X-Git-Url: http://git.megacz.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=compiler%2FdeSugar%2FDsExpr.lhs;h=043f54fa8066f491968487ea1b50355be150a329;hb=620531f5074b189bd04d10c88196493b1e2fa692;hp=0633717d09538b9f0f1077a42729eb7efa4e3731;hpb=6febb616f1ff46942434e9df39c6e4977b07cc6f;p=ghc-hetmet.git diff --git a/compiler/deSugar/DsExpr.lhs b/compiler/deSugar/DsExpr.lhs index 0633717..043f54f 100644 --- a/compiler/deSugar/DsExpr.lhs +++ b/compiler/deSugar/DsExpr.lhs @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ import TcType import Type import CoreSyn import CoreUtils +import MkCore import DynFlags import CostCentre @@ -211,7 +212,7 @@ dsExpr (HsLam a_Match) = uncurry mkLams <$> matchWrapper LambdaExpr a_Match dsExpr (HsApp fun arg) - = mkDsApp <$> dsLExpr fun <*> dsLExpr arg + = mkCoreApp <$> dsLExpr fun <*> dsLExpr arg \end{code} Operator sections. At first it looks as if we can convert @@ -238,10 +239,10 @@ will sort it out. \begin{code} dsExpr (OpApp e1 op _ e2) = -- for the type of y, we need the type of op's 2nd argument - mkDsApps <$> dsLExpr op <*> mapM dsLExpr [e1, e2] + mkCoreApps <$> dsLExpr op <*> mapM dsLExpr [e1, e2] dsExpr (SectionL expr op) -- Desugar (e !) to ((!) e) - = mkDsApp <$> dsLExpr op <*> dsLExpr expr + = mkCoreApp <$> dsLExpr op <*> dsLExpr expr -- dsLExpr (SectionR op expr) -- \ x -> op x expr dsExpr (SectionR op expr) = do @@ -253,7 +254,7 @@ dsExpr (SectionR op expr) = do x_id <- newSysLocalDs x_ty y_id <- newSysLocalDs y_ty return (bindNonRec y_id y_core $ - Lam x_id (mkDsApps core_op [Var x_id, Var y_id])) + Lam x_id (mkCoreApps core_op [Var x_id, Var y_id])) dsExpr (HsSCC cc expr) = do mod_name <- getModuleDs @@ -505,10 +506,8 @@ dsExpr (HsBinTick ixT ixF e) = do \begin{code} -#ifdef DEBUG -- HsSyn constructs that just shouldn't be here: dsExpr (ExprWithTySig _ _) = panic "dsExpr:ExprWithTySig" -#endif findField :: [HsRecField Id arg] -> Name -> [arg] @@ -541,13 +540,18 @@ fruitless allocations. Essentially, whenever we see a list literal If fusion fails to occur then build will get inlined and (since we defined a RULE for foldr (:) []) we will get back exactly the - normal desugaring for an explicit list! However, if it does occur - then we can potentially save quite a bit of allocation (up to 25\% - of the total in some nofib programs!) + normal desugaring for an explicit list. + +This optimisation can be worth a lot: up to 25% of the total +allocation in some nofib programs. Specifically + + Program Size Allocs Runtime CompTime + rewrite +0.0% -26.3% 0.02 -1.8% + ansi -0.3% -13.8% 0.00 +0.0% + lift +0.0% -8.7% 0.00 -2.3% Of course, if rules aren't turned on then there is pretty much no point doing this fancy stuff, and it may even be harmful. - \begin{code} dsExplicitList :: PostTcType -> [LHsExpr Id] -> DsM CoreExpr