<screen>
Prelude> :! ghc -c D.hs
Prelude> :load A
-Skipping D ( D.hs, D.o )
-Compiling C ( C.hs, interpreted )
Compiling B ( B.hs, interpreted )
+Compiling C ( C.hs, interpreted )
Compiling A ( A.hs, interpreted )
Ok, modules loaded: A, B, C, D.
*Main>
</screen>
- <para>In the messages from the compiler, we see that it skipped D,
- and used the object file <filename>D.o</filename>. The message
- <literal>Skipping</literal> <replaceable>module</replaceable>
- indicates that compilation for <replaceable>module</replaceable>
- isn't necessary, because the source and everything it depends on
+ <para>In the messages from the compiler, we see that there is no line
+ for <literal>D</literal>. This is because
+ it isn't necessary to compile <literal>D</literal>,
+ because the source and everything it depends on
is unchanged since the last compilation.</para>
<para>At any time you can use the command
A ( A.hs, interpreted )
*Main></screen>
- <para>If we now modify the source of D (or pretend to: using Unix
+ <para>If we now modify the source of D (or pretend to: using the Unix
command <literal>touch</literal> on the source file is handy for
this), the compiler will no longer be able to use the object file,
because it might be out of date:</para>
*Main> :! touch D.hs
*Main> :reload
Compiling D ( D.hs, interpreted )
-Skipping C ( C.hs, interpreted )
-Skipping B ( B.hs, interpreted )
-Skipping A ( A.hs, interpreted )
Ok, modules loaded: A, B, C, D.
*Main>
</screen>
*Main> :! ghc -c C.hs
*Main> :load A
Compiling D ( D.hs, interpreted )
-Compiling C ( C.hs, interpreted )
Compiling B ( B.hs, interpreted )
+Compiling C ( C.hs, interpreted )
Compiling A ( A.hs, interpreted )
Ok, modules loaded: A, B, C, D.
</screen>
<screen>
*Main> :load A
-Skipping D ( D.hs, D.o )
-Skipping C ( C.hs, C.o )
Compiling B ( B.hs, interpreted )
Compiling A ( A.hs, interpreted )
Ok, modules loaded: A, B, C, D.
when working on a large program is to occasionally run
<literal>ghc ––make</literal> to compile the whole project (say
before you go for lunch :-), then continue working in the
- interpreter. As you modify code, the new modules will be
+ interpreter. As you modify code, the changed modules will be
interpreted, but the rest of the project will remain
compiled.</para>
<para>
Hint: GHCi will tab-complete names that are in scope; for
example, if you run GHCi and type <literal>J<tab></literal>
- then GHCi will expand it to <literal>Just </literal>.
+ then GHCi will expand it to “<literal>Just </literal>”.
</para>
<sect3>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
At the GHCi prompt, or with GHC if the
- <literal>-fextended-default-rules</literal> flag is given,
+ <literal>-XExtendedDefaultRules</literal> flag is given,
the following additional differences apply:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
instance that returns <literal>IO a</literal>.
However, it is only able to return
<literal>undefined</literal>
- (the reason for the instance having this type is to not require
- extensions to the class system), so if the type defaults to
+ (the reason for the instance having this type is so that printf
+ doesn't require extensions to the class system), so if the type defaults to
<literal>Integer</literal> then ghci gives an error when running a
printf.
</para>
<para>The debugger provides the following:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
- <para>The abilty to set a <firstterm>breakpoint</firstterm> on a
+ <para>The ability to set a <firstterm>breakpoint</firstterm> on a
function definition or expression in the program. When the function
is called, or the expression evaluated, GHCi suspends
execution and returns to the prompt, where you can inspect the
<title>Listing and deleting breakpoints</title>
<para>The list of breakpoints currently enabled can be displayed using
- <literal>:show breaks</literal></para>:
+ <literal>:show breaks</literal>:</para>
<screen>
*Main> :show breaks
[0] Main qsort.hs:1:11-12
</listitem>
<listitem><para>
Implicit parameters (see <xref linkend="implicit-parameters"/>) are only available
- at the scope of a breakpoint if there is a explicit type signature.
+ at the scope of a breakpoint if there is an explicit type signature.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
<para>Most of the command-line options accepted by GHC (see <xref
linkend="using-ghc"/>) also make sense in interactive mode. The ones
- that don't make sense are mostly obvious; for example, GHCi
- doesn't generate interface files, so options related to interface
- file generation won't have any effect.</para>
+ that don't make sense are mostly obvious.</para>
<sect2>
<title>Packages</title>