X-Git-Url: http://git.megacz.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=docs%2Fusers_guide%2Fsooner.xml;h=19c1c11bdca877bec9aa5ab1948898ea03786685;hb=147c8d2ec47fab14fd0386e10e73f1a4da005442;hp=1aba5d1af0afb4ffa66c489d98c93373f6875da2;hpb=0065d5ab628975892cea1ec7303f968c3338cbe1;p=ghc-hetmet.git diff --git a/docs/users_guide/sooner.xml b/docs/users_guide/sooner.xml index 1aba5d1..19c1c11 100644 --- a/docs/users_guide/sooner.xml +++ b/docs/users_guide/sooner.xml @@ -200,9 +200,6 @@ should go here! mind-bogglingly clever. Better to let GCC have a go, as it tries much harder on register allocation, etc. - At the moment, if you turn on you - get GCC instead. This may change in the future. - So, when we want very fast code, we use: . @@ -509,18 +506,6 @@ f (Wibble x y) # ugly, and proud of it -A<size> RTS option RTS options (see ). - - This is especially important if your program uses a - lot of mutable arrays of pointers or mutable variables - (i.e. STArray, - IOArray, STRef and - IORef, but not UArray, - STUArray or IOUArray). - GHC's garbage collector currently scans these objects on - every collection, so your program won't benefit from - generational GC in the normal way if you use lots of - these. Increasing the heap size to reduce the number of - collections will probably help.