X-Git-Url: http://git.megacz.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=rts%2Fsm%2FEvac.c;h=f537e2b9a3c46f559b00fbbdcfcd30fbe97196a5;hb=3e7ebef1f18e2718dd37f47613694de9ebf80ae2;hp=ab2047036d48943c4ad19c3e84a2a970339e9d1d;hpb=fcc3794aeb78081c04103a0b7e7560cb8c7bea58;p=ghc-hetmet.git diff --git a/rts/sm/Evac.c b/rts/sm/Evac.c index ab20470..f537e2b 100644 --- a/rts/sm/Evac.c +++ b/rts/sm/Evac.c @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ copy_tag_nolock(StgClosure **p, const StgInfoTable *info, * pointer of an object, but reserve some padding after it. This is * used to optimise evacuation of BLACKHOLEs. */ -static void +static rtsBool copyPart(StgClosure **p, StgClosure *src, nat size_to_reserve, nat size_to_copy, step *stp) { StgPtr to, from; @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ spin: if (IS_FORWARDING_PTR(info)) { src->header.info = (const StgInfoTable *)info; evacuate(p); // does the failed_to_evac stuff - return ; + return rtsFalse; } #else info = (W_)src->header.info; @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ spin: if (size_to_reserve - size_to_copy > 0) LDV_FILL_SLOP(to + size_to_copy - 1, (int)(size_to_reserve - size_to_copy)); #endif + + return rtsTrue; } @@ -697,14 +699,18 @@ loop: { StgTSO *new_tso; StgPtr r, s; - - copyPart(p,(StgClosure *)tso, tso_sizeW(tso), sizeofW(StgTSO), stp); - new_tso = (StgTSO *)*p; - move_TSO(tso, new_tso); - for (r = tso->sp, s = new_tso->sp; - r < tso->stack+tso->stack_size;) { - *s++ = *r++; - } + rtsBool mine; + + mine = copyPart(p,(StgClosure *)tso, tso_sizeW(tso), + sizeofW(StgTSO), stp); + if (mine) { + new_tso = (StgTSO *)*p; + move_TSO(tso, new_tso); + for (r = tso->sp, s = new_tso->sp; + r < tso->stack+tso->stack_size;) { + *s++ = *r++; + } + } return; } } @@ -773,14 +779,25 @@ unchain_thunk_selectors(StgSelector *p, StgClosure *val) prev = (StgSelector*)((StgClosure *)p)->payload[0]; // Update the THUNK_SELECTOR with an indirection to the - // EVACUATED closure now at p. Why do this rather than - // upd_evacuee(q,p)? Because we have an invariant that an - // EVACUATED closure always points to an object in the - // same or an older generation (required by the short-cut - // test in the EVACUATED case, below). - ((StgInd *)p)->indirectee = val; - write_barrier(); - SET_INFO(p, &stg_IND_info); + // value. The value is still in from-space at this stage. + // + // (old note: Why not do upd_evacuee(q,p)? Because we have an + // invariant that an EVACUATED closure always points to an + // object in the same or an older generation (required by + // the short-cut test in the EVACUATED case, below). + if ((StgClosure *)p == val) { + // must be a loop; just leave a BLACKHOLE in place. This + // can happen when we have a chain of selectors that + // eventually loops back on itself. We can't leave an + // indirection pointing to itself, and we want the program + // to deadlock if it ever enters this closure, so + // BLACKHOLE is correct. + SET_INFO(p, &stg_BLACKHOLE_info); + } else { + ((StgInd *)p)->indirectee = val; + write_barrier(); + SET_INFO(p, &stg_IND_info); + } // For the purposes of LDV profiling, we have created an // indirection. @@ -957,12 +974,18 @@ selector_loop: prev_thunk_selector = p; *q = val; - if (evac) evacuate(q); - val = *q; + + // update the other selectors in the chain *before* + // evacuating the value. This is necessary in the case + // where the value turns out to be one of the selectors + // in the chain (i.e. we have a loop), and evacuating it + // would corrupt the chain. + unchain_thunk_selectors(prev_thunk_selector, val); + // evacuate() cannot recurse through // eval_thunk_selector(), because we know val is not // a THUNK_SELECTOR. - unchain_thunk_selectors(prev_thunk_selector, val); + if (evac) evacuate(q); return; }