[project @ 1999-11-01 17:09:54 by simonpj]

[ghc-hetmet.git] / ghc / compiler / basicTypes / MkId.lhs

diff --git a/ghc/compiler/basicTypes/MkId.lhs b/ghc/compiler/basicTypes/MkId.lhs
index 20cdf6c..9da068a 100644 (file)
--- a/ghc/compiler/basicTypes/MkId.lhs
+++ b/ghc/compiler/basicTypes/MkId.lhs
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ import Type           ( Type, ThetaType,
                          mkUsgTy, UsageAnn(..)
                        )
 import Module          ( Module )
-import CoreUnfold      ( mkUnfolding )
+import CoreUnfold      ( mkTopUnfolding, mkCompulsoryUnfolding )
 import Subst           ( mkTopTyVarSubst, substTheta )
 import TyCon           ( TyCon, isNewTyCon, tyConDataCons, isDataTyCon )
 import Class           ( Class, classBigSig, classTyCon )
@@ -199,7 +199,9 @@ dataConInfo data_con
     `setArityInfo` exactArity (n_dicts + n_ex_dicts + n_id_args)
     `setUnfoldingInfo` unfolding
   where
-        unfolding = mkUnfolding (Note InlineMe con_rhs)
+        unfolding = mkTopUnfolding (Note InlineMe con_rhs)
+       -- The dictionary constructors of a class don't get a binding,
+       -- but they are always saturated, so they should always be inlined.
 
        (tyvars, theta, ex_tyvars, ex_theta, orig_arg_tys, tycon) 
           = dataConSig data_con
@@ -290,7 +292,7 @@ mkRecordSelId field_label selector_ty
           
        -- ToDo: consider adding further IdInfo
 
-    unfolding = mkUnfolding sel_rhs
+    unfolding = mkTopUnfolding sel_rhs
 
     (tyvars, theta, tau)  = splitSigmaTy selector_ty
     (data_ty,rhs_ty)      = expectJust "StdIdInfoRec" (splitFunTy_maybe tau)
@@ -343,7 +345,7 @@ mkNewTySelId field_label selector_ty = sel_id
           
        -- ToDo: consider adding further IdInfo
 
-    unfolding = mkUnfolding sel_rhs
+    unfolding = mkTopUnfolding sel_rhs
 
     (tyvars, theta, tau)  = splitSigmaTy selector_ty
     (data_ty,rhs_ty)      = expectJust "StdIdInfoRec" (splitFunTy_maybe tau)
@@ -380,7 +382,7 @@ mkDictSelId name clas ty
        -- We no longer use 'must-inline' on record selectors.  They'll
        -- inline like crazy if they scrutinise a constructor
 
-    unfolding = mkUnfolding rhs
+    unfolding = mkTopUnfolding rhs
 
     (tyvars, _, sc_sel_ids, op_sel_ids, defms) = classBigSig clas
 
@@ -419,13 +421,11 @@ mkPrimitiveId prim_op
                
     info = mkIdInfo (ConstantId (PrimOp prim_op))
           `setUnfoldingInfo`   unfolding
-          `setInlinePragInfo`  IMustBeINLINEd
-               -- The pragma @IMustBeINLINEd@ says that this Id absolutely 
+
+    unfolding = mkCompulsoryUnfolding rhs
+               -- The mkCompulsoryUnfolding says that this Id absolutely 
                -- must be inlined.  It's only used for primitives, 
                -- because we don't want to make a closure for each of them.
-          
-
-    unfolding = mkUnfolding rhs
 
     args = mkTemplateLocals arg_tys
     rhs =  mkLams tyvars $ mkLams args $
@@ -500,8 +500,7 @@ unsafeCoerceId
   = pcMiscPrelId unsafeCoerceIdKey pREL_GHC SLIT("unsafeCoerce#") ty info
   where
     info = vanillaIdInfo
-          `setUnfoldingInfo`   mkUnfolding rhs
-          `setInlinePragInfo`  IMustBeINLINEd 
+          `setUnfoldingInfo` mkCompulsoryUnfolding rhs
           
 
     ty  = mkForAllTys [openAlphaTyVar,openBetaTyVar]
@@ -520,8 +519,7 @@ getTagId
   = pcMiscPrelId getTagIdKey pREL_GHC SLIT("getTag#") ty info
   where
     info = vanillaIdInfo
-          `setUnfoldingInfo`   mkUnfolding rhs
-          `setInlinePragInfo`  IMustBeINLINEd 
+          `setUnfoldingInfo`   mkCompulsoryUnfolding rhs
        -- We don't provide a defn for this; you must inline it
 
     ty = mkForAllTys [alphaTyVar] (mkFunTy alphaTy intPrimTy)