(*********************************************************************************************************************************)
-(* HaskFlattener: *)
+(* HaskFlattener: *)
(* *)
(* The Flattening Functor. *)
(* *)
Require Import HaskKinds.
Require Import HaskCoreTypes.
-Require Import HaskLiteralsAndTyCons.
+Require Import HaskCoreVars.
+Require Import HaskWeakTypes.
+Require Import HaskWeakVars.
+Require Import HaskLiterals.
+Require Import HaskTyCons.
Require Import HaskStrongTypes.
Require Import HaskProof.
Require Import NaturalDeduction.
-Require Import NaturalDeductionCategory.
-
-Require Import Algebras_ch4.
-Require Import Categories_ch1_3.
-Require Import Functors_ch1_4.
-Require Import Isomorphisms_ch1_5.
-Require Import ProductCategories_ch1_6_1.
-Require Import OppositeCategories_ch1_6_2.
-Require Import Enrichment_ch2_8.
-Require Import Subcategories_ch7_1.
-Require Import NaturalTransformations_ch7_4.
-Require Import NaturalIsomorphisms_ch7_5.
-Require Import BinoidalCategories.
-Require Import PreMonoidalCategories.
-Require Import MonoidalCategories_ch7_8.
-Require Import Coherence_ch7_8.
Require Import HaskStrongTypes.
Require Import HaskStrong.
Require Import HaskProof.
Require Import HaskStrongToProof.
Require Import HaskProofToStrong.
-Require Import ProgrammingLanguage.
-Require Import HaskProgrammingLanguage.
-Require Import PCF.
+Require Import HaskWeakToStrong.
+
+Require Import HaskSkolemizer.
Open Scope nd_scope.
+Set Printing Width 130.
(*
* The flattening transformation. Currently only TWO-level languages are
*)
Section HaskFlattener.
- (* this actually has nothing to do with categories; it shows that proofs [|-A]//[|-B] are one-to-one with []//[A|-B] *)
- (* TODO Lemma hom_functor_full*)
+ Definition getlev {Γ}{κ}(lht:LeveledHaskType Γ κ) : HaskLevel Γ :=
+ match lht with t @@ l => l end.
+
+ Definition arrange :
+ forall {T} (Σ:Tree ??T) (f:T -> bool),
+ Arrange Σ (dropT (mkFlags (liftBoolFunc false f) Σ),,( (dropT (mkFlags (liftBoolFunc false (bnot ○ f)) Σ)))).
+ intros.
+ induction Σ.
+ simpl.
+ destruct a.
+ simpl.
+ destruct (f t); simpl.
+ apply RuCanL.
+ apply RuCanR.
+ simpl.
+ apply RuCanL.
+ simpl in *.
+ eapply RComp; [ idtac | apply arrangeSwapMiddle ].
+ eapply RComp.
+ eapply RLeft.
+ apply IHΣ2.
+ eapply RRight.
+ apply IHΣ1.
+ Defined.
+
+ Definition arrange' :
+ forall {T} (Σ:Tree ??T) (f:T -> bool),
+ Arrange (dropT (mkFlags (liftBoolFunc false f) Σ),,( (dropT (mkFlags (liftBoolFunc false (bnot ○ f)) Σ)))) Σ.
+ intros.
+ induction Σ.
+ simpl.
+ destruct a.
+ simpl.
+ destruct (f t); simpl.
+ apply RCanL.
+ apply RCanR.
+ simpl.
+ apply RCanL.
+ simpl in *.
+ eapply RComp; [ apply arrangeSwapMiddle | idtac ].
+ eapply RComp.
+ eapply RLeft.
+ apply IHΣ2.
+ eapply RRight.
+ apply IHΣ1.
+ Defined.
+
+ Ltac eqd_dec_refl' :=
+ match goal with
+ | [ |- context[@eqd_dec ?T ?V ?X ?X] ] =>
+ destruct (@eqd_dec T V X X) as [eqd_dec1 | eqd_dec2];
+ [ clear eqd_dec1 | set (eqd_dec2 (refl_equal _)) as eqd_dec2'; inversion eqd_dec2' ]
+ end.
+
+ Definition v2t {Γ}(ec:HaskTyVar Γ ECKind) : HaskType Γ ECKind := fun TV ite => TVar (ec TV ite).
+
+ Definition levelMatch {Γ}(lev:HaskLevel Γ) : LeveledHaskType Γ ★ -> bool :=
+ fun t => match t with ttype@@tlev => if eqd_dec tlev lev then true else false end.
- (* lemma: if a proof from no hypotheses contains no Brak's or Esc's, then the context contains no variables at level!=0 *)
+ (* In a tree of types, replace any type at depth "lev" or greater None *)
+ Definition mkDropFlags {Γ}(lev:HaskLevel Γ)(tt:Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★)) : TreeFlags tt :=
+ mkFlags (liftBoolFunc false (levelMatch lev)) tt.
- (* In a tree of types, replace any type at level "lev" with None *)
Definition drop_lev {Γ}(lev:HaskLevel Γ)(tt:Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★)) : Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★) :=
- mapTree (fun t => match t with
- | Some (ttype @@ tlev) => if eqd_dec tlev lev then None else t
- | _ => t
- end) tt.
+ dropT (mkDropFlags lev tt).
+
(* The opposite: replace any type which is NOT at level "lev" with None *)
- Definition take_lev {Γ}(lev:HaskLevel Γ)(tt:Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★)) : Tree ??(HaskType Γ ★) :=
- mapTree (fun t => match t with
- | Some (ttype @@ tlev) => if eqd_dec tlev lev then Some ttype else None
- | _ => None
- end) tt.
+ Definition mkTakeFlags {Γ}(lev:HaskLevel Γ)(tt:Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★)) : TreeFlags tt :=
+ mkFlags (liftBoolFunc true (bnot ○ levelMatch lev)) tt.
- (* In a tree of types, replace any type at depth "lev" or greater None *)
- Definition drop_depth {Γ}(n:nat)(tt:Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★)) : Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★) :=
- mapTree (fun t => match t with
- | Some (ttype @@ tlev) => if eqd_dec (length tlev) n then None else t
- | _ => t
- end) tt.
+ Definition take_lev {Γ}(lev:HaskLevel Γ)(tt:Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★)) : Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★) :=
+ dropT (mkTakeFlags lev tt).
+(*
+ mapOptionTree (fun x => flatten_type (unlev x))
+ (maybeTree (takeT tt (mkFlags (
+ fun t => match t with
+ | Some (ttype @@ tlev) => if eqd_dec tlev lev then true else false
+ | _ => true
+ end
+ ) tt))).
+
+ Definition maybeTree {T}(t:??(Tree ??T)) : Tree ??T :=
+ match t with
+ | None => []
+ | Some x => x
+ end.
+*)
- (* delete from the tree any type which is NOT at level "lev" *)
+ Lemma drop_lev_lemma : forall Γ (lev:HaskLevel Γ) x, drop_lev lev [x @@ lev] = [].
+ intros; simpl.
+ Opaque eqd_dec.
+ unfold drop_lev.
+ simpl.
+ unfold mkDropFlags.
+ simpl.
+ Transparent eqd_dec.
+ eqd_dec_refl'.
+ auto.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma drop_lev_lemma_s : forall Γ (lev:HaskLevel Γ) ec x, drop_lev (ec::lev) [x @@ (ec :: lev)] = [].
+ intros; simpl.
+ Opaque eqd_dec.
+ unfold drop_lev.
+ unfold mkDropFlags.
+ simpl.
+ Transparent eqd_dec.
+ eqd_dec_refl'.
+ auto.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma take_lemma : forall Γ (lev:HaskLevel Γ) x, take_lev lev [x @@ lev] = [x @@ lev].
+ intros; simpl.
+ Opaque eqd_dec.
+ unfold take_lev.
+ unfold mkTakeFlags.
+ simpl.
+ Transparent eqd_dec.
+ eqd_dec_refl'.
+ auto.
+ Qed.
- Fixpoint take_lev' {Γ}(lev:HaskLevel Γ)(tt:Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★)) : ??(Tree ??(HaskType Γ ★)) :=
- match tt with
- | T_Leaf None => Some (T_Leaf None) (* FIXME: unsure of this; it ends up on both sides *)
- | T_Branch b1 b2 =>
- let b1' := take_lev' lev b1 in
- let b2' := take_lev' lev b2 in
- match b1' with
- | None => b2'
- | Some b1'' => match b2' with
- | None => Some b1''
- | Some b2'' => Some (b1'',,b2'')
- end
- end
- | T_Leaf (Some (ttype@@tlev)) =>
- if eqd_dec tlev lev
- then Some [ttype]
- else None
+ Lemma take_lemma' : forall Γ (lev:HaskLevel Γ) x, take_lev lev (x @@@ lev) = x @@@ lev.
+ intros.
+ induction x.
+ destruct a; simpl; try reflexivity.
+ apply take_lemma.
+ simpl.
+ rewrite <- IHx1 at 2.
+ rewrite <- IHx2 at 2.
+ reflexivity.
+ Qed.
+(*
+ Lemma drop_lev_lemma' : forall Γ (lev:HaskLevel Γ) x, drop_lev lev (x @@@ lev) = [].
+ intros.
+ induction x.
+ destruct a; simpl; try reflexivity.
+ apply drop_lev_lemma.
+ simpl.
+ change (@drop_lev _ lev (x1 @@@ lev ,, x2 @@@ lev))
+ with ((@drop_lev _ lev (x1 @@@ lev)) ,, (@drop_lev _ lev (x2 @@@ lev))).
+ simpl.
+ rewrite IHx1.
+ rewrite IHx2.
+ reflexivity.
+ Qed.
+*)
+ Ltac drop_simplify :=
+ match goal with
+ | [ |- context[@drop_lev ?G ?L [ ?X @@ ?L ] ] ] =>
+ rewrite (drop_lev_lemma G L X)
+(*
+ | [ |- context[@drop_lev ?G ?L [ ?X @@@ ?L ] ] ] =>
+ rewrite (drop_lev_lemma' G L X)
+*)
+ | [ |- context[@drop_lev ?G (?E :: ?L) [ ?X @@ (?E :: ?L) ] ] ] =>
+ rewrite (drop_lev_lemma_s G L E X)
+ | [ |- context[@drop_lev ?G ?N (?A,,?B)] ] =>
+ change (@drop_lev G N (A,,B)) with ((@drop_lev G N A),,(@drop_lev G N B))
+ | [ |- context[@drop_lev ?G ?N (T_Leaf None)] ] =>
+ change (@drop_lev G N (T_Leaf (@None (LeveledHaskType G ★)))) with (T_Leaf (@None (LeveledHaskType G ★)))
+ end.
+
+ Ltac take_simplify :=
+ match goal with
+ | [ |- context[@take_lev ?G ?L [ ?X @@ ?L ] ] ] =>
+ rewrite (take_lemma G L X)
+ | [ |- context[@take_lev ?G ?L [ ?X @@@ ?L ] ] ] =>
+ rewrite (take_lemma' G L X)
+ | [ |- context[@take_lev ?G ?N (?A,,?B)] ] =>
+ change (@take_lev G N (A,,B)) with ((@take_lev G N A),,(@take_lev G N B))
+ | [ |- context[@take_lev ?G ?N (T_Leaf None)] ] =>
+ change (@take_lev G N (T_Leaf (@None (LeveledHaskType G ★)))) with (T_Leaf (@None (LeveledHaskType G ★)))
end.
- Context (ga' : forall TV, TV ★ -> Tree ??(RawHaskType TV ★) -> Tree ??(RawHaskType TV ★) -> RawHaskType TV ★).
- Definition ga : forall Γ, HaskTyVar Γ ★ -> Tree ??(HaskType Γ ★) -> Tree ??(HaskType Γ ★) -> HaskType Γ ★
- := fun Γ ec ant suc =>
- fun TV ite =>
- ga'
- TV
- (ec TV ite)
- (mapOptionTree (fun x => x TV ite) ant)
- (mapOptionTree (fun x => x TV ite) suc).
+ (*******************************************************************************)
- Implicit Arguments ga [ [Γ] ].
- Notation "a ~~~~> b" := (@ga _ _ a b) (at level 20).
- Context (unit_type : forall TV, RawHaskType TV ★).
+ Context (hetmet_flatten : WeakExprVar).
+ Context (hetmet_unflatten : WeakExprVar).
+ Context (hetmet_id : WeakExprVar).
+ Context {unitTy : forall TV, RawHaskType TV ECKind -> RawHaskType TV ★ }.
+ Context {prodTy : forall TV, RawHaskType TV ECKind -> RawHaskType TV ★ -> RawHaskType TV ★ -> RawHaskType TV ★ }.
+ Context {gaTy : forall TV, RawHaskType TV ECKind -> RawHaskType TV ★ -> RawHaskType TV ★ -> RawHaskType TV ★ }.
+
+ Definition ga_mk_tree' {TV}(ec:RawHaskType TV ECKind)(tr:Tree ??(RawHaskType TV ★)) : RawHaskType TV ★ :=
+ reduceTree (unitTy TV ec) (prodTy TV ec) tr.
+
+ Definition ga_mk_tree {Γ}(ec:HaskType Γ ECKind)(tr:Tree ??(HaskType Γ ★)) : HaskType Γ ★ :=
+ fun TV ite => ga_mk_tree' (ec TV ite) (mapOptionTree (fun x => x TV ite) tr).
+
+ Definition ga_mk_raw {TV}(ec:RawHaskType TV ECKind)(ant suc:Tree ??(RawHaskType TV ★)) : RawHaskType TV ★ :=
+ gaTy TV ec
+ (ga_mk_tree' ec ant)
+ (ga_mk_tree' ec suc).
+
+ Definition ga_mk {Γ}(ec:HaskType Γ ECKind)(ant suc:Tree ??(HaskType Γ ★)) : HaskType Γ ★ :=
+ fun TV ite => gaTy TV (ec TV ite) (ga_mk_tree ec ant TV ite) (ga_mk_tree ec suc TV ite).
(*
* The story:
* - free variables of type t at a level lev deeper than the succedent become garrows c () t
* - free variables at the level of the succedent become
*)
- Fixpoint flatten_rawtype {TV}{κ}(depth:nat)(exp: RawHaskType TV κ) : RawHaskType TV κ :=
+ Fixpoint flatten_rawtype {TV}{κ}(exp: RawHaskType TV κ) : RawHaskType TV κ :=
match exp with
- | TVar _ x => TVar x
- | TAll _ y => TAll _ (fun v => flatten_rawtype depth (y v))
- | TApp _ _ x y => TApp (flatten_rawtype depth x) (flatten_rawtype depth y)
- | TCon tc => TCon tc
- | TCoerc _ t1 t2 t => TCoerc (flatten_rawtype depth t1) (flatten_rawtype depth t2) (flatten_rawtype depth t)
- | TArrow => TArrow
- | TCode v e => match depth with
- | O => match v return RawHaskType TV ★ with
- | TVar ★ ec => ga' TV ec [] [flatten_rawtype depth e]
- | _ => unit_type TV
- end
- | (S depth') => TCode v (flatten_rawtype depth' e)
- end
- | TyFunApp tfc lt => TyFunApp tfc (flatten_rawtype_list _ depth lt)
+ | TVar _ x => TVar x
+ | TAll _ y => TAll _ (fun v => flatten_rawtype (y v))
+ | TApp _ _ x y => TApp (flatten_rawtype x) (flatten_rawtype y)
+ | TCon tc => TCon tc
+ | TCoerc _ t1 t2 t => TCoerc (flatten_rawtype t1) (flatten_rawtype t2) (flatten_rawtype t)
+ | TArrow => TArrow
+ | TCode ec e => let e' := flatten_rawtype e
+ in ga_mk_raw ec (unleaves_ (take_arg_types e')) [drop_arg_types e']
+ | TyFunApp tfc kl k lt => TyFunApp tfc kl k (flatten_rawtype_list _ lt)
end
- with flatten_rawtype_list {TV}(lk:list Kind)(depth:nat)(exp:@RawHaskTypeList TV lk) : @RawHaskTypeList TV lk :=
+ with flatten_rawtype_list {TV}(lk:list Kind)(exp:@RawHaskTypeList TV lk) : @RawHaskTypeList TV lk :=
match exp in @RawHaskTypeList _ LK return @RawHaskTypeList TV LK with
| TyFunApp_nil => TyFunApp_nil
- | TyFunApp_cons κ kl t rest => TyFunApp_cons _ _ (flatten_rawtype depth t) (flatten_rawtype_list _ depth rest)
+ | TyFunApp_cons κ kl t rest => TyFunApp_cons _ _ (flatten_rawtype t) (flatten_rawtype_list _ rest)
end.
- Inductive AllT {T:Type}{P:T->Prop} : Tree ??T -> Prop :=
- | allt_none : AllT []
- | allt_some : forall t, P t -> AllT [t]
- | allt_branch : forall b1 b2, AllT b1 -> AllT b2 -> AllT (b1,,b2)
- .
- Implicit Arguments AllT [[T]].
+ Definition flatten_type {Γ}{κ}(ht:HaskType Γ κ) : HaskType Γ κ :=
+ fun TV ite => flatten_rawtype (ht TV ite).
- Definition getΓ (j:Judg) := match j with Γ > _ > _ |- _ => Γ end.
+ Fixpoint levels_to_tcode {Γ}(ht:HaskType Γ ★)(lev:HaskLevel Γ) : HaskType Γ ★ :=
+ match lev with
+ | nil => flatten_type ht
+ | ec::lev' => @ga_mk _ (v2t ec) [] [levels_to_tcode ht lev']
+ end.
- Definition getSuc (j:Judg) : Tree ??(LeveledHaskType (getΓ j) ★) :=
- match j as J return Tree ??(LeveledHaskType (getΓ J) ★) with
- Γ > _ > _ |- s => s
- end.
+ Definition flatten_leveled_type {Γ}(ht:LeveledHaskType Γ ★) : LeveledHaskType Γ ★ :=
+ levels_to_tcode (unlev ht) (getlev ht) @@ nil.
+
+ (* AXIOMS *)
+
+ Axiom literal_types_unchanged : forall Γ l, flatten_type (literalType l) = literalType(Γ:=Γ) l.
+
+ Axiom flatten_coercion : forall Γ Δ κ (σ τ:HaskType Γ κ) (γ:HaskCoercion Γ Δ (σ ∼∼∼ τ)),
+ HaskCoercion Γ Δ (flatten_type σ ∼∼∼ flatten_type τ).
+
+ Axiom flatten_commutes_with_substT :
+ forall κ Γ (Δ:CoercionEnv Γ) (σ:∀ TV, InstantiatedTypeEnv TV Γ → TV κ → RawHaskType TV ★) (τ:HaskType Γ κ),
+ flatten_type (substT σ τ) = substT (fun TV ite v => flatten_rawtype (σ TV ite v))
+ (flatten_type τ).
+
+ Axiom flatten_commutes_with_HaskTAll :
+ forall κ Γ (Δ:CoercionEnv Γ) (σ:∀ TV, InstantiatedTypeEnv TV Γ → TV κ → RawHaskType TV ★),
+ flatten_type (HaskTAll κ σ) = HaskTAll κ (fun TV ite v => flatten_rawtype (σ TV ite v)).
- Definition getlev {Γ}{κ}(lht:LeveledHaskType Γ κ) :=
- match lht with t@@l => l end.
+ Axiom flatten_commutes_with_HaskTApp :
+ forall κ Γ (Δ:CoercionEnv Γ) (σ:∀ TV, InstantiatedTypeEnv TV Γ → TV κ → RawHaskType TV ★),
+ flatten_type (HaskTApp (weakF σ) (FreshHaskTyVar κ)) =
+ HaskTApp (weakF (fun TV ite v => flatten_rawtype (σ TV ite v))) (FreshHaskTyVar κ).
+
+ Axiom flatten_commutes_with_weakLT : forall (Γ:TypeEnv) κ t,
+ flatten_leveled_type (weakLT(Γ:=Γ)(κ:=κ) t) = weakLT(Γ:=Γ)(κ:=κ) (flatten_leveled_type t).
+
+ Axiom globals_do_not_have_code_types : forall (Γ:TypeEnv) (g:Global Γ) v,
+ flatten_type (g v) = g v.
(* This tries to assign a single level to the entire succedent of a judgment. If the succedent has types from different
* levels (should not happen) it just picks one; if the succedent has no non-None leaves (also should not happen) it
* picks nil *)
+ Definition getΓ (j:Judg) := match j with Γ > _ > _ |- _ => Γ end.
+ Definition getSuc (j:Judg) : Tree ??(LeveledHaskType (getΓ j) ★) :=
+ match j as J return Tree ??(LeveledHaskType (getΓ J) ★) with Γ > _ > _ |- s => s end.
Fixpoint getjlev {Γ}(tt:Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★)) : HaskLevel Γ :=
match tt with
| T_Leaf None => nil
end
end.
- (* an XJudg is a Judg for which the SUCCEDENT types all come from the same level, and that level is no deeper than "n" *)
- (* even the empty succedent [] has a level... *)
- Definition QJudg (n:nat)(j:Judg) := le (length (getjlev (getSuc j))) n.
-
-(* Definition qjudg2judg {n}(qj:QJudg n) : Judg := projT1 qj.*)
-
- Inductive QRule : nat -> Tree ??Judg -> Tree ??Judg -> Type :=
- mkQRule : forall n h c,
- Rule h c ->
- ITree _ (QJudg n) h ->
- ITree _ (QJudg n) c ->
- QRule n h c.
-
- Definition QND n := ND (QRule n).
+ (* "n" is the maximum depth remaining AFTER flattening *)
+ Definition flatten_judgment (j:Judg) :=
+ match j as J return Judg with
+ Γ > Δ > ant |- suc =>
+ match getjlev suc with
+ | nil => Γ > Δ > mapOptionTree flatten_leveled_type ant
+ |- mapOptionTree flatten_leveled_type suc
+
+ | (ec::lev') => Γ > Δ > mapOptionTree flatten_leveled_type (drop_lev (ec::lev') ant)
+ |- [ga_mk (v2t ec)
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) (take_lev (ec::lev') ant))
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) suc )
+ @@ nil] (* we know the level of all of suc *)
+ end
+ end.
- (*
- * Any type "t" at a level with length "n" becomes (g () t)
- * Any type "<[t]>" at a level with length "n-1" becomes (g () t)
- *)
+ Class garrow :=
+ { ga_id : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a a @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_cancelr : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec (a,,[]) a @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_cancell : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec ([],,a) a @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_uncancelr : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a (a,,[]) @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_uncancell : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a ([],,a) @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_assoc : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a b c, ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec ((a,,b),,c) (a,,(b,,c)) @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_unassoc : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a b c, ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec (a,,(b,,c)) ((a,,b),,c) @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_swap : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a b , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec (a,,b) (b,,a) @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_drop : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a [] @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_copy : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a (a,,a) @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_first : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a b x, ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [@ga_mk Γ ec a b @@ l] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec (a,,x) (b,,x) @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_second : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a b x, ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [@ga_mk Γ ec a b @@ l] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec (x,,a) (x,,b) @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_lit : ∀ Γ Δ ec l lit , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec [] [literalType lit] @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_curry : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a b c, ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [@ga_mk Γ ec (a,,[b]) [c] @@ l] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a [b ---> c] @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_comp : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a b c, ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [@ga_mk Γ ec a b @@ l],,[@ga_mk Γ ec b c @@ l] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a c @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_apply : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a a' b c,
+ ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [@ga_mk Γ ec a [b ---> c] @@ l],,[@ga_mk Γ ec a' [b] @@ l] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec (a,,a') [c] @@ l] ]
+ ; ga_kappa : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a b Σ, ND Rule
+ [Γ > Δ > Σ,,[@ga_mk Γ ec [] a @@ l] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec [] b @@ l] ]
+ [Γ > Δ > Σ |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a b @@ l] ]
+ }.
+ Context `(gar:garrow).
- Definition flatten_type {Γ}(n:nat)(ht:HaskType Γ ★) : HaskType Γ ★ :=
- fun TV ite =>
- flatten_rawtype n (ht TV ite).
+ Notation "a ~~~~> b" := (@ga_mk _ _ a b) (at level 20).
- Definition minus' n m :=
- match m with
- | 0 => n
- | _ => n - m
- end.
+ Definition boost : forall Γ Δ ant x y {lev},
+ ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > [x@@lev] |- [y@@lev] ] ->
+ ND Rule [ Γ > Δ > ant |- [x@@lev] ] [ Γ > Δ > ant |- [y@@lev] ].
+ intros.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; eapply RCanL ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; apply (@RLet Γ Δ [] ant y x lev) ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ apply nd_rlecnac | idtac ].
+ apply nd_prod.
+ apply nd_id.
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ apply X.
+ eapply nd_rule.
+ eapply RArrange.
+ apply RuCanL.
+ Defined.
- (* to do: integrate this more cleanly with qjudg *)
- Definition flatten_leveled_type {Γ}(n:nat)(ht:LeveledHaskType Γ ★) : LeveledHaskType Γ ★ :=
- match ht with
- htt @@ htlev =>
- flatten_type (minus' n (length htlev)) htt @@ htlev
- end.
+ Definition postcompose' : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a b c Σ,
+ ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > Σ |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a b @@ lev] ] ->
+ ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > Σ,,[@ga_mk Γ ec b c @@ lev] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a c @@ lev] ].
+ intros.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; eapply RExch ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac
+ | eapply nd_rule; apply (@RLet Γ Δ [@ga_mk _ ec b c @@lev] Σ (@ga_mk _ ec a c) (@ga_mk _ ec a b) lev) ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ apply nd_llecnac | idtac ].
+ apply nd_prod.
+ apply X.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; apply RExch ].
+ apply ga_comp.
+ Defined.
- Definition flatten_qjudg_ok (n:nat)(j:Judg) : Judg :=
- match j with
- Γ > Δ > ant |- suc =>
- let ant' := mapOptionTree (flatten_leveled_type n) ant in
- let suc' := mapOptionTree (flatten_leveled_type n) suc
- in (Γ > Δ > ant' |- suc')
- end.
+ Definition precompose Γ Δ ec : forall a x y z lev,
+ ND Rule
+ [ Γ > Δ > a |- [@ga_mk _ ec y z @@ lev] ]
+ [ Γ > Δ > a,,[@ga_mk _ ec x y @@ lev] |- [@ga_mk _ ec x z @@ lev] ].
+ intros.
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ apply nd_rlecnac.
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ eapply nd_prod.
+ apply nd_id.
+ eapply ga_comp.
- Definition take_lev'' {Γ}(lev:HaskLevel Γ)(tt:Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★)) : Tree ??(HaskType Γ ★) :=
- match (take_lev' lev tt) with
- | None => []
- | Some x => x
- end.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; apply RExch ].
- Definition flatten_qjudg : forall (n:nat), Judg -> Judg.
- refine (fun {n}{j} =>
- match j as J return Judg with
- Γ > Δ > ant |- suc =>
- match getjlev suc with
- | nil => flatten_qjudg_ok n j
- | (ec::lev') => if eqd_dec (length lev') n
- then let ant_host := drop_depth (S n) ant in
- let ant_guest := take_lev (ec::lev') ant in (* FIXME: I want take_lev''!!!!! *)
- (Γ > Δ > ant_host |- [ga ec ant_guest (mapOptionTree unlev suc) @@ lev'])
- else flatten_qjudg_ok n j
- end
- end).
+ apply nd_rule.
+ apply RLet.
Defined.
- Axiom literal_types_unchanged : forall n Γ l, flatten_type n (literalType l) = literalType(Γ:=Γ) l.
+ Definition precompose' : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a b c Σ,
+ ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > Σ |- [@ga_mk Γ ec b c @@ lev] ] ->
+ ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > Σ,,[@ga_mk Γ ec a b @@ lev] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a c @@ lev] ].
+ intros.
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ apply X.
+ apply precompose.
+ Defined.
- Lemma drop_depth_lemma : forall Γ (lev:HaskLevel Γ) x, drop_depth (length lev) [x @@ lev] = [].
- admit.
- Defined.
+ Definition postcompose : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a b c,
+ ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a b @@ lev] ] ->
+ ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > [@ga_mk Γ ec b c @@ lev] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a c @@ lev] ].
+ intros.
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ apply postcompose'.
+ apply X.
+ apply nd_rule.
+ apply RArrange.
+ apply RCanL.
+ Defined.
- Lemma drop_depth_lemma_s : forall Γ (lev:HaskLevel Γ) ec x, drop_depth (S (length lev)) [x @@ (ec :: lev)] = [].
- admit.
+ Definition firstify : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a b c Σ,
+ ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > Σ |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a b @@ lev] ] ->
+ ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > Σ |- [@ga_mk Γ ec (a,,c) (b,,c) @@ lev] ].
+ intros.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; eapply RCanL ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; apply RLet ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ apply nd_llecnac | idtac ].
+ apply nd_prod.
+ apply X.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; eapply RuCanL ].
+ apply ga_first.
Defined.
- Ltac drop_simplify :=
- match goal with
- | [ |- context[@drop_depth ?G (length ?L) [ ?X @@ ?L ] ] ] =>
- rewrite (drop_depth_lemma G L X)
- | [ |- context[@drop_depth ?G (S (length ?L)) [ ?X @@ (?E :: ?L) ] ] ] =>
- rewrite (drop_depth_lemma_s G L E X)
- | [ |- context[@drop_depth ?G ?N (?A,,?B)] ] =>
- change (@drop_depth G N (A,,B)) with ((@drop_depth G N A),,(@drop_depth G N B))
- | [ |- context[@drop_depth ?G ?N (T_Leaf None)] ] =>
- change (@drop_depth G N (T_Leaf (@None (LeveledHaskType G ★)))) with (T_Leaf (@None (LeveledHaskType G ★)))
- end.
-
- Lemma take_lemma : forall Γ (lev:HaskLevel Γ) x, take_lev lev [x @@ lev] = [x].
- admit.
+ Definition secondify : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a b c Σ,
+ ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > Σ |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a b @@ lev] ] ->
+ ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > Σ |- [@ga_mk Γ ec (c,,a) (c,,b) @@ lev] ].
+ intros.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; eapply RCanL ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; apply RLet ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ apply nd_llecnac | idtac ].
+ apply nd_prod.
+ apply X.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; eapply RuCanL ].
+ apply ga_second.
Defined.
- Ltac take_simplify :=
- match goal with
- | [ |- context[@take_lev ?G ?L [ ?X @@ ?L ] ] ] =>
- rewrite (take_lemma G L X)
- | [ |- context[@take_lev ?G ?N (?A,,?B)] ] =>
- change (@take_lev G N (A,,B)) with ((@take_lev G N A),,(@take_lev G N B))
- | [ |- context[@take_lev ?G ?N (T_Leaf None)] ] =>
- change (@take_lev G N (T_Leaf (@None (LeveledHaskType G ★)))) with (T_Leaf (@None (LeveledHaskType G ★)))
- end.
+ Lemma ga_unkappa : ∀ Γ Δ ec l z a b Σ,
+ ND Rule
+ [Γ > Δ > Σ |- [@ga_mk Γ ec a b @@ l] ]
+ [Γ > Δ > Σ,,[@ga_mk Γ ec z a @@ l] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec z b @@ l] ].
+ intros.
+ set (ga_comp Γ Δ ec l z a b) as q.
- Class garrow :=
- { ga_id : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga Γ ec a a @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_comp : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a b c, ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [@ga Γ ec a b @@ lev],,[@ga Γ ec b c @@ lev] |- [@ga Γ ec a c @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_cancelr : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga Γ ec (a,,[]) a @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_cancell : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga Γ ec ([],,a) a @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_uncancelr : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga Γ ec a (a,,[]) @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_uncancell : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga Γ ec a ([],,a) @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_assoc : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a b c, ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga Γ ec ((a,,b),,c) (a,,(b,,c)) @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_unassoc : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a b c, ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga Γ ec (a,,(b,,c)) ((a,,b),,c) @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_swap : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a b , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga Γ ec (a,,b) (b,,a) @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_drop : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga Γ ec a [] @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_copy : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga Γ ec a (a,,a) @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_first : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a b x, ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [@ga Γ ec a b @@ lev] |- [@ga Γ ec (a,,x) (b,,x) @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_second : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a b x, ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [@ga Γ ec a b @@ lev] |- [@ga Γ ec (x,,a) (x,,b) @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_lit : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev lit , ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga Γ ec [] [literalType lit] @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_curry : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a b c, ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [@ga Γ ec (a,,[b]) [c] @@ lev] |- [@ga Γ ec a [b ---> c] @@ lev] ]
- ; ga_apply : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a a' b c, ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ >
- [@ga Γ ec a [b ---> c] @@ lev],,[@ga Γ ec a' [b] @@ lev]
- |-
- [@ga Γ ec (a,,a') [c] @@ lev] ]
- }.
+ set (@RLet Γ Δ) as q'.
+ set (@RLet Γ Δ [@ga_mk _ ec z a @@ l] Σ (@ga_mk _ ec z b) (@ga_mk _ ec a b) l) as q''.
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ Focus 2.
+ eapply nd_rule.
+ eapply RArrange.
+ apply RExch.
- Context (gar:garrow).
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ Focus 2.
+ eapply nd_rule.
+ apply q''.
- Definition boost : forall Γ Δ ant x y,
- ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > x |- y ] ->
- ND Rule [ Γ > Δ > ant |- x ] [ Γ > Δ > ant |- y ].
- admit.
- Defined.
- Definition postcompose : ∀ Γ Δ ec lev a b c,
- ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga Γ ec a b @@ lev] ] ->
- ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > [@ga Γ ec b c @@ lev] |- [@ga Γ ec a c @@ lev] ].
- admit.
- Defined.
- Definition precompose : ∀ Γ Δ lev a b c x,
- ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > a |- x,,[b @@ lev] ] ->
- ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > [b @@ lev] |- [c @@ lev] ] ->
- ND Rule [] [ Γ > Δ > a,,x |- [c @@ lev] ].
- admit.
- Defined.
+ idtac.
+ clear q'' q'.
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ apply nd_rlecnac.
+ apply nd_prod.
+ apply nd_id.
+ apply q.
+ Defined.
+
+ Lemma ga_unkappa' : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a b Σ x,
+ ND Rule
+ [Γ > Δ > Σ |- [@ga_mk Γ ec (a,,x) b @@ l] ]
+ [Γ > Δ > Σ,,[@ga_mk Γ ec [] a @@ l] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec x b @@ l] ].
+ intros.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RLet ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ apply nd_llecnac | idtac ].
+ apply nd_prod.
+ apply ga_first.
+
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RLet ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ apply nd_llecnac | idtac ].
+ apply nd_prod.
+ apply postcompose.
+ apply ga_uncancell.
+ apply precompose.
+ Defined.
- Set Printing Width 130.
+ Lemma ga_kappa' : ∀ Γ Δ ec l a b Σ x,
+ ND Rule
+ [Γ > Δ > Σ,,[@ga_mk Γ ec [] a @@ l] |- [@ga_mk Γ ec x b @@ l] ]
+ [Γ > Δ > Σ |- [@ga_mk Γ ec (a,,x) b @@ l] ].
+ apply (Prelude_error "ga_kappa not supported yet (BIG FIXME)").
+ Defined.
- Definition garrowfy_arrangement' :
+ (* useful for cutting down on the pretty-printed noise
+
+ Notation "` x" := (take_lev _ x) (at level 20).
+ Notation "`` x" := (mapOptionTree unlev x) (at level 20).
+ Notation "``` x" := (drop_lev _ x) (at level 20).
+ *)
+ Definition flatten_arrangement' :
forall Γ (Δ:CoercionEnv Γ)
- (ec:HaskTyVar Γ ★) (lev:HaskLevel Γ) (ant1 ant2:Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★)) (r:Arrange ant1 ant2),
- ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga _ ec (take_lev (ec :: lev) ant2) (take_lev (ec :: lev) ant1) @@ lev] ].
+ (ec:HaskTyVar Γ ECKind) (lev:HaskLevel Γ) (ant1 ant2:Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★)) (r:Arrange ant1 ant2),
+ ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk _ (v2t ec) (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) (take_lev (ec :: lev) ant2))
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) (take_lev (ec :: lev) ant1)) @@ nil] ].
intros Γ Δ ec lev.
- refine (fix garrowfy ant1 ant2 (r:Arrange ant1 ant2):
- ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga _ ec (take_lev (ec :: lev) ant2) (take_lev (ec :: lev) ant1) @@ lev]] :=
+ refine (fix flatten ant1 ant2 (r:Arrange ant1 ant2):
+ ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk _ (v2t ec)
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) (take_lev (ec :: lev) ant2))
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) (take_lev (ec :: lev) ant1)) @@ nil]] :=
match r as R in Arrange A B return
- ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga _ ec (take_lev (ec :: lev) B) (take_lev (ec :: lev) A) @@ lev]]
+ ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > [] |- [@ga_mk _ (v2t ec)
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) (take_lev (ec :: lev) B))
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) (take_lev (ec :: lev) A)) @@ nil]]
with
+ | RId a => let case_RId := tt in ga_id _ _ _ _ _
| RCanL a => let case_RCanL := tt in ga_uncancell _ _ _ _ _
| RCanR a => let case_RCanR := tt in ga_uncancelr _ _ _ _ _
| RuCanL a => let case_RuCanL := tt in ga_cancell _ _ _ _ _
| RAssoc a b c => let case_RAssoc := tt in ga_assoc _ _ _ _ _ _ _
| RCossa a b c => let case_RCossa := tt in ga_unassoc _ _ _ _ _ _ _
| RExch a b => let case_RExch := tt in ga_swap _ _ _ _ _ _
- | RWeak a => let case_RWeak := tt in ga_drop _ _ _ _ _
+ | RWeak a => let case_RWeak := tt in ga_drop _ _ _ _ _
| RCont a => let case_RCont := tt in ga_copy _ _ _ _ _
- | RLeft a b c r' => let case_RLeft := tt in garrowfy _ _ r' ;; boost _ _ _ _ _ (ga_second _ _ _ _ _ _ _)
- | RRight a b c r' => let case_RRight := tt in garrowfy _ _ r' ;; boost _ _ _ _ _ (ga_first _ _ _ _ _ _ _)
- | RComp a b c r1 r2 => let case_RComp := tt in (fun r1' r2' => _) (garrowfy _ _ r1) (garrowfy _ _ r2)
- end); clear garrowfy; repeat take_simplify; repeat drop_simplify; intros.
+ | RLeft a b c r' => let case_RLeft := tt in flatten _ _ r' ;; boost _ _ _ _ _ (ga_second _ _ _ _ _ _ _)
+ | RRight a b c r' => let case_RRight := tt in flatten _ _ r' ;; boost _ _ _ _ _ (ga_first _ _ _ _ _ _ _)
+ | RComp c b a r1 r2 => let case_RComp := tt in (fun r1' r2' => _) (flatten _ _ r1) (flatten _ _ r2)
+ end); clear flatten; repeat take_simplify; repeat drop_simplify; intros.
destruct case_RComp.
- (*
- set (ga_comp Γ Δ ec lev (``c) (``b) (``a)) as q.
- eapply precompose.
- Focus 2.
- apply q.
- refine ( _ ;; boost _ _ _ _ _ (ga_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _)).
- apply precompose.
- Focus 2.
- eapply ga_comp.
- *)
- admit.
+ set (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) (take_lev (ec :: lev) a)) as a' in *.
+ set (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) (take_lev (ec :: lev) b)) as b' in *.
+ set (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) (take_lev (ec :: lev) c)) as c' in *.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; apply RCanL ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; apply
+ (@RLet Γ Δ [] [] (@ga_mk _ (v2t ec) a' c') (@ga_mk _ (v2t ec) a' b')) ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ apply nd_llecnac | idtac ].
+ apply nd_prod.
+ apply r2'.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; apply RuCanL ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; apply RCanR ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; apply
+ (@RLet Γ Δ [@ga_mk _ (v2t ec) a' b' @@ _] [] (@ga_mk _ (v2t ec) a' c') (@ga_mk _ (v2t ec) b' c'))].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ apply nd_llecnac | idtac ].
+ eapply nd_prod.
+ apply r1'.
+ apply ga_comp.
Defined.
- Definition garrowfy_arrangement :
+ Definition flatten_arrangement :
forall Γ (Δ:CoercionEnv Γ) n
- (ec:HaskTyVar Γ ★) (lev:HaskLevel Γ) (ant1 ant2:Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★)) (r:Arrange ant1 ant2) succ,
- (*ec :: lev = getjlev succ ->*)
- (* H0 : left (Datatypes.length lev ≠ n) e = Peano_dec.eq_nat_dec (Datatypes.length lev) n *)
+ (ec:HaskTyVar Γ ECKind) (lev:HaskLevel Γ) (ant1 ant2:Tree ??(LeveledHaskType Γ ★)) (r:Arrange ant1 ant2) succ,
ND Rule
- [Γ > Δ > drop_depth n ant1 |- [@ga _ ec (take_lev (ec :: lev) ant1) (mapOptionTree unlev succ) @@ lev]]
- [Γ > Δ > drop_depth n ant2 |- [@ga _ ec (take_lev (ec :: lev) ant2) (mapOptionTree unlev succ) @@ lev]].
+ [Γ > Δ > mapOptionTree (flatten_leveled_type ) (drop_lev n ant1)
+ |- [@ga_mk _ (v2t ec)
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) (take_lev (ec :: lev) ant1))
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) succ) @@ nil]]
+ [Γ > Δ > mapOptionTree (flatten_leveled_type ) (drop_lev n ant2)
+ |- [@ga_mk _ (v2t ec)
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) (take_lev (ec :: lev) ant2))
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) succ) @@ nil]].
intros.
- refine ( _ ;; (boost _ _ _ _ _ (postcompose _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (garrowfy_arrangement' Γ Δ ec lev ant1 ant2 r)))).
+ refine ( _ ;; (boost _ _ _ _ _ (postcompose _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (flatten_arrangement' Γ Δ ec lev ant1 ant2 r)))).
apply nd_rule.
apply RArrange.
- refine ((fix garrowfy ant1 ant2 (r:Arrange ant1 ant2) :=
- match r as R in Arrange A B return Arrange (drop_depth _ A) (drop_depth _ B) with
+ refine ((fix flatten ant1 ant2 (r:Arrange ant1 ant2) :=
+ match r as R in Arrange A B return
+ Arrange (mapOptionTree (flatten_leveled_type ) (drop_lev _ A))
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_leveled_type ) (drop_lev _ B)) with
+ | RId a => let case_RId := tt in RId _
| RCanL a => let case_RCanL := tt in RCanL _
| RCanR a => let case_RCanR := tt in RCanR _
| RuCanL a => let case_RuCanL := tt in RuCanL _
| RExch a b => let case_RExch := tt in RExch _ _
| RWeak a => let case_RWeak := tt in RWeak _
| RCont a => let case_RCont := tt in RCont _
- | RLeft a b c r' => let case_RLeft := tt in RLeft _ (garrowfy _ _ r')
- | RRight a b c r' => let case_RRight := tt in RRight _ (garrowfy _ _ r')
- | RComp a b c r1 r2 => let case_RComp := tt in RComp (garrowfy _ _ r1) (garrowfy _ _ r2)
- end) ant1 ant2 r); clear garrowfy; repeat take_simplify; repeat drop_simplify; intros.
+ | RLeft a b c r' => let case_RLeft := tt in RLeft _ (flatten _ _ r')
+ | RRight a b c r' => let case_RRight := tt in RRight _ (flatten _ _ r')
+ | RComp a b c r1 r2 => let case_RComp := tt in RComp (flatten _ _ r1) (flatten _ _ r2)
+ end) ant1 ant2 r); clear flatten; repeat take_simplify; repeat drop_simplify; intros.
Defined.
- Definition flatten_arrangement :
- forall n Γ Δ ant1 ant2 succ (r:Arrange ant1 ant2),
- ND Rule (mapOptionTree (flatten_qjudg n) [Γ > Δ > ant1 |- succ])
- (mapOptionTree (flatten_qjudg n) [Γ > Δ > ant2 |- succ]).
+ Definition flatten_arrangement'' :
+ forall Γ Δ ant1 ant2 succ (r:Arrange ant1 ant2),
+ ND Rule (mapOptionTree (flatten_judgment ) [Γ > Δ > ant1 |- succ])
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_judgment ) [Γ > Δ > ant2 |- succ]).
intros.
simpl.
set (getjlev succ) as succ_lev.
apply nd_rule.
apply RArrange.
induction r; simpl.
+ apply RId.
apply RCanL.
apply RCanR.
apply RuCanL.
apply RRight; auto.
eapply RComp; [ apply IHr1 | apply IHr2 ].
- set (Peano_dec.eq_nat_dec (Datatypes.length succ_lev) n) as lev_is_n.
- assert (lev_is_n=Peano_dec.eq_nat_dec (Datatypes.length succ_lev) n).
- reflexivity.
- destruct lev_is_n.
- rewrite <- e.
- apply garrowfy_arrangement.
+ apply flatten_arrangement.
apply r.
- auto.
- apply nd_rule.
- apply RArrange.
- induction r; simpl.
- apply RCanL.
- apply RCanR.
- apply RuCanL.
- apply RuCanR.
- apply RAssoc.
- apply RCossa.
- apply RExch.
- apply RWeak.
- apply RCont.
- apply RLeft; auto.
- apply RRight; auto.
- eapply RComp; [ apply IHr1 | apply IHr2 ].
Defined.
- Lemma flatten_coercion : forall n Γ Δ σ τ (γ:HaskCoercion Γ Δ (σ ∼∼∼ τ)),
- HaskCoercion Γ Δ (flatten_type n σ ∼∼∼ flatten_type n τ).
- admit.
+ Definition ga_join Γ Δ Σ₁ Σ₂ a b ec :
+ ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > Σ₁ |- [@ga_mk _ ec [] a @@ nil]] ->
+ ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > Σ₂ |- [@ga_mk _ ec [] b @@ nil]] ->
+ ND Rule [] [Γ > Δ > Σ₁,,Σ₂ |- [@ga_mk _ ec [] (a,,b) @@ nil]].
+ intro pfa.
+ intro pfb.
+ apply secondify with (c:=a) in pfb.
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ Focus 2.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RLet ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ eapply nd_llecnac | idtac ].
+ eapply nd_prod.
+ apply pfb.
+ clear pfb.
+ apply postcompose'.
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ apply pfa.
+ clear pfa.
+ apply boost.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; eapply RCanL ].
+ apply precompose'.
+ apply ga_uncancelr.
+ apply nd_id.
Defined.
- Ltac eqd_dec_refl' :=
- match goal with
- | [ |- context[@eqd_dec ?T ?V ?X ?X] ] =>
- destruct (@eqd_dec T V X X) as [eqd_dec1 | eqd_dec2];
- [ clear eqd_dec1 | set (eqd_dec2 (refl_equal _)) as eqd_dec2'; inversion eqd_dec2' ]
- end.
+ Definition arrange_brak : forall Γ Δ ec succ t,
+ ND Rule
+ [Γ > Δ > mapOptionTree (flatten_leveled_type ) (drop_lev (ec :: nil) succ),,
+ [(@ga_mk _ (v2t ec) [] (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) (take_lev (ec :: nil) succ))) @@ nil] |- [t @@ nil]]
+ [Γ > Δ > mapOptionTree (flatten_leveled_type ) succ |- [t @@ nil]].
+ intros.
+ unfold drop_lev.
+ set (@arrange' _ succ (levelMatch (ec::nil))) as q.
+ set (arrangeMap _ _ flatten_leveled_type q) as y.
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ Focus 2.
+ eapply nd_rule.
+ eapply RArrange.
+ apply y.
+ idtac.
+ clear y q.
+ simpl.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ apply nd_llecnac | idtac ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RLet ].
+ apply nd_prod.
+ Focus 2.
+ apply nd_id.
+ idtac.
+ induction succ; try destruct a; simpl.
+ unfold take_lev.
+ unfold mkTakeFlags.
+ unfold mkFlags.
+ unfold bnot.
+ simpl.
+ destruct l as [t' lev'].
+ destruct lev' as [|ec' lev'].
+ simpl.
+ apply ga_id.
+ unfold levelMatch.
+ set (@eqd_dec (HaskLevel Γ) (haskLevelEqDecidable Γ) (ec' :: lev') (ec :: nil)) as q.
+ destruct q.
+ inversion e; subst.
+ simpl.
+ apply nd_rule.
+ unfold flatten_leveled_type.
+ simpl.
+ unfold flatten_type.
+ simpl.
+ unfold ga_mk.
+ simpl.
+ apply RVar.
+ simpl.
+ apply ga_id.
+ apply ga_id.
+ unfold take_lev.
+ simpl.
+ apply ga_join.
+ apply IHsucc1.
+ apply IHsucc2.
+ Defined.
+
+ Definition arrange_empty_tree : forall {T}{A}(q:Tree A)(t:Tree ??T),
+ t = mapTree (fun _:A => None) q ->
+ Arrange t [].
+ intros T A q.
+ induction q; intros.
+ simpl in H.
+ rewrite H.
+ apply RId.
+ simpl in *.
+ destruct t; try destruct o; inversion H.
+ set (IHq1 _ H1) as x1.
+ set (IHq2 _ H2) as x2.
+ eapply RComp.
+ eapply RRight.
+ rewrite <- H1.
+ apply x1.
+ eapply RComp.
+ apply RCanL.
+ rewrite <- H2.
+ apply x2.
+ Defined.
+
+(* Definition unarrange_empty_tree : forall {T}{A}(t:Tree ??T)(q:Tree A),
+ t = mapTree (fun _:A => None) q ->
+ Arrange [] t.
+ Defined.*)
+
+ Definition decide_tree_empty : forall {T:Type}(t:Tree ??T),
+ sum { q:Tree unit & t = mapTree (fun _ => None) q } unit.
+ intro T.
+ refine (fix foo t :=
+ match t with
+ | T_Leaf x => _
+ | T_Branch b1 b2 => let b1' := foo b1 in let b2' := foo b2 in _
+ end).
+ intros.
+ destruct x.
+ right; apply tt.
+ left.
+ exists (T_Leaf tt).
+ auto.
+ destruct b1'.
+ destruct b2'.
+ destruct s.
+ destruct s0.
+ subst.
+ left.
+ exists (x,,x0).
+ reflexivity.
+ right; auto.
+ right; auto.
+ Defined.
+
+ Definition arrange_esc : forall Γ Δ ec succ t,
+ ND Rule
+ [Γ > Δ > mapOptionTree (flatten_leveled_type ) succ |- [t @@ nil]]
+ [Γ > Δ > mapOptionTree (flatten_leveled_type ) (drop_lev (ec :: nil) succ),,
+ [(@ga_mk _ (v2t ec) [] (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev) (take_lev (ec :: nil) succ))) @@ nil] |- [t @@ nil]].
+ intros.
+ set (@arrange _ succ (levelMatch (ec::nil))) as q.
+ set (@drop_lev Γ (ec::nil) succ) as q'.
+ assert (@drop_lev Γ (ec::nil) succ=q') as H.
+ reflexivity.
+ unfold drop_lev in H.
+ unfold mkDropFlags in H.
+ rewrite H in q.
+ clear H.
+ set (arrangeMap _ _ flatten_leveled_type q) as y.
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ eapply nd_rule.
+ eapply RArrange.
+ apply y.
+ clear y q.
+ set (mapOptionTree flatten_leveled_type (dropT (mkFlags (liftBoolFunc false (bnot ○ levelMatch (ec :: nil))) succ))) as q.
+ destruct (decide_tree_empty q); [ idtac | apply (Prelude_error "escapifying open code not yet supported") ].
+ destruct s.
+ simpl.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; apply RExch ].
+ set (fun z z' => @RLet Γ Δ z (mapOptionTree flatten_leveled_type q') t z' nil) as q''.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; apply q'' ].
+ clear q''.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ apply nd_rlecnac | idtac ].
+ apply nd_prod.
+ apply nd_rule.
+ apply RArrange.
+ eapply RComp; [ idtac | apply RCanR ].
+ apply RLeft.
+ apply (@arrange_empty_tree _ _ _ _ e).
+
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ eapply nd_rule.
+ eapply (@RVar Γ Δ t nil).
+ apply nd_rule.
+ apply RArrange.
+ eapply RComp.
+ apply RuCanL.
+ apply RRight.
+ apply RWeak.
(*
- Lemma foog : forall Γ Δ,
- ND Rule
- ( [ Γ > Δ > Σ₁ |- a ],,[ Γ > Δ > Σ₂ |- b ] )
- [ Γ > Δ > Σ₁,,Σ₂ |- a,,b ]
+ eapply decide_tree_empty.
+
+ simpl.
+ set (dropT (mkFlags (liftBoolFunc false (bnot ○ levelMatch (ec :: nil))) succ)) as escapified.
+ destruct (decide_tree_empty escapified).
+
+ induction succ.
+ destruct a.
+ unfold drop_lev.
+ destruct l.
+ simpl.
+ unfold mkDropFlags; simpl.
+ unfold take_lev.
+ unfold mkTakeFlags.
+ simpl.
+ destruct (General.list_eq_dec h0 (ec :: nil)).
+ simpl.
+ rewrite e.
+ apply nd_id.
+ simpl.
+ apply nd_rule.
+ apply RArrange.
+ apply RLeft.
+ apply RWeak.
+ simpl.
+ apply nd_rule.
+ unfold take_lev.
+ simpl.
+ apply RArrange.
+ apply RLeft.
+ apply RWeak.
+ apply (Prelude_error "escapifying code with multi-leaf antecedents is not supported").
*)
+ Defined.
- Notation "` x" := (take_lev _ x) (at level 20).
- Notation "`` x" := (mapOptionTree unlev x) (at level 20).
- Notation "``` x" := (drop_depth _ x) (at level 20).
+ Lemma mapOptionTree_distributes
+ : forall T R (a b:Tree ??T) (f:T->R),
+ mapOptionTree f (a,,b) = (mapOptionTree f a),,(mapOptionTree f b).
+ reflexivity.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma unlev_relev : forall {Γ}(t:Tree ??(HaskType Γ ★)) lev, mapOptionTree unlev (t @@@ lev) = t.
+ intros.
+ induction t.
+ destruct a; reflexivity.
+ rewrite <- IHt1 at 2.
+ rewrite <- IHt2 at 2.
+ reflexivity.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma tree_of_nothing : forall Γ ec t a,
+ Arrange (a,,mapOptionTree flatten_leveled_type (drop_lev(Γ:=Γ) (ec :: nil) (t @@@ (ec :: nil)))) a.
+ intros.
+ induction t; try destruct o; try destruct a0.
+ simpl.
+ drop_simplify.
+ simpl.
+ apply RCanR.
+ simpl.
+ apply RCanR.
+ Opaque drop_lev.
+ simpl.
+ Transparent drop_lev.
+ drop_simplify.
+ simpl.
+ eapply RComp.
+ eapply RComp.
+ eapply RAssoc.
+ eapply RRight.
+ apply IHt1.
+ apply IHt2.
+ Defined.
+
+ Lemma tree_of_nothing' : forall Γ ec t a,
+ Arrange a (a,,mapOptionTree flatten_leveled_type (drop_lev(Γ:=Γ) (ec :: nil) (t @@@ (ec :: nil)))).
+ intros.
+ induction t; try destruct o; try destruct a0.
+ simpl.
+ drop_simplify.
+ simpl.
+ apply RuCanR.
+ simpl.
+ apply RuCanR.
+ Opaque drop_lev.
+ simpl.
+ Transparent drop_lev.
+ drop_simplify.
+ simpl.
+ eapply RComp.
+ Focus 2.
+ eapply RComp.
+ Focus 2.
+ eapply RCossa.
+ Focus 2.
+ eapply RRight.
+ apply IHt1.
+ apply IHt2.
+ Defined.
+
+ Lemma krunk : forall Γ (ec:HaskTyVar Γ ECKind) t,
+ flatten_type (<[ ec |- t ]>)
+ = @ga_mk Γ (v2t ec)
+ (mapOptionTree flatten_type (take_arg_types_as_tree t))
+ [ flatten_type (drop_arg_types_as_tree t)].
+ intros.
+ unfold flatten_type at 1.
+ simpl.
+ unfold ga_mk.
+ apply phoas_extensionality.
+ intros.
+ unfold v2t.
+ unfold ga_mk_raw.
+ unfold ga_mk_tree.
+ rewrite <- mapOptionTree_compose.
+ unfold take_arg_types_as_tree.
+ simpl.
+ replace (flatten_type (drop_arg_types_as_tree t) tv ite)
+ with (drop_arg_types (flatten_rawtype (t tv ite))).
+ replace (unleaves_ (take_arg_types (flatten_rawtype (t tv ite))))
+ with ((mapOptionTree (fun x : HaskType Γ ★ => flatten_type x tv ite)
+ (unleaves_
+ (take_trustme (count_arg_types (t (fun _ : Kind => unit) (ite_unit Γ)))
+ (fun TV : Kind → Type => take_arg_types ○ t TV))))).
+ reflexivity.
+ unfold flatten_type.
+ clear hetmet_flatten.
+ clear hetmet_unflatten.
+ clear hetmet_id.
+ clear gar.
+ set (t tv ite) as x.
+ admit.
+ admit.
+ Qed.
- Definition flatten :
- forall n {h}{c},
- QND (S n) h c ->
- ND Rule (mapOptionTree (flatten_qjudg n) h) (mapOptionTree (flatten_qjudg n) c).
+ Definition flatten_proof :
+ forall {h}{c},
+ ND SRule h c ->
+ ND Rule (mapOptionTree (flatten_judgment ) h) (mapOptionTree (flatten_judgment ) c).
intros.
eapply nd_map'; [ idtac | apply X ].
clear h c X.
intros.
simpl in *.
- inversion X.
- subst.
- refine (match X0 as R in Rule H C with
+ refine
+ (match X as R in SRule H C with
+ | SBrak Γ Δ t ec succ lev => let case_SBrak := tt in _
+ | SEsc Γ Δ t ec succ lev => let case_SEsc := tt in _
+ | SFlat h c r => let case_SFlat := tt in _
+ end).
+
+ destruct case_SFlat.
+ refine (match r as R in Rule H C with
| RArrange Γ Δ a b x d => let case_RArrange := tt in _
| RNote Γ Δ Σ τ l n => let case_RNote := tt in _
| RLit Γ Δ l _ => let case_RLit := tt in _
| RLet Γ Δ Σ₁ Σ₂ σ₁ σ₂ lev => let case_RLet := tt in _
| RJoin Γ p lri m x q => let case_RJoin := tt in _
| RVoid _ _ => let case_RVoid := tt in _
- | RBrak Σ a b c n m => let case_RBrak := tt in _
- | REsc Σ a b c n m => let case_REsc := tt in _
+ | RBrak Γ Δ t ec succ lev => let case_RBrak := tt in _
+ | REsc Γ Δ t ec succ lev => let case_REsc := tt in _
| RCase Γ Δ lev tc Σ avars tbranches alts => let case_RCase := tt in _
| RLetRec Γ Δ lri x y t => let case_RLetRec := tt in _
- end); clear X X0 X1 X2 h c.
+ end); clear X h c.
destruct case_RArrange.
- apply (flatten_arrangement n Γ Δ a b x d).
+ apply (flatten_arrangement'' Γ Δ a b x d).
destruct case_RBrak.
- admit.
+ apply (Prelude_error "found unskolemized Brak rule; this shouldn't happen").
destruct case_REsc.
- admit.
+ apply (Prelude_error "found unskolemized Esc rule; this shouldn't happen").
destruct case_RNote.
simpl.
destruct l; simpl.
apply nd_rule; apply RNote; auto.
- destruct (Peano_dec.eq_nat_dec (Datatypes.length l) n).
- apply nd_rule; apply RNote; auto.
apply nd_rule; apply RNote; auto.
destruct case_RLit.
simpl.
destruct l0; simpl.
+ unfold flatten_leveled_type.
+ simpl.
rewrite literal_types_unchanged.
apply nd_rule; apply RLit.
- destruct (Peano_dec.eq_nat_dec (Datatypes.length l0) n); unfold mapTree; unfold mapOptionTree; simpl.
unfold take_lev; simpl.
- unfold drop_depth; simpl.
- apply ga_lit.
+ unfold drop_lev; simpl.
+ simpl.
rewrite literal_types_unchanged.
- apply nd_rule.
- apply RLit.
+ apply ga_lit.
destruct case_RVar.
+ Opaque flatten_judgment.
simpl.
- destruct lev as [|ec lev]; simpl; [ apply nd_rule; apply RVar | idtac ].
- destruct (Peano_dec.eq_nat_dec (Datatypes.length lev) n); [ idtac | apply nd_rule; apply RVar ]; simpl.
- rewrite <- e.
- clear e n.
- repeat drop_simplify.
+ Transparent flatten_judgment.
+ idtac.
+ unfold flatten_judgment.
+ unfold getjlev.
+ destruct lev.
+ apply nd_rule. apply RVar.
+ repeat drop_simplify.
repeat take_simplify.
- apply ga_id.
+ simpl.
+ apply ga_id.
destruct case_RGlobal.
simpl.
- destruct l as [|ec lev]; simpl; [ apply nd_rule; apply RGlobal; auto | idtac ].
- destruct (Peano_dec.eq_nat_dec (Datatypes.length lev) n); [ idtac | apply nd_rule; apply RGlobal; auto ]; simpl.
- apply (Prelude_error "found RGlobal at depth >0").
+ rename l into g.
+ rename σ into l.
+ destruct l as [|ec lev]; simpl.
+ destruct (eqd_dec (g:CoreVar) (hetmet_flatten:CoreVar)).
+ set (flatten_type (g wev)) as t.
+ set (RGlobal _ Δ nil (mkGlobal Γ t hetmet_id)) as q.
+ simpl in q.
+ apply nd_rule.
+ apply q.
+ apply INil.
+ destruct (eqd_dec (g:CoreVar) (hetmet_unflatten:CoreVar)).
+ set (flatten_type (g wev)) as t.
+ set (RGlobal _ Δ nil (mkGlobal Γ t hetmet_id)) as q.
+ simpl in q.
+ apply nd_rule.
+ apply q.
+ apply INil.
+ unfold flatten_leveled_type. simpl.
+ apply nd_rule; rewrite globals_do_not_have_code_types.
+ apply RGlobal.
+ apply (Prelude_error "found RGlobal at depth >0; globals should never appear inside code brackets unless escaped").
destruct case_RLam.
+ Opaque drop_lev.
+ Opaque take_lev.
simpl.
destruct lev as [|ec lev]; simpl; [ apply nd_rule; apply RLam; auto | idtac ].
- destruct (Peano_dec.eq_nat_dec (Datatypes.length lev) n); [ idtac | apply nd_rule; apply RLam; auto ]; simpl.
- rewrite <- e.
- clear e n.
repeat drop_simplify.
repeat take_simplify.
eapply nd_comp.
eapply nd_rule.
eapply RArrange.
+ simpl.
apply RCanR.
apply boost.
+ simpl.
apply ga_curry.
-
+
destruct case_RCast.
simpl.
destruct lev as [|ec lev]; simpl; [ apply nd_rule; apply RCast; auto | idtac ].
+ simpl.
apply flatten_coercion; auto.
- destruct (Peano_dec.eq_nat_dec (Datatypes.length lev) n); [ idtac | apply nd_rule; apply RCast; auto ]; simpl.
- apply (Prelude_error "RCast at level >0").
- apply flatten_coercion; auto.
+ apply (Prelude_error "RCast at level >0; casting inside of code brackets is currently not supported").
destruct case_RJoin.
simpl.
- destruct (getjlev x); destruct (getjlev q).
- apply nd_rule.
- apply RJoin.
- apply (Prelude_error "RJoin at depth >0").
- apply (Prelude_error "RJoin at depth >0").
- apply (Prelude_error "RJoin at depth >0").
+ destruct (getjlev x); destruct (getjlev q);
+ [ apply nd_rule; apply RJoin | idtac | idtac | idtac ];
+ apply (Prelude_error "RJoin at depth >0").
destruct case_RApp.
simpl.
destruct lev as [|ec lev]. simpl. apply nd_rule.
- replace (flatten_type n (tx ---> te)) with ((flatten_type n tx) ---> (flatten_type n te)).
- apply RApp.
- unfold flatten_type.
+ unfold flatten_leveled_type at 4.
+ unfold flatten_leveled_type at 2.
simpl.
+ replace (flatten_type (tx ---> te))
+ with (flatten_type tx ---> flatten_type te).
+ apply RApp.
reflexivity.
- destruct (Peano_dec.eq_nat_dec (Datatypes.length lev) n).
- eapply nd_comp.
- eapply nd_rule.
- apply RJoin.
- repeat drop_simplify.
+ repeat drop_simplify.
repeat take_simplify.
- apply boost.
- apply ga_apply.
-
- replace (flatten_type (minus' n (length (ec::lev))) (tx ---> te))
- with ((flatten_type (minus' n (length (ec::lev))) tx) ---> (flatten_type (minus' n (length (ec::lev))) te)).
- apply nd_rule.
- apply RApp.
- unfold flatten_type.
- simpl.
+ rewrite mapOptionTree_distributes.
+ set (mapOptionTree (flatten_leveled_type ) (drop_lev (ec :: lev) Σ₁)) as Σ₁'.
+ set (mapOptionTree (flatten_leveled_type ) (drop_lev (ec :: lev) Σ₂)) as Σ₂'.
+ set (take_lev (ec :: lev) Σ₁) as Σ₁''.
+ set (take_lev (ec :: lev) Σ₂) as Σ₂''.
+ replace (flatten_type (tx ---> te)) with ((flatten_type tx) ---> (flatten_type te)).
+ apply (Prelude_error "FIXME: ga_apply").
reflexivity.
+(*
+ Notation "` x" := (take_lev _ x).
+ Notation "`` x" := (mapOptionTree unlev x) (at level 20).
+ Notation "``` x" := ((drop_lev _ x)) (at level 20).
+ Notation "!<[]> x" := (flatten_type _ x) (at level 1).
+ Notation "!<[@]> x" := (mapOptionTree flatten_leveled_type x) (at level 1).
+*)
+
destruct case_RLet.
simpl.
destruct lev as [|ec lev]; simpl; [ apply nd_rule; apply RLet; auto | idtac ].
- destruct (Peano_dec.eq_nat_dec (Datatypes.length lev) n); [ idtac | apply nd_rule; apply RLet; auto ]; simpl.
repeat drop_simplify.
repeat take_simplify.
- admit. (* FIXME *)
+ simpl.
+
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ eapply nd_prod; [ idtac | apply nd_id ].
+ eapply boost.
+ apply ga_second.
+
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ eapply nd_prod.
+ apply nd_id.
+ eapply nd_comp.
+ eapply nd_rule.
+ eapply RArrange.
+ apply RCanR.
+ eapply precompose.
+
+ apply nd_rule.
+ apply RLet.
destruct case_RVoid.
simpl.
destruct case_RAppT.
simpl. destruct lev; simpl.
- admit.
- admit.
+ unfold flatten_leveled_type.
+ simpl.
+ rewrite flatten_commutes_with_HaskTAll.
+ rewrite flatten_commutes_with_substT.
+ apply nd_rule.
+ apply RAppT.
+ apply Δ.
+ apply Δ.
+ apply (Prelude_error "found type application at level >0; this is not supported").
destruct case_RAbsT.
simpl. destruct lev; simpl.
- admit.
- admit.
+ unfold flatten_leveled_type at 4.
+ unfold flatten_leveled_type at 2.
+ simpl.
+ rewrite flatten_commutes_with_HaskTAll.
+ rewrite flatten_commutes_with_HaskTApp.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RAbsT ].
+ simpl.
+ set (mapOptionTree (flatten_leveled_type ) (mapOptionTree (weakLT(κ:=κ)) Σ)) as a.
+ set (mapOptionTree (weakLT(κ:=κ)) (mapOptionTree (flatten_leveled_type ) Σ)) as q'.
+ assert (a=q').
+ unfold a.
+ unfold q'.
+ clear a q'.
+ induction Σ.
+ destruct a.
+ simpl.
+ rewrite flatten_commutes_with_weakLT.
+ reflexivity.
+ reflexivity.
+ simpl.
+ rewrite <- IHΣ1.
+ rewrite <- IHΣ2.
+ reflexivity.
+ rewrite H.
+ apply nd_id.
+ apply Δ.
+ apply Δ.
+ apply (Prelude_error "found type abstraction at level >0; this is not supported").
destruct case_RAppCo.
simpl. destruct lev; simpl.
- admit.
- admit.
+ unfold flatten_leveled_type at 4.
+ unfold flatten_leveled_type at 2.
+ unfold flatten_type.
+ simpl.
+ apply nd_rule.
+ apply RAppCo.
+ apply flatten_coercion.
+ apply γ.
+ apply (Prelude_error "found coercion application at level >0; this is not supported").
destruct case_RAbsCo.
simpl. destruct lev; simpl.
- admit.
- admit.
+ unfold flatten_type.
+ simpl.
+ apply (Prelude_error "AbsCo not supported (FIXME)").
+ apply (Prelude_error "found coercion abstraction at level >0; this is not supported").
destruct case_RLetRec.
+ rename t into lev.
simpl.
- admit.
+ apply (Prelude_error "LetRec not supported (FIXME)").
destruct case_RCase.
simpl.
- admit.
- Defined.
+ apply (Prelude_error "Case not supported (BIG FIXME)").
- Lemma flatten_qjudg_qjudg : forall {n}{j} (q:QJudg (S n) j), QJudg n (flatten_qjudg n j).
- admit.
- (*
- intros.
- destruct q.
- destruct a.
- unfold flatten_qjudg.
- destruct j.
- destruct (eqd_dec (Datatypes.length x) (S n)).
- destruct x.
- inversion e.
- exists x; split.
- simpl in e.
- inversion e.
- auto.
- simpl in *.
- apply allt_some.
+ destruct case_SBrak.
+ simpl.
+ destruct lev.
+ drop_simplify.
+ set (drop_lev (ec :: nil) (take_arg_types_as_tree t @@@ (ec :: nil))) as empty_tree.
+ take_simplify.
+ rewrite take_lemma'.
+ simpl.
+ rewrite mapOptionTree_compose.
+ rewrite mapOptionTree_compose.
+ rewrite unlev_relev.
+ rewrite <- mapOptionTree_compose.
+ unfold flatten_leveled_type at 4.
+ simpl.
+ rewrite krunk.
+ set (mapOptionTree flatten_leveled_type (drop_lev (ec :: nil) succ)) as succ_host.
+ set (mapOptionTree (flatten_type ○ unlev)(take_lev (ec :: nil) succ)) as succ_guest.
+ set (mapOptionTree flatten_type (take_arg_types_as_tree t)) as succ_args.
+ unfold empty_tree.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; apply tree_of_nothing | idtac ].
+ refine (ga_unkappa' Γ Δ (v2t ec) nil _ _ _ _ ;; _).
+ unfold succ_host.
+ unfold succ_guest.
+ apply arrange_brak.
+ apply (Prelude_error "found Brak at depth >0 indicating 3-level code; only two-level code is currently supported").
+
+ destruct case_SEsc.
+ simpl.
+ destruct lev.
+ simpl.
+ unfold flatten_leveled_type at 2.
+ simpl.
+ rewrite krunk.
+ rewrite mapOptionTree_compose.
+ take_simplify.
+ drop_simplify.
+ simpl.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; apply tree_of_nothing' ].
+ simpl.
+ rewrite take_lemma'.
+ rewrite unlev_relev.
+ rewrite <- mapOptionTree_compose.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ apply (arrange_esc _ _ ec) | idtac ].
+
+ set (decide_tree_empty (take_lev (ec :: nil) succ)) as q'.
+ destruct q'.
+ destruct s.
+ rewrite e.
+ clear e.
+
+ set (mapOptionTree flatten_leveled_type (drop_lev (ec :: nil) succ)) as succ_host.
+ set (mapOptionTree flatten_type (take_arg_types_as_tree t)) as succ_args.
+
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; apply RCanR ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RLet ].
+ eapply nd_comp; [ apply nd_llecnac | idtac ].
+ apply nd_prod; [ idtac | eapply boost ].
+ induction x.
+ apply ga_id.
+ eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply RArrange; eapply RCanR ].
simpl.
- auto.
- unfold QJudg.
- exists x.
- split; auto.
- clear a.
- Set Printing Implicit.
+ apply ga_join.
+ apply IHx1.
+ apply IHx2.
+ simpl.
+ apply postcompose.
+
+ refine ( _ ;; (boost _ _ _ _ _ (postcompose _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _))).
+ apply ga_cancell.
+ apply firstify.
+
+ induction x.
+ destruct a; simpl.
+ apply ga_id.
simpl.
- set (length x) as x'.
- assert (x'=length x).
- reflexivity.
- simpl in *.
- rewrite <- H.
- Unset Printing Implicit.
- idtac.
- omega.
- simpl in *.
- induction t0.
- destruct a0; simpl in *.
- apply allt_some.
- inversion a.
- subst.
- destruct l0.
- simpl.
- auto.
- apply allt_none.
- simpl in *.
- inversion a; subst.
- apply allt_branch.
- apply IHt0_1; auto.
- apply IHt0_2; auto.
- *)
- Defined.
+ refine ( _ ;; (boost _ _ _ _ _ (postcompose _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _))).
+ apply ga_cancell.
+ refine ( _ ;; (boost _ _ _ _ _ (postcompose _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _))).
+ eapply firstify.
+ apply IHx1.
+ apply secondify.
+ apply IHx2.
+
+ (* environment has non-empty leaves *)
+ apply ga_kappa'.
+
+ (* nesting too deep *)
+ apply (Prelude_error "found Esc at depth >0 indicating 3-level code; only two-level code is currently supported").
+ Defined.
+
+ Definition skolemize_and_flatten_proof :
+ forall {h}{c},
+ ND Rule h c ->
+ ND Rule
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_judgment ○ skolemize_judgment) h)
+ (mapOptionTree (flatten_judgment ○ skolemize_judgment) c).
+ intros.
+ rewrite mapOptionTree_compose.
+ rewrite mapOptionTree_compose.
+ apply flatten_proof.
+ apply skolemize_proof.
+ apply X.
+ Defined.
+
+ (* to do: establish some metric on judgments (max length of level of any succedent type, probably), show how to
+ * calculate it, and show that the flattening procedure above drives it down by one *)
(*
Instance FlatteningFunctor {Γ}{Δ}{ec} : Functor (JudgmentsL (PCF Γ Δ ec)) (TypesL (SystemFCa Γ Δ)) (obact) :=
{ fmor := FlatteningFunctor_fmor }.
- Admitted.
Definition ReificationFunctor Γ Δ : Functor (JudgmentsL _ _ (PCF n Γ Δ)) SystemFCa' (mapOptionTree brakifyJudg).
refine {| fmor := ReificationFunctor_fmor Γ Δ |}; unfold hom; unfold ob; simpl ; intros.
- Admitted.
Definition PCF_SMME (n:nat)(Γ:TypeEnv)(Δ:CoercionEnv Γ) : ProgrammingLanguageSMME.
refine {| plsmme_pl := PCF n Γ Δ |}.
- admit.
Defined.
Definition SystemFCa_SMME (n:nat)(Γ:TypeEnv)(Δ:CoercionEnv Γ) : ProgrammingLanguageSMME.
refine {| plsmme_pl := SystemFCa n Γ Δ |}.
- admit.
Defined.
Definition ReificationFunctorMonoidal n : MonoidalFunctor (JudgmentsN n) (JudgmentsN (S n)) (ReificationFunctor n).
- admit.
Defined.
(* 5.1.4 *)
Definition PCF_SystemFCa_two_level n Γ Δ : TwoLevelLanguage (PCF_SMME n Γ Δ) (SystemFCa_SMME (S n) Γ Δ).
- admit.
Defined.
*)
(* ... and the retraction exists *)
End HaskFlattener.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-(*
-
- Old flattening code; ignore this - just to remind me how I used to do it
-
- (*
- * Here it is, what you've all been waiting for! When reading this,
- * it might help to have the definition for "Inductive ND" (see
- * NaturalDeduction.v) handy as a cross-reference.
- *)
- Hint Constructors Rule_Flat.
- Definition FlatteningFunctor_fmor
- : forall h c,
- (ND (PCFRule Γ Δ ec) h c) ->
- ((obact h)====>(obact c)).
-
- set (@nil (HaskTyVar Γ ★)) as lev.
-
- unfold hom; unfold ob; unfold ehom; simpl; unfold pmon_I; unfold obact; intros.
-
- induction X; simpl.
-
- (* the proof from no hypotheses of no conclusions (nd_id0) becomes RVoid *)
- apply nd_rule; apply (org_fc Γ Δ [] [(_,_)] (RVoid _ _)). apply Flat_RVoid.
-
- (* the proof from hypothesis X of conclusion X (nd_id1) becomes RVar *)
- apply nd_rule; apply (org_fc _ _ [] [(_,_)] (RVar _ _ _ _)). apply Flat_RVar.
-
- (* the proof from hypothesis X of no conclusions (nd_weak) becomes RWeak;;RVoid *)
- eapply nd_comp;
- [ idtac
- | eapply nd_rule
- ; eapply (org_fc _ _ [(_,_)] [(_,_)] (RArrange _ _ _ _ _ (RWeak _)))
- ; auto ].
- eapply nd_rule.
- eapply (org_fc _ _ [] [(_,_)] (RVoid _ _)); auto. apply Flat_RVoid.
- apply Flat_RArrange.
-
- (* the proof from hypothesis X of two identical conclusions X,,X (nd_copy) becomes RVar;;RJoin;;RCont *)
- eapply nd_comp; [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; eapply (org_fc _ _ [(_,_)] [(_,_)] (RArrange _ _ _ _ _ (RCont _))) ].
- eapply nd_comp; [ apply nd_llecnac | idtac ].
- set (snd_initial(SequentND:=pl_snd(ProgrammingLanguage:=SystemFCa Γ Δ))
- (mapOptionTree (guestJudgmentAsGArrowType) h @@@ lev)) as q.
- eapply nd_comp.
- eapply nd_prod.
- apply q.
- apply q.
- apply nd_rule.
- eapply (org_fc _ _ ([(_,_)],,[(_,_)]) [(_,_)] (RJoin _ _ _ _ _ _ )).
- destruct h; simpl.
- destruct o.
- simpl.
- apply Flat_RJoin.
- apply Flat_RJoin.
- apply Flat_RJoin.
- apply Flat_RArrange.
-
- (* nd_prod becomes nd_llecnac;;nd_prod;;RJoin *)
- eapply nd_comp.
- apply (nd_llecnac ;; nd_prod IHX1 IHX2).
- apply nd_rule.
- eapply (org_fc _ _ ([(_,_)],,[(_,_)]) [(_,_)] (RJoin _ _ _ _ _ _ )).
- apply (Flat_RJoin Γ Δ (mapOptionTree guestJudgmentAsGArrowType h1 @@@ nil)
- (mapOptionTree guestJudgmentAsGArrowType h2 @@@ nil)
- (mapOptionTree guestJudgmentAsGArrowType c1 @@@ nil)
- (mapOptionTree guestJudgmentAsGArrowType c2 @@@ nil)).
-
- (* nd_comp becomes pl_subst (aka nd_cut) *)
- eapply nd_comp.
- apply (nd_llecnac ;; nd_prod IHX1 IHX2).
- clear IHX1 IHX2 X1 X2.
- apply (@snd_cut _ _ _ _ (pl_snd(ProgrammingLanguage:=SystemFCa Γ Δ))).
-
- (* nd_cancell becomes RVar;;RuCanL *)
- eapply nd_comp;
- [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; apply (org_fc _ _ [(_,_)] [(_,_)] (RArrange _ _ _ _ _ (RuCanL _))) ].
- apply (snd_initial(SequentND:=pl_cnd(ProgrammingLanguage:=(SystemFCa Γ Δ)))).
- apply Flat_RArrange.
-
- (* nd_cancelr becomes RVar;;RuCanR *)
- eapply nd_comp;
- [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; apply (org_fc _ _ [(_,_)] [(_,_)] (RArrange _ _ _ _ _ (RuCanR _))) ].
- apply (snd_initial(SequentND:=pl_cnd(ProgrammingLanguage:=(SystemFCa Γ Δ)))).
- apply Flat_RArrange.
-
- (* nd_llecnac becomes RVar;;RCanL *)
- eapply nd_comp;
- [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; apply (org_fc _ _ [(_,_)] [(_,_)] (RArrange _ _ _ _ _ (RCanL _))) ].
- apply (snd_initial(SequentND:=pl_cnd(ProgrammingLanguage:=(SystemFCa Γ Δ)))).
- apply Flat_RArrange.
-
- (* nd_rlecnac becomes RVar;;RCanR *)
- eapply nd_comp;
- [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; apply (org_fc _ _ [(_,_)] [(_,_)] (RArrange _ _ _ _ _ (RCanR _))) ].
- apply (snd_initial(SequentND:=pl_cnd(ProgrammingLanguage:=(SystemFCa Γ Δ)))).
- apply Flat_RArrange.
-
- (* nd_assoc becomes RVar;;RAssoc *)
- eapply nd_comp;
- [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; apply (org_fc _ _ [(_,_)] [(_,_)] (RArrange _ _ _ _ _ (RAssoc _ _ _))) ].
- apply (snd_initial(SequentND:=pl_cnd(ProgrammingLanguage:=(SystemFCa Γ Δ)))).
- apply Flat_RArrange.
-
- (* nd_cossa becomes RVar;;RCossa *)
- eapply nd_comp;
- [ idtac | eapply nd_rule; apply (org_fc _ _ [(_,_)] [(_,_)] (RArrange _ _ _ _ _ (RCossa _ _ _))) ].
- apply (snd_initial(SequentND:=pl_cnd(ProgrammingLanguage:=(SystemFCa Γ Δ)))).
- apply Flat_RArrange.
-
- destruct r as [r rp].
- rename h into h'.
- rename c into c'.
- rename r into r'.
-
- refine (match rp as R in @Rule_PCF _ _ _ H C _
- return
- ND (OrgR Γ Δ) []
- [sequent (mapOptionTree guestJudgmentAsGArrowType H @@@ nil)
- (mapOptionTree guestJudgmentAsGArrowType C @@@ nil)]
- with
- | PCF_RArrange h c r q => let case_RURule := tt in _
- | PCF_RLit lit => let case_RLit := tt in _
- | PCF_RNote Σ τ n => let case_RNote := tt in _
- | PCF_RVar σ => let case_RVar := tt in _
- | PCF_RLam Σ tx te => let case_RLam := tt in _
- | PCF_RApp Σ tx te p => let case_RApp := tt in _
- | PCF_RLet Σ σ₁ σ₂ p => let case_RLet := tt in _
- | PCF_RJoin b c d e => let case_RJoin := tt in _
- | PCF_RVoid => let case_RVoid := tt in _
- (*| PCF_RCase T κlen κ θ l x => let case_RCase := tt in _*)
- (*| PCF_RLetRec Σ₁ τ₁ τ₂ lev => let case_RLetRec := tt in _*)
- end); simpl in *.
- clear rp h' c' r'.
-
- rewrite (unlev_lemma h (ec::nil)).
- rewrite (unlev_lemma c (ec::nil)).
- destruct case_RURule.
- refine (match q as Q in Arrange H C
- return
- H=(h @@@ (ec :: nil)) ->
- C=(c @@@ (ec :: nil)) ->
- ND (OrgR Γ Δ) []
- [sequent
- [ga_type (ga_rep (mapOptionTree unlev H)) (ga_rep r) @@ nil ]
- [ga_type (ga_rep (mapOptionTree unlev C)) (ga_rep r) @@ nil ] ]
- with
- | RLeft a b c r => let case_RLeft := tt in _
- | RRight a b c r => let case_RRight := tt in _
- | RCanL b => let case_RCanL := tt in _
- | RCanR b => let case_RCanR := tt in _
- | RuCanL b => let case_RuCanL := tt in _
- | RuCanR b => let case_RuCanR := tt in _
- | RAssoc b c d => let case_RAssoc := tt in _
- | RCossa b c d => let case_RCossa := tt in _
- | RExch b c => let case_RExch := tt in _
- | RWeak b => let case_RWeak := tt in _
- | RCont b => let case_RCont := tt in _
- | RComp a b c f g => let case_RComp := tt in _
- end (refl_equal _) (refl_equal _));
- intros; simpl in *;
- subst;
- try rewrite <- unlev_lemma in *.
-
- destruct case_RCanL.
- apply magic.
- apply ga_uncancell.
-
- destruct case_RCanR.
- apply magic.
- apply ga_uncancelr.
-
- destruct case_RuCanL.
- apply magic.
- apply ga_cancell.
-
- destruct case_RuCanR.
- apply magic.
- apply ga_cancelr.
-
- destruct case_RAssoc.
- apply magic.
- apply ga_assoc.
-
- destruct case_RCossa.
- apply magic.
- apply ga_unassoc.
-
- destruct case_RExch.
- apply magic.
- apply ga_swap.
-
- destruct case_RWeak.
- apply magic.
- apply ga_drop.
-
- destruct case_RCont.
- apply magic.
- apply ga_copy.
-
- destruct case_RLeft.
- apply magic.
- (*apply ga_second.*)
- admit.
-
- destruct case_RRight.
- apply magic.
- (*apply ga_first.*)
- admit.
-
- destruct case_RComp.
- apply magic.
- (*apply ga_comp.*)
- admit.
-
- destruct case_RLit.
- apply ga_lit.
-
- (* hey cool, I figured out how to pass CoreNote's through... *)
- destruct case_RNote.
- eapply nd_comp.
- eapply nd_rule.
- eapply (org_fc _ _ [] [(_,_)] (RVar _ _ _ _)) . auto.
- apply Flat_RVar.
- apply nd_rule.
- apply (org_fc _ _ [(_,_)] [(_,_)] (RNote _ _ _ _ _ n)). auto.
- apply Flat_RNote.
-
- destruct case_RVar.
- apply ga_id.
-
- (*
- * class GArrow g (**) u => GArrowApply g (**) u (~>) where
- * ga_applyl :: g (x**(x~>y) ) y
- * ga_applyr :: g ( (x~>y)**x) y
- *
- * class GArrow g (**) u => GArrowCurry g (**) u (~>) where
- * ga_curryl :: g (x**y) z -> g x (y~>z)
- * ga_curryr :: g (x**y) z -> g y (x~>z)
- *)
- destruct case_RLam.
- (* GArrowCurry.ga_curry *)
- admit.
-
- destruct case_RApp.
- (* GArrowApply.ga_apply *)
- admit.
-
- destruct case_RLet.
- admit.
-
- destruct case_RVoid.
- apply ga_id.
-
- destruct case_RJoin.
- (* this assumes we want effects to occur in syntactically-left-to-right order *)
- admit.
- Defined.
-*)
\ No newline at end of file
+Implicit Arguments garrow [ ].