SimplifierSwitch(..)
)
import SimplMonad
-import SimplUtils ( mkCase, transformRhs, findAlt,
+import SimplUtils ( mkCase, tryRhsTyLam, tryEtaExpansion, findAlt,
simplBinder, simplBinders, simplIds, findDefault,
SimplCont(..), DupFlag(..), mkStop, mkRhsStop,
contResultType, discardInline, countArgs, contIsDupable,
zapLamIdInfo, setOneShotLambda,
)
import IdInfo ( OccInfo(..), isDeadOcc, isLoopBreaker,
- setArityInfo, unknownArity,
- setUnfoldingInfo,
+ setArityInfo,
+ setUnfoldingInfo, atLeastArity,
occInfo
)
import Demand ( isStrict )
)
import CoreUtils ( cheapEqExpr, exprIsDupable, exprIsTrivial,
exprIsConApp_maybe, mkPiType,
- exprType, coreAltsType, exprIsValue, idAppIsCheap,
- exprOkForSpeculation,
+ exprType, coreAltsType, exprIsValue,
+ exprOkForSpeculation, exprArity, exprIsCheap,
mkCoerce, mkSCC, mkInlineMe, mkAltExpr
)
import Rules ( lookupRule )
import TyCon ( isDataTyCon, tyConDataConsIfAvailable )
import TysPrim ( realWorldStatePrimTy )
import PrelInfo ( realWorldPrimId )
+import OrdList
import Maybes ( maybeToBool )
import Util ( zipWithEqual )
import Outputable
simplIds (bindersOfBinds binds) $ \ bndrs' ->
simpl_binds binds bndrs' `thenSmpl` \ (binds', _) ->
freeTick SimplifierDone `thenSmpl_`
- returnSmpl binds'
+ returnSmpl (fromOL binds')
where
-- We need to track the zapped top-level binders, because
-- they should have their fragile IdInfo zapped (notably occurrence info)
- simpl_binds [] bs = ASSERT( null bs ) returnSmpl ([], panic "simplTopBinds corner")
+ simpl_binds [] bs = ASSERT( null bs ) returnSmpl (nilOL, panic "simplTopBinds corner")
simpl_binds (NonRec bndr rhs : binds) (b:bs) = simplLazyBind True bndr b rhs (simpl_binds binds bs)
simpl_binds (Rec pairs : binds) bs = simplRecBind True pairs (take n bs) (simpl_binds binds (drop n bs))
where
simplRecBind :: Bool -> [(InId, InExpr)] -> [OutId]
-> SimplM (OutStuff a) -> SimplM (OutStuff a)
simplRecBind top_lvl pairs bndrs' thing_inside
- = go pairs bndrs' `thenSmpl` \ (binds', (binds'', res)) ->
- returnSmpl (Rec (flattenBinds binds') : binds'', res)
+ = go pairs bndrs' `thenSmpl` \ (binds', (_, (binds'', res))) ->
+ returnSmpl (unitOL (Rec (flattenBinds (fromOL binds'))) `appOL` binds'', res)
where
go [] _ = thing_inside `thenSmpl` \ stuff ->
- returnSmpl ([], stuff)
+ returnOutStuff stuff
go ((bndr, rhs) : pairs) (bndr' : bndrs')
= simplLazyBind top_lvl bndr bndr' rhs (go pairs bndrs')
-- Simplify an expression, given a continuation
simplExprC expr cont = simplExprF expr cont `thenSmpl` \ (floats, (_, body)) ->
- returnSmpl (mkLets floats body)
+ returnSmpl (wrapFloats floats body)
simplExprF :: InExpr -> SimplCont -> SimplM OutExprStuff
-- Simplify an expression, returning floated binds
-- create the (dead) let-binding let x = (a,b) in ...
= thing_inside
- | exprIsTrivial new_rhs
+ | trivial_rhs && not must_keep_binding
-- We're looking at a binding with a trivial RHS, so
-- perhaps we can discard it altogether!
--
-- NB: Even NOINLINEis ignored here: if the rhs is trivial
-- it's best to inline it anyway. We often get a=E; b=a
-- from desugaring, with both a and b marked NOINLINE.
- = if must_keep_binding then -- Keep the binding
- finally_bind_it unknownArity new_rhs
- -- Arity doesn't really matter because for a trivial RHS
- -- we will inline like crazy at call sites
- -- If this turns out be false, we can easily compute arity
- else -- Drop the binding
- extendSubst old_bndr (DoneEx new_rhs) $
+ = -- Drop the binding
+ extendSubst old_bndr (DoneEx new_rhs) $
-- Use the substitution to make quite, quite sure that the substitution
-- will happen, since we are going to discard the binding
- tick (PostInlineUnconditionally old_bndr) `thenSmpl_`
- thing_inside
+ tick (PostInlineUnconditionally old_bndr) `thenSmpl_`
+ thing_inside
- | Note coercion@(Coerce _ inner_ty) inner_rhs <- new_rhs
- -- [NB inner_rhs is guaranteed non-trivial by now]
+ | Note coercion@(Coerce _ inner_ty) inner_rhs <- new_rhs,
+ not trivial_rhs
-- x = coerce t e ==> c = e; x = inline_me (coerce t c)
-- Now x can get inlined, which moves the coercion
-- to the usage site. This is a bit like worker/wrapper stuff,
(Note InlineMe (Note coercion (Var c_id))) $
thing_inside
-
| otherwise
- = transformRhs new_rhs finally_bind_it
-
- where
- old_info = idInfo old_bndr
- occ_info = occInfo old_info
- loop_breaker = isLoopBreaker occ_info
- must_keep_binding = black_listed || loop_breaker || isExportedId old_bndr
-
- finally_bind_it arity_info new_rhs
- = getSubst `thenSmpl` \ subst ->
- let
+ = getSubst `thenSmpl` \ subst ->
+ let
-- We make new IdInfo for the new binder by starting from the old binder,
-- doing appropriate substitutions.
-- Then we add arity and unfolding info to get the new binder
- new_bndr_info = substIdInfo subst old_info (idInfo new_bndr)
- `setArityInfo` arity_info
+ new_bndr_info = substIdInfo subst old_info (idInfo new_bndr)
+ `setArityInfo` arity_info
-- Add the unfolding *only* for non-loop-breakers
-- Making loop breakers not have an unfolding at all
-- means that we can avoid tests in exprIsConApp, for example.
-- This is important: if exprIsConApp says 'yes' for a recursive
-- thing, then we can get into an infinite loop
- info_w_unf | loop_breaker = new_bndr_info
- | otherwise = new_bndr_info `setUnfoldingInfo` mkUnfolding top_lvl new_rhs
+ info_w_unf | loop_breaker = new_bndr_info
+ | otherwise = new_bndr_info `setUnfoldingInfo` mkUnfolding top_lvl new_rhs
- final_id = new_bndr `setIdInfo` info_w_unf
- in
+ final_id = new_bndr `setIdInfo` info_w_unf
+ in
-- These seqs forces the Id, and hence its IdInfo,
-- and hence any inner substitutions
- final_id `seq`
- addLetBind (NonRec final_id new_rhs) $
- modifyInScope new_bndr final_id thing_inside
+ final_id `seq`
+ addLetBind (NonRec final_id new_rhs) $
+ modifyInScope new_bndr final_id thing_inside
+
+ where
+ old_info = idInfo old_bndr
+ occ_info = occInfo old_info
+ loop_breaker = isLoopBreaker occ_info
+ trivial_rhs = exprIsTrivial new_rhs
+ must_keep_binding = black_listed || loop_breaker || isExportedId old_bndr
+ arity_info = atLeastArity (exprArity new_rhs)
\end{code}
\begin{code}
simplRhs :: Bool -- True <=> Top level
-> Bool -- True <=> OK to float unboxed (speculative) bindings
- -- False for (a) recursive and (b) top-level bindings
+ -- False for (a) recursive and (b) top-level bindings
-> OutType -- Type of RHS; used only occasionally
-> InExpr -> SubstEnv
-> (OutExpr -> SimplM (OutStuff a))
-> SimplM (OutStuff a)
simplRhs top_lvl float_ubx rhs_ty rhs rhs_se thing_inside
= -- Simplify it
- setSubstEnv rhs_se (simplExprF rhs (mkRhsStop rhs_ty)) `thenSmpl` \ (floats, (in_scope', rhs')) ->
-
- -- Float lets out of RHS
+ setSubstEnv rhs_se (simplExprF rhs (mkRhsStop rhs_ty)) `thenSmpl` \ (floats1, (rhs_in_scope, rhs1)) ->
let
- (floats_out, rhs'') = splitFloats float_ubx floats rhs'
+ (floats2, rhs2) = splitFloats float_ubx floats1 rhs1
in
- if (top_lvl || wantToExpose 0 rhs') && -- Float lets if (a) we're at the top level
- not (null floats_out) -- or (b) the resulting RHS is one we'd like to expose
- then
- tickLetFloat floats_out `thenSmpl_`
- -- Do the float
- --
-- There's a subtlety here. There may be a binding (x* = e) in the
-- floats, where the '*' means 'will be demanded'. So is it safe
-- to float it out? Answer no, but it won't matter because
-- we only float if arg' is a WHNF,
-- and so there can't be any 'will be demanded' bindings in the floats.
-- Hence the assert
- WARN( any demanded_float floats_out, ppr floats_out )
- addLetBinds floats_out $
- setInScope in_scope' $
- thing_inside rhs''
- -- in_scope' may be excessive, but that's OK;
- -- it's a superset of what's in scope
+ WARN( any demanded_float (fromOL floats2), ppr (fromOL floats2) )
+
+ -- Transform the RHS
+ -- It's important that we do eta expansion on function *arguments* (which are
+ -- simplified with simplRhs), as well as let-bound right-hand sides.
+ -- Otherwise we find that things like
+ -- f (\x -> case x of I# x' -> coerce T (\ y -> ...))
+ -- get right through to the code generator as two separate lambdas,
+ -- which is a Bad Thing
+ tryRhsTyLam rhs2 `thenSmpl` \ (floats3, rhs3) ->
+ tryEtaExpansion rhs3 rhs_ty `thenSmpl` \ (floats4, rhs4) ->
+
+ -- Float lets if (a) we're at the top level
+ -- or (b) the resulting RHS is one we'd like to expose
+ if (top_lvl || exprIsCheap rhs4) then
+ (if (isNilOL floats2 && null floats3 && null floats4) then
+ returnSmpl ()
+ else
+ tick LetFloatFromLet) `thenSmpl_`
+
+ addFloats floats2 rhs_in_scope $
+ addAuxiliaryBinds floats3 $
+ addAuxiliaryBinds floats4 $
+ thing_inside rhs4
else
-- Don't do the float
- thing_inside (mkLets floats rhs')
+ thing_inside (wrapFloats floats1 rhs1)
--- In a let-from-let float, we just tick once, arbitrarily
--- choosing the first floated binder to identify it
-tickLetFloat (NonRec b r : fs) = tick (LetFloatFromLet b)
-tickLetFloat (Rec ((b,r):prs) : fs) = tick (LetFloatFromLet b)
-
demanded_float (NonRec b r) = isStrict (idDemandInfo b) && not (isUnLiftedType (idType b))
-- Unlifted-type (cheap-eagerness) lets may well have a demanded flag on them
demanded_float (Rec _) = False
-- can tolerate them.
splitFloats float_ubx floats rhs
| float_ubx = (floats, rhs) -- Float them all
- | otherwise = go floats
+ | otherwise = go (fromOL floats)
where
- go [] = ([], rhs)
- go (f:fs) | must_stay f = ([], mkLets (f:fs) rhs)
+ go [] = (nilOL, rhs)
+ go (f:fs) | must_stay f = (nilOL, mkLets (f:fs) rhs)
| otherwise = case go fs of
- (out, rhs') -> (f:out, rhs')
+ (out, rhs') -> (f `consOL` out, rhs')
must_stay (Rec prs) = False -- No unlifted bindings in here
must_stay (NonRec b r) = isUnLiftedType (idType b)
-
-wantToExpose :: Int -> CoreExpr -> Bool
--- True for expressions that we'd like to expose at the
--- top level of an RHS. This includes partial applications
--- even if the args aren't cheap; the next pass will let-bind the
--- args and eta expand the partial application. So exprIsCheap won't do.
--- Here's the motivating example:
--- z = letrec g = \x y -> ...g... in g E
--- Even though E is a redex we'd like to float the letrec to give
--- g = \x y -> ...g...
--- z = g E
--- Now the next use of SimplUtils.tryEtaExpansion will give
--- g = \x y -> ...g...
--- z = let v = E in \w -> g v w
--- And now we'll float the v to give
--- g = \x y -> ...g...
--- v = E
--- z = \w -> g v w
--- Which is what we want; chances are z will be inlined now.
-
-wantToExpose n (Var v) = idAppIsCheap v n
-wantToExpose n (Lit l) = True
-wantToExpose n (Lam _ e) = True
-wantToExpose n (Note _ e) = wantToExpose n e
-wantToExpose n (App f (Type _)) = wantToExpose n f
-wantToExpose n (App f a) = wantToExpose (n+1) f
-wantToExpose n other = False -- There won't be any lets
\end{code}
\begin{code}
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Finish rebuilding
-rebuild_done expr
- = getInScope `thenSmpl` \ in_scope ->
- returnSmpl ([], (in_scope, expr))
+rebuild_done expr = returnOutStuff expr
---------------------------------------------------------
rebuild :: OutExpr -> SimplCont -> SimplM OutExprStuff
mkDupableCont join_arg_ty (ArgOf _ cont_ty cont_fn) thing_inside
= -- Build the RHS of the join point
newId SLIT("a") join_arg_ty ( \ arg_id ->
- cont_fn (Var arg_id) `thenSmpl` \ (binds, (_, rhs)) ->
- returnSmpl (Lam (setOneShotLambda arg_id) (mkLets binds rhs))
+ cont_fn (Var arg_id) `thenSmpl` \ (floats, (_, rhs)) ->
+ returnSmpl (Lam (setOneShotLambda arg_id) (wrapFloats floats rhs))
) `thenSmpl` \ join_rhs ->
-- Build the join Id and continuation
setSubstEnv se (
simplBinder case_bndr $ \ case_bndr' ->
prepareCaseCont alts cont $ \ cont' ->
- mapAndUnzipSmpl (mkDupableAlt case_bndr case_bndr' cont') alts `thenSmpl` \ (alt_binds_s, alts') ->
- returnSmpl (concat alt_binds_s, alts')
- ) `thenSmpl` \ (alt_binds, alts') ->
+ mkDupableAlts case_bndr case_bndr' cont' alts $ \ alts' ->
+ returnOutStuff alts'
+ ) `thenSmpl` \ (alt_binds, (in_scope, alts')) ->
- addAuxiliaryBinds alt_binds $
+ addFloats alt_binds in_scope $
-- NB that the new alternatives, alts', are still InAlts, using the original
-- binders. That means we can keep the case_bndr intact. This is important
-- arg of unboxed tuple type, and indeed such a case_bndr is always dead
thing_inside (Select OkToDup case_bndr alts' se (mkStop (contResultType cont)))
-mkDupableAlt :: InId -> OutId -> SimplCont -> InAlt -> SimplM (OutStuff InAlt)
-mkDupableAlt case_bndr case_bndr' cont alt@(con, bndrs, rhs)
+mkDupableAlts :: InId -> OutId -> SimplCont -> [InAlt]
+ -> ([InAlt] -> SimplM (OutStuff a))
+ -> SimplM (OutStuff a)
+mkDupableAlts case_bndr case_bndr' cont [] thing_inside
+ = thing_inside []
+mkDupableAlts case_bndr case_bndr' cont (alt:alts) thing_inside
+ = mkDupableAlt case_bndr case_bndr' cont alt $ \ alt' ->
+ mkDupableAlts case_bndr case_bndr' cont alts $ \ alts' ->
+ thing_inside (alt' : alts')
+
+mkDupableAlt case_bndr case_bndr' cont alt@(con, bndrs, rhs) thing_inside
= simplBinders bndrs $ \ bndrs' ->
simplExprC rhs cont `thenSmpl` \ rhs' ->
-- because otherwise we'd need to pair it up with an empty subst-env.
-- (Remember we must zap the subst-env before re-simplifying something).
-- Rather than do this we simply agree to re-simplify the original (small) thing later.
- returnSmpl ([], alt)
+ thing_inside alt
else
let
one_shot v | isId v = setOneShotLambda v
| otherwise = v
in
- returnSmpl ([NonRec join_bndr (mkLams really_final_bndrs rhs')],
- (con, bndrs, mkApps (Var join_bndr) final_args))
+ addLetBind (NonRec join_bndr (mkLams really_final_bndrs rhs')) $
+ thing_inside (con, bndrs, mkApps (Var join_bndr) final_args)
\end{code}
projects / ghc-hetmet.git / blobdiff