-- the inner one is redundant
addCoerce t1t2 s1s2 (ApplyTo dup arg arg_se cont)
- | Just (s1, s2) <- splitFunTy_maybe s1s2
+ | not (isTypeArg arg), -- This whole case only works for value args
+ -- Could upgrade to have equiv thing for type apps too
+ Just (s1, s2) <- splitFunTy_maybe s1s2
-- (coerce (T1->T2) (S1->S2) F) E
-- ===>
-- coerce T2 S2 (F (coerce S1 T1 E))
--
- -- t1t2 must be a function type, T1->T2
+ -- t1t2 must be a function type, T1->T2, because it's applied to something
-- but s1s2 might conceivably not be
--
-- When we build the ApplyTo we can't mix the out-types
tick (RuleFired rule_name) `thenSmpl_`
(if dopt Opt_D_dump_inlinings dflags then
pprTrace "Rule fired" (vcat [
- text "Rule:" <+> ptext rule_name,
+ text "Rule:" <+> ftext rule_name,
text "Before:" <+> ppr var <+> sep (map pprParendExpr args),
text "After: " <+> pprCoreExpr rule_rhs,
text "Cont: " <+> ppr call_cont])
) `thenSmpl` \ (final_bndrs', final_args) ->
-- See comment about "$j" name above
- newId (encodeFS SLIT("$j")) (mkPiTypes final_bndrs' rhs_ty') `thenSmpl` \ join_bndr ->
+ newId (encodeFS FSLIT("$j")) (mkPiTypes final_bndrs' rhs_ty') `thenSmpl` \ join_bndr ->
-- Notice the funky mkPiTypes. If the contructor has existentials
-- it's possible that the join point will be abstracted over
-- type varaibles as well as term variables.