From f58fd1c755e17002102c84436f9803c4a1c4c4d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: simonmar <unknown>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:11:44 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] [project @ 2002-09-09 12:11:44 by simonmar] Make sure we get
 the compiler's own Pretty library when we #include
 ../utils/ghc-pkg/Package.hs.

---
 ghc/compiler/main/Packages.lhs |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ghc/compiler/main/Packages.lhs b/ghc/compiler/main/Packages.lhs
index 43b96ec..190a1f8 100644
--- a/ghc/compiler/main/Packages.lhs
+++ b/ghc/compiler/main/Packages.lhs
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ module Packages ( PackageConfig(..),
 where
 
 #include "HsVersions.h"
+
 import Pretty
 
 import CmdLineOpts	( dynFlag, verbosity )
@@ -22,7 +23,9 @@ import Outputable	( docToSDoc )
 
 \begin{code}
 #define WANT_PRETTY
--- Yes, do generate pretty-printing stuff for packages
+#define INTERNAL_PRETTY
+-- Yes, do generate pretty-printing stuff for packages, and use our
+-- own Pretty library rather than Text.PrettyPrint
 
 -- There's a blob of code shared with ghc-pkg, 
 -- so we just include it from there 
-- 
1.7.10.4