-%
-% (c) The AQUA Project, Glasgow University, 1993-1996
+
+% (c) The AQUA Project, Glasgow University, 1993-1998
%
\section[Simplify]{The main module of the simplifier}
\begin{code}
-module Simplify ( simplTopBinds, simplExpr, simplBind ) where
+module Simplify ( simplTopBinds, simplExpr ) where
#include "HsVersions.h"
-import BinderInfo
-import CmdLineOpts ( SimplifierSwitch(..) )
-import ConFold ( completePrim )
-import CoreUnfold ( Unfolding, mkFormSummary, noUnfolding,
- exprIsTrivial, whnfOrBottom, inlineUnconditionally,
- FormSummary(..)
+import CmdLineOpts ( intSwitchSet,
+ opt_SccProfilingOn, opt_PprStyle_Debug, opt_SimplDoEtaReduction,
+ opt_SimplNoPreInlining, opt_DictsStrict, opt_SimplPedanticBottoms,
+ SimplifierSwitch(..)
+ )
+import SimplMonad
+import SimplUtils ( mkCase, transformRhs, findAlt,
+ simplBinder, simplBinders, simplIds, findDefault, mkCoerce
)
-import CostCentre ( isSccCountCostCentre, cmpCostCentre, costsAreSubsumed, useCurrentCostCentre )
+import Var ( TyVar, mkSysTyVar, tyVarKind, maybeModifyIdInfo )
+import VarEnv
+import VarSet
+import Id ( Id, idType, idInfo, idUnique,
+ getIdUnfolding, setIdUnfolding, isExportedId,
+ getIdSpecialisation, setIdSpecialisation,
+ getIdDemandInfo, setIdDemandInfo,
+ getIdArity, setIdArity,
+ getIdStrictness,
+ setInlinePragma, getInlinePragma, idMustBeINLINEd,
+ setOneShotLambda
+ )
+import IdInfo ( InlinePragInfo(..), OccInfo(..), StrictnessInfo(..),
+ ArityInfo(..), atLeastArity, arityLowerBound, unknownArity,
+ specInfo, inlinePragInfo, zapLamIdInfo
+ )
+import Demand ( Demand, isStrict, wwLazy )
+import Const ( isWHNFCon, conOkForAlt )
+import ConFold ( tryPrimOp )
+import PrimOp ( PrimOp, primOpStrictness, primOpType )
+import DataCon ( DataCon, dataConNumInstArgs, dataConRepStrictness, dataConSig, dataConArgTys )
+import Const ( Con(..) )
+import Name ( isLocallyDefined )
import CoreSyn
-import CoreUtils ( coreExprType, nonErrorRHSs, maybeErrorApp,
- unTagBinders, squashableDictishCcExpr
+import CoreFVs ( exprFreeVars )
+import CoreUnfold ( Unfolding, mkOtherCon, mkUnfolding, otherCons,
+ callSiteInline, blackListed
)
-import Id ( idType, idMustBeINLINEd, idWantsToBeINLINEd, idMustNotBeINLINEd,
- addIdArity, getIdArity, getIdSpecialisation, setIdSpecialisation,
- getIdDemandInfo, addIdDemandInfo
+import CoreUtils ( cheapEqExpr, exprIsDupable, exprIsCheap, exprIsTrivial,
+ coreExprType, coreAltsType, exprArity, exprIsValue,
+ exprOkForSpeculation
)
-import Name ( isExported, isLocallyDefined )
-import IdInfo ( willBeDemanded, noDemandInfo, DemandInfo, ArityInfo(..),
- atLeastArity, unknownArity )
-import Literal ( isNoRepLit )
-import Maybes ( maybeToBool )
-import PrimOp ( primOpOkForSpeculation, PrimOp(..) )
-import SimplCase ( simplCase, bindLargeRhs )
-import SimplEnv
-import SimplMonad
-import SimplVar ( completeVar, simplBinder, simplBinders, simplTyBinder, simplTyBinders )
-import SimplUtils
-import SpecEnv ( isEmptySpecEnv, substSpecEnv )
-import Type ( mkTyVarTy, mkTyVarTys, mkAppTy, applyTy, applyTys,
- mkFunTys, splitAlgTyConApp_maybe,
- splitFunTys, splitFunTy_maybe, isUnpointedType
+import Rules ( lookupRule )
+import CostCentre ( isSubsumedCCS, currentCCS, isEmptyCC )
+import Type ( Type, mkTyVarTy, mkTyVarTys, isUnLiftedType,
+ mkFunTy, splitFunTys, splitTyConApp_maybe, splitFunTy_maybe,
+ funResultTy, isDictTy, isDataType, applyTy, applyTys, mkFunTys
)
-import TysPrim ( realWorldStatePrimTy )
-import Util ( Eager, appEager, returnEager, runEager, mapEager,
- isSingleton, zipEqual, zipWithEqual, mapAndUnzip
+import Subst ( Subst, mkSubst, emptySubst, substExpr, substTy,
+ substEnv, lookupInScope, lookupSubst, substRules
)
-import Outputable
-
+import TyCon ( isDataTyCon, tyConDataCons, tyConClass_maybe, tyConArity, isDataTyCon )
+import TysPrim ( realWorldStatePrimTy )
+import PrelInfo ( realWorldPrimId )
+import BasicTypes ( TopLevelFlag(..), isTopLevel )
+import Maybes ( maybeToBool )
+import Util ( zipWithEqual, stretchZipEqual, lengthExceeds )
+import PprCore
+import Outputable
\end{code}
-The controlling flags, and what they do
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-passes:
-------
--fsimplify = run the simplifier
--ffloat-inwards = runs the float lets inwards pass
--ffloat = runs the full laziness pass
- (ToDo: rename to -ffull-laziness)
--fupdate-analysis = runs update analyser
--fstrictness = runs strictness analyser
--fsaturate-apps = saturates applications (eta expansion)
-
-options:
--------
--ffloat-past-lambda = OK to do full laziness.
- (ToDo: remove, as the full laziness pass is
- useless without this flag, therefore
- it is unnecessary. Just -ffull-laziness
- should be kept.)
-
--ffloat-lets-ok = OK to float lets out of lets if the enclosing
- let is strict or if the floating will expose
- a WHNF [simplifier].
-
--ffloat-primops-ok = OK to float out of lets cases whose scrutinee
- is a primop that cannot fail [simplifier].
-
--fcode-duplication-ok = allows the previous option to work on cases with
- multiple branches [simplifier].
-
--flet-to-case = does let-to-case transformation [simplifier].
-
--fcase-of-case = does case of case transformation [simplifier].
-
--fpedantic-bottoms = does not allow:
- case x of y -> e ===> e[x/y]
- (which may turn bottom into non-bottom)
-
-
- NOTES ON INLINING
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-Inlining is one of the delicate aspects of the simplifier. By
-``inlining'' we mean replacing an occurrence of a variable ``x'' by
-the RHS of x's definition. Thus
-
- let x = e in ...x... ===> let x = e in ...e...
-
-We have two mechanisms for inlining:
-
-1. Unconditional. The occurrence analyser has pinned an (OneOcc
-FunOcc NoDupDanger NotInsideSCC n) flag on the variable, saying ``it's
-certainly safe to inline this variable, and to drop its binding''.
-(...Umm... if n <= 1; if n > 1, it is still safe, provided you are
-happy to be duplicating code...) When it encounters such a beast, the
-simplifer binds the variable to its RHS (in the id_env) and continues.
-It doesn't even look at the RHS at that stage. It also drops the
-binding altogether.
-
-2. Conditional. In all other situations, the simplifer simplifies
-the RHS anyway, and keeps the new binding. It also binds the new
-(cloned) variable to a ``suitable'' Unfolding in the UnfoldEnv.
-
-Here, ``suitable'' might mean NoUnfolding (if the occurrence
-info is ManyOcc and the RHS is not a manifest HNF, or UnfoldAlways (if
-the variable has an INLINE pragma on it). The idea is that anything
-in the UnfoldEnv is safe to use, but also has an enclosing binding if
-you decide not to use it.
-
-Head normal forms
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-We *never* put a non-HNF unfolding in the UnfoldEnv except in the
-INLINE-pragma case.
-
-At one time I thought it would be OK to put non-HNF unfoldings in for
-variables which occur only once [if they got inlined at that
-occurrence the RHS of the binding would become dead, so no duplication
-would occur]. But consider:
-@
- let x = <expensive>
- f = \y -> ...y...y...y...
- in f x
-@
-Now, it seems that @x@ appears only once, but even so it is NOT safe
-to put @x@ in the UnfoldEnv, because @f@ will be inlined, and will
-duplicate the references to @x@.
-
-Because of this, the "unconditional-inline" mechanism above is the
-only way in which non-HNFs can get inlined.
-
-INLINE pragmas
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-When a variable has an INLINE pragma on it --- which includes wrappers
-produced by the strictness analyser --- we treat it rather carefully.
-
-For a start, we are careful not to substitute into its RHS, because
-that might make it BIG, and the user said "inline exactly this", not
-"inline whatever you get after inlining other stuff inside me". For
-example
-
- let f = BIG
- in {-# INLINE y #-} y = f 3
- in ...y...y...
-
-Here we don't want to substitute BIG for the (single) occurrence of f,
-because then we'd duplicate BIG when we inline'd y. (Exception:
-things in the UnfoldEnv with UnfoldAlways flags, which originated in
-other INLINE pragmas.)
-So, we clean out the UnfoldEnv of all SimpleUnfolding inlinings before
-going into such an RHS.
-
-What about imports? They don't really matter much because we only
-inline relatively small things via imports.
-
-We augment the the UnfoldEnv with UnfoldAlways guidance if there's an
-INLINE pragma. We also do this for the RHSs of recursive decls,
-before looking at the recursive decls. That way we achieve the effect
-of inlining a wrapper in the body of its worker, in the case of a
-mutually-recursive worker/wrapper split.
+The guts of the simplifier is in this module, but the driver
+loop for the simplifier is in SimplCore.lhs.
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\subsection[Simplify-simplExpr]{The main function: simplExpr}
+\subsection{Bindings}
%* *
%************************************************************************
-At the top level things are a little different.
-
- * No cloning (not allowed for exported Ids, unnecessary for the others)
- * Floating is done a bit differently (no case floating; check for leaks; handle letrec)
-
\begin{code}
-simplTopBinds :: SimplEnv -> [InBinding] -> SmplM [OutBinding]
+simplTopBinds :: [InBind] -> SimplM [OutBind]
+
+simplTopBinds binds
+ = -- Put all the top-level binders into scope at the start
+ -- so that if a transformation rule has unexpectedly brought
+ -- anything into scope, then we don't get a complaint about that.
+ -- It's rather as if the top-level binders were imported.
+ extendInScopes top_binders $
+ simpl_binds binds `thenSmpl` \ (binds', _) ->
+ freeTick SimplifierDone `thenSmpl_`
+ returnSmpl binds'
+ where
+ top_binders = bindersOfBinds binds
--- Dead code is now discarded by the occurrence analyser,
+ simpl_binds [] = returnSmpl ([], panic "simplTopBinds corner")
+ simpl_binds (NonRec bndr rhs : binds) = simplLazyBind TopLevel bndr bndr rhs (simpl_binds binds)
+ simpl_binds (Rec pairs : binds) = simplRecBind TopLevel pairs (map fst pairs) (simpl_binds binds)
-simplTopBinds env binds
- = mapSmpl (floatBind env True) binds `thenSmpl` \ binds_s ->
- simpl_top_binds env (concat binds_s)
+
+simplRecBind :: TopLevelFlag -> [(InId, InExpr)] -> [OutId]
+ -> SimplM (OutStuff a) -> SimplM (OutStuff a)
+simplRecBind top_lvl pairs bndrs' thing_inside
+ = go pairs bndrs' `thenSmpl` \ (binds', stuff) ->
+ returnSmpl (addBind (Rec (flattenBinds binds')) stuff)
where
- simpl_top_binds env [] = returnSmpl []
-
- simpl_top_binds env (NonRec binder@(in_id,occ_info) rhs : binds)
- = --- No cloning necessary at top level
- simplBinder env binder `thenSmpl` \ (env1, out_id) ->
- simplRhsExpr env binder rhs out_id `thenSmpl` \ (rhs',arity) ->
- completeNonRec env1 binder (out_id `withArity` arity) rhs' `thenSmpl` \ (new_env, binds1) ->
- simpl_top_binds new_env binds `thenSmpl` \ binds2 ->
- returnSmpl (binds1 ++ binds2)
-
- simpl_top_binds env (Rec pairs : binds)
- = -- No cloning necessary at top level, but we nevertheless
- -- add the Ids to the environment. This makes sure that
- -- info carried on the Id (such as arity info) gets propagated
- -- to occurrences.
- --
- -- This may seem optional, but I found an occasion when it Really matters.
- -- Consider foo{n} = ...foo...
- -- baz* = foo
- --
- -- where baz* is exported and foo isn't. Then when we do "indirection-shorting"
- -- in tidyCore, we need the {no-inline} pragma from foo to attached to the final
- -- thing: baz*{n} = ...baz...
- --
- -- Sure we could have made the indirection-shorting a bit cleverer, but
- -- propagating pragma info is a Good Idea anyway.
- simplBinders env (map fst pairs) `thenSmpl` \ (env1, out_ids) ->
- simplRecursiveGroup env1 out_ids pairs `thenSmpl` \ (bind', new_env) ->
- simpl_top_binds new_env binds `thenSmpl` \ binds' ->
- returnSmpl (Rec bind' : binds')
+ go [] _ = thing_inside `thenSmpl` \ stuff ->
+ returnSmpl ([], stuff)
+
+ go ((bndr, rhs) : pairs) (bndr' : bndrs')
+ = simplLazyBind top_lvl bndr bndr' rhs (go pairs bndrs')
+ -- Don't float unboxed bindings out,
+ -- because we can't "rec" them
\end{code}
+
%************************************************************************
%* *
\subsection[Simplify-simplExpr]{The main function: simplExpr}
%* *
%************************************************************************
-
\begin{code}
-simplExpr :: SimplEnv
- -> InExpr -> [OutArg]
- -> OutType -- Type of (e args); i.e. type of overall result
- -> SmplM OutExpr
-\end{code}
+addBind :: CoreBind -> OutStuff a -> OutStuff a
+addBind bind (binds, res) = (bind:binds, res)
-The expression returned has the same meaning as the input expression
-applied to the specified arguments.
+addBinds :: [CoreBind] -> OutStuff a -> OutStuff a
+addBinds [] stuff = stuff
+addBinds binds1 (binds2, res) = (binds1++binds2, res)
+\end{code}
+The reason for this OutExprStuff stuff is that we want to float *after*
+simplifying a RHS, not before. If we do so naively we get quadratic
+behaviour as things float out.
-Variables
-~~~~~~~~~
+To see why it's important to do it after, consider this (real) example:
-\begin{code}
-simplExpr env (Var var) args result_ty
- = simplVar env False {- No InlineCall -} var args result_ty
-\end{code}
+ let t = f x
+ in fst t
+==>
+ let t = let a = e1
+ b = e2
+ in (a,b)
+ in fst t
+==>
+ let a = e1
+ b = e2
+ t = (a,b)
+ in
+ a -- Can't inline a this round, cos it appears twice
+==>
+ e1
-Literals
-~~~~~~~~
+Each of the ==> steps is a round of simplification. We'd save a
+whole round if we float first. This can cascade. Consider
-\begin{code}
-simplExpr env (Lit l) [] result_ty = returnSmpl (Lit l)
-#ifdef DEBUG
-simplExpr env (Lit l) _ _ = panic "simplExpr:Lit with argument"
-#endif
-\end{code}
+ let f = g d
+ in \x -> ...f...
+==>
+ let f = let d1 = ..d.. in \y -> e
+ in \x -> ...f...
+==>
+ let d1 = ..d..
+ in \x -> ...(\y ->e)...
-Primitive applications are simple.
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Only in this second round can the \y be applied, and it
+might do the same again.
-NB: Prim expects an empty argument list! (Because it should be
-saturated and not higher-order. ADR)
\begin{code}
-simplExpr env (Prim op prim_args) args result_ty
- = ASSERT (null args)
- mapEager (simplArg env) prim_args `appEager` \ prim_args' ->
- simpl_op op `appEager` \ op' ->
- completePrim env op' prim_args'
- where
- -- PrimOps just need any types in them renamed.
+simplExpr :: CoreExpr -> SimplM CoreExpr
+simplExpr expr = getSubst `thenSmpl` \ subst ->
+ simplExprC expr (Stop (substTy subst (coreExprType expr)))
+ -- The type in the Stop continuation is usually not used
+ -- It's only needed when discarding continuations after finding
+ -- a function that returns bottom
- simpl_op (CCallOp label is_asm may_gc arg_tys result_ty)
- = mapEager (simplTy env) arg_tys `appEager` \ arg_tys' ->
- simplTy env result_ty `appEager` \ result_ty' ->
- returnEager (CCallOp label is_asm may_gc arg_tys' result_ty')
+simplExprC :: CoreExpr -> SimplCont -> SimplM CoreExpr
+ -- Simplify an expression, given a continuation
- simpl_op other_op = returnEager other_op
-\end{code}
+simplExprC expr cont = simplExprF expr cont `thenSmpl` \ (floats, (_, body)) ->
+ returnSmpl (mkLets floats body)
-Constructor applications
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-Nothing to try here. We only reuse constructors when they appear as the
-rhs of a let binding (see completeLetBinding).
+simplExprF :: InExpr -> SimplCont -> SimplM OutExprStuff
+ -- Simplify an expression, returning floated binds
-\begin{code}
-simplExpr env (Con con con_args) args result_ty
- = ASSERT( null args )
- mapEager (simplArg env) con_args `appEager` \ con_args' ->
- returnSmpl (Con con con_args')
-\end{code}
+simplExprF (Var v) cont
+ = simplVar v cont
+simplExprF expr@(Con (PrimOp op) args) cont
+ = getSubstEnv `thenSmpl` \ se ->
+ prepareArgs (ppr op)
+ (primOpType op)
+ (primOpStrictness op)
+ (pushArgs se args cont) $ \ args1 cont1 ->
-Applications are easy too:
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-Just stuff 'em in the arg stack
-
-\begin{code}
-simplExpr env (App fun arg) args result_ty
- = simplArg env arg `appEager` \ arg' ->
- simplExpr env fun (arg' : args) result_ty
+ let
+ -- Boring... we may have too many arguments now, so we push them back
+ n_args = length args
+ args2 = ASSERT( length args1 >= n_args )
+ take n_args args1
+ cont2 = pushArgs emptySubstEnv (drop n_args args1) cont1
+ in
+ -- Try the prim op simplification
+ -- It's really worth trying simplExpr again if it succeeds,
+ -- because you can find
+ -- case (eqChar# x 'a') of ...
+ -- ==>
+ -- case (case x of 'a' -> True; other -> False) of ...
+ case tryPrimOp op args2 of
+ Just e' -> zapSubstEnv (simplExprF e' cont2)
+ Nothing -> rebuild (Con (PrimOp op) args2) cont2
+
+simplExprF (Con con@(DataCon _) args) cont
+ = freeTick LeafVisit `thenSmpl_`
+ simplConArgs args ( \ args' ->
+ rebuild (Con con args') cont)
+
+simplExprF expr@(Con con@(Literal _) args) cont
+ = ASSERT( null args )
+ freeTick LeafVisit `thenSmpl_`
+ rebuild expr cont
+
+simplExprF (App fun arg) cont
+ = getSubstEnv `thenSmpl` \ se ->
+ simplExprF fun (ApplyTo NoDup arg se cont)
+
+simplExprF (Case scrut bndr alts) cont
+ = getSubstEnv `thenSmpl` \ se ->
+ simplExprF scrut (Select NoDup bndr alts se cont)
+
+
+simplExprF (Let (Rec pairs) body) cont
+ = simplIds (map fst pairs) $ \ bndrs' ->
+ -- NB: bndrs' don't have unfoldings or spec-envs
+ -- We add them as we go down, using simplPrags
+
+ simplRecBind NotTopLevel pairs bndrs' (simplExprF body cont)
+
+simplExprF expr@(Lam _ _) cont = simplLam expr cont
+
+simplExprF (Type ty) cont
+ = ASSERT( case cont of { Stop _ -> True; ArgOf _ _ _ -> True; other -> False } )
+ simplType ty `thenSmpl` \ ty' ->
+ rebuild (Type ty') cont
+
+simplExprF (Note (Coerce to from) e) cont
+ | to == from = simplExprF e cont
+ | otherwise = getSubst `thenSmpl` \ subst ->
+ simplExprF e (CoerceIt (substTy subst to) cont)
+
+-- hack: we only distinguish subsumed cost centre stacks for the purposes of
+-- inlining. All other CCCSs are mapped to currentCCS.
+simplExprF (Note (SCC cc) e) cont
+ = setEnclosingCC currentCCS $
+ simplExpr e `thenSmpl` \ e ->
+ rebuild (mkNote (SCC cc) e) cont
+
+simplExprF (Note InlineCall e) cont
+ = simplExprF e (InlinePlease cont)
+
+-- Comments about the InlineMe case
+-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+-- Don't inline in the RHS of something that has an
+-- inline pragma. But be careful that the InScopeEnv that
+-- we return does still have inlinings on!
+--
+-- It really is important to switch off inlinings. This function
+-- may be inlinined in other modules, so we don't want to remove
+-- (by inlining) calls to functions that have specialisations, or
+-- that may have transformation rules in an importing scope.
+-- E.g. {-# INLINE f #-}
+-- f x = ...g...
+-- and suppose that g is strict *and* has specialisations.
+-- If we inline g's wrapper, we deny f the chance of getting
+-- the specialised version of g when f is inlined at some call site
+-- (perhaps in some other module).
+
+simplExprF (Note InlineMe e) cont
+ = case cont of
+ Stop _ -> -- Totally boring continuation
+ -- Don't inline inside an INLINE expression
+ switchOffInlining (simplExpr e) `thenSmpl` \ e' ->
+ rebuild (mkNote InlineMe e') cont
+
+ other -> -- Dissolve the InlineMe note if there's
+ -- an interesting context of any kind to combine with
+ -- (even a type application -- anything except Stop)
+ simplExprF e cont
+
+-- A non-recursive let is dealt with by simplBeta
+simplExprF (Let (NonRec bndr rhs) body) cont
+ = getSubstEnv `thenSmpl` \ se ->
+ simplBeta bndr rhs se (contResultType cont) $
+ simplExprF body cont
\end{code}
-Type lambdas
-~~~~~~~~~~~~
-First the case when it's applied to an argument.
+---------------------------------
\begin{code}
-simplExpr env (Lam (TyBinder tyvar) body) (TyArg ty : args) result_ty
- = tick TyBetaReduction `thenSmpl_`
- simplExpr (bindTyVar env tyvar ty) body args result_ty
-\end{code}
+simplLam fun cont
+ = go fun cont
+ where
+ zap_it = mkLamBndrZapper fun (countArgs cont)
+ cont_ty = contResultType cont
+
+ -- Type-beta reduction
+ go (Lam bndr body) (ApplyTo _ (Type ty_arg) arg_se body_cont)
+ = ASSERT( isTyVar bndr )
+ tick (BetaReduction bndr) `thenSmpl_`
+ getInScope `thenSmpl` \ in_scope ->
+ let
+ ty' = substTy (mkSubst in_scope arg_se) ty_arg
+ in
+ extendSubst bndr (DoneTy ty')
+ (go body body_cont)
+
+ -- Ordinary beta reduction
+ go (Lam bndr body) cont@(ApplyTo _ arg arg_se body_cont)
+ = tick (BetaReduction bndr) `thenSmpl_`
+ simplBeta zapped_bndr arg arg_se cont_ty
+ (go body body_cont)
+ where
+ zapped_bndr = zap_it bndr
-\begin{code}
-simplExpr env tylam@(Lam (TyBinder tyvar) body) [] result_ty
- = simplTyBinder env tyvar `thenSmpl` \ (new_env, tyvar') ->
- let
- new_result_ty = applyTy result_ty (mkTyVarTy tyvar')
- in
- simplExpr new_env body [] new_result_ty `thenSmpl` \ body' ->
- returnSmpl (Lam (TyBinder tyvar') body')
+ -- Not enough args
+ go lam@(Lam _ _) cont = completeLam [] lam cont
-#ifdef DEBUG
-simplExpr env (Lam (TyBinder _) _) (_ : _) result_ty
- = panic "simplExpr:TyLam with non-TyArg"
-#endif
-\end{code}
+ -- Exactly enough args
+ go expr cont = simplExprF expr cont
-Ordinary lambdas
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+-- completeLam deals with the case where a lambda doesn't have an ApplyTo
+-- continuation. Try for eta reduction, but *only* if we get all
+-- the way to an exprIsTrivial expression.
+-- 'acc' holds the simplified binders, in reverse order
-There's a complication with lambdas that aren't saturated.
-Suppose we have:
+completeLam acc (Lam bndr body) cont
+ = simplBinder bndr $ \ bndr' ->
+ completeLam (bndr':acc) body cont
- (\x. \y. ...x...)
+completeLam acc body cont
+ = simplExpr body `thenSmpl` \ body' ->
-If we did nothing, x is used inside the \y, so would be marked
-as dangerous to dup. But in the common case where the abstraction
-is applied to two arguments this is over-pessimistic.
-So instead we don't take account of the \y when dealing with x's usage;
-instead, the simplifier is careful when partially applying lambdas.
+ case (opt_SimplDoEtaReduction, check_eta acc body') of
+ (True, Just body'') -- Eta reduce!
+ -> tick (EtaReduction (head acc)) `thenSmpl_`
+ rebuild body'' cont
-\begin{code}
-simplExpr env expr@(Lam (ValBinder binder) body) orig_args result_ty
- = go 0 env expr orig_args
+ other -> -- No eta reduction
+ rebuild (foldl (flip Lam) body' acc) cont
+ -- Remember, acc is the reversed binders
+ where
+ -- NB: the binders are reversed
+ check_eta (b : bs) (App fun arg)
+ | (varToCoreExpr b `cheapEqExpr` arg)
+ = check_eta bs fun
+
+ check_eta [] body
+ | exprIsTrivial body && -- ONLY if the body is trivial
+ not (any (`elemVarSet` body_fvs) acc)
+ = Just body -- Success!
+ where
+ body_fvs = exprFreeVars body
+
+ check_eta _ _ = Nothing -- Bale out
+
+mkLamBndrZapper :: CoreExpr -- Function
+ -> Int -- Number of args
+ -> Id -> Id -- Use this to zap the binders
+mkLamBndrZapper fun n_args
+ | n_args >= n_params fun = \b -> b -- Enough args
+ | otherwise = \b -> maybeModifyIdInfo zapLamIdInfo b
where
- go n env (Lam (ValBinder binder) body) (val_arg : args)
- | isValArg val_arg -- The lambda has an argument
- = tick BetaReduction `thenSmpl_`
- go (n+1) (bindIdToAtom env binder val_arg) body args
-
- go n env expr@(Lam (ValBinder binder) body) args
- -- The lambda is un-saturated, so we must zap the occurrence info
- -- on the arguments we've already beta-reduced into the body of the lambda
- = ASSERT( null args ) -- Value lambda must match value argument!
- let
- new_env = markDangerousOccs env orig_args
- in
- simplValLam new_env expr 0 {- Guaranteed applied to at least 0 args! -} result_ty
- `thenSmpl` \ (expr', arity) ->
- returnSmpl expr'
-
- go n env non_val_lam_expr args -- The lambda had enough arguments
- = simplExpr env non_val_lam_expr args result_ty
+ n_params (Lam b e) | isId b = 1 + n_params e
+ | otherwise = n_params e
+ n_params other = 0::Int
\end{code}
-Let expressions
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+---------------------------------
+simplConArgs makes sure that the arguments all end up being atomic.
+That means it may generate some Lets, hence the strange type
\begin{code}
-simplExpr env (Let bind body) args result_ty
- = simplBind env bind (\env -> simplExpr env body args result_ty) result_ty
+simplConArgs :: [InArg] -> ([OutArg] -> SimplM OutExprStuff) -> SimplM OutExprStuff
+simplConArgs [] thing_inside
+ = thing_inside []
+
+simplConArgs (arg:args) thing_inside
+ = switchOffInlining (simplExpr arg) `thenSmpl` \ arg' ->
+ -- Simplify the RHS with inlining switched off, so that
+ -- only absolutely essential things will happen.
+
+ simplConArgs args $ \ args' ->
+
+ -- If the argument ain't trivial, then let-bind it
+ if exprIsTrivial arg' then
+ thing_inside (arg' : args')
+ else
+ newId (coreExprType arg') $ \ arg_id ->
+ thing_inside (Var arg_id : args') `thenSmpl` \ res ->
+ returnSmpl (addBind (NonRec arg_id arg') res)
\end{code}
-Case expressions
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+---------------------------------
\begin{code}
-simplExpr env expr@(Case scrut alts) args result_ty
- = simplCase env scrut
- (getSubstEnvs env, alts)
- (\env rhs -> simplExpr env rhs args result_ty)
- result_ty
+simplType :: InType -> SimplM OutType
+simplType ty
+ = getSubst `thenSmpl` \ subst ->
+ returnSmpl (substTy subst ty)
\end{code}
-Coercions
-~~~~~~~~~
-\begin{code}
-simplExpr env (Note (Coerce to_ty from_ty) body) args result_ty
- = simplCoerce env to_ty from_ty body args result_ty
-
-simplExpr env (Note (SCC cc) body) args result_ty
- = simplSCC env cc body args result_ty
-
--- InlineCall is simple enough to deal with on the spot
--- The only complication is that we slide the InlineCall
--- inwards past any function arguments
-simplExpr env (Note InlineCall expr) args result_ty
- = go expr args
- where
- go (Var v) args = simplVar env True {- InlineCall -} v args result_ty
-
- go (App fun arg) args = simplArg env arg `appEager` \ arg' ->
- go fun (arg' : args)
-
- go other args = -- Unexpected discard; report it
- pprTrace "simplExpr: discarding InlineCall" (ppr expr) $
- simplExpr env other args result_ty
-\end{code}
-
-
-
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\subsection{Simplify RHS of a Let/Letrec}
+\subsection{Binding}
%* *
%************************************************************************
-simplRhsExpr does arity-expansion. That is, given:
+@simplBeta@ is used for non-recursive lets in expressions,
+as well as true beta reduction.
- * a right hand side /\ tyvars -> \a1 ... an -> e
- * the information (stored in BinderInfo) that the function will always
- be applied to at least k arguments
+Very similar to @simplLazyBind@, but not quite the same.
-it transforms the rhs to
+\begin{code}
+simplBeta :: InId -- Binder
+ -> InExpr -> SubstEnv -- Arg, with its subst-env
+ -> OutType -- Type of thing computed by the context
+ -> SimplM OutExprStuff -- The body
+ -> SimplM OutExprStuff
+#ifdef DEBUG
+simplBeta bndr rhs rhs_se cont_ty thing_inside
+ | isTyVar bndr
+ = pprPanic "simplBeta" (ppr bndr <+> ppr rhs)
+#endif
- /\tyvars -> \a1 ... an b(n+1) ... bk -> (e b(n+1) ... bk)
+simplBeta bndr rhs rhs_se cont_ty thing_inside
+ | preInlineUnconditionally bndr && not opt_SimplNoPreInlining
+ = tick (PreInlineUnconditionally bndr) `thenSmpl_`
+ extendSubst bndr (ContEx rhs_se rhs) thing_inside
-This is a Very Good Thing!
+ | otherwise
+ = -- Simplify the RHS
+ simplBinder bndr $ \ bndr' ->
+ simplArg (idType bndr') (getIdDemandInfo bndr)
+ rhs rhs_se cont_ty $ \ rhs' ->
+
+ -- Now complete the binding and simplify the body
+ completeBeta bndr bndr' rhs' thing_inside
+
+completeBeta bndr bndr' rhs' thing_inside
+ | isUnLiftedType (idType bndr') && not (exprOkForSpeculation rhs')
+ -- Make a case expression instead of a let
+ -- These can arise either from the desugarer,
+ -- or from beta reductions: (\x.e) (x +# y)
+ = getInScope `thenSmpl` \ in_scope ->
+ thing_inside `thenSmpl` \ (floats, (_, body)) ->
+ returnSmpl ([], (in_scope, Case rhs' bndr' [(DEFAULT, [], mkLets floats body)]))
-\begin{code}
-simplRhsExpr
- :: SimplEnv
- -> InBinder
- -> InExpr
- -> OutId -- The new binder (used only for its type)
- -> SmplM (OutExpr, ArityInfo)
+ | otherwise
+ = completeBinding bndr bndr' rhs' thing_inside
\end{code}
\begin{code}
-simplRhsExpr env binder@(id,occ_info) rhs new_id
- | maybeToBool (splitAlgTyConApp_maybe rhs_ty)
- -- Deal with the data type case, in which case the elaborate
- -- eta-expansion nonsense is really quite a waste of time.
- = simplExpr rhs_env rhs [] rhs_ty `thenSmpl` \ rhs' ->
- returnSmpl (rhs', ArityExactly 0)
-
- | otherwise -- OK, use the big hammer
- = -- Deal with the big lambda part
- simplTyBinders rhs_env tyvars `thenSmpl` \ (lam_env, tyvars') ->
- let
- body_ty = applyTys rhs_ty (mkTyVarTys tyvars')
- in
- -- Deal with the little lambda part
- -- Note that we call simplLam even if there are no binders,
- -- in case it can do arity expansion.
- simplValLam lam_env body (getBinderInfoArity occ_info) body_ty `thenSmpl` \ (lambda', arity) ->
+simplArg :: OutType -> Demand
+ -> InExpr -> SubstEnv
+ -> OutType -- Type of thing computed by the context
+ -> (OutExpr -> SimplM OutExprStuff)
+ -> SimplM OutExprStuff
+simplArg arg_ty demand arg arg_se cont_ty thing_inside
+ | isStrict demand ||
+ isUnLiftedType arg_ty ||
+ (opt_DictsStrict && isDictTy arg_ty && isDataType arg_ty)
+ -- Return true only for dictionary types where the dictionary
+ -- has more than one component (else we risk poking on the component
+ -- of a newtype dictionary)
+ = getSubstEnv `thenSmpl` \ body_se ->
+ transformRhs arg `thenSmpl` \ t_arg ->
+ setSubstEnv arg_se (simplExprF t_arg (ArgOf NoDup cont_ty $ \ arg' ->
+ setSubstEnv body_se (thing_inside arg')
+ )) -- NB: we must restore body_se before carrying on with thing_inside!!
- -- Put on the big lambdas, trying to float out any bindings caught inside
- mkRhsTyLam tyvars' lambda' `thenSmpl` \ rhs' ->
-
- returnSmpl (rhs', arity)
- where
- rhs_ty = idType new_id
- rhs_env | idWantsToBeINLINEd id -- Don't ever inline in a INLINE thing's rhs
- = switchOffInlining env1 -- See comments with switchOffInlining
- | otherwise
- = env1
-
- -- The top level "enclosing CC" is "SUBSUMED". But the enclosing CC
- -- for the rhs of top level defs is "OST_CENTRE". Consider
- -- f = \x -> e
- -- g = \y -> let v = f y in scc "x" (v ...)
- -- Here we want to inline "f", since its CC is SUBSUMED, but we don't
- -- want to inline "v" since its CC is dynamically determined.
-
- current_cc = getEnclosingCC env
- env1 | costsAreSubsumed current_cc = setEnclosingCC env useCurrentCostCentre
- | otherwise = env
-
- (tyvars, body) = collectTyBinders rhs
+ | otherwise
+ = simplRhs NotTopLevel True arg_ty arg arg_se thing_inside
\end{code}
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- An old special case that is now nuked.
-
-First a special case for variable right-hand sides
- v = w
-It's OK to simplify the RHS, but it's often a waste of time. Often
-these v = w things persist because v is exported, and w is used
-elsewhere. So if we're not careful we'll eta expand the rhs, only
-to eta reduce it in competeNonRec.
-
-If we leave the binding unchanged, we will certainly replace v by w at
-every occurrence of v, which is good enough.
-
-In fact, it's *better* to replace v by w than to inline w in v's rhs,
-even if this is the only occurrence of w. Why? Because w might have
-IdInfo (such as strictness) that v doesn't.
-
-Furthermore, there might be other uses of w; if so, inlining w in
-v's rhs will duplicate w's rhs, whereas replacing v by w doesn't.
-
-HOWEVER, we have to be careful if w is something that *must* be
-inlined. In particular, its binding may have been dropped. Here's
-an example that actually happened:
- let x = let y = e in y
- in f x
-The "let y" was floated out, and then (since y occurs once in a
-definitely inlinable position) the binding was dropped, leaving
- {y=e} let x = y in f x
-But now using the reasoning of this little section,
-y wasn't inlined, because it was a let x=y form.
-
-
- HOWEVER
+completeBinding
+ - deals only with Ids, not TyVars
+ - take an already-simplified RHS
-This "optimisation" turned out to be a bad idea. If there's are
-top-level exported bindings like
+It does *not* attempt to do let-to-case. Why? Because they are used for
- y = I# 3#
- x = y
+ - top-level bindings
+ (when let-to-case is impossible)
-then y wasn't getting inlined in x's rhs, and we were getting
-bad code. So I've removed the special case from here, and
-instead we only try eta reduction and constructor reuse
-in completeNonRec if the thing is *not* exported.
-
-
-\begin{pseudocode}
-simplRhsExpr env binder@(id,occ_info) (Var v) new_id
- | maybeToBool maybe_stop_at_var
- = returnSmpl (Var the_var, getIdArity the_var)
- where
- maybe_stop_at_var
- = case (runEager $ lookupId env v) of
- VarArg v' | not (must_unfold v') -> Just v'
- other -> Nothing
-
- Just the_var = maybe_stop_at_var
-
- must_unfold v' = idMustBeINLINEd v'
- || case lookupOutIdEnv env v' of
- Just (_, _, InUnfolding _ _) -> True
- other -> False
-\end{pseudocode}
-
- End of old, nuked, special case.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-%************************************************************************
-%* *
-\subsection{Simplify a lambda abstraction}
-%* *
-%************************************************************************
-
-Simplify (\binders -> body) trying eta expansion and reduction, given that
-the abstraction will always be applied to at least min_no_of_args.
+ - many situations where the "rhs" is known to be a WHNF
+ (so let-to-case is inappropriate).
\begin{code}
-simplValLam env expr min_no_of_args expr_ty
- | not (switchIsSet env SimplDoLambdaEtaExpansion) || -- Bale out if eta expansion off
-
- exprIsTrivial expr || -- or it's a trivial RHS
- -- No eta expansion for trivial RHSs
- -- It's rather a Bad Thing to expand
- -- g = f alpha beta
- -- to
- -- g = \a b c -> f alpha beta a b c
+completeBinding :: InId -- Binder
+ -> OutId -- New binder
+ -> OutExpr -- Simplified RHS
+ -> SimplM (OutStuff a) -- Thing inside
+ -> SimplM (OutStuff a)
+
+completeBinding old_bndr new_bndr new_rhs thing_inside
+ | isDeadBinder old_bndr -- This happens; for example, the case_bndr during case of
+ -- known constructor: case (a,b) of x { (p,q) -> ... }
+ -- Here x isn't mentioned in the RHS, so we don't want to
+ -- create the (dead) let-binding let x = (a,b) in ...
+ = thing_inside
+
+ | postInlineUnconditionally old_bndr new_rhs
+ -- Maybe we don't need a let-binding! Maybe we can just
+ -- inline it right away. Unlike the preInlineUnconditionally case
+ -- we are allowed to look at the RHS.
--
- -- The original RHS is "trivial" (exprIsTrivial), because it generates
- -- no code (renames f to g). But the new RHS isn't.
-
- null potential_extra_binder_tys || -- or ain't a function
- no_of_extra_binders <= 0 -- or no extra binders needed
- = simplBinders env binders `thenSmpl` \ (new_env, binders') ->
- simplExpr new_env body [] body_ty `thenSmpl` \ body' ->
- returnSmpl (mkValLam binders' body', final_arity)
-
- | otherwise -- Eta expansion possible
- = -- A SSERT( no_of_extra_binders <= length potential_extra_binder_tys )
- (if not ( no_of_extra_binders <= length potential_extra_binder_tys ) then
- pprTrace "simplValLam" (vcat [ppr expr,
- ppr expr_ty,
- ppr binders,
- int no_of_extra_binders,
- ppr potential_extra_binder_tys])
- else \x -> x) $
-
- tick EtaExpansion `thenSmpl_`
- simplBinders env binders `thenSmpl` \ (new_env, binders') ->
- newIds extra_binder_tys `thenSmpl` \ extra_binders' ->
- simplExpr new_env body (map VarArg extra_binders') etad_body_ty `thenSmpl` \ body' ->
- returnSmpl (
- mkValLam (binders' ++ extra_binders') body',
- final_arity
- )
-
- where
- (binders,body) = collectValBinders expr
- no_of_binders = length binders
- (arg_tys, res_ty) = splitFunTys expr_ty
- potential_extra_binder_tys = (if not (no_of_binders <= length arg_tys) then
- pprTrace "simplValLam" (vcat [ppr expr,
- ppr expr_ty,
- ppr binders])
- else \x->x) $
- drop no_of_binders arg_tys
- body_ty = mkFunTys potential_extra_binder_tys res_ty
-
- -- Note: it's possible that simplValLam will be applied to something
- -- with a forall type. Eg when being applied to the rhs of
- -- let x = wurble
- -- where wurble has a forall-type, but no big lambdas at the top.
- -- We could be clever an insert new big lambdas, but we don't bother.
-
- etad_body_ty = mkFunTys (drop no_of_extra_binders potential_extra_binder_tys) res_ty
- extra_binder_tys = take no_of_extra_binders potential_extra_binder_tys
- final_arity = atLeastArity (no_of_binders + no_of_extra_binders)
-
- no_of_extra_binders = -- First, use the info about how many args it's
- -- always applied to in its scope; but ignore this
- -- info for thunks. To see why we ignore it for thunks,
- -- consider let f = lookup env key in (f 1, f 2)
- -- We'd better not eta expand f just because it is
- -- always applied!
- (min_no_of_args - no_of_binders)
-
- -- Next, try seeing if there's a lambda hidden inside
- -- something cheap.
- -- etaExpandCount can reuturn a huge number (like 10000!) if
- -- it finds that the body is a call to "error"; hence
- -- the use of "min" here.
- `max`
- (etaExpandCount body `min` length potential_extra_binder_tys)
-
- -- Finally, see if it's a state transformer, in which
- -- case we eta-expand on principle! This can waste work,
- -- but usually doesn't
- `max`
- case potential_extra_binder_tys of
- [ty] | ty == realWorldStatePrimTy -> 1
- other -> 0
-\end{code}
+ -- NB: a loop breaker never has postInlineUnconditionally True
+ -- and non-loop-breakers only have *forward* references
+ -- Hence, it's safe to discard the binding
+ = tick (PostInlineUnconditionally old_bndr) `thenSmpl_`
+ extendSubst old_bndr (DoneEx new_rhs)
+ thing_inside
+
+ | otherwise
+ = getSubst `thenSmpl` \ subst ->
+ let
+ bndr_info = idInfo old_bndr
+ old_rules = specInfo bndr_info
+ new_rules = substRules subst old_rules
+
+ -- The new binding site Id needs its specialisations re-attached
+ bndr_w_arity = new_bndr `setIdArity` ArityAtLeast (exprArity new_rhs)
+
+ binding_site_id
+ | isEmptyCoreRules old_rules = bndr_w_arity
+ | otherwise = bndr_w_arity `setIdSpecialisation` new_rules
+
+ -- At the occurrence sites we want to know the unfolding,
+ -- and the occurrence info of the original
+ -- (simplBinder cleaned up the inline prag of the original
+ -- to eliminate un-stable info, in case this expression is
+ -- simplified a second time; hence the need to reattach it)
+ occ_site_id = binding_site_id
+ `setIdUnfolding` mkUnfolding new_rhs
+ `setInlinePragma` inlinePragInfo bndr_info
+ in
+ modifyInScope occ_site_id thing_inside `thenSmpl` \ stuff ->
+ returnSmpl (addBind (NonRec binding_site_id new_rhs) stuff)
+\end{code}
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\subsection[Simplify-var]{Variables}
+\subsection{simplLazyBind}
%* *
%************************************************************************
-Check if there's a macro-expansion, and if so rattle on. Otherwise do
-the more sophisticated stuff.
+simplLazyBind basically just simplifies the RHS of a let(rec).
+It does two important optimisations though:
+
+ * It floats let(rec)s out of the RHS, even if they
+ are hidden by big lambdas
+
+ * It does eta expansion
\begin{code}
-simplVar env inline_call var args result_ty
- = case lookupIdSubst env var of
-
- Just (SubstExpr ty_subst id_subst expr)
- -> simplExpr (setSubstEnvs env (ty_subst, id_subst)) expr args result_ty
+simplLazyBind :: TopLevelFlag
+ -> InId -> OutId
+ -> InExpr -- The RHS
+ -> SimplM (OutStuff a) -- The body of the binding
+ -> SimplM (OutStuff a)
+-- When called, the subst env is correct for the entire let-binding
+-- and hence right for the RHS.
+-- Also the binder has already been simplified, and hence is in scope
+
+simplLazyBind top_lvl bndr bndr' rhs thing_inside
+ | preInlineUnconditionally bndr && not opt_SimplNoPreInlining
+ = tick (PreInlineUnconditionally bndr) `thenSmpl_`
+ getSubstEnv `thenSmpl` \ rhs_se ->
+ (extendSubst bndr (ContEx rhs_se rhs) thing_inside)
- Just (SubstLit lit) -- A boring old literal
- -> ASSERT( null args )
- returnSmpl (Lit lit)
+ | otherwise
+ = -- Simplify the RHS
+ getSubstEnv `thenSmpl` \ rhs_se ->
- Just (SubstVar var') -- More interesting! An id!
- -> completeVar env inline_call var' args result_ty
+ simplRhs top_lvl False {- Not ok to float unboxed -}
+ (idType bndr')
+ rhs rhs_se $ \ rhs' ->
- Nothing -- Not in the substitution; hand off to completeVar
- -> completeVar env inline_call var args result_ty
+ -- Now compete the binding and simplify the body
+ completeBinding bndr bndr' rhs' thing_inside
\end{code}
-%************************************************************************
-%* *
-\subsection[Simplify-coerce]{Coerce expressions}
-%* *
-%************************************************************************
\begin{code}
--- (coerce (case s of p -> r)) args ==> case s of p -> (coerce r) args
-simplCoerce env to_ty from_ty expr@(Case scrut alts) args result_ty
- = simplCase env scrut (getSubstEnvs env, alts)
- (\env rhs -> simplCoerce env to_ty from_ty rhs args result_ty)
- result_ty
-
--- (coerce (let defns in b)) args ==> let defns' in (coerce b) args
-simplCoerce env to_ty from_ty (Let bind body) args result_ty
- = simplBind env bind (\env -> simplCoerce env to_ty from_ty body args result_ty) result_ty
-
--- Default case
--- NB: we do *not* push the argments inside the coercion
-
-simplCoerce env to_ty from_ty expr args result_ty
- = simplTy env to_ty `appEager` \ to_ty' ->
- simplTy env from_ty `appEager` \ from_ty' ->
- simplExpr env expr [] from_ty' `thenSmpl` \ expr' ->
- returnSmpl (mkGenApp (mkCoerce to_ty' from_ty' expr') args)
+simplRhs :: TopLevelFlag
+ -> Bool -- True <=> OK to float unboxed (speculative) bindings
+ -> OutType -> InExpr -> SubstEnv
+ -> (OutExpr -> SimplM (OutStuff a))
+ -> SimplM (OutStuff a)
+simplRhs top_lvl float_ubx rhs_ty rhs rhs_se thing_inside
+ = -- Swizzle the inner lets past the big lambda (if any)
+ -- and try eta expansion
+ transformRhs rhs `thenSmpl` \ t_rhs ->
+
+ -- Simplify it
+ setSubstEnv rhs_se (simplExprF t_rhs (Stop rhs_ty)) `thenSmpl` \ (floats, (in_scope', rhs')) ->
+
+ -- Float lets out of RHS
+ let
+ (floats_out, rhs'') | float_ubx = (floats, rhs')
+ | otherwise = splitFloats floats rhs'
+ in
+ if (isTopLevel top_lvl || exprIsCheap rhs') && -- Float lets if (a) we're at the top level
+ not (null floats_out) -- or (b) it exposes a cheap (i.e. duplicatable) expression
+ then
+ tickLetFloat floats_out `thenSmpl_`
+ -- Do the float
+ --
+ -- There's a subtlety here. There may be a binding (x* = e) in the
+ -- floats, where the '*' means 'will be demanded'. So is it safe
+ -- to float it out? Answer no, but it won't matter because
+ -- we only float if arg' is a WHNF,
+ -- and so there can't be any 'will be demanded' bindings in the floats.
+ -- Hence the assert
+ WARN( any demanded_float floats_out, ppr floats_out )
+ setInScope in_scope' (thing_inside rhs'') `thenSmpl` \ stuff ->
+ -- in_scope' may be excessive, but that's OK;
+ -- it's a superset of what's in scope
+ returnSmpl (addBinds floats_out stuff)
+ else
+ -- Don't do the float
+ thing_inside (mkLets floats rhs')
+
+-- In a let-from-let float, we just tick once, arbitrarily
+-- choosing the first floated binder to identify it
+tickLetFloat (NonRec b r : fs) = tick (LetFloatFromLet b)
+tickLetFloat (Rec ((b,r):prs) : fs) = tick (LetFloatFromLet b)
+
+demanded_float (NonRec b r) = isStrict (getIdDemandInfo b) && not (isUnLiftedType (idType b))
+ -- Unlifted-type (cheap-eagerness) lets may well have a demanded flag on them
+demanded_float (Rec _) = False
+
+-- Don't float any unlifted bindings out, because the context
+-- is either a Rec group, or the top level, neither of which
+-- can tolerate them.
+splitFloats floats rhs
+ = go floats
where
- -- Try cancellation; we do this "on the way up" because
- -- I think that's where it'll bite best
- mkCoerce to_ty1 from_ty1 (Note (Coerce to_ty2 from_ty2) body)
- = ASSERT( from_ty1 == to_ty2 )
- mkCoerce to_ty1 from_ty2 body
- mkCoerce to_ty from_ty body
- | to_ty == from_ty = body
- | otherwise = Note (Coerce to_ty from_ty) body
+ go [] = ([], rhs)
+ go (f:fs) | must_stay f = ([], mkLets (f:fs) rhs)
+ | otherwise = case go fs of
+ (out, rhs') -> (f:out, rhs')
+
+ must_stay (Rec prs) = False -- No unlifted bindings in here
+ must_stay (NonRec b r) = isUnLiftedType (idType b)
\end{code}
+
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\subsection[Simplify-scc]{SCC expressions
+\subsection{Variables}
%* *
%************************************************************************
-1) Eliminating nested sccs ...
-We must be careful to maintain the scc counts ...
-
\begin{code}
-simplSCC env cc1 (Note (SCC cc2) expr) args result_ty
- | not (isSccCountCostCentre cc2) && case cmpCostCentre cc1 cc2 of { EQ -> True; _ -> False }
- -- eliminate inner scc if no call counts and same cc as outer
- = simplSCC env cc1 expr args result_ty
-
- | not (isSccCountCostCentre cc2) && not (isSccCountCostCentre cc1)
- -- eliminate outer scc if no call counts associated with either ccs
- = simplSCC env cc2 expr args result_ty
-\end{code}
+simplVar var cont
+ = freeTick LeafVisit `thenSmpl_`
+ getSubst `thenSmpl` \ subst ->
+ case lookupSubst subst var of
+ Just (DoneEx (Var v)) -> zapSubstEnv (simplVar v cont)
+ Just (DoneEx e) -> zapSubstEnv (simplExprF e cont)
+ Just (ContEx env' e) -> setSubstEnv env' (simplExprF e cont)
+
+ Nothing -> let
+ var' = case lookupInScope subst var of
+ Just v' -> v'
+ Nothing ->
+#ifdef DEBUG
+ if isLocallyDefined var && not (idMustBeINLINEd var)
+ -- The idMustBeINLINEd test accouunts for the fact
+ -- that class dictionary constructors don't have top level
+ -- bindings and hence aren't in scope.
+ then
+ -- Not in scope
+ pprTrace "simplVar:" (ppr var) var
+ else
+#endif
+ var
+ in
+ getBlackList `thenSmpl` \ black_list ->
+ getInScope `thenSmpl` \ in_scope ->
+ completeCall black_list in_scope var' cont
+
+---------------------------------------------------------
+-- Dealing with a call
+
+completeCall black_list_fn in_scope var cont
+ -- Look for rules or specialisations that match
+ -- Do this *before* trying inlining because some functions
+ -- have specialisations *and* are strict; we don't want to
+ -- inline the wrapper of the non-specialised thing... better
+ -- to call the specialised thing instead.
+ | maybeToBool maybe_rule_match
+ = tick (RuleFired rule_name) `thenSmpl_`
+ zapSubstEnv (simplExprF rule_rhs (pushArgs emptySubstEnv rule_args result_cont))
+ -- See note below about zapping the substitution here
+
+ -- Look for an unfolding. There's a binding for the
+ -- thing, but perhaps we want to inline it anyway
+ | maybeToBool maybe_inline
+ = tick (UnfoldingDone var) `thenSmpl_`
+ zapSubstEnv (completeInlining var unf_template discard_inline_cont)
+ -- The template is already simplified, so don't re-substitute.
+ -- This is VITAL. Consider
+ -- let x = e in
+ -- let y = \z -> ...x... in
+ -- \ x -> ...y...
+ -- We'll clone the inner \x, adding x->x' in the id_subst
+ -- Then when we inline y, we must *not* replace x by x' in
+ -- the inlined copy!!
+
+ | otherwise -- Neither rule nor inlining
+ -- Use prepareArgs to use function strictness
+ = prepareArgs (ppr var) (idType var) (get_str var) cont $ \ args' cont' ->
+ rebuild (mkApps (Var var) args') cont'
+
+ where
+ get_str var = case getIdStrictness var of
+ NoStrictnessInfo -> (repeat wwLazy, False)
+ StrictnessInfo demands result_bot -> (demands, result_bot)
-2) Moving sccs inside lambdas ...
-\begin{code}
-simplSCC env cc (Lam binder@(ValBinder _) body) args result_ty
- | not (isSccCountCostCentre cc)
- -- move scc inside lambda only if no call counts
- = simplExpr env (Lam binder (Note (SCC cc) body)) args result_ty
-
-simplSCC env cc (Lam binder body) args result_ty
- -- always ok to move scc inside type/usage lambda
- = simplExpr env (Lam binder (Note (SCC cc) body)) args result_ty
-\end{code}
+ (args', result_cont) = contArgs in_scope cont
+ inline_call = contIsInline result_cont
+ interesting_cont = contIsInteresting result_cont
+ discard_inline_cont | inline_call = discardInline cont
+ | otherwise = cont
+
+ ---------- Unfolding stuff
+ maybe_inline = callSiteInline black_listed inline_call
+ var args' interesting_cont
+ Just unf_template = maybe_inline
+ black_listed = black_list_fn var
+
+ ---------- Specialisation stuff
+ maybe_rule_match = lookupRule in_scope var args'
+ Just (rule_name, rule_rhs, rule_args) = maybe_rule_match
+
+
+-- First a special case
+-- Don't actually inline the scrutinee when we see
+-- case x of y { .... }
+-- and x has unfolding (C a b). Why not? Because
+-- we get a silly binding y = C a b. If we don't
+-- inline knownCon can directly substitute x for y instead.
+completeInlining var (Con con con_args) (Select _ bndr alts se cont)
+ | conOkForAlt con
+ = knownCon (Var var) con con_args bndr alts se cont
+
+-- Now the normal case
+completeInlining var unfolding cont
+ = simplExprF unfolding cont
+
+----------- costCentreOk
+-- costCentreOk checks that it's ok to inline this thing
+-- The time it *isn't* is this:
+--
+-- f x = let y = E in
+-- scc "foo" (...y...)
+--
+-- Here y has a "current cost centre", and we can't inline it inside "foo",
+-- regardless of whether E is a WHNF or not.
+
+costCentreOk ccs_encl cc_rhs
+ = not opt_SccProfilingOn
+ || isSubsumedCCS ccs_encl -- can unfold anything into a subsumed scope
+ || not (isEmptyCC cc_rhs) -- otherwise need a cc on the unfolding
+\end{code}
-3) Eliminating dict sccs ...
\begin{code}
-simplSCC env cc expr args result_ty
- | squashableDictishCcExpr cc expr
- -- eliminate dict cc if trivial dict expression
- = simplExpr env expr args result_ty
-\end{code}
+---------------------------------------------------------
+-- Preparing arguments for a call
-4) Moving arguments inside the body of an scc ...
-This moves the cost of doing the application inside the scc
-(which may include the cost of extracting methods etc)
+prepareArgs :: SDoc -- Error message info
+ -> OutType -> ([Demand],Bool) -> SimplCont
+ -> ([OutExpr] -> SimplCont -> SimplM OutExprStuff)
+ -> SimplM OutExprStuff
-\begin{code}
-simplSCC env cc body args result_ty
- = let
- new_env = setEnclosingCC env cc
- in
- simplExpr new_env body args result_ty `thenSmpl` \ body' ->
- returnSmpl (Note (SCC cc) body')
+prepareArgs pp_fun orig_fun_ty (fun_demands, result_bot) orig_cont thing_inside
+ = go [] demands orig_fun_ty orig_cont
+ where
+ not_enough_args = fun_demands `lengthExceeds` countValArgs orig_cont
+ -- "No strictness info" is signalled by an infinite list of wwLazy
+
+ demands | not_enough_args = repeat wwLazy -- Not enough args, or no strictness
+ | result_bot = fun_demands -- Enough args, and function returns bottom
+ | otherwise = fun_demands ++ repeat wwLazy -- Enough args and function does not return bottom
+ -- NB: demands is finite iff enough args and result_bot is True
+
+ -- Main game plan: loop through the arguments, simplifying
+ -- each of them in turn. We carry with us a list of demands,
+ -- and the type of the function-applied-to-earlier-args
+
+ -- Type argument
+ go acc ds fun_ty (ApplyTo _ arg@(Type ty_arg) se cont)
+ = getInScope `thenSmpl` \ in_scope ->
+ let
+ ty_arg' = substTy (mkSubst in_scope se) ty_arg
+ res_ty = applyTy fun_ty ty_arg'
+ in
+ go (Type ty_arg' : acc) ds res_ty cont
+
+ -- Value argument
+ go acc (d:ds) fun_ty (ApplyTo _ val_arg se cont)
+ = case splitFunTy_maybe fun_ty of {
+ Nothing -> pprTrace "prepareArgs" (pp_fun $$ ppr orig_fun_ty $$ ppr orig_cont)
+ (thing_inside (reverse acc) cont) ;
+ Just (arg_ty, res_ty) ->
+ simplArg arg_ty d val_arg se (contResultType cont) $ \ arg' ->
+ go (arg':acc) ds res_ty cont }
+
+ -- We've run out of demands, which only happens for functions
+ -- we *know* now return bottom
+ -- This deals with
+ -- * case (error "hello") of { ... }
+ -- * (error "Hello") arg
+ -- * f (error "Hello") where f is strict
+ -- etc
+ go acc [] fun_ty cont = tick_case_of_error cont `thenSmpl_`
+ thing_inside (reverse acc) (discardCont cont)
+
+ -- We're run out of arguments
+ go acc ds fun_ty cont = thing_inside (reverse acc) cont
+
+-- Boring: we must only record a tick if there was an interesting
+-- continuation to discard. If not, we tick forever.
+tick_case_of_error (Stop _) = returnSmpl ()
+tick_case_of_error (CoerceIt _ (Stop _)) = returnSmpl ()
+tick_case_of_error other = tick BottomFound
\end{code}
-
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\subsection[Simplify-bind]{Binding groups}
+\subsection{Decisions about inlining}
%* *
%************************************************************************
\begin{code}
-simplBind :: SimplEnv
- -> InBinding
- -> (SimplEnv -> SmplM OutExpr)
- -> OutType
- -> SmplM OutExpr
-
-simplBind env (NonRec binder rhs) body_c body_ty = simplNonRec env binder rhs body_c body_ty
-simplBind env (Rec pairs) body_c body_ty = simplRec env pairs body_c body_ty
+preInlineUnconditionally :: InId -> Bool
+ -- Examines a bndr to see if it is used just once in a
+ -- completely safe way, so that it is safe to discard the binding
+ -- inline its RHS at the (unique) usage site, REGARDLESS of how
+ -- big the RHS might be. If this is the case we don't simplify
+ -- the RHS first, but just inline it un-simplified.
+ --
+ -- This is much better than first simplifying a perhaps-huge RHS
+ -- and then inlining and re-simplifying it.
+ --
+ -- NB: we don't even look at the RHS to see if it's trivial
+ -- We might have
+ -- x = y
+ -- where x is used many times, but this is the unique occurrence
+ -- of y. We should NOT inline x at all its uses, because then
+ -- we'd do the same for y -- aargh! So we must base this
+ -- pre-rhs-simplification decision solely on x's occurrences, not
+ -- on its rhs.
+ --
+ -- Evne RHSs labelled InlineMe aren't caught here, because
+ -- there might be no benefit from inlining at the call site.
+ -- But things labelled 'IMustBeINLINEd' *are* caught. We use this
+ -- for the trivial bindings introduced by SimplUtils.mkRhsTyLam
+preInlineUnconditionally bndr
+ = case getInlinePragma bndr of
+ IMustBeINLINEd -> True
+ ICanSafelyBeINLINEd NotInsideLam True -> True -- Not inside a lambda,
+ -- one occurrence ==> safe!
+ other -> False
+
+
+postInlineUnconditionally :: InId -> OutExpr -> Bool
+ -- Examines a (bndr = rhs) binding, AFTER the rhs has been simplified
+ -- It returns True if it's ok to discard the binding and inline the
+ -- RHS at every use site.
+
+ -- NOTE: This isn't our last opportunity to inline.
+ -- We're at the binding site right now, and
+ -- we'll get another opportunity when we get to the ocurrence(s)
+
+postInlineUnconditionally bndr rhs
+ | isExportedId bndr
+ = False
+ | otherwise
+ = case getInlinePragma bndr of
+ IAmALoopBreaker -> False
+
+ ICanSafelyBeINLINEd InsideLam one_branch -> exprIsTrivial rhs
+ -- Don't inline even WHNFs inside lambdas; doing so may
+ -- simply increase allocation when the function is called
+ -- This isn't the last chance; see NOTE above.
+
+ ICanSafelyBeINLINEd not_in_lam one_branch -> one_branch || exprIsTrivial rhs
+ -- Was 'exprIsDupable' instead of 'exprIsTrivial' but the
+ -- decision about duplicating code is best left to callSiteInline
+
+ other -> exprIsTrivial rhs -- Duplicating is *free*
+ -- NB: Even InlineMe and IMustBeINLINEd are ignored here
+ -- Why? Because we don't even want to inline them into the
+ -- RHS of constructor arguments. See NOTE above
+ -- NB: Even IMustBeINLINEd is ignored here: if the rhs is trivial
+ -- it's best to inline it anyway. We often get a=E; b=a
+ -- from desugaring, with both a and b marked NOINLINE.
\end{code}
+
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\subsection[Simplify-let]{Let-expressions}
+\subsection{The main rebuilder}
%* *
%************************************************************************
-Float switches
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-The booleans controlling floating have to be set with a little care.
-Here's one performance bug I found:
-
- let x = let y = let z = case a# +# 1 of {b# -> E1}
- in E2
- in E3
- in E4
-
-Now, if E2, E3 aren't HNFs we won't float the y-binding or the z-binding.
-Before case_floating_ok included float_exposes_hnf, the case expression was floated
-*one level per simplifier iteration* outwards. So it made th s
-
-
-Floating case from let
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-When floating cases out of lets, remember this:
-
- let x* = case e of alts
- in <small expr>
-
-where x* is sure to be demanded or e is a cheap operation that cannot
-fail, e.g. unboxed addition. Here we should be prepared to duplicate
-<small expr>. A good example:
-
- let x* = case y of
- p1 -> build e1
- p2 -> build e2
- in
- foldr c n x*
-==>
- case y of
- p1 -> foldr c n (build e1)
- p2 -> foldr c n (build e2)
-
-NEW: We use the same machinery that we use for case-of-case to
-*always* do case floating from let, that is we let bind and abstract
-the original let body, and let the occurrence analyser later decide
-whether the new let should be inlined or not. The example above
-becomes:
+\begin{code}
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+-- Finish rebuilding
+rebuild_done expr
+ = getInScope `thenSmpl` \ in_scope ->
+ returnSmpl ([], (in_scope, expr))
+
+---------------------------------------------------------
+rebuild :: OutExpr -> SimplCont -> SimplM OutExprStuff
+
+-- Stop continuation
+rebuild expr (Stop _) = rebuild_done expr
+
+-- ArgOf continuation
+rebuild expr (ArgOf _ _ cont_fn) = cont_fn expr
+
+-- ApplyTo continuation
+rebuild expr cont@(ApplyTo _ arg se cont')
+ = setSubstEnv se (simplExpr arg) `thenSmpl` \ arg' ->
+ rebuild (App expr arg') cont'
+
+-- Coerce continuation
+rebuild expr (CoerceIt to_ty cont)
+ = rebuild (mkCoerce to_ty expr) cont
+
+-- Inline continuation
+rebuild expr (InlinePlease cont)
+ = rebuild (Note InlineCall expr) cont
+
+-- Case of known constructor or literal
+rebuild expr@(Con con args) (Select _ bndr alts se cont)
+ | conOkForAlt con -- Knocks out PrimOps and NoRepLits
+ = knownCon expr con args bndr alts se cont
+
+
+---------------------------------------------------------
+-- The other Select cases
+
+rebuild scrut (Select _ bndr alts se cont)
+ | -- Check that the RHSs are all the same, and
+ -- don't use the binders in the alternatives
+ -- This test succeeds rapidly in the common case of
+ -- a single DEFAULT alternative
+ all (cheapEqExpr rhs1) other_rhss && all binders_unused alts
+
+ -- Check that the scrutinee can be let-bound instead of case-bound
+ && ( (isUnLiftedType (idType bndr) && -- It's unlifted and floatable
+ exprOkForSpeculation scrut) -- NB: scrut = an unboxed variable satisfies
+ || exprIsValue scrut -- It's already evaluated
+ || var_demanded_later scrut -- It'll be demanded later
+
+-- || not opt_SimplPedanticBottoms) -- Or we don't care!
+-- We used to allow improving termination by discarding cases, unless -fpedantic-bottoms was on,
+-- but that breaks badly for the dataToTag# primop, which relies on a case to evaluate
+-- its argument: case x of { y -> dataToTag# y }
+-- Here we must *not* discard the case, because dataToTag# just fetches the tag from
+-- the info pointer. So we'll be pedantic all the time, and see if that gives any
+-- other problems
+ )
+
+-- && opt_SimplDoCaseElim
+-- [June 99; don't test this flag. The code generator dies if it sees
+-- case (\x.e) of f -> ...
+-- so better to always do it
+
+ -- Get rid of the case altogether
+ -- See the extensive notes on case-elimination below
+ -- Remember to bind the binder though!
+ = tick (CaseElim bndr) `thenSmpl_` (
+ setSubstEnv se $
+ simplBinder bndr $ \ bndr' ->
+ completeBinding bndr bndr' scrut $
+ simplExprF rhs1 cont)
-==>
- let join_body x' = foldr c n x'
- in case y of
- p1 -> let x* = build e1
- in join_body x*
- p2 -> let x* = build e2
- in join_body x*
+ | otherwise
+ = rebuild_case scrut bndr alts se cont
+ where
+ (rhs1:other_rhss) = [rhs | (_,_,rhs) <- alts]
+ binders_unused (_, bndrs, _) = all isDeadBinder bndrs
-note that join_body is a let-no-escape.
-In this particular example join_body will later be inlined,
-achieving the same effect.
-ToDo: check this is OK with andy
+ var_demanded_later (Var v) = isStrict (getIdDemandInfo bndr) -- It's going to be evaluated later
+ var_demanded_later other = False
+\end{code}
+Case elimination [see the code above]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Start with a simple situation:
+
+ case x# of ===> e[x#/y#]
+ y# -> e
+
+(when x#, y# are of primitive type, of course). We can't (in general)
+do this for algebraic cases, because we might turn bottom into
+non-bottom!
+
+Actually, we generalise this idea to look for a case where we're
+scrutinising a variable, and we know that only the default case can
+match. For example:
+\begin{verbatim}
+ case x of
+ 0# -> ...
+ other -> ...(case x of
+ 0# -> ...
+ other -> ...) ...
+\end{code}
+Here the inner case can be eliminated. This really only shows up in
+eliminating error-checking code.
-Let to case: two points
-~~~~~~~~~~~
+We also make sure that we deal with this very common case:
-Point 1. We defer let-to-case for all data types except single-constructor
-ones. Suppose we change
+ case e of
+ x -> ...x...
- let x* = e in b
-to
- case e of x -> b
+Here we are using the case as a strict let; if x is used only once
+then we want to inline it. We have to be careful that this doesn't
+make the program terminate when it would have diverged before, so we
+check that
+ - x is used strictly, or
+ - e is already evaluated (it may so if e is a variable)
-It can be the case that we find that b ultimately contains ...(case x of ..)....
-and this is the only occurrence of x. Then if we've done let-to-case
-we can't inline x, which is a real pain. On the other hand, we lose no
-transformations by not doing this transformation, because the relevant
-case-of-X transformations are also implemented by simpl_bind.
+Lastly, we generalise the transformation to handle this:
-If x is a single-constructor type, then we go ahead anyway, giving
+ case e of ===> r
+ True -> r
+ False -> r
- case e of (y,z) -> let x = (y,z) in b
+We only do this for very cheaply compared r's (constructors, literals
+and variables). If pedantic bottoms is on, we only do it when the
+scrutinee is a PrimOp which can't fail.
-because now we can squash case-on-x wherever they occur in b.
+We do it *here*, looking at un-simplified alternatives, because we
+have to check that r doesn't mention the variables bound by the
+pattern in each alternative, so the binder-info is rather useful.
-We do let-to-case on multi-constructor types in the tidy-up phase
-(tidyCoreExpr) mainly so that the code generator doesn't need to
-spot the demand-flag.
+So the case-elimination algorithm is:
+ 1. Eliminate alternatives which can't match
-Point 2. It's important to try let-to-case before doing the
-strict-let-of-case transformation, which happens in the next equation
-for simpl_bind.
+ 2. Check whether all the remaining alternatives
+ (a) do not mention in their rhs any of the variables bound in their pattern
+ and (b) have equal rhss
- let a*::Int = case v of {p1->e1; p2->e2}
- in b
+ 3. Check we can safely ditch the case:
+ * PedanticBottoms is off,
+ or * the scrutinee is an already-evaluated variable
+ or * the scrutinee is a primop which is ok for speculation
+ -- ie we want to preserve divide-by-zero errors, and
+ -- calls to error itself!
-(The * means that a is sure to be demanded.)
-If we do case-floating first we get this:
+ or * [Prim cases] the scrutinee is a primitive variable
- let k = \a* -> b
- in case v of
- p1-> let a*=e1 in k a
- p2-> let a*=e2 in k a
+ or * [Alg cases] the scrutinee is a variable and
+ either * the rhs is the same variable
+ (eg case x of C a b -> x ===> x)
+ or * there is only one alternative, the default alternative,
+ and the binder is used strictly in its scope.
+ [NB this is helped by the "use default binder where
+ possible" transformation; see below.]
-Now watch what happens if we do let-to-case first:
- case (case v of {p1->e1; p2->e2}) of
- Int a# -> let a*=I# a# in b
-===>
- let k = \a# -> let a*=I# a# in b
- in case v of
- p1 -> case e1 of I# a# -> k a#
- p1 -> case e2 of I# a# -> k a#
+If so, then we can replace the case with one of the rhss.
-The latter is clearly better. (Remember the reboxing let-decl for a
-is likely to go away, because after all b is strict in a.)
-We do not do let to case for WHNFs, e.g.
+Blob of helper functions for the "case-of-something-else" situation.
- let x = a:b in ...
- =/=>
- case a:b of x in ...
+\begin{code}
+---------------------------------------------------------
+-- Case of something else
-as this is less efficient. but we don't mind doing let-to-case for
-"bottom", as that will allow us to remove more dead code, if anything:
+rebuild_case scrut case_bndr alts se cont
+ = -- Prepare case alternatives
+ prepareCaseAlts case_bndr (splitTyConApp_maybe (idType case_bndr))
+ scrut_cons alts `thenSmpl` \ better_alts ->
+
+ -- Set the new subst-env in place (before dealing with the case binder)
+ setSubstEnv se $
- let x = error in ...
- ===>
- case error of x -> ...
- ===>
- error
+ -- Deal with the case binder, and prepare the continuation;
+ -- The new subst_env is in place
+ prepareCaseCont better_alts cont $ \ cont' ->
+
-Notice that let to case occurs only if x is used strictly in its body
-(obviously).
+ -- Deal with variable scrutinee
+ ( simplBinder case_bndr $ \ case_bndr' ->
+ substForVarScrut scrut case_bndr' $ \ zap_occ_info ->
+ let
+ case_bndr'' = zap_occ_info case_bndr'
+ in
+ -- Deal with the case alternaatives
+ simplAlts zap_occ_info scrut_cons
+ case_bndr'' better_alts cont' `thenSmpl` \ alts' ->
-\begin{code}
--- Dead code is now discarded by the occurrence analyser,
-
-simplNonRec env binder@(id,_) rhs body_c body_ty
- | inlineUnconditionally binder
- = -- The binder is used in definitely-inline way in the body
- -- So add it to the environment, drop the binding, and continue
- body_c (bindIdToExpr env binder rhs)
-
- | idWantsToBeINLINEd id
- = complete_bind env rhs -- Don't mess about with floating or let-to-case on
- -- INLINE things
-
- -- Do let-to-case right away for unpointed types
- -- These shouldn't occur much, but do occur right after desugaring,
- -- because we havn't done dependency analysis at that point, so
- -- we can't trivially do let-to-case (because there may be some unboxed
- -- things bound in letrecs that aren't really recursive).
- | isUnpointedType rhs_ty && not rhs_is_whnf
- = simplCase env rhs (getSubstEnvs env, PrimAlts [] (BindDefault binder (Var id)))
- (\env rhs -> complete_bind env rhs) body_ty
-
- -- Try let-to-case; see notes below about let-to-case
- | try_let_to_case &&
- will_be_demanded &&
- ( rhs_is_bot
- || (not rhs_is_whnf && singleConstructorType rhs_ty)
- -- Don't do let-to-case if the RHS is a constructor application.
- -- Even then only do it for single constructor types.
- -- For other types we defer doing it until the tidy-up phase at
- -- the end of simplification.
- )
- = tick Let2Case `thenSmpl_`
- simplCase env rhs (getSubstEnvs env, AlgAlts [] (BindDefault binder (Var id)))
- (\env rhs -> complete_bind env rhs) body_ty
- -- OLD COMMENT: [now the new RHS is only "x" so there's less worry]
- -- NB: it's tidier to call complete_bind not simpl_bind, else
- -- we nearly end up in a loop. Consider:
- -- let x = rhs in b
- -- ==> case rhs of (p,q) -> let x=(p,q) in b
- -- This effectively what the above simplCase call does.
- -- Now, the inner let is a let-to-case target again! Actually, since
- -- the RHS is in WHNF it won't happen, but it's a close thing!
+ mkCase scrut case_bndr'' alts'
+ ) `thenSmpl` \ case_expr ->
- | otherwise
- = simpl_bind env rhs
+ -- Notice that the simplBinder, prepareCaseCont, etc, do *not* scope
+ -- over the rebuild_done; rebuild_done returns the in-scope set, and
+ -- that should not include these chaps!
+ rebuild_done case_expr
where
- -- Try let-from-let
- simpl_bind env (Let bind rhs) | let_floating_ok
- = tick LetFloatFromLet `thenSmpl_`
- simplBind env (if will_be_demanded then bind
- else un_demandify_bind bind)
- (\env -> simpl_bind env rhs) body_ty
-
- -- Try case-from-let; this deals with a strict let of error too
- simpl_bind env (Case scrut alts) | case_floating_ok scrut
- = tick CaseFloatFromLet `thenSmpl_`
-
- -- First, bind large let-body if necessary
- if isSingleton (nonErrorRHSs alts)
- then
- simplCase env scrut (getSubstEnvs env, alts)
- (\env rhs -> simpl_bind env rhs) body_ty
- else
- bindLargeRhs env [binder] body_ty body_c `thenSmpl` \ (extra_binding, new_body) ->
- let
- body_c' = \env -> simplExpr env new_body [] body_ty
- case_c = \env rhs -> simplNonRec env binder rhs body_c' body_ty
- in
- simplCase env scrut (getSubstEnvs env, alts) case_c body_ty `thenSmpl` \ case_expr ->
- returnSmpl (Let extra_binding case_expr)
-
- -- None of the above; simplify rhs and tidy up
- simpl_bind env rhs = complete_bind env rhs
-
- complete_bind env rhs
- = simplBinder env binder `thenSmpl` \ (env_w_clone, new_id) ->
- simplRhsExpr env binder rhs new_id `thenSmpl` \ (rhs',arity) ->
- completeNonRec env_w_clone binder
- (new_id `withArity` arity) rhs' `thenSmpl` \ (new_env, binds) ->
- body_c new_env `thenSmpl` \ body' ->
- returnSmpl (mkCoLetsAny binds body')
-
-
- -- All this stuff is computed at the start of the simpl_bind loop
- float_lets = switchIsSet env SimplFloatLetsExposingWHNF
- float_primops = switchIsSet env SimplOkToFloatPrimOps
- always_float_let_from_let = switchIsSet env SimplAlwaysFloatLetsFromLets
- try_let_to_case = switchIsSet env SimplLetToCase
- no_float = switchIsSet env SimplNoLetFromStrictLet
-
- demand_info = getIdDemandInfo id
- will_be_demanded = willBeDemanded demand_info
- rhs_ty = idType id
-
- form = mkFormSummary rhs
- rhs_is_bot = case form of
- BottomForm -> True
- other -> False
- rhs_is_whnf = case form of
- VarForm -> True
- ValueForm -> True
- other -> False
-
- float_exposes_hnf = floatExposesHNF float_lets float_primops rhs
-
- let_floating_ok = (will_be_demanded && not no_float) ||
- always_float_let_from_let ||
- float_exposes_hnf
-
- case_floating_ok scrut = (will_be_demanded && not no_float) ||
- (float_exposes_hnf && is_cheap_prim_app scrut && float_primops)
- -- See note below
+ -- scrut_cons tells what constructors the scrutinee can't possibly match
+ scrut_cons = case scrut of
+ Var v -> otherCons (getIdUnfolding v)
+ other -> []
+
+
+knownCon expr con args bndr alts se cont
+ = tick (KnownBranch bndr) `thenSmpl_`
+ setSubstEnv se (
+ simplBinder bndr $ \ bndr' ->
+ case findAlt con alts of
+ (DEFAULT, bs, rhs) -> ASSERT( null bs )
+ completeBinding bndr bndr' expr $
+ -- Don't use completeBeta here. The expr might be
+ -- an unboxed literal, like 3, or a variable
+ -- whose unfolding is an unboxed literal... and
+ -- completeBeta will just construct another case
+ -- expression!
+ simplExprF rhs cont
+
+ (Literal lit, bs, rhs) -> ASSERT( null bs )
+ extendSubst bndr (DoneEx expr) $
+ -- Unconditionally substitute, because expr must
+ -- be a variable or a literal. It can't be a
+ -- NoRep literal because they don't occur in
+ -- case patterns.
+ simplExprF rhs cont
+
+ (DataCon dc, bs, rhs) -> ASSERT( length bs == length real_args )
+ completeBinding bndr bndr' expr $
+ -- See note above
+ extendSubstList bs (map mk real_args) $
+ simplExprF rhs cont
+ where
+ real_args = drop (dataConNumInstArgs dc) args
+ mk (Type ty) = DoneTy ty
+ mk other = DoneEx other
+ )
\end{code}
-
-@completeNonRec@ looks at the simplified post-floating RHS of the
-let-expression, with a view to turning
- x = e
-into
- x = y
-where y is just a variable. Now we can eliminate the binding
-altogether, and replace x by y throughout.
-
-There are two cases when we can do this:
-
- * When e is a constructor application, and we have
- another variable in scope bound to the same
- constructor application. [This is just a special
- case of common-subexpression elimination.]
-
- * When e can be eta-reduced to a variable. E.g.
- x = \a b -> y a b
-
-
-HOWEVER, if x is exported, we don't attempt this at all. Why not?
-Because then we can't remove the x=y binding, in which case we
-have just made things worse, perhaps a lot worse.
-
\begin{code}
-completeNonRec env binder new_id new_rhs
- = returnSmpl (env', [NonRec b r | (b,r) <- binds])
- where
- (env', binds) = completeBind env binder new_id new_rhs
-
-
-completeBind :: SimplEnv
- -> InBinder -> OutId -> OutExpr -- Id and RHS
- -> (SimplEnv, [(OutId, OutExpr)]) -- Final envt and binding(s)
+prepareCaseCont :: [InAlt] -> SimplCont
+ -> (SimplCont -> SimplM (OutStuff a))
+ -> SimplM (OutStuff a)
+ -- Polymorphic recursion here!
-completeBind env binder@(old_id,occ_info) new_id new_rhs
- | not (idMustNotBeINLINEd new_id)
- && atomic_rhs -- If rhs (after eta reduction) is atomic
- && not (isExported new_id) -- and binder isn't exported
-
- = -- Drop the binding completely
- let
- env1 = notInScope env new_id
- env2 = bindIdToAtom env1 binder the_arg
- in
- (env2, [])
-
- | otherwise -- Non-atomic
- -- The big deal here is that we simplify the
- -- SpecEnv of the Id, if any. We used to do that in simplBinders, but
- -- that didn't work because it didn't take account of the fact that
- -- one of the mutually recursive group might mention one of the others
- -- in its SpecEnv
- = let
- id_w_specenv | isEmptySpecEnv spec_env = new_id
- | otherwise = setIdSpecialisation new_id spec_env'
-
- env1 | idMustNotBeINLINEd new_id -- Occurrence analyser says "don't inline"
- = extendEnvGivenUnfolding env id_w_specenv occ_info noUnfolding
- -- Still need to record the new_id with its SpecEnv
-
- | otherwise -- Can inline it
- = extendEnvGivenBinding env occ_info id_w_specenv new_rhs
-
- new_binds = [(id_w_specenv, new_rhs)]
- in
- (env1, new_binds)
-
- where
- spec_env = getIdSpecialisation old_id
- spec_env' = substSpecEnv ty_subst (substSpecEnvRhs ty_subst id_subst) spec_env
- (ty_subst,id_subst) = getSubstEnvs env
-
- atomic_rhs = is_atomic eta'd_rhs
- eta'd_rhs = case lookForConstructor env new_rhs of
- Just v -> Var v
- other -> etaCoreExpr new_rhs
-
- the_arg = case eta'd_rhs of
- Var v -> VarArg v
- Lit l -> LitArg l
+prepareCaseCont [alt] cont thing_inside = thing_inside cont
+prepareCaseCont alts cont thing_inside = mkDupableCont (coreAltsType alts) cont thing_inside
\end{code}
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- A digression on constructor CSE
-
-Consider
-@
- f = \x -> case x of
- (y:ys) -> y:ys
- [] -> ...
-@
-Is it a good idea to replace the rhs @y:ys@ with @x@? This depends a
-bit on the compiler technology, but in general I believe not. For
-example, here's some code from a real program:
-@
-const.Int.max.wrk{-s2516-} =
- \ upk.s3297# upk.s3298# ->
- let {
- a.s3299 :: Int
- _N_ {-# U(P) #-}
- a.s3299 = I#! upk.s3297#
- } in
- case (const.Int._tagCmp.wrk{-s2513-} upk.s3297# upk.s3298#) of {
- _LT -> I#! upk.s3298#
- _EQ -> a.s3299
- _GT -> a.s3299
- }
-@
-The a.s3299 really isn't doing much good. We'd be better off inlining
-it. (Actually, let-no-escapery means it isn't as bad as it looks.)
-
-So the current strategy is to inline all known-form constructors, and
-only do the reverse (turn a constructor application back into a
-variable) when we find a let-expression:
-@
- let x = C a1 .. an
- in
- ... (let y = C a1 .. an in ...) ...
-@
-where it is always good to ditch the binding for y, and replace y by
-x.
- End of digression
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- A digression on "optimising" coercions
-
- The trouble is that we kept transforming
- let x = coerce e
- y = coerce x
- in ...
- to
- let x' = coerce e
- y' = coerce x'
- in ...
- and counting a couple of ticks for this non-transformation
-\begin{pseudocode}
- -- We want to ensure that all let-bound Coerces have
- -- atomic bodies, so they can freely be inlined.
-completeNonRec env binder new_id (Coerce coercion ty rhs)
- | not (is_atomic rhs)
- = newId (coreExprType rhs) `thenSmpl` \ inner_id ->
- completeNonRec env
- (inner_id, dangerousArgOcc) inner_id rhs `thenSmpl` \ (env1, binds1) ->
- -- Dangerous occ because, like constructor args,
- -- it can be duplicated easily
- let
- atomic_rhs = case runEager $ lookupId env1 inner_id of
- LitArg l -> Lit l
- VarArg v -> Var v
- in
- completeNonRec env1 binder new_id
- (Coerce coercion ty atomic_rhs) `thenSmpl` \ (env2, binds2) ->
+substForVarScrut checks whether the scrutinee is a variable, v.
+If so, try to eliminate uses of v in the RHSs in favour of case_bndr;
+that way, there's a chance that v will now only be used once, and hence inlined.
- returnSmpl (env2, binds1 ++ binds2)
-\end{pseudocode}
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+If we do this, then we have to nuke any occurrence info (eg IAmDead)
+in the case binder, because the case-binder now effectively occurs
+whenever v does. AND we have to do the same for the pattern-bound
+variables! Example:
+ (case x of { (a,b) -> a }) (case x of { (p,q) -> q })
+Here, b and p are dead. But when we move the argment inside the first
+case RHS, and eliminate the second case, we get
-%************************************************************************
-%* *
-\subsection[Simplify-letrec]{Letrec-expressions}
-%* *
-%************************************************************************
-
-Letrec expressions
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-Here's the game plan
-
-1. Float any let(rec)s out of the RHSs
-2. Clone all the Ids and extend the envt with these clones
-3. Simplify one binding at a time, adding each binding to the
- environment once it's done.
-
-This relies on the occurrence analyser to
- a) break all cycles with an Id marked MustNotBeInlined
- b) sort the decls into topological order
-The former prevents infinite inlinings, and the latter means
-that we get maximum benefit from working top to bottom.
+ case x or { (a,b) -> a b }
+Urk! b is alive! Reason: the scrutinee was a variable, and case elimination
+happened. Hence the zap_occ_info function returned by substForVarScrut
\begin{code}
-simplRec env pairs body_c body_ty
- = -- Do floating, if necessary
- floatBind env False (Rec pairs) `thenSmpl` \ [Rec pairs'] ->
- let
- binders = map fst pairs'
- in
- simplBinders env binders `thenSmpl` \ (env_w_clones, ids') ->
- simplRecursiveGroup env_w_clones ids' pairs' `thenSmpl` \ (pairs', new_env) ->
-
- body_c new_env `thenSmpl` \ body' ->
-
- returnSmpl (Let (Rec pairs') body')
+substForVarScrut (Var v) case_bndr' thing_inside
+ | isLocallyDefined v -- No point for imported things
+ = modifyInScope (v `setIdUnfolding` mkUnfolding (Var case_bndr')
+ `setInlinePragma` IMustBeINLINEd) $
+ -- We could extend the substitution instead, but it would be
+ -- a hack because then the substitution wouldn't be idempotent
+ -- any more.
+ thing_inside (\ bndr -> bndr `setInlinePragma` NoInlinePragInfo)
+
+substForVarScrut other_scrut case_bndr' thing_inside
+ = thing_inside (\ bndr -> bndr) -- NoOp on bndr
\end{code}
-\begin{code}
--- The env passed to simplRecursiveGroup already has
--- bindings that clone the variables of the group.
-simplRecursiveGroup env new_ids []
- = returnSmpl ([], env)
-
-simplRecursiveGroup env (new_id : new_ids) ((binder, rhs) : pairs)
-{-
- | inlineUnconditionally binder
- = -- Single occurrence, so drop binding and extend env with the inlining
- -- This is a little delicate, because what if the unique occurrence
- -- is *before* this binding? This'll never happen, because
- -- either it'll be marked "never inline" or else its occurrence will
- -- occur after its binding in the group.
- --
- -- If these claims aren't right Core Lint will spot an unbound
- -- variable. A quick fix is to delete this clause for simplRecursiveGroup
- let
- new_env = bindIdToExpr env binder rhs
- in
- simplRecursiveGroup new_env new_ids pairs
--}
- | otherwise
- = simplRhsExpr env binder rhs new_id `thenSmpl` \ (new_rhs, arity) ->
- let
- new_id' = new_id `withArity` arity
- (new_env, new_binds') = completeBind env binder new_id' new_rhs
- in
- simplRecursiveGroup new_env new_ids pairs `thenSmpl` \ (new_pairs, final_env) ->
- returnSmpl (new_binds' ++ new_pairs, final_env)
-\end{code}
+prepareCaseAlts does two things:
+1. Remove impossible alternatives
+2. If the DEFAULT alternative can match only one possible constructor,
+ then make that constructor explicit.
+ e.g.
+ case e of x { DEFAULT -> rhs }
+ ===>
+ case e of x { (a,b) -> rhs }
+ where the type is a single constructor type. This gives better code
+ when rhs also scrutinises x or e.
\begin{code}
-floatBind :: SimplEnv
- -> Bool -- True <=> Top level
- -> InBinding
- -> SmplM [InBinding]
-
-floatBind env top_level bind
- | not float_lets ||
- n_extras == 0
- = returnSmpl [bind]
-
- | otherwise
- = tickN LetFloatFromLet n_extras `thenSmpl_`
- -- It's important to increment the tick counts if we
- -- do any floating. A situation where this turns out
- -- to be important is this:
- -- Float in produces:
- -- letrec x = let y = Ey in Ex
- -- in B
- -- Now floating gives this:
- -- letrec x = Ex
- -- y = Ey
- -- in B
- --- We now want to iterate once more in case Ey doesn't
- -- mention x, in which case the y binding can be pulled
- -- out as an enclosing let(rec), which in turn gives
- -- the strictness analyser more chance.
- returnSmpl binds'
-
+prepareCaseAlts bndr (Just (tycon, inst_tys)) scrut_cons alts
+ | isDataTyCon tycon
+ = case (findDefault filtered_alts, missing_cons) of
+
+ ((alts_no_deflt, Just rhs), [data_con]) -- Just one missing constructor!
+ -> tick (FillInCaseDefault bndr) `thenSmpl_`
+ let
+ (_,_,ex_tyvars,_,_,_) = dataConSig data_con
+ in
+ getUniquesSmpl (length ex_tyvars) `thenSmpl` \ tv_uniqs ->
+ let
+ ex_tyvars' = zipWithEqual "simpl_alt" mk tv_uniqs ex_tyvars
+ mk uniq tv = mkSysTyVar uniq (tyVarKind tv)
+ in
+ newIds (dataConArgTys
+ data_con
+ (inst_tys ++ mkTyVarTys ex_tyvars')) $ \ bndrs ->
+ returnSmpl ((DataCon data_con, ex_tyvars' ++ bndrs, rhs) : alts_no_deflt)
+
+ other -> returnSmpl filtered_alts
where
- binds' = fltBind bind
- n_extras = sum (map no_of_binds binds') - no_of_binds bind
+ -- Filter out alternatives that can't possibly match
+ filtered_alts = case scrut_cons of
+ [] -> alts
+ other -> [alt | alt@(con,_,_) <- alts, not (con `elem` scrut_cons)]
- float_lets = switchIsSet env SimplFloatLetsExposingWHNF
- always_float_let_from_let = switchIsSet env SimplAlwaysFloatLetsFromLets
-
- -- fltBind guarantees not to return leaky floats
- -- and all the binders of the floats have had their demand-info zapped
- fltBind (NonRec bndr rhs)
- = binds ++ [NonRec bndr rhs']
- where
- (binds, rhs') = fltRhs rhs
-
- fltBind (Rec pairs)
- = [Rec pairs']
- where
- pairs' = concat [ let
- (binds, rhs') = fltRhs rhs
- in
- foldr get_pairs [(bndr, rhs')] binds
- | (bndr, rhs) <- pairs
- ]
-
- get_pairs (NonRec bndr rhs) rest = (bndr,rhs) : rest
- get_pairs (Rec pairs) rest = pairs ++ rest
-
- -- fltRhs has same invariant as fltBind
- fltRhs rhs
- | (always_float_let_from_let ||
- floatExposesHNF True False rhs)
- = fltExpr rhs
-
- | otherwise
- = ([], rhs)
-
-
- -- fltExpr has same invariant as fltBind
- fltExpr (Let bind body)
- | not top_level || binds_wont_leak
- -- fltExpr guarantees not to return leaky floats
- = (binds' ++ body_binds, body')
- where
- binds_wont_leak = all leakFreeBind binds'
- (body_binds, body') = fltExpr body
- binds' = fltBind (un_demandify_bind bind)
-
- fltExpr expr = ([], expr)
+ missing_cons = [data_con | data_con <- tyConDataCons tycon,
+ not (data_con `elem` handled_data_cons)]
+ handled_data_cons = [data_con | DataCon data_con <- scrut_cons] ++
+ [data_con | (DataCon data_con, _, _) <- filtered_alts]
--- Crude but effective
-no_of_binds (NonRec _ _) = 1
-no_of_binds (Rec pairs) = length pairs
+-- The default case
+prepareCaseAlts _ _ scrut_cons alts
+ = returnSmpl alts -- Functions
-leakFreeBind (NonRec bndr rhs) = leakFree bndr rhs
-leakFreeBind (Rec pairs) = and [leakFree bndr rhs | (bndr, rhs) <- pairs]
-leakFree (id,_) rhs = case getIdArity id of
- ArityAtLeast n | n > 0 -> True
- ArityExactly n | n > 0 -> True
- other -> whnfOrBottom (mkFormSummary rhs)
+----------------------
+simplAlts zap_occ_info scrut_cons case_bndr'' alts cont'
+ = mapSmpl simpl_alt alts
+ where
+ inst_tys' = case splitTyConApp_maybe (idType case_bndr'') of
+ Just (tycon, inst_tys) -> inst_tys
+
+ -- handled_cons is all the constructors that are dealt
+ -- with, either by being impossible, or by there being an alternative
+ handled_cons = scrut_cons ++ [con | (con,_,_) <- alts, con /= DEFAULT]
+
+ simpl_alt (DEFAULT, _, rhs)
+ = -- In the default case we record the constructors that the
+ -- case-binder *can't* be.
+ -- We take advantage of any OtherCon info in the case scrutinee
+ modifyInScope (case_bndr'' `setIdUnfolding` mkOtherCon handled_cons) $
+ simplExprC rhs cont' `thenSmpl` \ rhs' ->
+ returnSmpl (DEFAULT, [], rhs')
+
+ simpl_alt (con, vs, rhs)
+ = -- Deal with the pattern-bound variables
+ -- Mark the ones that are in ! positions in the data constructor
+ -- as certainly-evaluated
+ simplBinders (add_evals con vs) $ \ vs' ->
+
+ -- Bind the case-binder to (Con args)
+ let
+ con_app = Con con (map Type inst_tys' ++ map varToCoreExpr vs')
+ in
+ modifyInScope (case_bndr'' `setIdUnfolding` mkUnfolding con_app) $
+ simplExprC rhs cont' `thenSmpl` \ rhs' ->
+ returnSmpl (con, vs', rhs')
+
+
+ -- add_evals records the evaluated-ness of the bound variables of
+ -- a case pattern. This is *important*. Consider
+ -- data T = T !Int !Int
+ --
+ -- case x of { T a b -> T (a+1) b }
+ --
+ -- We really must record that b is already evaluated so that we don't
+ -- go and re-evaluate it when constructing the result.
+
+ add_evals (DataCon dc) vs = cat_evals vs (dataConRepStrictness dc)
+ add_evals other_con vs = vs
+
+ cat_evals [] [] = []
+ cat_evals (v:vs) (str:strs)
+ | isTyVar v = v : cat_evals vs (str:strs)
+ | isStrict str = (v' `setIdUnfolding` mkOtherCon []) : cat_evals vs strs
+ | otherwise = v' : cat_evals vs strs
+ where
+ v' = zap_occ_info v
\end{code}
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\subsection[Simplify-atoms]{Simplifying atoms}
+\subsection{Duplicating continuations}
%* *
%************************************************************************
\begin{code}
-simplArg :: SimplEnv -> InArg -> Eager ans OutArg
-
-simplArg env (LitArg lit) = returnEager (LitArg lit)
-simplArg env (TyArg ty) = simplTy env ty `appEager` \ ty' ->
- returnEager (TyArg ty')
-simplArg env arg@(VarArg id)
- = case lookupIdSubst env id of
- Just (SubstVar id') -> returnEager (VarArg id')
- Just (SubstLit lit) -> returnEager (LitArg lit)
- Just (SubstExpr _ __) -> panic "simplArg"
- Nothing -> case lookupOutIdEnv env id of
- Just (id', _, _) -> returnEager (VarArg id')
- Nothing -> returnEager arg
-\end{code}
-
-%************************************************************************
-%* *
-\subsection[Simplify-quickies]{Some local help functions}
-%* *
-%************************************************************************
-
-
-\begin{code}
--- un_demandify_bind switches off the willBeDemanded Info field
--- for bindings floated out of a non-demanded let
-un_demandify_bind (NonRec binder rhs)
- = NonRec (un_demandify_bndr binder) rhs
-un_demandify_bind (Rec pairs)
- = Rec [(un_demandify_bndr binder, rhs) | (binder,rhs) <- pairs]
-
-un_demandify_bndr (id, occ_info) = (id `addIdDemandInfo` noDemandInfo, occ_info)
-
-is_cheap_prim_app (Prim op _) = primOpOkForSpeculation op
-is_cheap_prim_app other = False
-
-computeResultType :: SimplEnv -> InType -> [OutArg] -> OutType
-computeResultType env expr_ty orig_args
- = simplTy env expr_ty `appEager` \ expr_ty' ->
+mkDupableCont :: InType -- Type of the thing to be given to the continuation
+ -> SimplCont
+ -> (SimplCont -> SimplM (OutStuff a))
+ -> SimplM (OutStuff a)
+mkDupableCont ty cont thing_inside
+ | contIsDupable cont
+ = thing_inside cont
+
+mkDupableCont _ (CoerceIt ty cont) thing_inside
+ = mkDupableCont ty cont $ \ cont' ->
+ thing_inside (CoerceIt ty cont')
+
+mkDupableCont ty (InlinePlease cont) thing_inside
+ = mkDupableCont ty cont $ \ cont' ->
+ thing_inside (InlinePlease cont')
+
+mkDupableCont join_arg_ty (ArgOf _ cont_ty cont_fn) thing_inside
+ = -- Build the RHS of the join point
+ simplType join_arg_ty `thenSmpl` \ join_arg_ty' ->
+ newId join_arg_ty' ( \ arg_id ->
+ getSwitchChecker `thenSmpl` \ chkr ->
+ cont_fn (Var arg_id) `thenSmpl` \ (binds, (_, rhs)) ->
+ returnSmpl (Lam arg_id (mkLets binds rhs))
+ ) `thenSmpl` \ join_rhs ->
+
+ -- Build the join Id and continuation
+ newId (coreExprType join_rhs) $ \ join_id ->
let
- go ty [] = ty
- go ty (TyArg ty_arg : args) = go (mkAppTy ty ty_arg) args
- go ty (a:args) | isValArg a = case (splitFunTy_maybe ty) of
- Just (_, res_ty) -> go res_ty args
- Nothing ->
- pprPanic "computeResultType" (vcat [
- ppr (a:args),
- ppr orig_args,
- ppr expr_ty',
- ppr ty])
+ new_cont = ArgOf OkToDup cont_ty
+ (\arg' -> rebuild_done (App (Var join_id) arg'))
in
- go expr_ty' orig_args
-
+
+ -- Do the thing inside
+ thing_inside new_cont `thenSmpl` \ res ->
+ returnSmpl (addBind (NonRec join_id join_rhs) res)
+
+mkDupableCont ty (ApplyTo _ arg se cont) thing_inside
+ = mkDupableCont (funResultTy ty) cont $ \ cont' ->
+ setSubstEnv se (simplExpr arg) `thenSmpl` \ arg' ->
+ if exprIsDupable arg' then
+ thing_inside (ApplyTo OkToDup arg' emptySubstEnv cont')
+ else
+ newId (coreExprType arg') $ \ bndr ->
+ thing_inside (ApplyTo OkToDup (Var bndr) emptySubstEnv cont') `thenSmpl` \ res ->
+ returnSmpl (addBind (NonRec bndr arg') res)
+
+mkDupableCont ty (Select _ case_bndr alts se cont) thing_inside
+ = tick (CaseOfCase case_bndr) `thenSmpl_`
+ setSubstEnv se (
+ simplBinder case_bndr $ \ case_bndr' ->
+ prepareCaseCont alts cont $ \ cont' ->
+ mapAndUnzipSmpl (mkDupableAlt case_bndr case_bndr' cont') alts `thenSmpl` \ (alt_binds_s, alts') ->
+ returnSmpl (concat alt_binds_s, alts')
+ ) `thenSmpl` \ (alt_binds, alts') ->
+
+ extendInScopes [b | NonRec b _ <- alt_binds] $
+
+ -- NB that the new alternatives, alts', are still InAlts, using the original
+ -- binders. That means we can keep the case_bndr intact. This is important
+ -- because another case-of-case might strike, and so we want to keep the
+ -- info that the case_bndr is dead (if it is, which is often the case).
+ -- This is VITAL when the type of case_bndr is an unboxed pair (often the
+ -- case in I/O rich code. We aren't allowed a lambda bound
+ -- arg of unboxed tuple type, and indeed such a case_bndr is always dead
+ thing_inside (Select OkToDup case_bndr alts' se (Stop (contResultType cont))) `thenSmpl` \ res ->
+
+ returnSmpl (addBinds alt_binds res)
+
+
+mkDupableAlt :: InId -> OutId -> SimplCont -> InAlt -> SimplM (OutStuff InAlt)
+mkDupableAlt case_bndr case_bndr' cont alt@(con, bndrs, rhs)
+ = -- Not worth checking whether the rhs is small; the
+ -- inliner will inline it if so.
+ simplBinders bndrs $ \ bndrs' ->
+ simplExprC rhs cont `thenSmpl` \ rhs' ->
+ let
+ rhs_ty' = coreExprType rhs'
+ (used_bndrs, used_bndrs')
+ = unzip [pr | pr@(bndr,bndr') <- zip (case_bndr : bndrs)
+ (case_bndr' : bndrs'),
+ not (isDeadBinder bndr)]
+ -- The new binders have lost their occurrence info,
+ -- so we have to extract it from the old ones
+ in
+ ( if null used_bndrs'
+ -- If we try to lift a primitive-typed something out
+ -- for let-binding-purposes, we will *caseify* it (!),
+ -- with potentially-disastrous strictness results. So
+ -- instead we turn it into a function: \v -> e
+ -- where v::State# RealWorld#. The value passed to this function
+ -- is realworld#, which generates (almost) no code.
+
+ -- There's a slight infelicity here: we pass the overall
+ -- case_bndr to all the join points if it's used in *any* RHS,
+ -- because we don't know its usage in each RHS separately
+
+ -- We used to say "&& isUnLiftedType rhs_ty'" here, but now
+ -- we make the join point into a function whenever used_bndrs'
+ -- is empty. This makes the join-point more CPR friendly.
+ -- Consider: let j = if .. then I# 3 else I# 4
+ -- in case .. of { A -> j; B -> j; C -> ... }
+ --
+ -- Now CPR should not w/w j because it's a thunk, so
+ -- that means that the enclosing function can't w/w either,
+ -- which is a lose. Here's the example that happened in practice:
+ -- kgmod :: Int -> Int -> Int
+ -- kgmod x y = if x > 0 && y < 0 || x < 0 && y > 0
+ -- then 78
+ -- else 5
+
+ then newId realWorldStatePrimTy $ \ rw_id ->
+ returnSmpl ([rw_id], [Var realWorldPrimId])
+ else
+ returnSmpl (used_bndrs', map varToCoreExpr used_bndrs)
+ )
+ `thenSmpl` \ (final_bndrs', final_args) ->
-var `withArity` UnknownArity = var
-var `withArity` arity = var `addIdArity` arity
+ newId (foldr (mkFunTy . idType) rhs_ty' final_bndrs') $ \ join_bndr ->
-is_atomic (Var v) = True
-is_atomic (Lit l) = not (isNoRepLit l)
-is_atomic other = False
+ -- Notice that we make the lambdas into one-shot-lambdas. The
+ -- join point is sure to be applied at most once, and doing so
+ -- prevents the body of the join point being floated out by
+ -- the full laziness pass
+ returnSmpl ([NonRec join_bndr (mkLams (map setOneShotLambda final_bndrs') rhs')],
+ (con, bndrs, mkApps (Var join_bndr) final_args))
\end{code}
-
projects / ghc-hetmet.git / blobdiff