X-Git-Url: http://git.megacz.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=compiler%2FcoreSyn%2FCoreUtils.lhs;h=61bfd2e5831dac001485a65a9cb633b30cafbf4a;hb=d056dfedcf9c7e5e58031ad5948c480f9cdca16f;hp=3b7f1af3aafb775d8fb5d3282ff8d9162d0c4836;hpb=1d7a3cf332532b1f9d798b44e76c4be6f0c74dcf;p=ghc-hetmet.git diff --git a/compiler/coreSyn/CoreUtils.lhs b/compiler/coreSyn/CoreUtils.lhs index 3b7f1af..61bfd2e 100644 --- a/compiler/coreSyn/CoreUtils.lhs +++ b/compiler/coreSyn/CoreUtils.lhs @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ exprIsCheap' good_app other_expr -- Applications and variables go (Var _) [] = True -- Just a type application of a variable -- (f t1 t2 t3) counts as WHNF go (Var f) args - = case idDetails f of + = case idDetails f of RecSelId {} -> go_sel args ClassOpId {} -> go_sel args PrimOpId op -> go_primop op args @@ -631,6 +631,11 @@ it's applied only to dictionaries. -- -- * Safe /not/ to evaluate even if normal order would do so -- +-- It is usually called on arguments of unlifted type, but not always +-- In particular, Simplify.rebuildCase calls it on lifted types +-- when a 'case' is a plain 'seq'. See the example in +-- Note [exprOkForSpeculation: case expressions] below +-- -- Precisely, it returns @True@ iff: -- -- * The expression guarantees to terminate, @@ -656,9 +661,14 @@ it's applied only to dictionaries. exprOkForSpeculation :: CoreExpr -> Bool exprOkForSpeculation (Lit _) = True exprOkForSpeculation (Type _) = True - -- Tick boxes are *not* suitable for speculation -exprOkForSpeculation (Var v) = isUnLiftedType (idType v) - && not (isTickBoxOp v) + +exprOkForSpeculation (Var v) + | isTickBoxOp v = False -- Tick boxes are *not* suitable for speculation + | otherwise = isUnLiftedType (idType v) -- c.f. the Var case of exprIsHNF + || isDataConWorkId v -- Nullary constructors + || idArity v > 0 -- Functions + || isEvaldUnfolding (idUnfolding v) -- Let-bound values + exprOkForSpeculation (Note _ e) = exprOkForSpeculation e exprOkForSpeculation (Cast e _) = exprOkForSpeculation e @@ -687,6 +697,9 @@ exprOkForSpeculation other_expr -- Often there is a literal divisor, and this -- can get rid of a thunk in an inner looop + | DataToTagOp <- op -- See Note [dataToTag speculation] + = True + | otherwise = primOpOkForSpeculation op && all exprOkForSpeculation args @@ -715,7 +728,6 @@ isDivOp _ = False Note [exprOkForSpeculation: case expressions] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - It's always sound for exprOkForSpeculation to return False, and we don't want it to take too long, so it bales out on complicated-looking terms. Notably lets, which can be stacked very deeply; and in any @@ -723,7 +735,7 @@ case the argument of exprOkForSpeculation is usually in a strict context, so any lets will have been floated away. However, we keep going on case-expressions. An example like this one -showed up in DPH code: +showed up in DPH code (Trac #3717): foo :: Int -> Int foo 0 = 0 foo n = (if n < 5 then 1 else 2) `seq` foo (n-1) @@ -742,6 +754,27 @@ If exprOkForSpeculation doesn't look through case expressions, you get this: The inner case is redundant, and should be nuked. +Note [dataToTag speculation] +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +Is this OK? + f x = let v::Int# = dataToTag# x + in ... +We say "yes", even though 'x' may not be evaluated. Reasons + + * dataToTag#'s strictness means that its argument often will be + evaluated, but FloatOut makes that temporarily untrue + case x of y -> let v = dataToTag# y in ... + --> + case x of y -> let v = dataToTag# x in ... + Note that we look at 'x' instead of 'y' (this is to improve + floating in FloatOut). So Lint complains. + + Moreover, it really *might* improve floating to let the + v-binding float out + + * CorePrep makes sure dataToTag#'s argument is evaluated, just + before code gen. Until then, it's not guaranteed + %************************************************************************ %* *