+> pushVar x = if isGlobalVar x then PUSHGLOBAL x else PUSHLOCAL x
+@
+
+\ToDo{Is there an easy way to add semi-tagging? Would it be that different?}
+
+\ToDo{Optimise thunks of the form @f{x1,...xm}@ so that we build an AP directly}
+
+\subsection{Instructions}
+
+We specify the semantics of instructions using transition rules of
+the form:
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & $\is$ & $s$ & $\su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is'$ & $s'$ & $\su'$ & $h'$ & $hp'$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+where $\is$ is an instruction stream, $s$ is the stack, $\su$ is the
+update frame pointer and $h$ is the heap.
+
+
+\subsection{Stack manipulation}
+
+\begin{description}
+
+\item[ Push a global variable ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & PUSHGLOBAL $o$ : $\is$ & $s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $\sigma!o:s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+\item[ Push a local variable ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & PUSHLOCAL $o$ : $\is$ & $s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $s!o : s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+\item[ Push an unboxed int ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & PUSHINT $o$ : $\is$ & $s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $I\# : \sigma!o : s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+The $I\#$ is a tag included for the benefit of the garbage collector.
+Similar rules exist for floats, doubles, chars, etc.
+
+\item[ Push an unboxed int ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & PUSHUNTAGGEDINT $o$ : $\is$ & $s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $\sigma!o : s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+Similar rules exist for floats, doubles, chars, etc.
+
+\item[ Delete environment from stack --- ready for tail call ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & SLIDE $m$ $n$ : $\is$ & $\as \append \bs \append \cs$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $\as \append \cs$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\\
+where $\size{\as} = m$ and $\size{\bs} = n$.
+
+
+\item[ Push a return address ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & PUSHALTS $o$:$\is$ & $s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $@HUGS_RET@:\sigma!o:s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+\item[ Push a BCO ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & PUSHBCO $o$ : $\is$ & $s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $\sigma!o : s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+\end{description}
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\subsection{Heap manipulation}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+\begin{description}
+
+\item[ Allocate a heap object ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & ALLOC $m$ : $\is$ & $s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $hp:s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp+m$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+\item[ Build a constructor ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & PACK $o$ $o'$ : $\is$ & $\ws \append s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $s$ & $su$ & $h[s!o \mapsto Pack C\{\ws\}]$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\\
+where $C = \sigma!o'$ and $\size{\ws} = \arity{C}$.
+
+\item[ Build an AP or PAP ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & MKAP $o$ $m$:$\is$ & $f : \ws \append s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $s$ & $su$ & $h[s!o \mapsto \AP(f,\ws)]$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\\
+where $\size{\ws} = m$.
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & MKPAP $o$ $m$:$\is$ & $f : \ws \append s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $s$ & $su$ & $h[s!o \mapsto \PAP(f,\ws)]$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\\
+where $\size{\ws} = m$.
+
+\item[ Unpacking a constructor ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & UNPACK : $is$ & $a : s$ & $su$ & $h[a \mapsto C\ \ws]$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $is'$ & $(\reverse\ \ws) \append a : s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+The $\reverse\ \ws$ looks expensive but, since the stack grows down
+and the heap grows up, that's actually the cheap way of copying from
+heap to stack. Looking at the compilation rules, you'll see that we
+always push the args in reverse order.
+
+\end{description}
+
+
+\subsection{Entering a closure}
+
+\begin{description}
+
+\item[ Enter a BCO ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & [ENTER] & $a : s$ & $su$ & $h[a \mapsto BCO\{\is\} ]$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $a : s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $a$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+\item[ Enter a PAP closure ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & [ENTER] & $a : s$ & $su$ & $h[a \mapsto \PAP(f,\ws)]$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & [ENTER] & $f : \ws \append s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $???$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+\item[ Entering an AP closure ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & [ENTER] & $a : s$ & $su$ & $h[a \mapsto \AP(f,ws)]$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & [ENTER] & $f : \ws \append @UPD_RET@:\su:a:s$ & $su'$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $???$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+Optimisations:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Instead of blindly pushing an update frame for $a$, we can first test whether there's already
+ an update frame there. If so, overwrite the existing updatee with an indirection to $a$ and
+ overwrite the updatee field with $a$. (Overwriting $a$ with an indirection to the updatee also
+ works.) This results in update chains of maximum length 2.
+\end{itemize}
+
+
+\item[ Returning a constructor ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & [ENTER] & $a : @HUGS_RET@ : \alts : s$ & $su$ & $h[a \mapsto C\{\ws\}]$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\alts.\entry$ & $a:s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+
+\item[ Entering an indirection node ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & [ENTER] & $a : s$ & $su$ & $h[a \mapsto \Ind{a'}]$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & [ENTER] & $a' : s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+\item[Entering GHC closure].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & [ENTER] & $a : s$ & $su$ & $h[a \mapsto \GHCOBJ]$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & [ENTERGHC] & $a : s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+\item[Returning a constructor to GHC].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & [ENTER] & $a : \GHCRET : s$ & $su$ & $h[a \mapsto C \ws]$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & [ENTERGHC] & $a : \GHCRET : s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+\end{description}
+
+
+\subsection{Updates}
+
+\begin{description}
+
+\item[ Updating with a constructor].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & [ENTER] & $a : @UPD_RET@ : ua : s$ & $su$ & $h[a \mapsto C\{\ws\}]$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & [ENTER] & $a \append s$ & $su$ & $h[au \mapsto \Ind{a}$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+
+\item[ Argument checks].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & ARGCHECK $m$:$\is$ & $a : \as \append s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $a : \as \append s$ & $su$ & $h'$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\\
+where $m \ge (su - sp)$
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & ARGCHECK $m$:$\is$ & $a : \as \append @UPD_RET@:su:ua:s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $a : \as \append s$ & $su$ & $h'$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\\
+where $m < (su - sp)$ and
+ $h' = h[ua \mapsto \Ind{a'}, a' \mapsto \PAP(a,\reverse\ \as) ]$
+
+Again, we reverse the list of values as we transfer them from the
+stack to the heap --- reflecting the fact that the stack and heap grow
+in different directions.
+
+\end{description}
+
+\subsection{Branches}
+
+\begin{description}
+
+\item[ Testing a constructor ].
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & TEST $tag$ $is'$ : $is$ & $a : s$ & $su$ & $h[a \mapsto C\ \ws]$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $is$ & $a : s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\\
+where $C.\tag = tag$
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & TEST $tag$ $is'$ : $is$ & $a : s$ & $su$ & $h[a \mapsto C\ \ws]$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $is'$ & $a : s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\\
+where $C.\tag \neq tag$
-\begin{itemize}
-\item A GHC thread enters a Hugs-built thunk.
-\item A GHC thread calls a Hugs-compiled function.
-\item A GHC thread returns to a Hugs-compiled return address.
-\item A Hugs thread enters a GHC-built thunk.
-\item A Hugs thread calls a GHC-compiled function.
-\item A Hugs thread returns to a Hugs-compiled return address.
-\end{itemize}
+\end{description}
-A running system has a global state, consisting of
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\subsection{Heap and stack checks}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-\begin{itemize}
-\item @Hp@, the current heap pointer, which points to the next
-available address in the Heap.
-\item @HpLim@, the heap limit pointer, which points to the end of the
-heap.
-\item The Thread Preemption Flag, which is set whenever the currently
-running thread should be preempted at the next opportunity.
-\end{itemize}
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & STACKCHECK $stk$:$\is$ & $s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\\
+if $s$ has $stk$ free slots.
+
+\begin{tabular}{|llrrrrr|}
+\hline
+ & HEAPCHECK $hp$:$\is$ & $s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\next & $\is$ & $s$ & $su$ & $h$ & $hp$ & $\sigma$ \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\\
+if $h$ has $hp$ free slots.
-Each thread has a thread-local state, which consists of
+If either check fails, we push the current bco ($\sigma$) onto the
+stack and return to the scheduler. When the scheduler has fixed the
+problem, it pops the top object off the stack and reenters it.
+
+Optimisations:
\begin{itemize}
-\item @TSO@, the Thread State Object for this thread. This is a heap
-object that is used to store the current thread state when the thread
-is blocked or sleeping.
-\item @Sp@, the current stack pointer.
-\item @Su@, the current stack update frame pointer. This register
-points to the most recent update frame on the stack, and is used to
-calculate the number of arguments available when entering a function.
-\item @SpLim@, the stack limit pointer. This points to the end of the
-current stack chunk.
-\item Several general purpose registers, used for passing arguments to
-functions.
+\item The bytecode CHECK1000 conservatively checks for 1000 words of heap space and 1000 words of stack space.
+ We use it to reduce code space and instruction decoding time.
+\item The bytecode HEAPCHECK1000 conservatively checks for 1000 words of heap space.
+ It is used in case alternatives.
\end{itemize}
-\noindent and various other bits of information used in specialised
-circumstances, such as profiling and parallel execution. These are
-described in the appropriate sections.
-The following is pseudo-code for the inner loop of the scheduler
-itself.
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+\subsection{Primops}
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-@
-while (threads_exist) {
- // handle global problems: GC, parallelism, etc
- if (need_gc) gc();
- if (external_message) service_message();
- // deal with other urgent stuff
+\ToDo{primops take m words and return n words. The expect boxed arguments on the stack.}
- pick a runnable thread;
- do {
- switch (thread->whatNext) {
- case (RunGHC pc): status=runGHC(pc); break;
- case (RunHugs bc): status=runHugs(bc); break;
- }
- switch (status) { // handle local problems
- case (StackOverflow): enlargeStack; break;
- case (Error e) : error(thread,e); break;
- case (ExitWith e) : exit(e); break;
- case (Yield) : break;
- }
- } while (thread_runnable);
-}
-@
-Optimisations to avoid excess trampolining from Hugs into itself.
-How do we invoke GC, ccalls, etc.
-General ccall (@ccall-GC@) and optimised ccall.
+\section{The Machine Code Evaluator}
-\section{Evaluation}
+This section describes the framework in which compiled code evaluates
+expressions. Only at certain points will compiled code need to be
+able to talk to the interpreted world; these are discussed in Section
+\ref{sect:switching-worlds}.
\subsection{Calling conventions}
have different kinds.
\subsubsection{Entering closures}
+\label{sect:entering-closures}
To evaluate a closure we jump to the entry code for the closure
passing a pointer to the closure in \Arg{1} so that the entry code can
\Arg{2} \ldots \Arg{m+1} and jumps to the fast entry point.
-\item {\em Unknown function closure or thunk.}
+\item {\em Unknown function closure, thunk or constructor.}
Sometimes, the function being called is not statically identifiable.
Consider, for example, the @compose@ function:
@
case x of (a,b) -> E
@
-In a stack-based evaluator such as the STG machine,
-a @case@ expression is evaluated by pushing a {\em return address} on the stack
-before evaluating the scrutinee (@x@ in this case). Once evaluation of the
-scrutinee is complete, execution resumes at the return address, which
-points to the code for the expression @E@.
+
+The code for a @case@ expression looks like this:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Push the free variables of the branches on the stack (fv(@E@) in
+this case).
+\item Push a \emph{return address} on the stack.
+\item Evaluate the scrutinee (@x@ in this case).
+\end{itemize}
+
+Once evaluation of the scrutinee is complete, execution resumes at the
+return address, which points to the code for the expression @E@.
When execution resumes at the return point, there must be some {\em
return convention} that defines where the components of the pair, @a@
(section~\ref{sect:activation-records}) --- should a garbage collection
be required.
-\item If @x@ has a pointed type (e.g.~a data constructor or a function),
+\item If @x@ has a boxed type (e.g.~a data constructor or a function),
a pointer to @x@ is returned in \Arg{1}.
\ToDo{Warn that components of E should be extracted as soon as
possible to avoid a space leak.}
-\item If @x@ is an unpointed type (e.g.~@Int#@ or @Float#@), @x@ is
+\item If @x@ is an unboxed type (e.g.~@Int#@ or @Float#@), @x@ is
returned in \Arg{1}
-\item If @x@ is an unpointed tuple constructor, the components of @x@
+\item If @x@ is an unboxed tuple constructor, the components of @x@
are returned in \Arg{1} \ldots \Arg{n} but no object is constructed in
-the heap. Unboxed tuple constructors are useful for functions which
-want to return multiple values such as those used in an (explicitly
-encoded) state monad:
-
-\ToDo{Move stuff about unboxed tuples to a separate section}
-
-@
-data unpointed AAndState a = AnS a State
-type S a = State -> AAndState a
-
-bindS m k s0 = case m s0 of { AnS s1 a -> k s1 a }
-returnS a s = AnS a s
-@
-
-Note that unboxed datatypes can only have one constructor and that
-thunks never have unboxed types --- so we'll never try to update an
-unboxed constructor. Unboxed tuples are \emph{never} built on the
-heap.
+the heap.
When passing an unboxed tuple to a function, the components are
-flattened out and passed on the stack/in registers as usual.
+flattened out and passed in \Arg{1} \ldots \Arg{n} as usual.
\end{itemize}
@
data Maybe a = Nothing | Just a
@
-How does the return convention encode which of the two constructors is being returned?
-A @case@ expression scrutinising a value of @Maybe@ type would look like this:
+How does the return convention encode which of the two constructors is
+being returned? A @case@ expression scrutinising a value of @Maybe@
+type would look like this:
@
case E of
Nothing -> ...
The code at the return address will test the tag and jump to the
appropriate code for the case branch.
-\ToDo{Decide whether it's better to load the tag into \Arg{2} or not.
-May be affected by whether \Arg{2} is a real register.}
-
The choice of whether to use a vectored return or a direct return is
made on a type-by-type basis --- up to a certain maximum number of
constructors imposed by the update mechanism
(section~\ref{sect:data-updates}).
+Single-constructor data types also use direct returns, although in
+that case there is no need to return a tag in \Arg{2}.
+
\ToDo{Say whether we pop the return address before returning}
+\ToDo{Stack stubbing?}
+
\subsection{Updates}
\label{sect:data-updates}
-The entry code for an updatable thunk (which must also be of arity 0):
+The entry code for an updatable thunk (which must be of arity 0):
\begin{itemize}
\item copies the free variables out of the thunk into registers or
\item The update frame is still on the stack.
\end{itemize}
+We can safely share a single statically-compiled update function
+between all types. However, the code must be able to handle both
+vectored and direct-return datatypes. This is done by arranging that
+the update code looks like this:
+
+@
+ | ^ |
+ | return vector |
+ |---------------|
+ | fixed-size |
+ | info table |
+ |---------------| <- update code pointer
+ | update code |
+ | v |
+@
+
+Each entry in the return vector (which is large enough to cover the
+largest vectored-return type) points to the update code.
+
The update code:
\begin{itemize}
\item overwrites the {\em updatee} with an indirection to \Arg{1};
\item enters \Arg{1}.
\end{itemize}
-This update code is the same for all data types, and can therefore be
-compiled statically in the runtime system.
-
-Since Haskell is polymorphic, we sometimes have to compile code for
-updatable thunks without knowing the type that will be returned. In
-this case, the update frame must work for both direct and vectored
-returns. This requires that we generate an infotable containing both
-a valid direct return address (which will perform the update and then
-perform a direct return) and a valid return vector (each entry of
-which will perform the update and then perform a vectored return).
-
+We enter \Arg{1} again, having probably just come from there, because
+it knows whether to perform a direct or vectored return. This could
+be optimised by compiling special update code for each slot in the
+return vector, which performs the correct return.
\subsection{Semi-tagging}
\label{sect:semi-tagging}
return address on the stack.
If we knew that the scrutinee was already evaluated we could generate
-(better) code which simply jumps to the appropriate branch of the @case@
-with a pointer to the scrutinee in \Arg{1}.
+(better) code which simply jumps to the appropriate branch of the
+@case@ with a pointer to the scrutinee in \Arg{1}. (For direct
+returns to multiconstructor datatypes, we might also load the tag into
+\Arg{2}).
An obvious idea, therefore, is to test dynamically whether the heap
closure is a value (using the tag in the info table). If not, we
tag = \Arg{1}->entry->tag;
if (isWHNF(tag)) {
Sp--; \\ insert space for return address
- goto ret;
+ goto ret;
}
push(ret);
goto \Arg{1}->entry;
\Arg{1} = <pointer to x>;
tag = \Arg{1}->entry->tag;
if (isWHNF(tag)) {
- Sp--; \\ insert space for return address
- goto retvec[tag];
+ Sp--; \\ insert space for return address
+ goto retvec[tag];
}
push(retinfo);
goto \Arg{1}->entry;
\subsection{Heap and Stack Checks}
-
-\note{I reckon these deserve a subsection of their own}
-
-Don't move heap pointer before success occurs.
-Talk about how stack check looks ahead into the branches of case expressions.
+\label{sect:heap-and-stack-checks}
+
+The storage manager detects that it needs to garbage collect the old
+generation when the evaluator requests a garbage collection without
+having moved the heap pointer since the last garbage collection. It
+is therefore important that the GC routines {\em not} move the heap
+pointer unless the heap check fails. This is different from what
+happens in the current STG implementation.
+
+Assuming that the stack can never shrink, we perform a stack check
+when we enter a closure but not when we return to a return
+continuation. This doesn't work for heap checks because we cannot
+predict what will happen to the heap if we call a function.
+
+If we wish to allow the stack to shrink, we need to perform a stack
+check whenever we enter a return continuation. Most of these checks
+could be eliminated if the storage manager guaranteed that a stack
+would always have 1000 words (say) of space after it was shrunk. Then
+we can omit stack checks for less than 1000 words in return
+continuations.
+
+When an argument satisfaction check fails, we need to push the closure
+(in R1) onto the stack - so we need to perform a stack check. The
+problem is that the argument satisfaction check occurs \emph{before}
+the stack check. The solution is that the caller of a slow entry
+point or closure will guarantee that there is at least one word free
+on the stack for the callee to use.
+
+Similarily, if a heap or stack check fails, we need to push the arguments
+and closure onto the stack. If we just came from the slow entry point,
+there's certainly enough space and it is the responsibility of anyone
+using the fast entry point to guarantee that there is enough space.
+
+\ToDo{Be more precise about how much space is required - document it
+in the calling convention section.}
\subsection{Handling interrupts/signals}
@
+
+\section{The Loader}
+\section{The Compilers}
+
+\iffalse
+\part{Old stuff - needs to be mined for useful info}
+
+\section{The Scheduler}
+
+The Scheduler is the heart of the run-time system. A running program
+consists of a single running thread, and a list of runnable and
+blocked threads. The running thread returns to the scheduler when any
+of the following conditions arises:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item A heap check fails, and a garbage collection is required
+\item Compiled code needs to switch to interpreted code, and vice
+versa.
+\item The thread becomes blocked.
+\item The thread is preempted.
+\end{itemize}
+
+A running system has a global state, consisting of
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item @Hp@, the current heap pointer, which points to the next
+available address in the Heap.
+\item @HpLim@, the heap limit pointer, which points to the end of the
+heap.
+\item The Thread Preemption Flag, which is set whenever the currently
+running thread should be preempted at the next opportunity.
+\item A list of runnable threads.
+\item A list of blocked threads.
+\end{itemize}
+
+Each thread is represented by a Thread State Object (TSO), which is
+described in detail in Section \ref{sect:TSO}.
+
+The following is pseudo-code for the inner loop of the scheduler
+itself.
+
+@
+while (threads_exist) {
+ // handle global problems: GC, parallelism, etc
+ if (need_gc) gc();
+ if (external_message) service_message();
+ // deal with other urgent stuff
+
+ pick a runnable thread;
+ do {
+ // enter object on top of stack
+ // if the top object is a BCO, we must enter it
+ // otherwise appply any heuristic we wish.
+ if (thread->stack[thread->sp]->info.type == BCO) {
+ status = runHugs(thread,&smInfo);
+ } else {
+ status = runGHC(thread,&smInfo);
+ }
+ switch (status) { // handle local problems
+ case (StackOverflow): enlargeStack; break;
+ case (Error e) : error(thread,e); break;
+ case (ExitWith e) : exit(e); break;
+ case (Yield) : break;
+ }
+ } while (thread_runnable);
+}
+@
+
+\subsection{Invoking the garbage collector}
+\subsection{Putting the thread to sleep}
+
+\subsection{Calling C from Haskell}
+
+We distinguish between "safe calls" where the programmer guarantees
+that the C function will not call a Haskell function or, in a
+multithreaded system, block for a long period of time and "unsafe
+calls" where the programmer cannot make that guarantee.
+
+Safe calls are performed without returning to the scheduler and are
+discussed elsewhere (\ToDo{discuss elsewhere}).
+
+Unsafe calls are performed by returning an array (outside the Haskell
+heap) of arguments and a C function pointer to the scheduler. The
+scheduler allocates a new thread from the operating system
+(multithreaded system only), spawns a call to the function and
+continues executing another thread. When the ccall completes, the
+thread informs the scheduler and the scheduler adds the thread to the
+runnable threads list.
+
+\ToDo{Describe this in more detail.}
+
+
+\subsection{Calling Haskell from C}
+
+When C calls a Haskell closure, it sends a message to the scheduler
+thread. On receiving the message, the scheduler creates a new Haskell
+thread, pushes the arguments to the C function onto the thread's stack
+(with tags for unboxed arguments) pushes the Haskell closure and adds
+the thread to the runnable list so that it can be entered in the
+normal way.
+
+When the closure returns, the scheduler sends back a message which
+awakens the (C) thread.
+
+\ToDo{Do we need to worry about the garbage collector deallocating the
+thread if it gets blocked?}
+
+\subsection{Switching Worlds}
+\label{sect:switching-worlds}
+
+\ToDo{This has all changed: we always leave a closure on top of the
+stack if we mean to continue executing it. The scheduler examines the
+top of the stack and tries to guess which world we want to be in. If
+it finds a @BCO@, it certainly enters Hugs, if it finds a @GHC@
+closure, it certainly enters GHC and if it finds a standard closure,
+it is free to choose either one but it's probably best to enter GHC
+for everything except @BCO@s and perhaps @AP@s.}
+
+Because this is a combined compiled/interpreted system, the
+interpreter will sometimes encounter compiled code, and vice-versa.
+
+All world-switches go via the scheduler, ensuring that the world is in
+a known state ready to enter either compiled code or the interpreter.
+When a thread is run from the scheduler, the @whatNext@ field in the
+TSO (Section \ref{sect:TSO}) is checked to find out how to execute the
+thread.
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item If @whatNext@ is set to @ReturnGHC@, we load up the required
+registers from the TSO and jump to the address at the top of the user
+stack.
+\item If @whatNext@ is set to @EnterGHC@, we load up the required
+registers from the TSO and enter the closure pointed to by the top
+word of the stack.
+\item If @whatNext@ is set to @EnterHugs@, we enter the top thing on
+the stack, using the interpreter.
+\end{itemize}
+
+There are four cases we need to consider:
+
+\begin{enumerate}
+\item A GHC thread enters a Hugs-built closure.
+\item A GHC thread returns to a Hugs-compiled return address.
+\item A Hugs thread enters a GHC-built closure.
+\item A Hugs thread returns to a Hugs-compiled return address.
+\end{enumerate}
+
+GHC-compiled modules cannot call functions in a Hugs-compiled module
+directly, because the compiler has no information about arities in the
+external module. Therefore it must assume any top-level objects are
+CAFs, and enter their closures.
+
+\ToDo{Hugs-built constructors?}
+
+We now examine the various cases one by one and describe how the
+switch happens in each situation.
+
+\subsection{A GHC thread enters a Hugs-built closure}
+\label{sect:ghc-to-hugs-switch}
+
+There is three possibilities: GHC has entered a @PAP@, or it has
+entered a @AP@, or it has entered the BCO directly (for a top-level
+function closure). @AP@s and @PAP@s are ``standard closures'' and
+so do not require us to enter the bytecode interpreter.
+
+The entry code for a BCO does the following:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Push the address of the object entered on the stack.
+\item Save the current state of the thread in its TSO.
+\item Return to the scheduler, setting @whatNext@ to @EnterHugs@.
+\end{itemize}
+
+BCO's for thunks and functions have the same entry conventions as
+slow entry points: they expect to find their arguments on the stac
+with unboxed arguments preceded by appropriate tags.
+
+\subsection{A GHC thread returns to a Hugs-compiled return address}
+\label{sect:ghc-to-hugs-switch}
+
+Hugs return addresses are laid out as in Figure
+\ref{fig:hugs-return-stack}. If GHC is returning, it will return to
+the address at the top of the stack, namely @HUGS_RET@. The code at
+@HUGS_RET@ performs the following:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item pushes \Arg{1} (the return value) on the stack.
+\item saves the thread state in the TSO
+\item returns to the scheduler with @whatNext@ set to @EnterHugs@.
+\end{itemize}
+
+\noindent When Hugs runs, it will enter the return value, which will
+return using the correct Hugs convention (Section
+\ref{sect:hugs-return-convention}) to the return address underneath it
+on the stack.
+
+\subsection{A Hugs thread enters a GHC-compiled closure}
+\label{sect:hugs-to-ghc-switch}
+
+Hugs can recognise a GHC-built closure as not being one of the
+following types of object:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item A @BCO@,
+\item A @AP@,
+\item A @PAP@,
+\item An indirection, or
+\item A constructor.
+\end{itemize}
+
+When Hugs is called on to enter a GHC closure, it executes the
+following sequence of instructions:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Push the address of the closure on the stack.
+\item Save the current state of the thread in the TSO.
+\item Return to the scheduler, with the @whatNext@ field set to
+@EnterGHC@.
+\end{itemize}
+
+\subsection{A Hugs thread returns to a GHC-compiled return address}
+\label{sect:hugs-to-ghc-switch}
+
+When Hugs encounters a return address on the stack that is not
+@HUGS_RET@, it knows that a world-switch is required. At this point
+the stack contains a pointer to the return value, followed by the GHC
+return address. The following sequence is then performed:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item save the state of the thread in the TSO.
+\item return to the scheduler, setting @whatNext@ to @EnterGHC@.
+\end{itemize}
+
+The first thing that GHC will do is enter the object on the top of the
+stack, which is a pointer to the return value. This value will then
+return itself to the return address using the GHC return convention.
+
+
+\fi
+
+\part{Implementation}
+
+\section{Overview}
+
+This part describes the inner workings of the major components of the system.
+Their external interfaces are described in the previous part.
+
+The major components of the system are:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item The scheduler
+\item The loader
+\item The storage manager
+\item The machine code evaluator (compiled code)
+\item The bytecode evaluator (interpreted code)
+\end{itemize}
+
+\iffalse
+
\section{Heap objects}
+\label{sect:heap-objects}
\label{sect:fixed-header}
\ToDo{Fix this picture}
\label{fig:closure}
\end{figure}
-Every {\em heap object}, or {\em closure} is a contiguous block
+Every {\em heap object} is a contiguous block
of memory, consisting of a fixed-format {\em header} followed
by zero or more {\em data words}.
-The header consists of
-the following fields:
+
+\ToDo{I absolutely do not believe that every heap object has a header
+like this - ADR. I believe that they all have an info pointer but I
+see no readon why stack objects and unpointed heap objects would have
+an entry count since this will always be zero.}
+
+The header consists of the following fields:
\begin{itemize}
\item A one-word {\em info pointer}, which points to
the object's static {\em info table}.
\item Statistics (e.g. a word to track how many times a thunk is entered.).
We add a Ticky word to the fixed-header part of closures. This is
-used to record indicate if a closure has been updated but not yet
-entered. It is set when the closure is updated and cleared when
-subsequently entered.
+used to indicate if a closure has been updated but not yet entered. It
+is set when the closure is updated and cleared when subsequently
+entered.
NB: It is {\em not} an ``entry count'', it is an
``entries-after-update count.'' The commoning up of @CONST@,
@CHARLIKE@ and @INTLIKE@ closures is turned off(?) if this is
required. This has only been done for 2s collection.
-
-
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
+
Most of the RTS is completely insensitive to the number of admin words.
The total size of the fixed header is @FIXED_HS@.
\hline Parallelism Info
\\ \hline Profile Info
\\ \hline Debug Info
-\\ \hline Tag/bytecode pointer
-\\ \hline Static reference table
+\\ \hline Tag / Static reference table
\\ \hline Storage manager layout info
\\ \hline Closure type
-\\ \hline entry code \ldots
-\\ \hline
+\\ \hline entry code
+\\ \vdots
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
An info table has the following contents (working backwards in memory
precise layout, for the benefit of the garbage collector and the code
that stuffs graph into packets for transmission over the network.
-\item A one-pointer {\em Static Reference Table (SRT) pointer}, @INFO_SRT@, points to
-a table which enables the garbage collector to identify all accessible
-code and CAFs. They are fully described in Section~\ref{sect:srt}.
-
-\item A one-pointer {\em tag/bytecode-pointer} field, @INFO_TAG@ or @INFO_BC@.
-For data constructors this field contains the constructor tag, in the
-range $0..n-1$ where $n$ is the number of constructors.
-
-For other objects that can be entered this field points to the byte
-codes for the object. For the constructor case you can think of the
-tag as the name of a a suitable bytecode sequence but it can also be used to
-implement semi-tagging (section~\ref{sect:semi-tagging}).
-
-One awkward question (which may not belong here) is ``how does the
-bytecode interpreter know whether to do a vectored return?'' The
-answer is it examines the @INFO_TYPE@ field of the return address:
-@RET_VEC_@$sz$ requires a vectored return and @RET_@$sz$ requires a
-direct return.
+\item A one-word {\em Tag/Static Reference Table} field, @INFO_SRT@.
+For data constructors, this field contains the constructor tag, in the
+range $0..n-1$ where $n$ is the number of constructors. For all other
+objects it contains a pointer to a table which enables the garbage
+collector to identify all accessible code and CAFs. They are fully
+described in Section~\ref{sect:srt}.
\item {\em Profiling info\/}
\end{itemize}
-
-\section{Kinds of Heap Object}
+%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+\subsection{Kinds of Heap Object}
\label{sect:closures}
Heap objects can be classified in several ways, but one useful one is
A second useful classification is this:
\begin{itemize}
\item
-{\em Executive closures}, such as thunks and data constructors,
+{\em Executive objects}, such as thunks and data constructors,
participate directly in a program's execution. They can be subdivided into
-two kinds of objects according to their type:
+three kinds of objects according to their type:
\begin{itemize}
\item
{\em Pointed objects}, represent values of a {\em pointed} type
\end{itemize}
-\item {\em Administrative closures}, such as stack objects and thread
+\item {\em Administrative objects}, such as stack objects and thread
state objects, do not represent values in the original program.
\end{itemize}
{\em Pointed} \\
\hline
-@CONSTR@ & 1 & & 1 & & & & & & & \ref{sect:CONSTR} \\
-@CONSTR_STATIC@ & 1 & & 1 & 1 & & & & & & \ref{sect:CONSTR} \\
-@CONSTR_STATIC_NOCAF@ & 1 & & 1 & 1 & & & & & & \ref{sect:CONSTR} \\
-
-@FUN@ & 1 & & ? & & & & & & & \ref{sect:FUN} \\
-@FUN_STATIC@ & 1 & & ? & 1 & & & & & & \ref{sect:FUN} \\
-
-@THUNK@ & 1 & 1 & & & 1 & & & & & \ref{sect:THUNK} \\
-@THUNK_STATIC@ & 1 & 1 & & 1 & 1 & & & & & \ref{sect:THUNK} \\
-@THUNK_SELECTOR@ & 1 & 1 & 1 & & 1 & & & & & \ref{sect:THUNK_SEL} \\
-
-@PAP@ & 1 & & ? & & & & & & & \ref{sect:PAP} \\
-
-@IND@ & & & 1 & & ? & & & & 1 & \ref{sect:IND} \\
-@IND_OLDGEN@ & 1 & & 1 & & ? & & & & 1 & \ref{sect:IND} \\
-@IND_PERM@ & & & 1 & & ? & & & & 1 & \ref{sect:IND} \\
-@IND_OLDGEN_PERM@ & 1 & & 1 & & ? & & & & 1 & \ref{sect:IND} \\
-@IND_STATIC@ & ? & & 1 & 1 & ? & & & & 1 & \ref{sect:IND} \\
-
-\hline
-{\em Unpointed} \\
-\hline
-
-
-@ARR_WORDS@ & 1 & & 1 & & & 1 & 1 & & & \ref{sect:ARR_WORDS1},\ref{sect:ARR_WORDS2} \\
-@ARR_PTRS@ & 1 & & 1 & & & 1 & 1 & & & \ref{sect:ARR_PTRS} \\
-@MUTVAR@ & 1 & & 1 & & & 1 & 1 & & & \ref{sect:MUTVAR} \\
-@MUTARR_PTRS@ & 1 & & 1 & & & 1 & 1 & & & \ref{sect:MUTARR_PTRS} \\
-@MUTARR_PTRS_FROZEN@ & 1 & & 1 & & & 1 & 1 & & & \ref{sect:MUTARR_PTRS_FROZEN} \\
-
-@FOREIGN@ & 1 & & 1 & & & & 1 & & & \ref{sect:FOREIGN} \\
-
-@BH@ & ? & 0/1 & 1 & & ? & ? & & 1 & ? & \ref{sect:BH} \\
-@MVAR@ & & & & & & & & & & \ref{sect:MVAR} \\
-@IVAR@ & & & & & & & & & & \ref{sect:IVAR} \\
-@FETCHME@ & & & & & & & & & & \ref{sect:FETCHME} \\
+@CONSTR@ & 1 & & 1 & & & & & & & \ref{sect:CONSTR} \\
+@CONSTR_STATIC@ & 1 & & 1 & 1 & & & & & & \ref{sect:CONSTR} \\
+@CONSTR_STATIC_NOCAF@ & 1 & & 1 & 1 & & & & & & \ref{sect:CONSTR} \\
+
+@FUN@ & 1 & & ? & & & & & & & \ref{sect:FUN} \\
+@FUN_STATIC@ & 1 & & ? & 1 & & & & & & \ref{sect:FUN} \\
+
+@THUNK@ & & 1 & & & 1 & & & & & \ref{sect:THUNK} \\
+@THUNK_STATIC@ & & 1 & & 1 & 1 & & & & & \ref{sect:THUNK} \\
+@THUNK_SELECTOR@ & & 1 & 1 & & 1 & & & & & \ref{sect:THUNK_SEL} \\
+
+@BCO@ & 1 & & 1 & & & & & & & \ref{sect:BCO} \\
+@BCO_CAF@ & & 1 & & & 1 & & & & & \ref{sect:BCO} \\
+
+@AP@ & & 1 & & & 1 & & & & & \ref{sect:AP} \\
+@PAP@ & 1 & & 1 & & & & & & & \ref{sect:PAP} \\
+
+@IND@ & ? & & ? & & ? & & & & 1 & \ref{sect:IND} \\
+@IND_OLDGEN@ & ? & & ? & & ? & & & & 1 & \ref{sect:IND} \\
+@IND_PERM@ & ? & & ? & & ? & & & & 1 & \ref{sect:IND} \\
+@IND_OLDGEN_PERM@ & ? & & ? & & ? & & & & 1 & \ref{sect:IND} \\
+@IND_STATIC@ & ? & & ? & 1 & ? & & & & 1 & \ref{sect:IND} \\
+
+\hline
+{\em Unpointed} \\
+\hline
+
+
+@ARR_WORDS@ & 1 & & 1 & & & & 1 & & & \ref{sect:ARR_WORDS1},\ref{sect:ARR_WORDS2} \\
+@ARR_PTRS@ & 1 & & 1 & & & & 1 & & & \ref{sect:ARR_PTRS} \\
+@MUTVAR@ & 1 & & 1 & & & 1 & 1 & & & \ref{sect:MUTVAR} \\
+@MUTARR_PTRS@ & 1 & & 1 & & & 1 & 1 & & & \ref{sect:MUTARR_PTRS} \\
+@MUTARR_PTRS_FROZEN@ & 1 & & 1 & & & 1 & 1 & & & \ref{sect:MUTARR_PTRS_FROZEN} \\
+
+@FOREIGN@ & 1 & & 1 & & & & 1 & & & \ref{sect:FOREIGN} \\
+
+@BH@ & & 1 & 1 & & ? & ? & & 1 & ? & \ref{sect:BH} \\
+@MVAR@ & 1 & & 1 & & & & & & & \ref{sect:MVAR} \\
+@IVAR@ & 1 & & 1 & & & & & & & \ref{sect:IVAR} \\
+@FETCHME@ & 1 & & 1 & & & & & & & \ref{sect:FETCHME} \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
+\subsection{Hugs Objects}
+
+\subsubsection{Byte-Code Objects}
+\label{sect:BCO}
+
+A Byte-Code Object (BCO) is a container for a a chunk of byte-code,
+which can be executed by Hugs. The byte-code represents a
+supercombinator in the program: when hugs compiles a module, it
+performs lambda lifting and each resulting supercombinator becomes a
+byte-code object in the heap.
+
+There are two kinds of BCO: a standard @BCO@ which has an arity of one
+or more, and a @BCO_CAF@ which takes no arguments and can be updated.
+When a @BCO_CAF@ is updated, the code is thrown away!
+
+The semantics of BCOs are described in Section
+\ref{sect:hugs-heap-objects}. A BCO has the following structure:
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|}
+\hline
+\emph{Fixed Header} & \emph{Layout} & \emph{Offset} & \emph{Size} &
+\emph{Literals} & \emph{Byte code} \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+\noindent where:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item The entry code is a static code fragment/info table that
+returns to the scheduler to invoke Hugs (Section
+\ref{sect:ghc-to-hugs-switch}).
+\item \emph{Layout} contains the number of pointer literals in the
+\emph{Literals} field.
+\item \emph{Offset} is the offset to the byte code from the start of
+the object.
+\item \emph{Size} is the number of words of byte code in the object.
+\item \emph{Literals} contains any pointer and non-pointer literals used in
+the byte-codes (including jump addresses), pointers first.
+\item \emph{Byte code} contains \emph{Size} words of non-pointer byte
+code.
+\end{itemize}
+
\subsection{Pointed Objects}
All pointed objects can be entered.
{\em Fixed header} & {\em Static object link} \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
-Static function closurs have no free variables. (However they may refer to other
+Static function closures have no free variables. (However they may refer to other
static closures; these references are recorded in the function closure's SRT.)
They have one field that is not present in dynamic closures, the {\em static object
link} field. This is used by the garbage collector in the same way that to-space
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
-The SRT pointer in a data constructor's info table is never used --- the
-code for a constructor does not make any static references.
-\note{Use it for something else?? E.g. tag?}
+The SRT pointer in a data constructor's info table is used for the
+constructor tag, since a constructor never has any static references.
There are several different sorts of constructor:
\begin{itemize}
{\em Fixed header} & {\em No of arg words} & {\em Function closure} & {\em Arg stack} \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
-The ``arg stack'' is a copy of of the chunk of stack above the update
+The ``arg stack'' is a copy of the chunk of stack above the update
frame; ``no of arg words'' tells how many words it consists of. The
function closure is (a pointer to) the closure for the function whose
argument-satisfaction check failed.
Its entry code simply copies the arg stack chunk back on top of the
stack and enters the function closure. (It has to do a stack overflow test first.)
-There are no static PAPs.
+PAPs are also used to implement Hugs functions (where the arguments are free variables).
+PAPs generated by Hugs can be static.
+
+\subsubsection{@AP@ objects}
+\label{sect:AP}
+
+@AP@ objects are used to represent thunks built by Hugs. The only distintion between
+an @AP@ and a @PAP@ is that an @AP@ is updateable.
+
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|}
+\hline
+\emph{Fixed Header} & {\em No of arg words} & {\em Function closure} & {\em Arg stack} \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+
+The entry code pushes an update frame, copies the arg stack chunk on
+top of the stack, and enters the function closure. (It has to do a
+stack overflow test first.)
+
+The ``arg stack'' is a block of (tagged) arguments representing the
+free variables of the thunk; ``no of arg words'' tells how many words
+it consists of. The function closure is (a pointer to) the closure
+for the thunk. The argument stack may be empty if the thunk has no
+free variables.
+
\subsubsection{Indirections}
\label{sect:IND}
\begin{itemize}
\item A pointer (@TSO_LINK@) used to maintain a list of threads with a similar
- state (e.g.~all runable, all sleeping, all blocked on the same black
+ state (e.g.~all runnable, all sleeping, all blocked on the same black
hole, all blocked on the same MVar, etc.)
\item A word (@TSO_WHATNEXT@) which is in suspended threads to record
There's no need to link the stable pointer table onto the mutable
list because we always treat it as a root.
-
+\fi
\section{The Storage Manager}
\end{description}
-
%************************************************************************
%* *
\subsection{``What really happens in a garbage collection?''}
%* *
%************************************************************************
+\ToDo{I commented out this long, out of date section - ADR}
+
+\iffalse
+
This is a brief tutorial on ``what really happens'' going to/from the
storage manager in a garbage collection.
enough space before continuing.
\end{description}
-
+\fi % end of commented out part
\subsection{Static Reference Tables (SRTs)}
\label{sect:srt}
the expression
@
let xs = [1..1000] in last xs
-@
+@
where @last@ is a function that returns the last element of its
argument list. When the thunk is entered it will call @last@, which
will consume @xs@ until it finds the last element. Since the list
thereby plugging the space leak.
\subsubsection{Lazy black-holing}
+\label{sect:lazy-black-holing}
+
+\Note{We currently plan to implement eager black holing because the
+lazy blackholing scheme leavs "slop" in the heap.}
Black-holing is a well-known idea. The trouble is that it is
gallingly expensive. To avoid the occasional space leak, for every
\subsection{Squeezing identical updates}
+\Note{This can also be done by testing whether @Sp == Su@ when we push
+an update frame. If so, we can overwrite the updatee with an
+indirection to the existing updatee (and some slop objects) and avoid
+pushing an update frame.}
+
\iffalse
\ToDo{Insert text stolen from update paper}
\fi
-\subsection{Space leaks and selectors}
+\subsection{Space leaks and selectors}\label{sect:space-leaks-and-selectors}
\iffalse
A very similar idea, dubbed ``stingy evaluation'', is described
by <.stingy.>.
+\ToDo{Simple generalisation: handle all the ``standard closures'' this way.}
+
<.sparud lazy pattern matching.> describes another solution to the
lazy-pattern-matching
problem. His solution involves adding code to the two thunks for
\subsection{Internal workings of the Generational Collector}
-
\section{Profiling}
Registering costs centres looks awkward - can we tidy it up?
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\subsubsection[ticky-stk-heap-use]{Stack and heap usage}
+\subsection[ticky-stk-heap-use]{Stack and heap usage}
%* *
%************************************************************************
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\subsubsection[ticky-allocs]{Allocations}
+\subsection[ticky-allocs]{Allocations}
%* *
%************************************************************************
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\subsubsection[ticky-enters]{Enters}
+\subsection[ticky-enters]{Enters}
%* *
%************************************************************************
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\subsubsection[ticky-returns]{Returns}
+\subsection[ticky-returns]{Returns}
%* *
%************************************************************************
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\subsubsection[ticky-update-frames]{Update frames}
+\subsection[ticky-update-frames]{Update frames}
%* *
%************************************************************************
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\subsubsection[ticky-updates]{Updates}
+\subsection[ticky-updates]{Updates}
%* *
%************************************************************************
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\subsubsection[ticky-selectors]{Doing selectors at GC time}
+\subsection[ticky-selectors]{Doing selectors at GC time}
%* *
%************************************************************************
\section{Old stuff about SRTs}
+\ToDo{Commented out}
+
+\iffalse
+
Garbage collection of @CAF@s is tricky. We have to cope with explicit
collection from the @CAFlist@ as well as potential references from the
stack and heap which will cause the @CAF@ evacuation code to be
This scheme has not been adopted but has been implemented. The code is
commented out with @#if 0@.
+\fi
+
\subsection{The virtual register set}
+\ToDo{Commented out}
+
+\iffalse
+
We refer to any (atomic) part of the virtual machine state as a ``register.''
These ``registers'' may be shared between all threads in the system or may be
specific to each thread.
allow faster access to all the other non-machine registers.
@
+\fi
\end{document}
projects / ghc-hetmet.git / blobdiff