X-Git-Url: http://git.megacz.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=compiler%2Ftypecheck%2FTcSimplify.lhs;h=30718c298e256b7715016a00b80aa919c58cf49f;hb=54fa96ad5bd53058c0da9b9f3eb4b321f2ddbc16;hp=872a7a856dea7c406ca659a0170db2b2532e0a3e;hpb=6d2b0ae3ae3296cb6cdd496cbf85b897c7ce150b;p=ghc-hetmet.git diff --git a/compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs b/compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs index 872a7a8..30718c2 100644 --- a/compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs +++ b/compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ with 'given' implications. So our best approximation is to make (D [a]) part of the inferred context, so we can use that to discharge the implication. Hence -the strange function get_dictsin approximateImplications. +the strange function get_dicts in approximateImplications. The common cases are more clear-cut, when we have things like forall a. C a => C b @@ -1047,6 +1047,16 @@ gentleCheckLoop inst_loc givens wanteds | otherwise = Stop -- When checking against a given signature -- we MUST be very gentle: Note [Check gently] + +gentleInferLoop :: SDoc -> [Inst] + -> TcM ([Inst], TcDictBinds) +gentleInferLoop doc wanteds + = do { (irreds, binds, _) <- checkLoop env wanteds + ; return (irreds, binds) } + where + env = mkRedEnv doc try_me [] + try_me inst | isMethodOrLit inst = ReduceMe AddSCs + | otherwise = Stop \end{code} Note [Check gently] @@ -1064,7 +1074,7 @@ Inside the pattern match, which binds (a:*, x:a), we know that Hence we have a dictionary for Show [a] available; and indeed we need it. We are going to build an implication contraint forall a. (b~[a]) => Show [a] -Later, we will solve this constraint using the knowledg e(Show b) +Later, we will solve this constraint using the knowledge (Show b) But we MUST NOT reduce (Show [a]) to (Show a), else the whole thing becomes insoluble. So we simplify gently (get rid of literals @@ -1085,10 +1095,11 @@ checkLoop :: RedEnv checkLoop env wanteds = go env wanteds [] where go env wanteds needed_givens - = do { -- Givens are skolems, so no need to zonk them - wanteds' <- zonkInsts wanteds + = do { -- We do need to zonk the givens; cf Note [Zonking RedEnv] + ; env' <- zonkRedEnv env + ; wanteds' <- zonkInsts wanteds - ; (improved, binds, irreds, more_needed_givens) <- reduceContext env wanteds' + ; (improved, binds, irreds, more_needed_givens) <- reduceContext env' wanteds' ; let all_needed_givens = needed_givens ++ more_needed_givens @@ -1101,10 +1112,44 @@ checkLoop env wanteds -- Using an instance decl might have introduced a fresh type variable -- which might have been unified, so we'd get an infinite loop -- if we started again with wanteds! See Note [LOOP] - { (irreds1, binds1, all_needed_givens1) <- go env irreds all_needed_givens + { (irreds1, binds1, all_needed_givens1) <- go env' irreds all_needed_givens ; return (irreds1, binds `unionBags` binds1, all_needed_givens1) } } \end{code} +Note [Zonking RedEnv] +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +It might appear as if the givens in RedEnv are always rigid, but that is not +necessarily the case for programs involving higher-rank types that have class +contexts constraining the higher-rank variables. An example from tc237 in the +testsuite is + + class Modular s a | s -> a + + wim :: forall a w. Integral a + => a -> (forall s. Modular s a => M s w) -> w + wim i k = error "urk" + + test5 :: (Modular s a, Integral a) => M s a + test5 = error "urk" + + test4 = wim 4 test4' + +Notice how the variable 'a' of (Modular s a) in the rank-2 type of wim is +quantified further outside. When type checking test4, we have to check +whether the signature of test5 is an instance of + + (forall s. Modular s a => M s w) + +Consequently, we will get (Modular s t_a), where t_a is a TauTv into the +givens. + +Given the FD of Modular in this example, class improvement will instantiate +t_a to 'a', where 'a' is the skolem from test5's signatures (due to the +Modular s a predicate in that signature). If we don't zonk (Modular s t_a) in +the givens, we will get into a loop as improveOne uses the unification engine +TcGadt.tcUnifyTys, which doesn't know about mutable type variables. + + Note [LOOP] ~~~~~~~~~~~ class If b t e r | b t e -> r @@ -1574,12 +1619,11 @@ bindInstsOfLocalFuns wanteds local_ids returnM emptyLHsBinds | otherwise - = do { (irreds, binds,_) <- checkLoop env for_me + = do { (irreds, binds) <- gentleInferLoop doc for_me ; extendLIEs not_for_me ; extendLIEs irreds ; return binds } where - env = mkRedEnv doc try_me [] doc = text "bindInsts" <+> ppr local_ids overloaded_ids = filter is_overloaded local_ids is_overloaded id = isOverloadedTy (idType id) @@ -1588,8 +1632,6 @@ bindInstsOfLocalFuns wanteds local_ids overloaded_set = mkVarSet overloaded_ids -- There can occasionally be a lot of them -- so it's worth building a set, so that -- lookup (in isMethodFor) is faster - try_me inst | isMethod inst = ReduceMe NoSCs - | otherwise = Stop \end{code} @@ -1609,6 +1651,8 @@ data RedEnv , red_givens :: [Inst] -- All guaranteed rigid -- Always dicts -- but see Note [Rigidity] + , red_reft :: Refinement -- The refinement to apply to the 'givens' + -- You should think of it as 'given equalities' , red_stack :: (Int, [Inst]) -- Recursion stack (for err msg) -- See Note [RedStack] } @@ -1630,14 +1674,17 @@ data RedEnv mkRedEnv :: SDoc -> (Inst -> WhatToDo) -> [Inst] -> RedEnv mkRedEnv doc try_me givens = RedEnv { red_doc = doc, red_try_me = try_me, - red_givens = givens, red_stack = (0,[]), + red_givens = givens, + red_reft = emptyRefinement, + red_stack = (0,[]), red_improve = True } mkNoImproveRedEnv :: SDoc -> (Inst -> WhatToDo) -> RedEnv -- Do not do improvement; no givens mkNoImproveRedEnv doc try_me = RedEnv { red_doc = doc, red_try_me = try_me, - red_givens = [], red_stack = (0,[]), + red_givens = [], red_reft = emptyRefinement, + red_stack = (0,[]), red_improve = True } data WhatToDo @@ -1655,6 +1702,12 @@ data WantSCs = NoSCs | AddSCs -- Tells whether we should add the superclasses -- of a predicate when adding it to the avails -- The reason for this flag is entirely the super-class loop problem -- Note [SUPER-CLASS LOOP 1] + +zonkRedEnv :: RedEnv -> TcM RedEnv +zonkRedEnv env + = do { givens' <- mappM zonkInst (red_givens env) + ; return $ env {red_givens = givens'} + } \end{code} @@ -1694,6 +1747,7 @@ reduceContext env wanteds text "----------------------" ])) + ; let givens = red_givens env (given_eqs0, given_dicts0) = partition isEqInst givens (wanted_eqs0, wanted_dicts) = partition isEqInst wanteds @@ -1721,7 +1775,12 @@ reduceContext env wanteds ; eq_irreds <- normaliseWantedEqs eq_irreds0 -- 5. Build the Avail mapping from "given_dicts" + -- Add dicts refined by the current type refinement ; init_state <- foldlM addGiven emptyAvails given_dicts + ; let reft = red_reft env + ; init_state <- if isEmptyRefinement reft then return init_state + else foldlM (addRefinedGiven reft) + init_state given_dicts -- 6. Solve the *wanted* *dictionary* constraints -- This may expose some further equational constraints... @@ -1818,7 +1877,8 @@ The main context-reduction function is @reduce@. Here's its game plan. \begin{code} reduceList :: RedEnv -> [Inst] -> Avails -> TcM Avails reduceList env@(RedEnv {red_stack = (n,stk)}) wanteds state - = do { dopts <- getDOpts + = do { traceTc (text "reduceList " <+> (ppr wanteds $$ ppr state)) + ; dopts <- getDOpts #ifdef DEBUG ; if n > 8 then dumpTcRn (hang (ptext SLIT("Interesting! Context reduction stack depth") <+> int n) @@ -1831,8 +1891,7 @@ reduceList env@(RedEnv {red_stack = (n,stk)}) wanteds state go wanteds state } where go [] state = return state - go (w:ws) state = do { traceTc (text "reduceList " <+> ppr (w:ws) <+> ppr state) - ; state' <- reduce (env {red_stack = (n+1, w:stk)}) w state + go (w:ws) state = do { state' <- reduce (env {red_stack = (n+1, w:stk)}) w state ; go ws state' } -- Base case: we're done! @@ -1844,7 +1903,7 @@ reduce env wanted avails } | otherwise - = do { traceTc (text "reduce" <+> ppr avails <+> ppr wanted) + = do { traceTc (text "reduce" <+> ppr wanted $$ ppr avails) ; case red_try_me env wanted of { Stop -> try_simple (addIrred NoSCs); -- See Note [No superclasses for Stop] @@ -1969,9 +2028,10 @@ contributing clauses. \begin{code} --------------------------------------------- reduceInst :: RedEnv -> Avails -> Inst -> TcM (Avails, LookupInstResult) -reduceInst env avails (ImplicInst { tci_tyvars = tvs, tci_reft = reft, tci_loc = loc, +reduceInst env avails (ImplicInst { tci_name = name, + tci_tyvars = tvs, tci_reft = reft, tci_loc = loc, tci_given = extra_givens, tci_wanted = wanteds }) - = reduceImplication env avails reft tvs extra_givens wanteds loc + = reduceImplication env avails name reft tvs extra_givens wanteds loc reduceInst env avails other_inst = do { result <- lookupSimpleInst other_inst @@ -1981,7 +2041,7 @@ reduceInst env avails other_inst Note [Equational Constraints in Implication Constraints] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -An equational constraint is of the form +An implication constraint is of the form Given => Wanted where Given and Wanted may contain both equational and dictionary constraints. The delay and reduction of these two kinds of constraints @@ -2007,6 +2067,7 @@ which are types. --------------------------------------------- reduceImplication :: RedEnv -> Avails + -> Name -> Refinement -- May refine the givens; often empty -> [TcTyVar] -- Quantified type variables; all skolems -> [Inst] -- Extra givens; all rigid @@ -2047,16 +2108,21 @@ Note that -- the solved dictionaries use these binders -- these binders are generated by reduceImplication -- -reduceImplication env orig_avails reft tvs extra_givens wanteds inst_loc +reduceImplication env orig_avails name reft tvs extra_givens wanteds inst_loc = do { -- Add refined givens, and the extra givens -- Todo fix this - (refined_red_givens,refined_avails) - <- if isEmptyRefinement reft then return (red_givens env,orig_avails) - else foldlM (addRefinedGiven reft) ([],orig_avails) (red_givens env) +-- (refined_red_givens,refined_avails) +-- <- if isEmptyRefinement reft then return (red_givens env,orig_avails) +-- else foldlM (addRefinedGiven reft) ([],orig_avails) (red_givens env) +-- Commented out SLPJ Sept 07; see comment with extractLocalResults below + let refined_red_givens = [] -- Solve the sub-problem ; let try_me inst = ReduceMe AddSCs -- Note [Freeness and implications] - env' = env { red_givens = refined_red_givens ++ extra_givens ++ availsInsts orig_avails + env' = env { red_givens = extra_givens ++ availsInsts orig_avails + , red_reft = reft + , red_doc = sep [ptext SLIT("reduceImplication for") <+> ppr name, + nest 2 (parens $ ptext SLIT("within") <+> red_doc env)] , red_try_me = try_me } ; traceTc (text "reduceImplication" <+> vcat @@ -2064,20 +2130,23 @@ reduceImplication env orig_avails reft tvs extra_givens wanteds inst_loc ppr (red_givens env), ppr extra_givens, ppr reft, ppr wanteds]) ; (irreds,binds,needed_givens0) <- checkLoop env' wanteds - ; let needed_givens1 = [ng | ng <- needed_givens0, notElem ng extra_givens] + ; let (extra_eq_givens, extra_dict_givens) = partition isEqInst extra_givens + -- SLPJ Sept 07: I think this is bogus; currently + -- there are no Eqinsts in extra_givens + dict_ids = map instToId extra_dict_givens + + -- needed_givens0 is the free vars of the bindings + -- Remove the ones we are going to lambda-bind + -- Use the actual dictionary identity *not* equality on Insts + -- (Mind you, it should make no difference here.) + ; let needed_givens = [ng | ng <- needed_givens0 + , instToVar ng `notElem` dict_ids] -- Note [Reducing implication constraints] -- Tom -- update note, put somewhere! ; traceTc (text "reduceImplication result" <+> vcat - [ppr irreds, ppr binds, ppr needed_givens1]) --- ; avails <- reduceList env' wanteds avails --- --- -- Extract the binding --- ; (binds, irreds) <- extractResults avails wanteds - ; (refinement_binds,needed_givens) <- extractLocalResults refined_avails needed_givens1 - ; traceTc (text "reduceImplication local results" <+> vcat - [ppr refinement_binds, ppr needed_givens]) + [ppr irreds, ppr binds, ppr needed_givens]) ; -- extract superclass binds -- (sc_binds,_) <- extractResults avails [] @@ -2091,9 +2160,12 @@ reduceImplication env orig_avails reft tvs extra_givens wanteds inst_loc ; let ret_avails = orig_avails -- ; let ret_avails = updateImprovement orig_avails avails + -- SLPJ Sept 07: what if improvement happened inside the checkLoop? + -- Then we must iterate the outer loop too! + ; traceTc (text "reduceImplication condition" <+> ppr ((isEmptyLHsBinds binds) || (null irreds))) --- Porgress is no longer measered by the number of bindings +-- Progress is no longer measered by the number of bindings -- ; if isEmptyLHsBinds binds then -- No progress ; if (isEmptyLHsBinds binds) && (not $ null irreds) then return (ret_avails, NoInstance) @@ -2106,24 +2178,26 @@ reduceImplication env orig_avails reft tvs extra_givens wanteds inst_loc -- when inferring types. ; let dict_wanteds = filter (not . isEqInst) wanteds - (extra_eq_givens, extra_dict_givens) = partition isEqInst extra_givens - dict_ids = map instToId extra_dict_givens -- TOMDO: given equational constraints bug! -- we need a different evidence for given -- equations depending on whether we solve -- dictionary constraints or equational constraints + eq_tyvars = uniqSetToList $ tyVarsOfTypes $ map eqInstType extra_eq_givens + -- SLPJ Sept07: this looks Utterly Wrong to me, but I think + -- that current extra_givens has no EqInsts, so + -- it makes no difference -- dict_ids = map instToId extra_givens - co = mkWpTyLams tvs <.> mkWpTyLams eq_tyvars <.> mkWpLams dict_ids <.> WpLet (binds `unionBags` refinement_binds `unionBags` bind) + co = mkWpTyLams tvs <.> mkWpTyLams eq_tyvars <.> mkWpLams dict_ids <.> WpLet (binds `unionBags` bind) rhs = mkHsWrap co payload loc = instLocSpan inst_loc payload | [dict_wanted] <- dict_wanteds = HsVar (instToId dict_wanted) | otherwise = ExplicitTuple (map (L loc . HsVar . instToId) dict_wanteds) Boxed - ; traceTc (text "reduceImplication ->" <+> vcat - [ ppr ret_avails, - ppr implic_insts]) + ; traceTc (vcat [text "reduceImplication" <+> ppr name, + ppr implic_insts, + text "->" <+> sep [ppr needed_givens, ppr rhs]]) -- If there are any irreds, we back off and return NoInstance ; return (ret_avails, GenInst (implic_insts ++ needed_givens) (L loc rhs)) } @@ -2133,7 +2207,8 @@ reduceImplication env orig_avails reft tvs extra_givens wanteds inst_loc Note [Reducing implication constraints] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Suppose we are trying to simplify - (Ord a, forall b. C a b => (W [a] b, D c b)) + ( do: Ord a, + ic: (forall b. C a b => (W [a] b, D c b)) ) where instance (C a b, Ord a) => W [a] b When solving the implication constraint, we'll start with @@ -2141,16 +2216,26 @@ When solving the implication constraint, we'll start with in the Avails. Then we add (C a b -> Given) and solve. Extracting the results gives us a binding for the (W [a] b), with an Irred of (Ord a, D c b). Now, the (Ord a) comes from "outside" the implication, -but the (D d b) is from "inside". So we want to generate a Rhs binding +but the (D d b) is from "inside". So we want to generate a GenInst like this - ic = /\b \dc:C a b). (df a b dc do, ic' b dc) - depending on - do :: Ord a - ic' :: forall b. C a b => D c b + ic = GenInst + [ do :: Ord a, + ic' :: forall b. C a b => D c b] + (/\b \(dc:C a b). (df a b dc do, ic' b dc)) + +The first arg of GenInst gives the free dictionary variables of the +second argument -- the "needed givens". And that list in turn is +vital because it's used to determine what other dicts must be solved. +This very list ends up in the second field of the Rhs, and drives +extractResults. + +The need for this field is why we have to return "needed givens" +from extractResults, reduceContext, checkLoop, and so on. -The 'depending on' part of the Rhs is important, because it drives -the extractResults code. +NB: the "needed givens" in a GenInst or Rhs, may contain two dicts +with the same type but different Ids, e.g. [d12 :: Eq a, d81 :: Eq a] +That says we must generate a binding for both d12 and d81. The "inside" and "outside" distinction is what's going on with 'inner' and 'outer' in reduceImplication @@ -2214,7 +2299,7 @@ data AvailHow = IsIrred -- Used for irreducible dictionaries, -- which are going to be lambda bound - | Given TcId -- Used for dictionaries for which we have a binding + | Given Inst -- Used for dictionaries for which we have a binding -- e.g. those "given" in a signature | Rhs -- Used when there is a RHS @@ -2226,8 +2311,9 @@ instance Outputable Avails where pprAvails (Avails imp avails) = vcat [ ptext SLIT("Avails") <> (if imp then ptext SLIT("[improved]") else empty) - , nest 2 (vcat [sep [ppr inst, nest 2 (equals <+> ppr avail)] - | (inst,avail) <- fmToList avails ])] + , nest 2 $ braces $ + vcat [ sep [ppr inst, nest 2 (equals <+> ppr avail)] + | (inst,avail) <- fmToList avails ]] instance Outputable AvailHow where ppr = pprAvail @@ -2236,7 +2322,8 @@ instance Outputable AvailHow where pprAvail :: AvailHow -> SDoc pprAvail IsIrred = text "Irred" pprAvail (Given x) = text "Given" <+> ppr x -pprAvail (Rhs rhs bs) = text "Rhs" <+> sep [ppr rhs, braces (ppr bs)] +pprAvail (Rhs rhs bs) = sep [text "Rhs" <+> ppr bs, + nest 2 (ppr rhs)] ------------------------- extendAvailEnv :: AvailEnv -> Inst -> AvailHow -> AvailEnv @@ -2284,6 +2371,9 @@ extractResults :: Avails -> TcM ( TcDictBinds, -- Bindings [Inst], -- Irreducible ones [Inst]) -- Needed givens, i.e. ones used in the bindings + -- Postcondition: needed-givens = free vars( binds ) \ irreds + -- needed-gives is subset of Givens in incoming Avails + -- Note [Reducing implication constraints] extractResults (Avails _ avails) wanteds = go avails emptyBag [] [] wanteds @@ -2298,64 +2388,42 @@ extractResults (Avails _ avails) wanteds Nothing -> pprTrace "Urk: extractResults" (ppr w) $ go avails binds irreds givens ws - Just (Given id) - | id == w_id -> go avails binds irreds (w:givens) ws - | otherwise -> - go avails (addInstToDictBind binds w (nlHsVar id)) irreds - (update_id w id:givens) ws - -- The sought Id can be one of the givens, via a superclass chain - -- and then we definitely don't want to generate an x=x binding! + Just (Given g) -> go (avails_with g g_id) + (add_triv_bind g_id) + irreds (g:givens) ws + -- avail_with g ensures that we don't emit the + -- same given twice into needed-givens + where + g_id = instToId g - Just IsIrred -> go (add_given avails w) binds (w:irreds) givens ws - -- The add_given handles the case where we want (Ord a, Eq a), and we + Just IsIrred -> go (avails_with w w_id) binds (w:irreds) givens ws + + -- The avails_with_w handles the case where we want (Ord a, Eq a), and we -- don't want to emit *two* Irreds for Ord a, one via the superclass chain -- This showed up in a dupliated Ord constraint in the error message for -- test tcfail043 + -- More generally, we don't want to emit two irreds with + -- the same type - Just (Rhs rhs ws') -> go (add_given avails w) new_binds irreds givens (ws' ++ ws) - where - new_binds = addInstToDictBind binds w rhs - where - w_id = instToId w - update_id m@(Method{}) id = m {tci_id = id} - update_id w id = w {tci_name = idName id} + Just (Rhs rhs@(L _ (HsVar g_id)) ws') + -> go avails (add_triv_bind g_id) irreds givens (ws' ++ ws) - add_given avails w = extendAvailEnv avails w (Given (instToId w)) - -extractLocalResults :: Avails - -> [Inst] -- Wanted - -> TcM ( TcDictBinds, -- Bindings - [Inst]) -- Needed givens, i.e. ones used in the bindings - -extractLocalResults (Avails _ avails) wanteds - = go avails emptyBag [] wanteds - where - go :: AvailEnv -> TcDictBinds -> [Inst] -> [Inst] - -> TcM (TcDictBinds, [Inst]) - go avails binds givens [] - = returnM (binds, givens) - - go avails binds givens (w:ws) - = case findAvailEnv avails w of - Nothing -> -- pprTrace "Urk: extractLocalResults" (ppr w) $ - go avails binds givens ws - - Just IsIrred -> - go avails binds givens ws - - Just (Given id) - | id == w_id -> go avails binds (w:givens) ws - | otherwise -> go avails binds (w{tci_name=idName id}:givens) ws - -- The sought Id can be one of the givens, via a superclass chain - -- and then we definitely don't want to generate an x=x binding! - - Just (Rhs rhs ws') -> go (add_given avails w) new_binds givens (ws' ++ ws) - where - new_binds = addInstToDictBind binds w rhs + Just (Rhs rhs ws') + -> go (avails_with w w_id) (add_bind rhs) + irreds givens (ws' ++ ws) + -- The avails-with w replaces a complex RHS with a simple one + -- for the benefit of subsequent lookups where w_id = instToId w - add_given avails w = extendAvailEnv avails w (Given (instToId w)) + add_triv_bind rhs_id | rhs_id == w_id = binds + | otherwise = add_bind (nlHsVar rhs_id) + -- The sought Id can be one of the givens, via a + -- superclass chain and then we definitely don't + -- want to generate an x=x binding! + + add_bind rhs = addInstToDictBind binds w rhs + avails_with w w_id = extendAvailEnv avails w (Rhs (nlHsVar w_id) []) \end{code} @@ -2377,15 +2445,15 @@ addWanted want_scs avails wanted rhs_expr wanteds avail = Rhs rhs_expr wanteds addGiven :: Avails -> Inst -> TcM Avails -addGiven avails given = addAvailAndSCs AddSCs avails given (Given (instToId given)) +addGiven avails given = addAvailAndSCs AddSCs avails given (Given given) -- Always add superclasses for 'givens' -- -- No ASSERT( not (given `elemAvails` avails) ) because in an instance -- decl for Ord t we can add both Ord t and Eq t as 'givens', -- so the assert isn't true -addRefinedGiven :: Refinement -> ([Inst], Avails) -> Inst -> TcM ([Inst], Avails) -addRefinedGiven reft (refined_givens, avails) given +addRefinedGiven :: Refinement -> Avails -> Inst -> TcM Avails +addRefinedGiven reft avails given | isDict given -- We sometimes have 'given' methods, but they -- are always optional, so we can drop them , let pred = dictPred given @@ -2394,13 +2462,12 @@ addRefinedGiven reft (refined_givens, avails) given = do { new_given <- newDictBndr (instLoc given) pred ; let rhs = L (instSpan given) $ HsWrap (WpCo co) (HsVar (instToId given)) - ; avails <- addAvailAndSCs AddSCs avails new_given (Rhs rhs [given]) - ; return (new_given:refined_givens, avails) } + ; addAvailAndSCs AddSCs avails new_given (Rhs rhs [given]) } -- ToDo: the superclasses of the original given all exist in Avails -- so we could really just cast them, but it's more awkward to do, -- and hopefully the optimiser will spot the duplicated work | otherwise - = return (refined_givens, avails) + = return avails \end{code} Note [ImplicInst rigidity] @@ -2462,7 +2529,7 @@ addAvailAndSCs want_scs avails inst avail addSCs :: (TcPredType -> Bool) -> Avails -> Inst -> TcM Avails -- Add all the superclasses of the Inst to Avails - -- The first param says "dont do this because the original thing + -- The first param says "don't do this because the original thing -- depends on this one, so you'd build a loop" -- Invariant: the Inst is already in Avails. @@ -2559,6 +2626,7 @@ tc_simplify_top doc interactive wanteds ; traceTc (text "tc_simplify_top 0: " <+> ppr wanteds) ; (irreds1, binds1) <- tryHardCheckLoop doc1 wanteds +-- ; (irreds1, binds1) <- gentleInferLoop doc1 wanteds ; traceTc (text "tc_simplify_top 1: " <+> ppr irreds1) ; (irreds2, binds2) <- approximateImplications doc2 (\d -> True) irreds1 ; traceTc (text "tc_simplify_top 2: " <+> ppr irreds2) @@ -2822,7 +2890,7 @@ tcSimplifyDefault theta if null irreds then returnM () else - failM + traceTc (ptext SLIT("tcSimplifyDefault failing")) >> failM where doc = ptext SLIT("default declaration") \end{code}