projects / ghc-hetmet.git / commit
? search:
summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
(parent: f37acb7) | patch
[project @ 2002-10-29 11:57:41 by chak]
authorchak <unknown>
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:57:41 +0000 (11:57 +0000)
committerchak <unknown>
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:57:41 +0000 (11:57 +0000)
commit73ac2f44193dcfe4cc56aab5b2910cf4edc24a18
tree96a419c2764a1d062a671757e4904ef988571e65tree | snapshot
parentf37acb70bec2bbffffa59912f6876abef0ae0073commit | diff
[project @ 2002-10-29 11:57:41 by chak]
Added a case for HsPar to repE.  Also completed the cases in repE to at
least panic for the missing syntactic forms of HsExpr.

Is there any good reason for the semi-random order of the cases in repE?
Using the same order as in the data declaration for HsExpr would make it
easier to spot missing cases.
ghc/compiler/deSugar/DsMeta.hs diff | blob | history
Glasgow Haskell Compiler with heterogeneous metaprogramming (generalized arrows and modal types)