/* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- * $Id: TailCalls.h,v 1.6 2000/11/07 10:42:56 simonmar Exp $
*
* (c) The GHC Team, 1998-1999
*
#ifdef USE_MINIINTERPRETER
-#define JMP_(cont) return(stgCast(StgFunPtr,cont))
+#define JMP_(cont) return((StgFunPtr)(cont))
#define FB_
#define FE_
#else
+extern void __DISCARD__(void);
+
/* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tail calling on x86
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
-#if i386_TARGET_ARCH
-
-extern void __DISCARD__(void);
+#if i386_HOST_ARCH
/* Note about discard: possibly there to fool GCC into clearing up
before we do the jump eg. if there are some arguments left on the C
#define JMP_(cont) \
{ \
- void *target; \
+ void *__target; \
__DISCARD__(); \
- target = (void *)(cont); \
- goto *target; \
+ __target = (void *)(cont); \
+ goto *__target; \
+ }
+
+#endif /* i386_HOST_ARCH */
+
+/* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Tail calling on x86_64
+ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
+
+#if x86_64_HOST_ARCH
+
+/*
+ NOTE about __DISCARD__():
+
+ On x86_64 this is necessary to work around bugs in the register
+ variable support in gcc. Without the __DISCARD__() call, gcc will
+ silently throw away assignements to global register variables that
+ happen before the jump.
+
+ Here's the example:
+
+ extern void g(void);
+ static void f(void) {
+ R1 = g;
+ __DISCARD__()
+ goto *R1;
+ }
+
+ without the dummy function call, gcc throws away the assignment to R1
+ (gcc 3.4.3) gcc bug #20359.
+*/
+
+#define JMP_(cont) \
+ { \
+ __DISCARD__(); \
+ goto *(void *)(cont); \
}
-#endif /* i386_TARGET_ARCH */
+#endif /* x86_64_HOST_ARCH */
/* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tail calling on Sparc
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
-#ifdef sparc_TARGET_ARCH
+#ifdef sparc_HOST_ARCH
#define JMP_(cont) ((F_) (cont))()
/* Oh so happily, the above turns into a "call" instruction,
#define FB_
#define FE_
-#endif /* sparc_TARGET_ARCH */
+#endif /* sparc_HOST_ARCH */
/* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tail calling on Alpha
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
-#ifdef alpha_TARGET_ARCH
+#ifdef alpha_HOST_ARCH
+#if IN_STG_CODE
register void *_procedure __asm__("$27");
+#endif
-#define JMP_(cont) \
- do { _procedure = (void *)(cont); \
- goto *_procedure; \
+#define JMP_(cont) \
+ do { _procedure = (void *)(cont); \
+ __DISCARD__(); \
+ goto *_procedure; \
} while(0)
/* Don't need these for alpha mangling */
#define FB_
#define FE_
-#endif /* alpha_TARGET_ARCH */
+#endif /* alpha_HOST_ARCH */
/* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tail calling on HP
+
+Description of HP's weird procedure linkage, many thanks to Andy Bennet
+<andy_bennett@hp.com>:
+
+I've been digging a little further into the problem of how HP-UX does
+dynamic procedure calls. My solution in the last e-mail inserting an extra
+'if' statement into the JMP_ I think is probably the best general solution I
+can come up with. There are still a few problems with it however: It wont
+work, if JMP_ ever has to call anything in a shared library, if this is
+likely to be required it'll need something more elaborate. It also wont work
+with PA-RISC 2.0 wide mode (64-bit) which uses a different format PLT.
+
+I had some feedback from someone in HP's compiler lab and the problem
+relates to the linker on HP-UX, not gcc as I first suspected. The reason the
+'hsc' executable works is most likely due to a change in 'ld's behaviour for
+performance reasons between your revision and mine.
+
+The major issue relating to this is shared libraries and how they are
+implented under HP-UX. The whole point of the Procedure Label Table (PLT) is
+to allow a function pointer to hold the address of the function and a
+pointer to the library's global data lookup table (DLT) used by position
+independent code (PIC). This makes the PLT absolutely essential for shared
+library calls. HP has two linker introduced assembly functions for dealing
+with dynamic calls, $$dyncall and $$dyncall_external. The former does a
+check to see if the address is a PLT pointer and dereferences if necessary
+or just calls the address otherwise; the latter skips the check and just
+does the indirect jump no matter what.
+
+Since $$dyncall_external runs faster due to its not having the test, the
+linker nowadays prefers to generate calls to that, rather than $$dyncall. It
+makes this decision based on the presence of any shared library. If it even
+smells an sl's existence at link time, it rigs the runtime system to
+generate PLT references for everything on the assumption that the result
+will be slightly more efficient. This is what is crashing GHC since the
+calls it is generating have no understanding of the procedure label proper.
+The only way to get real addresses is to link everything archive, including
+system libraries, at which point it assumes you probably are going to be
+using calls similar to GHC's (its rigged for HP's +ESfic compiler option)
+but uses $$dyncall if necessary to cope, just in case you aren't.
+
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
#ifdef hppa1_1_hp_hpux_TARGET
-#define JMP_(cont) \
- do { void *_procedure = (void *)(cont); \
- goto *_procedure; \
+#define JMP_(cont) \
+ do { void *_procedure = (void *)(cont); \
+ if (((int) _procedure) & 2) \
+ _procedure = (void *)(*((int *) (_procedure - 2))); \
+ goto *_procedure; \
} while(0)
#endif /* hppa1_1_hp_hpux_TARGET */
/* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Tail calling on PowerPC
+ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
+
+#ifdef powerpc_HOST_ARCH
+
+#define JMP_(cont) \
+ { \
+ void *target; \
+ target = (void *)(cont); \
+ __DISCARD__(); \
+ goto *target; \
+ }
+
+/*
+ The __DISCARD__ is there because Apple's April 2002 Beta of GCC 3.1
+ sometimes generates incorrect code otherwise.
+ It tends to "forget" to update global register variables in the presence
+ of decrement/increment operators:
+ JMP_(*(--Sp)) is wrongly compiled as JMP_(Sp[-1]).
+ Calling __DISCARD__ in between works around this problem.
+*/
+
+/*
+ I would _love_ to use the following instead,
+ but some versions of Apple's GCC fail to generate code for it
+ if it is called for a casted data pointer - which is exactly what
+ we are going to do...
+
+ #define JMP_(cont) ((F_) (cont))()
+*/
+
+#endif /* powerpc_HOST_ARCH */
+
+#ifdef powerpc64_HOST_ARCH
+#define JMP_(cont) ((F_) (cont))()
+#endif
+
+/* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Tail calling on IA64
+ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
+
+#ifdef ia64_HOST_ARCH
+
+/* The compiler can more intelligently decide how to do this. We therefore
+ * implement it as a call and optimise to a jump at mangle time. */
+#define JMP_(cont) ((F_) (cont))(); __asm__ volatile ("--- TAILCALL ---");
+
+/* Don't emit calls to __DISCARD__ as this causes hassles */
+#define __DISCARD__()
+
+#endif
+
+/* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUNBEGIN and FUNEND.
These are markers indicating the start and end of Real Code in a
* it just doesn't choose to do it at the moment.
* -= chak
*/
+
#ifndef FB_
#define FB_ __asm__ volatile ("--- BEGIN ---"); __DISCARD__ ();
#endif