X-Git-Url: http://git.megacz.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=chips%2Ff2%2Fdoc%2Fam42%2Fam42.tex;h=caf4aaf0858a612684407e6384b3e42d8f9bce24;hb=45976f3a79fa5d572b907ac716350b75d15e978a;hp=bc7204803bcdcbe4991fb37facc59ecc0684ddc8;hpb=fcf6bfe537a716299bb58e6dfb1c20afeb39c6ed;p=fleet.git

diff --git a/chips/f2/doc/am42/am42.tex b/chips/f2/doc/am42/am42.tex
index bc72048..caf4aaf 100644
--- a/chips/f2/doc/am42/am42.tex
+++ b/chips/f2/doc/am42/am42.tex
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ To Do:
 
 \begin{verbatim}
 
+Revisit the decision to have the dock include a word-wide latch?  If
+ it doesn't, then literals become trickier.
+
 "Supertorpedo" for retrieving dock state.
 
 THEREFORE: I propose that DockTwo only be able to load the counter from the data latch, not from the instruction word.  This gets rid of an entire instruction.  In exchange, I would like to propose that "data predecessor full is a condition of execution" and "drain data predecessor when you execute" be different opcode bits.