mapTermType,
termTyVars,
-- unsafeDeepSeq,
- reconstructType
+ cvReconstructType
) where
#include "HsVersions.h"
| t == tVarPrimTyCon = "<tVar>"
| otherwise = showSDoc (char '<' <> ppr t <> char '>')
where build ww = unsafePerformIO $ withArray ww (peek . castPtr)
+
-----------------------------------
-- Type Reconstruction
-----------------------------------
+{-
+Type Reconstruction is type inference done on heap closures.
+The algorithm walks the heap generating a set of equations, which
+are solved with syntactic unification.
+A type reconstruction equation looks like:
+
+ <datacon reptype> = <actual heap contents>
+
+The full equation set is generated by traversing all the subterms, starting
+from a given term.
+
+The only difficult part is that newtypes are only found in the lhs of equations.
+Right hand sides are missing them. We can either (a) drop them from the lhs, or
+(b) reconstruct them in the rhs when possible.
+
+The function congruenceNewtypes takes a shot at (b)
+-}
-- The Type Reconstruction monad
type TR a = TcM a
trIO :: IO a -> TR a
trIO = liftTcM . ioToTcRn
-addConstraint :: TcType -> TcType -> TR ()
-addConstraint t1 t2 = congruenceNewtypes t1 t2 >>= uncurry unifyType
-
-{-
- A parallel fold over two Type values,
- compensating for missing newtypes on both sides.
- This is necessary because newtypes are not present
- in runtime, but since sometimes there is evidence
- available we do our best to reconstruct them.
- Evidence can come from DataCon signatures or
- from compile-time type inference.
- I am using the words congruence and rewriting
- because what we are doing here is an approximation
- of unification modulo a set of equations, which would
- come from newtype definitions. These should be the
- equality coercions seen in System Fc. Rewriting
- is performed, taking those equations as rules,
- before launching unification.
-
- It doesn't make sense to rewrite everywhere,
- or we would end up with all newtypes. So we rewrite
- only in presence of evidence.
- The lhs comes from the heap structure of ptrs,nptrs.
- The rhs comes from a DataCon type signature.
- Rewriting in the rhs is restricted to the result type.
-
- Note that it is very tricky to make this 'rewriting'
- work with the unification implemented by TcM, where
- substitutions are 'inlined'. The order in which
- constraints are unified is vital for this (or I am
- using TcM wrongly).
--}
-congruenceNewtypes :: TcType -> TcType -> TcM (TcType,TcType)
-congruenceNewtypes = go True
- where
- go rewriteRHS lhs rhs
- -- TyVar lhs inductive case
- | Just tv <- getTyVar_maybe lhs
- = recoverM (return (lhs,rhs)) $ do
- Indirect ty_v <- readMetaTyVar tv
- (lhs', rhs') <- go rewriteRHS ty_v rhs
- writeMutVar (metaTvRef tv) (Indirect lhs')
- return (lhs, rhs')
- -- TyVar rhs inductive case
- | Just tv <- getTyVar_maybe rhs
- = recoverM (return (lhs,rhs)) $ do
- Indirect ty_v <- readMetaTyVar tv
- (lhs', rhs') <- go rewriteRHS lhs ty_v
- writeMutVar (metaTvRef tv) (Indirect rhs')
- return (lhs', rhs)
--- FunTy inductive case
- | Just (l1,l2) <- splitFunTy_maybe lhs
- , Just (r1,r2) <- splitFunTy_maybe rhs
- = do (l2',r2') <- go True l2 r2
- (l1',r1') <- go False l1 r1
- return (mkFunTy l1' l2', mkFunTy r1' r2')
--- TyconApp Inductive case; this is the interesting bit.
- | Just (tycon_l, args_l) <- splitNewTyConApp_maybe lhs
- , Just (tycon_r, args_r) <- splitNewTyConApp_maybe rhs = do
-
- let (tycon_l',args_l') = if isNewTyCon tycon_r && not(isNewTyCon tycon_l)
- then (tycon_r, rewrite tycon_r lhs)
- else (tycon_l, args_l)
- (tycon_r',args_r') = if rewriteRHS && isNewTyCon tycon_l && not(isNewTyCon tycon_r)
- then (tycon_l, rewrite tycon_l rhs)
- else (tycon_r, args_r)
- (args_l'', args_r'') <- unzip `liftM` zipWithM (go rewriteRHS) args_l' args_r'
- return (mkTyConApp tycon_l' args_l'', mkTyConApp tycon_r' args_r'')
-
- | otherwise = return (lhs,rhs)
-
- where rewrite newtyped_tc lame_tipe
- | (tvs, tipe) <- newTyConRep newtyped_tc
- = case tcUnifyTys (const BindMe) [tipe] [lame_tipe] of
- Just subst -> substTys subst (map mkTyVarTy tvs)
- otherwise -> panic "congruenceNewtypes: Can't unify a newtype"
+liftTcM = id
newVar :: Kind -> TR TcTyVar
newVar = liftTcM . newFlexiTyVar
-liftTcM = id
-
-- | Returns the instantiated type scheme ty', and the substitution sigma
-- such that sigma(ty') = ty
instScheme :: Type -> TR (TcType, TvSubst)
(tvs',theta,ty') <- tcInstType (mapM tcInstTyVar) ty
return (ty', zipTopTvSubst tvs' (mkTyVarTys tvs))
+addConstraint :: TcType -> TcType -> TR ()
+addConstraint t1 t2 = congruenceNewtypes t1 t2 >>= uncurry unifyType
+
+
+
+-- Type & Term reconstruction
cvObtainTerm :: HscEnv -> Bool -> Maybe Type -> HValue -> IO Term
cvObtainTerm hsc_env force mb_ty hval = runTR hsc_env $ do
tv <- liftM mkTyVarTy (newVar argTypeKind)
, ptext SLIT("reOrderTerms") $$ (ppr pointed $$ ppr unpointed))
head unpointed : reOrderTerms pointed (tail unpointed) tys
--- Strict application of f at index i
-appArr f (Array _ _ ptrs#) (I# i#) = case indexArray# ptrs# i# of
- (# e #) -> f e
+
-- Fast, breadth-first version of obtainTerm that deals only with type reconstruction
+
cvReconstructType :: HscEnv -> Bool -> Maybe Type -> HValue -> IO Type
cvReconstructType hsc_env force mb_ty hval = runTR hsc_env $ do
tv <- liftM mkTyVarTy (newVar argTypeKind)
otherwise -> return []
+-- Dealing with newtypes
+{-
+ A parallel fold over two Type values,
+ compensating for missing newtypes on both sides.
+ This is necessary because newtypes are not present
+ in runtime, but since sometimes there is evidence
+ available we do our best to reconstruct them.
+ Evidence can come from DataCon signatures or
+ from compile-time type inference.
+ I am using the words congruence and rewriting
+ because what we are doing here is an approximation
+ of unification modulo a set of equations, which would
+ come from newtype definitions. These should be the
+ equality coercions seen in System Fc. Rewriting
+ is performed, taking those equations as rules,
+ before launching unification.
+
+ It doesn't make sense to rewrite everywhere,
+ or we would end up with all newtypes. So we rewrite
+ only in presence of evidence.
+ The lhs comes from the heap structure of ptrs,nptrs.
+ The rhs comes from a DataCon type signature.
+ Rewriting in the rhs is restricted to the result type.
+
+ Note that it is very tricky to make this 'rewriting'
+ work with the unification implemented by TcM, where
+ substitutions are 'inlined'. The order in which
+ constraints are unified is vital for this (or I am
+ using TcM wrongly).
+-}
+congruenceNewtypes :: TcType -> TcType -> TcM (TcType,TcType)
+congruenceNewtypes = go True
+ where
+ go rewriteRHS lhs rhs
+ -- TyVar lhs inductive case
+ | Just tv <- getTyVar_maybe lhs
+ = recoverM (return (lhs,rhs)) $ do
+ Indirect ty_v <- readMetaTyVar tv
+ (lhs', rhs') <- go rewriteRHS ty_v rhs
+ writeMutVar (metaTvRef tv) (Indirect lhs')
+ return (lhs, rhs')
+ -- TyVar rhs inductive case
+ | Just tv <- getTyVar_maybe rhs
+ = recoverM (return (lhs,rhs)) $ do
+ Indirect ty_v <- readMetaTyVar tv
+ (lhs', rhs') <- go rewriteRHS lhs ty_v
+ writeMutVar (metaTvRef tv) (Indirect rhs')
+ return (lhs', rhs)
+-- FunTy inductive case
+ | Just (l1,l2) <- splitFunTy_maybe lhs
+ , Just (r1,r2) <- splitFunTy_maybe rhs
+ = do (l2',r2') <- go True l2 r2
+ (l1',r1') <- go False l1 r1
+ return (mkFunTy l1' l2', mkFunTy r1' r2')
+-- TyconApp Inductive case; this is the interesting bit.
+ | Just (tycon_l, args_l) <- splitNewTyConApp_maybe lhs
+ , Just (tycon_r, args_r) <- splitNewTyConApp_maybe rhs = do
+
+ let (tycon_l',args_l') = if isNewTyCon tycon_r && not(isNewTyCon tycon_l)
+ then (tycon_r, rewrite tycon_r lhs)
+ else (tycon_l, args_l)
+ (tycon_r',args_r') = if rewriteRHS && isNewTyCon tycon_l && not(isNewTyCon tycon_r)
+ then (tycon_l, rewrite tycon_l rhs)
+ else (tycon_r, args_r)
+ (args_l'', args_r'') <- unzip `liftM` zipWithM (go rewriteRHS) args_l' args_r'
+ return (mkTyConApp tycon_l' args_l'', mkTyConApp tycon_r' args_r'')
+
+ | otherwise = return (lhs,rhs)
+
+ where rewrite newtyped_tc lame_tipe
+ | (tvs, tipe) <- newTyConRep newtyped_tc
+ = case tcUnifyTys (const BindMe) [tipe] [lame_tipe] of
+ Just subst -> substTys subst (map mkTyVarTy tvs)
+ otherwise -> panic "congruenceNewtypes: Can't unify a newtype"
+
+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
isMonomorphic ty | (tvs, ty') <- splitForAllTys ty
= null tvs && (isEmptyVarSet . tyVarsOfType) ty'
unlessM condM acc = condM >>= \c -> unless c acc
+-- Strict application of f at index i
+appArr f (Array _ _ ptrs#) (I# i#) = case indexArray# ptrs# i# of
+ (# e #) -> f e
+
zonkTerm :: Term -> TcM Term
zonkTerm = foldTerm idTermFoldM {
fTerm = \ty dc v tt -> sequence tt >>= \tt ->
-- Generalize the type: find all free tyvars and wrap in the appropiate ForAll.
sigmaType ty = mkForAllTys (varSetElems$ tyVarsOfType (dropForAlls ty)) ty
-{-
-Example of Type Reconstruction
---------------------------------
-Suppose we have an existential type such as
-
-data Opaque = forall a. Opaque a
-
-And we have a term built as:
-
-t = Opaque (map Just [[1,1],[2,2]])
-
-The type of t as far as the typechecker goes is t :: Opaque
-If we seq the head of t, we obtain:
-
-t - O (_1::a)
-
-seq _1 ()
-
-t - O ( (_3::b) : (_4::[b]) )
-
-seq _3 ()
-
-t - O ( (Just (_5::c)) : (_4::[b]) )
-At this point, we know that b = (Maybe c)
-
-seq _5 ()
-
-t - O ( (Just ((_6::d) : (_7::[d]) )) : (_4::[b]) )
-
-At this point, we know that c = [d]
-
-seq _6 ()
-
-t - O ( (Just (1 : (_7::[d]) )) : (_4::[b]) )
-
-At this point, we know that d = Integer
-
-The fully reconstructed expressions, with propagation, would be:
-
-t - O ( (Just (_5::c)) : (_4::[Maybe c]) )
-t - O ( (Just ((_6::d) : (_7::[d]) )) : (_4::[Maybe [d]]) )
-t - O ( (Just (1 : (_7::[Integer]) )) : (_4::[Maybe [Integer]]) )
-
-
-For reference, the type of the thing inside the opaque is
-map Just [[1,1],[2,2]] :: [Maybe [Integer]]
-
-NOTE: (Num t) contexts have been manually replaced by Integer for clarity
--}
projects / ghc-hetmet.git / blobdiff