X-Git-Url: http://git.megacz.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=compiler%2Ftypecheck%2FTcInstDcls.lhs;h=d7aafc1f11736bbebd7ba500aedcd84538254277;hb=b9235325e1dfc23cc489aa478aef852e76c4075f;hp=d4100d00243abdf1ec7c7d008da70d9d004220aa;hpb=193627349898ca7d7b44a3b583d895f23851b038;p=ghc-hetmet.git diff --git a/compiler/typecheck/TcInstDcls.lhs b/compiler/typecheck/TcInstDcls.lhs index d4100d0..d7aafc1 100644 --- a/compiler/typecheck/TcInstDcls.lhs +++ b/compiler/typecheck/TcInstDcls.lhs @@ -197,14 +197,15 @@ a top-level axiom: df :: forall a. C a => C [a] {-# NOINLINE df DFun[ $cop_list ] #-} - df = /\a. \d. MkD ($cop_list a d) + df = /\a. \d. MkC ($cop_list a d) - $cop_list :: forall a. C a => a -> a + $cop_list :: forall a. C a => [a] -> [a] $cop_list = -The "constructor" MkD expands to a cast, as does the class-op selector. +The "constructor" MkC expands to a cast, as does the class-op selector. The RULE works just like for multi-field dictionaries: - * (df a d) returns (Just (MkD,..,[$cop_list a d])) + + * (df a d) returns (Just (MkC,..,[$cop_list a d])) to exprIsConApp_Maybe * The RULE for op picks the right result @@ -214,18 +215,25 @@ application. But it works just fine in this case, exprIsConApp_maybe is otherwise used only when we hit a case expression which will have a real data constructor in it. -The biggest reason for doing it this way, apart form uniformity, is +The biggest reason for doing it this way, apart from uniformity, is that we want to be very careful when we have instance C a => C [a] where {-# INLINE op #-} op = ... -then we'll get an INLINE pragma on $cop_list. The danger is that -we'll get something like - foo = /\a.\d. $cop_list a d +then we'll get an INLINE pragma on $cop_list but it's important that +$cop_list only inlines when it's applied to *two* arguments (the +dictionary and the list argument + +The danger is that we'll get something like + op_list :: C a => [a] -> [a] + op_list = /\a.\d. $cop_list a d and then we'll eta expand, and then we'll inline TOO EARLY. This happened in -Trac #3772 and I spent far too long fiddling arond trying to fix it. +Trac #3772 and I spent far too long fiddling around trying to fix it. Look at the test for Trac #3772. + (Note: re-reading the above, I can't see how using the + uniform story solves the problem.) + Note [Subtle interaction of recursion and overlap] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Consider this @@ -531,13 +539,17 @@ tcInstDecls2 tycl_decls inst_decls = do { -- (a) Default methods from class decls let class_decls = filter (isClassDecl . unLoc) tycl_decls ; dm_binds_s <- mapM tcClassDecl2 class_decls + ; let dm_binds = unionManyBags dm_binds_s -- (b) instance declarations - ; inst_binds_s <- mapM tcInstDecl2 inst_decls + ; let dm_ids = collectHsBindsBinders dm_binds + -- Add the default method Ids (again) + -- See Note [Default methods and instances] + ; inst_binds_s <- tcExtendIdEnv dm_ids $ + mapM tcInstDecl2 inst_decls -- Done - ; return (unionManyBags dm_binds_s `unionBags` - unionManyBags inst_binds_s) } + ; return (dm_binds `unionBags` unionManyBags inst_binds_s) } tcInstDecl2 :: InstInfo Name -> TcM (LHsBinds Id) tcInstDecl2 (InstInfo { iSpec = ispec, iBinds = ibinds }) @@ -550,6 +562,18 @@ tcInstDecl2 (InstInfo { iSpec = ispec, iBinds = ibinds }) loc = getSrcSpan dfun_id \end{code} +See Note [Default methods and instances] +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +The default method Ids are already in the type environment (see Note +[Default method Ids and Template Haskell] in TcTyClsDcls), BUT they +don't have their InlinePragmas yet. Usually that would not matter, +because the simplifier propagates information from binding site to +use. But, unusually, when compiling instance decls we *copy* the +INLINE pragma from the default method to the method for that +particular operation (see Note [INLINE and default methods] below). + +So right here in tcInstDecl2 we must re-extend the type envt with +the default method Ids replete with their INLINE pragmas. Urk. \begin{code} tc_inst_decl2 :: Id -> InstBindings Name -> TcM (LHsBinds Id)