X-Git-Url: http://git.megacz.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=docs%2Fusers_guide%2Fglasgow_exts.xml;h=7a918a8f49ad1908a59c085d54c1228f17d0a6a3;hb=bec18cb3a1dcbc70b0257a367091c9a5948da6f6;hp=c1dca222a9175babae0a1125d5ac529460b1a427;hpb=aa2c486e51caa0386aaff0d1b866a60316500b41;p=ghc-hetmet.git
diff --git a/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml b/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml
index c1dca22..7a918a8 100644
--- a/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml
+++ b/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ documentation describes all the libraries that come with GHC.
-
+
@@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ documentation describes all the libraries that come with GHC.
Enables Template Haskell (see ). Currently also implied by
+ linkend="template-haskell"/>). This flag must
+ be given explicitly; it is no longer implied by
.Syntax stolen: [|,
@@ -616,7 +617,7 @@ clunky env var1 var1 = case lookup env var1 of
Nothing -> fail
Just val2 -> val1 + val2
where
- fail = val1 + val2
+ fail = var1 + var2
@@ -1009,8 +1010,8 @@ in a type synonym, thus:
f :: Discard a
f x y = (x, show y)
- g :: Discard Int -> (Int,Bool) -- A rank-2 type
- g f = f Int True
+ g :: Discard Int -> (Int,String) -- A rank-2 type
+ g f = f 3 True
@@ -2089,7 +2090,7 @@ option, you can use arbitrary
types in both an instance context and instance head. Termination is ensured by having a
fixed-depth recursion stack. If you exceed the stack depth you get a
sort of backtrace, and the opportunity to increase the stack depth
-with N.
+with N.
@@ -2106,7 +2107,9 @@ can be modified by two flags:
and
-fallow-incoherent-instances
-, as this section discusses.
+, as this section discusses. Both these
+flags are dynamic flags, and can be set on a per-module basis, using
+an OPTIONS_GHC pragma if desired ().
When GHC tries to resolve, say, the constraint C Int Bool,
it tries to match every instance declaration against the
@@ -4086,9 +4089,8 @@ Tim Sheard is going to expand it.)
constructions. You need to use the flag
to switch these syntactic extensions on
- ( is currently implied by
- , but you are encouraged to
- specify it explicitly).
+ ( is no longer implied by
+ ).
@@ -4236,7 +4238,46 @@ Hello
+
+
+Using Template Haskell with Profiling
+profilingwith Template Haskell
+Template Haskell relies on GHC's built-in bytecode compiler and
+interpreter to run the splice expressions. The bytecode interpreter
+runs the compiled expression on top of the same runtime on which GHC
+itself is running; this means that the compiled code referred to by
+the interpreted expression must be compatible with this runtime, and
+in particular this means that object code that is compiled for
+profiling cannot be loaded and used by a splice
+expression, because profiled object code is only compatible with the
+profiling version of the runtime.
+
+This causes difficulties if you have a multi-module program
+containing Template Haskell code and you need to compile it for
+profiling, because GHC cannot load the profiled object code and use it
+when executing the splices. Fortunately GHC provides a workaround.
+The basic idea is to compile the program twice:
+
+
+
+ Compile the program or library first the normal way, without
+ .
+
+
+ Then compile it again with , and
+ additionally use
+ to name the object files differentliy (you can choose any suffix
+ that isn't the normal object suffix here). GHC will automatically
+ load the object files built in the first step when executing splice
+ expressions. If you omit the flag when
+ building with and Template Haskell is used,
+ GHC will emit an error message.
+
+
+
+
@@ -5010,63 +5051,58 @@ key_function :: Int -> String -> (Bool, Double)
If you use you'll see the
sequence of phase numbers for successive runs of the
simplifier. In an INLINE pragma you can optionally specify a
- phase number, thus:
-
+ phase number, thus:
- You can say "inline f in Phase 2
- and all subsequent phases":
-
- {-# INLINE [2] f #-}
-
-
-
-
+ "INLINE[k] f" means: do not inline
+ f
+ until phase k, but from phase
+ k onwards be very keen to inline it.
+
- You can say "inline g in all
- phases up to, but not including, Phase 3":
-
- {-# INLINE [~3] g #-}
-
-
-
-
+ "INLINE[~k] f" means: be very keen to inline
+ f
+ until phase k, but from phase
+ k onwards do not inline it.
+
- If you omit the phase indicator, you mean "inline in
- all phases".
-
+ "NOINLINE[k] f" means: do not inline
+ f
+ until phase k, but from phase
+ k onwards be willing to inline it (as if
+ there was no pragma).
+
+
+ "INLINE[~k] f" means: be willing to inline
+ f
+ until phase k, but from phase
+ k onwards do not inline it.
+
-
- You can use a phase number on a NOINLINE pragma too:
-
-
-
- You can say "do not inline f
- until Phase 2; in Phase 2 and subsequently behave as if
- there was no pragma at all":
+The same information is summarised here:
- {-# NOINLINE [2] f #-}
-
-
-
+ -- Before phase 2 Phase 2 and later
+ {-# INLINE [2] f #-} -- No Yes
+ {-# INLINE [~2] f #-} -- Yes No
+ {-# NOINLINE [2] f #-} -- No Maybe
+ {-# NOINLINE [~2] f #-} -- Maybe No
-
- You can say "do not inline g in
- Phase 3 or any subsequent phase; before that, behave as if
- there was no pragma":
-
- {-# NOINLINE [~3] g #-}
+ {-# INLINE f #-} -- Yes Yes
+ {-# NOINLINE f #-} -- No No
-
-
-
-
- If you omit the phase indicator, you mean "never
- inline this function".
-
-
-
- The same phase-numbering control is available for RULES
+By "Maybe" we mean that the usual heuristic inlining rules apply (if the
+function body is small, or it is applied to interesting-looking arguments etc).
+Another way to understand the semantics is this:
+
+For both INLINE and NOINLINE, the phase number says
+when inlining is allowed at all.
+The INLINE pragma has the additional effect of making the
+function body look small, so that when inlining is allowed it is very likely to
+happen.
+
+
+
+The same phase-numbering control is available for RULES
().
@@ -5344,7 +5380,9 @@ The programmer can specify rewrite rules as part of the source program
(in a pragma). GHC applies these rewrite rules wherever it can, provided (a)
the flag () is on,
and (b) the flag
-() is not specified.
+() is not specified, and (c) the
+ ()
+flag is active.
@@ -5994,6 +6032,74 @@ r) ->
+
+Special built-in functions
+GHC has a few built-in funcions with special behaviour,
+described in this section. All are exported by
+GHC.Exts.
+
+The <literal>inline</literal> function
+
+The inline function is somewhat experimental.
+
+ inline :: a -> a
+
+The call (inline f) arranges that f
+is inlined, regardless of its size. More precisely, the call
+(inline f) rewrites to the right-hand side of f's
+definition.
+This allows the programmer to control inlining from
+a particular call site
+rather than the definition site of the function
+(c.f. INLINE pragmas ).
+
+
+This inlining occurs regardless of the argument to the call
+or the size of f's definition; it is unconditional.
+The main caveat is that f's definition must be
+visible to the compiler. That is, f must be
+let-bound in the current scope.
+If no inlining takes place, the inline function
+expands to the identity function in Phase zero; so its use imposes
+no overhead.
+
+ If the function is defined in another
+module, GHC only exposes its inlining in the interface file if the
+function is sufficiently small that it might be
+inlined by the automatic mechanism. There is currently no way to tell
+GHC to expose arbitrarily-large functions in the interface file. (This
+shortcoming is something that could be fixed, with some kind of pragma.)
+
+
+
+The <literal>inline</literal> function
+
+The lazy function restrains strictness analysis a little:
+
+ lazy :: a -> a
+
+The call (lazy e) means the same as e,
+but lazy has a magical property so far as strictness
+analysis is concerned: it is lazy in its first argument,
+even though its semantics is strict. After strictness analysis has run,
+calls to lazy are inlined to be the identity function.
+
+
+This behaviour is occasionally useful when controlling evaluation order.
+Notably, lazy is used in the library definition of
+Control.Parallel.par:
+
+ par :: a -> b -> b
+ par x y = case (par# x) of { _ -> lazy y }
+
+If lazy were not lazy, par would
+look strict in y which would defeat the whole
+purpose of par.
+
+
+
+
+
Generic classes