From 45976f3a79fa5d572b907ac716350b75d15e978a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Megacz Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:36:42 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] add note to am42 --- chips/f2/doc/am42/am42.tex | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/chips/f2/doc/am42/am42.tex b/chips/f2/doc/am42/am42.tex index bc72048..caf4aaf 100644 --- a/chips/f2/doc/am42/am42.tex +++ b/chips/f2/doc/am42/am42.tex @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ To Do: \begin{verbatim} +Revisit the decision to have the dock include a word-wide latch? If + it doesn't, then literals become trickier. + "Supertorpedo" for retrieving dock state. THEREFORE: I propose that DockTwo only be able to load the counter from the data latch, not from the instruction word. This gets rid of an entire instruction. In exchange, I would like to propose that "data predecessor full is a condition of execution" and "drain data predecessor when you execute" be different opcode bits. -- 1.7.10.4