mapTermType,
termTyVars,
-- unsafeDeepSeq,
- reconstructType
+ cvReconstructType
) where
#include "HsVersions.h"
import DataCon
import Type
-import TcRnMonad ( TcM, initTcPrintErrors, ioToTcRn, recoverM, writeMutVar )
+import TcRnMonad ( TcM, initTcPrintErrors, ioToTcRn, recoverM
+ , writeMutVar )
import TcType
import TcMType
import TcUnify
import Data.Array.Base
import Data.List ( partition, nub )
import Foreign
+import System.IO.Unsafe
---------------------------------------------
-- * A representation of semi evaluated Terms
ptrsList = Array 0 (fromIntegral$ elems) ptrs
nptrs_data = [W# (indexWordArray# nptrs i)
| I# i <- [0.. fromIntegral (BCI.nptrs itbl)] ]
- ptrsList `seq` return (Closure tipe (Ptr iptr) itbl ptrsList nptrs_data)
+ ptrsList `seq`
+ return (Closure tipe (Ptr iptr) itbl ptrsList nptrs_data)
readCType :: Integral a => a -> ClosureType
readCType i
unsafeDeepSeq :: a -> b -> b
unsafeDeepSeq = unsafeDeepSeq1 2
where unsafeDeepSeq1 0 a b = seq a $! b
- unsafeDeepSeq1 i a b -- 1st case avoids infinite loops for non reducible thunks
+ unsafeDeepSeq1 i a b -- 1st case avoids infinite loops for non reducible thunks
| not (isConstr tipe) = seq a $! unsafeDeepSeq1 (i-1) a b
-- | unsafePerformIO (isFullyEvaluated a) = b
| otherwise = case unsafePerformIO (getClosureData a) of
where tipe = unsafePerformIO (getClosureType a)
-}
isPointed :: Type -> Bool
-isPointed t | Just (t, _) <- splitTyConApp_maybe t = not$ isUnliftedTypeKind (tyConKind t)
+isPointed t | Just (t, _) <- splitTyConApp_maybe t
+ = not$ isUnliftedTypeKind (tyConKind t)
isPointed _ = True
extractUnboxed :: [Type] -> Closure -> [[Word]]
data TermFold a = TermFold { fTerm :: Type -> DataCon -> HValue -> [a] -> a
, fPrim :: Type -> [Word] -> a
- , fSuspension :: ClosureType -> Maybe Type -> HValue -> Maybe Name -> a
+ , fSuspension :: ClosureType -> Maybe Type -> HValue
+ -> Maybe Name -> a
}
foldTerm :: TermFold a -> Term -> a
| otherwise = parens$ ppr n <> text "::" <> ppr ty
-cPprTerm :: forall m. Monad m => ((Int->Term->m SDoc)->[Int->Term->m (Maybe SDoc)]) -> Term -> m SDoc
+cPprTerm :: forall m. Monad m =>
+ ((Int->Term->m SDoc)->[Int->Term->m (Maybe SDoc)]) -> Term -> m SDoc
cPprTerm custom = go 0 where
go prec t@Term{subTerms=tt, dc=dc} = do
let mb_customDocs = map (($t) . ($prec)) (custom go) :: [m (Maybe SDoc)]
, ifTerm (isDC doubleDataCon) (coerceShow$ \(a::Double)->a)
, ifTerm isIntegerDC (coerceShow$ \(a::Integer)->a)
]
- where ifTerm pred f p t = if pred t then liftM Just (f p t) else return Nothing
+ where ifTerm pred f p t = if pred t then liftM Just (f p t)
+ else return Nothing
isIntegerDC Term{dc=dc} =
dataConName dc `elem` [ smallIntegerDataConName
, largeIntegerDataConName]
| t == tVarPrimTyCon = "<tVar>"
| otherwise = showSDoc (char '<' <> ppr t <> char '>')
where build ww = unsafePerformIO $ withArray ww (peek . castPtr)
+-- This ^^^ relies on the representation of Haskell heap values being
+-- the same as in a C array.
+
-----------------------------------
-- Type Reconstruction
-----------------------------------
+{-
+Type Reconstruction is type inference done on heap closures.
+The algorithm walks the heap generating a set of equations, which
+are solved with syntactic unification.
+A type reconstruction equation looks like:
+
+ <datacon reptype> = <actual heap contents>
+
+The full equation set is generated by traversing all the subterms, starting
+from a given term.
+
+The only difficult part is that newtypes are only found in the lhs of equations.
+Right hand sides are missing them. We can either (a) drop them from the lhs, or
+(b) reconstruct them in the rhs when possible.
+
+The function congruenceNewtypes takes a shot at (b)
+-}
-- The Type Reconstruction monad
type TR a = TcM a
trIO :: IO a -> TR a
trIO = liftTcM . ioToTcRn
-addConstraint :: TcType -> TcType -> TR ()
-addConstraint t1 t2 = congruenceNewtypes t1 t2 >>= uncurry unifyType
-
-{-
- A parallel fold over two Type values,
- compensating for missing newtypes on both sides.
- This is necessary because newtypes are not present
- in runtime, but since sometimes there is evidence
- available we do our best to reconstruct them.
- Evidence can come from DataCon signatures or
- from compile-time type inference.
- I am using the words congruence and rewriting
- because what we are doing here is an approximation
- of unification modulo a set of equations, which would
- come from newtype definitions. These should be the
- equality coercions seen in System Fc. Rewriting
- is performed, taking those equations as rules,
- before launching unification.
-
- It doesn't make sense to rewrite everywhere,
- or we would end up with all newtypes. So we rewrite
- only in presence of evidence.
- The lhs comes from the heap structure of ptrs,nptrs.
- The rhs comes from a DataCon type signature.
- Rewriting in the rhs is restricted to the result type.
-
- Note that it is very tricky to make this 'rewriting'
- work with the unification implemented by TcM, where
- substitutions are 'inlined'. The order in which
- constraints are unified is vital for this (or I am
- using TcM wrongly).
--}
-congruenceNewtypes :: TcType -> TcType -> TcM (TcType,TcType)
-congruenceNewtypes = go True
- where
- go rewriteRHS lhs rhs
- -- TyVar lhs inductive case
- | Just tv <- getTyVar_maybe lhs
- = recoverM (return (lhs,rhs)) $ do
- Indirect ty_v <- readMetaTyVar tv
- (lhs', rhs') <- go rewriteRHS ty_v rhs
- writeMutVar (metaTvRef tv) (Indirect lhs')
- return (lhs, rhs')
- -- TyVar rhs inductive case
- | Just tv <- getTyVar_maybe rhs
- = recoverM (return (lhs,rhs)) $ do
- Indirect ty_v <- readMetaTyVar tv
- (lhs', rhs') <- go rewriteRHS lhs ty_v
- writeMutVar (metaTvRef tv) (Indirect rhs')
- return (lhs', rhs)
--- FunTy inductive case
- | Just (l1,l2) <- splitFunTy_maybe lhs
- , Just (r1,r2) <- splitFunTy_maybe rhs
- = do (l2',r2') <- go True l2 r2
- (l1',r1') <- go False l1 r1
- return (mkFunTy l1' l2', mkFunTy r1' r2')
--- TyconApp Inductive case; this is the interesting bit.
- | Just (tycon_l, args_l) <- splitNewTyConApp_maybe lhs
- , Just (tycon_r, args_r) <- splitNewTyConApp_maybe rhs = do
-
- let (tycon_l',args_l') = if isNewTyCon tycon_r && not(isNewTyCon tycon_l)
- then (tycon_r, rewrite tycon_r lhs)
- else (tycon_l, args_l)
- (tycon_r',args_r') = if rewriteRHS && isNewTyCon tycon_l && not(isNewTyCon tycon_r)
- then (tycon_l, rewrite tycon_l rhs)
- else (tycon_r, args_r)
- (args_l'', args_r'') <- unzip `liftM` zipWithM (go rewriteRHS) args_l' args_r'
- return (mkTyConApp tycon_l' args_l'', mkTyConApp tycon_r' args_r'')
-
- | otherwise = return (lhs,rhs)
-
- where rewrite newtyped_tc lame_tipe
- | (tvs, tipe) <- newTyConRep newtyped_tc
- = case tcUnifyTys (const BindMe) [tipe] [lame_tipe] of
- Just subst -> substTys subst (map mkTyVarTy tvs)
- otherwise -> panic "congruenceNewtypes: Can't unify a newtype"
+liftTcM = id
newVar :: Kind -> TR TcTyVar
newVar = liftTcM . newFlexiTyVar
-liftTcM = id
-
-- | Returns the instantiated type scheme ty', and the substitution sigma
-- such that sigma(ty') = ty
instScheme :: Type -> TR (TcType, TvSubst)
(tvs',theta,ty') <- tcInstType (mapM tcInstTyVar) ty
return (ty', zipTopTvSubst tvs' (mkTyVarTys tvs))
+-- Adds a constraint of the form t1 == t2
+-- t1 is expected to come from walking the heap
+-- t2 is expected to come from a datacon signature
+-- Before unification, congruenceNewtypes needs to
+-- do its magic.
+addConstraint :: TcType -> TcType -> TR ()
+addConstraint t1 t2 = congruenceNewtypes t1 t2 >>= uncurry unifyType
+
+
+
+-- Type & Term reconstruction
cvObtainTerm :: HscEnv -> Bool -> Maybe Type -> HValue -> IO Term
cvObtainTerm hsc_env force mb_ty hval = runTR hsc_env $ do
tv <- liftM mkTyVarTy (newVar argTypeKind)
return$ mapTermType (substTy rev_subst) term
where
go tv ty a = do
- let monomorphic = not(isTyVarTy tv) -- This is a convention. The ancestor tests for
- -- monomorphism and passes a type instead of a tv
+ let monomorphic = not(isTyVarTy tv)
+ -- This ^^^ is a convention. The ancestor tests for
+ -- monomorphism and passes a type instead of a tv
clos <- trIO $ getClosureData a
case tipe clos of
-- Thunks we may want to force
case m_dc of
Nothing -> panic "Can't find the DataCon for a term"
Just dc -> do
- let extra_args = length(dataConRepArgTys dc) - length(dataConOrigArgTys dc)
+ let extra_args = length(dataConRepArgTys dc) -
+ length(dataConOrigArgTys dc)
subTtypes = matchSubTypes dc ty
(subTtypesP, subTtypesNP) = partition isPointed subTtypes
subTermTvs <- sequence
- [ if isMonomorphic t then return t else (mkTyVarTy `fmap` newVar k)
+ [ if isMonomorphic t then return t
+ else (mkTyVarTy `fmap` newVar k)
| (t,k) <- zip subTtypesP (map typeKind subTtypesP)]
- -- It is vital for newtype reconstruction that the unification step is done
- -- right here, _before_ the subterms are RTTI reconstructed.
+ -- It is vital for newtype reconstruction that the unification step
+ -- is done right here, _before_ the subterms are RTTI reconstructed
when (not monomorphic) $ do
- let myType = mkFunTys (reOrderTerms subTermTvs subTtypesNP subTtypes) tv
- instScheme(dataConRepType dc) >>= addConstraint myType . fst
- subTermsP <- sequence $ drop extra_args -- all extra arguments are pointed
+ let myType = mkFunTys (reOrderTerms subTermTvs
+ subTtypesNP
+ subTtypes)
+ tv
+ (signatureType,_) <- instScheme(dataConRepType dc)
+ addConstraint myType signatureType
+ subTermsP <- sequence $ drop extra_args
+ -- ^^^ all extra arguments are pointed
[ appArr (go tv t) (ptrs clos) i
| (i,tv,t) <- zip3 [0..] subTermTvs subTtypesP]
let unboxeds = extractUnboxed subTtypesNP clos
subTermsNP = map (uncurry Prim) (zip subTtypesNP unboxeds)
- subTerms = reOrderTerms subTermsP subTermsNP (drop extra_args subTtypes)
+ subTerms = reOrderTerms subTermsP subTermsNP
+ (drop extra_args subTtypes)
return (Term tv dc a subTerms)
-- The otherwise case: can be a Thunk,AP,PAP,etc.
otherwise ->
matchSubTypes dc ty
| Just (_,ty_args) <- splitTyConApp_maybe (repType ty)
- , null (dataConExTyVars dc) --TODO Handle the case of extra existential tyvars
+ , null (dataConExTyVars dc) --TODO case of extra existential tyvars
= dataConInstArgTys dc ty_args
| otherwise = dataConRepArgTys dc
reOrderTerms _ _ [] = []
reOrderTerms pointed unpointed (ty:tys)
| isPointed ty = ASSERT2(not(null pointed)
- , ptext SLIT("reOrderTerms") $$ (ppr pointed $$ ppr unpointed))
+ , ptext SLIT("reOrderTerms") $$
+ (ppr pointed $$ ppr unpointed))
head pointed : reOrderTerms (tail pointed) unpointed tys
| otherwise = ASSERT2(not(null unpointed)
- , ptext SLIT("reOrderTerms") $$ (ppr pointed $$ ppr unpointed))
+ , ptext SLIT("reOrderTerms") $$
+ (ppr pointed $$ ppr unpointed))
head unpointed : reOrderTerms pointed (tail unpointed) tys
--- Strict application of f at index i
-appArr f (Array _ _ ptrs#) (I# i#) = case indexArray# ptrs# i# of
- (# e #) -> f e
--- Fast, breadth-first version of obtainTerm that deals only with type reconstruction
+
+-- Fast, breadth-first Type reconstruction
+
cvReconstructType :: HscEnv -> Bool -> Maybe Type -> HValue -> IO Type
cvReconstructType hsc_env force mb_ty hval = runTR hsc_env $ do
tv <- liftM mkTyVarTy (newVar argTypeKind)
case mb_ty of
- Nothing -> search (isMonomorphic `fmap` zonkTcType tv) (++) [(tv, hval)] >>
- zonkTcType tv -- TODO untested!
+ Nothing -> do search (isMonomorphic `fmap` zonkTcType tv)
+ (uncurry go)
+ [(tv, hval)]
+ zonkTcType tv -- TODO untested!
Just ty | isMonomorphic ty -> return ty
Just ty -> do
(ty',rev_subst) <- instScheme (sigmaType ty)
addConstraint tv ty'
- search (isMonomorphic `fmap` zonkTcType tv) (++) [(tv, hval)]
+ search (isMonomorphic `fmap` zonkTcType tv)
+ (uncurry go)
+ [(tv, hval)]
substTy rev_subst `fmap` zonkTcType tv
where
-- search :: m Bool -> ([a] -> [a] -> [a]) -> [a] -> m ()
- search stop combine [] = return ()
- search stop combine ((t,a):jj) = (jj `combine`) `fmap` go t a >>=
- unlessM stop . search stop combine
+ search stop expand [] = return ()
+ search stop expand (x:xx) = do new <- expand x
+ unlessM stop $ search stop expand (xx ++ new)
- -- returns unification tasks, since we are going to want a breadth-first search
+ -- returns unification tasks,since we are going to want a breadth-first search
go :: Type -> HValue -> TR [(Type, HValue)]
go tv a = do
clos <- trIO $ getClosureData a
case m_dc of
Nothing -> panic "Can't find the DataCon for a term"
Just dc -> do
- let extra_args = length(dataConRepArgTys dc) - length(dataConOrigArgTys dc)
+ let extra_args = length(dataConRepArgTys dc) -
+ length(dataConOrigArgTys dc)
subTtypes <- mapMif (not . isMonomorphic)
(\t -> mkTyVarTy `fmap` newVar (typeKind t))
(dataConRepArgTys dc)
- -- It is vital for newtype reconstruction that the unification step is done
- -- right here, _before_ the subterms are RTTI reconstructed.
+ -- It is vital for newtype reconstruction that the unification step
+ -- is done right here, _before_ the subterms are RTTI reconstructed
let myType = mkFunTys subTtypes tv
- fst `fmap` instScheme(dataConRepType dc) >>= addConstraint myType
- return $map (\(I# i#,t) -> case ptrs clos of
- (Array _ _ ptrs#) -> case indexArray# ptrs# i# of
- (# e #) -> (t,e))
+ signatureType <- instScheme(dataConRepType dc)
+ addConstraint myType signatureType
+ return $ map (\(I# i#,t) -> case ptrs clos of
+ (Array _ _ ptrs#) -> case indexArray# ptrs# i# of
+ (# e #) -> (t,e))
(drop extra_args $ zip [0..] subTtypes)
otherwise -> return []
+-- Dealing with newtypes
+{-
+ A parallel fold over two Type values,
+ compensating for missing newtypes on both sides.
+ This is necessary because newtypes are not present
+ in runtime, but since sometimes there is evidence
+ available we do our best to reconstruct them.
+ Evidence can come from DataCon signatures or
+ from compile-time type inference.
+ I am using the words congruence and rewriting
+ because what we are doing here is an approximation
+ of unification modulo a set of equations, which would
+ come from newtype definitions. These should be the
+ equality coercions seen in System Fc. Rewriting
+ is performed, taking those equations as rules,
+ before launching unification.
+
+ It doesn't make sense to rewrite everywhere,
+ or we would end up with all newtypes. So we rewrite
+ only in presence of evidence.
+ The lhs comes from the heap structure of ptrs,nptrs.
+ The rhs comes from a DataCon type signature.
+ Rewriting in the rhs is restricted to the result type.
+
+ Note that it is very tricky to make this 'rewriting'
+ work with the unification implemented by TcM, where
+ substitutions are 'inlined'. The order in which
+ constraints are unified is vital for this (or I am
+ using TcM wrongly).
+-}
+congruenceNewtypes :: TcType -> TcType -> TcM (TcType,TcType)
+congruenceNewtypes = go True
+ where
+ go rewriteRHS lhs rhs
+ -- TyVar lhs inductive case
+ | Just tv <- getTyVar_maybe lhs
+ = recoverM (return (lhs,rhs)) $ do
+ Indirect ty_v <- readMetaTyVar tv
+ (lhs', rhs') <- go rewriteRHS ty_v rhs
+ writeMutVar (metaTvRef tv) (Indirect lhs')
+ return (lhs, rhs')
+ -- TyVar rhs inductive case
+ | Just tv <- getTyVar_maybe rhs
+ = recoverM (return (lhs,rhs)) $ do
+ Indirect ty_v <- readMetaTyVar tv
+ (lhs', rhs') <- go rewriteRHS lhs ty_v
+ writeMutVar (metaTvRef tv) (Indirect rhs')
+ return (lhs', rhs)
+-- FunTy inductive case
+ | Just (l1,l2) <- splitFunTy_maybe lhs
+ , Just (r1,r2) <- splitFunTy_maybe rhs
+ = do (l2',r2') <- go True l2 r2
+ (l1',r1') <- go False l1 r1
+ return (mkFunTy l1' l2', mkFunTy r1' r2')
+-- TyconApp Inductive case; this is the interesting bit.
+ | Just (tycon_l, args_l) <- splitNewTyConApp_maybe lhs
+ , Just (tycon_r, args_r) <- splitNewTyConApp_maybe rhs = do
+
+ let (tycon_l',args_l') = if isNewTyCon tycon_r && not(isNewTyCon tycon_l)
+ then (tycon_r, rewrite tycon_r lhs)
+ else (tycon_l, args_l)
+ (tycon_r',args_r') = if rewriteRHS && isNewTyCon tycon_l &&
+ not(isNewTyCon tycon_r)
+ then (tycon_l, rewrite tycon_l rhs)
+ else (tycon_r, args_r)
+ (args_l'', args_r'') <- unzip `liftM` zipWithM (go rewriteRHS)
+ args_l'
+ args_r'
+ return (mkTyConApp tycon_l' args_l'', mkTyConApp tycon_r' args_r'')
+
+ | otherwise = return (lhs,rhs)
+
+ where rewrite newtyped_tc lame_tipe
+ | (tvs, tipe) <- newTyConRep newtyped_tc
+ = case tcUnifyTys (const BindMe) [tipe] [lame_tipe] of
+ Just subst -> substTys subst (map mkTyVarTy tvs)
+ otherwise -> panic "congruenceNewtypes: Can't unify a newtype"
+
+
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
isMonomorphic ty | (tvs, ty') <- splitForAllTys ty
= null tvs && (isEmptyVarSet . tyVarsOfType) ty'
unlessM condM acc = condM >>= \c -> unless c acc
+-- Strict application of f at index i
+appArr f (Array _ _ ptrs#) (I# i#) = case indexArray# ptrs# i# of
+ (# e #) -> f e
+
zonkTerm :: Term -> TcM Term
zonkTerm = foldTerm idTermFoldM {
fTerm = \ty dc v tt -> sequence tt >>= \tt ->
-- Generalize the type: find all free tyvars and wrap in the appropiate ForAll.
sigmaType ty = mkForAllTys (varSetElems$ tyVarsOfType (dropForAlls ty)) ty
-{-
-Example of Type Reconstruction
---------------------------------
-Suppose we have an existential type such as
-
-data Opaque = forall a. Opaque a
-
-And we have a term built as:
-
-t = Opaque (map Just [[1,1],[2,2]])
-
-The type of t as far as the typechecker goes is t :: Opaque
-If we seq the head of t, we obtain:
-
-t - O (_1::a)
-
-seq _1 ()
-
-t - O ( (_3::b) : (_4::[b]) )
-
-seq _3 ()
-
-t - O ( (Just (_5::c)) : (_4::[b]) )
-At this point, we know that b = (Maybe c)
-
-seq _5 ()
-
-t - O ( (Just ((_6::d) : (_7::[d]) )) : (_4::[b]) )
-
-At this point, we know that c = [d]
-
-seq _6 ()
-
-t - O ( (Just (1 : (_7::[d]) )) : (_4::[b]) )
-
-At this point, we know that d = Integer
-
-The fully reconstructed expressions, with propagation, would be:
-
-t - O ( (Just (_5::c)) : (_4::[Maybe c]) )
-t - O ( (Just ((_6::d) : (_7::[d]) )) : (_4::[Maybe [d]]) )
-t - O ( (Just (1 : (_7::[Integer]) )) : (_4::[Maybe [Integer]]) )
-
-
-For reference, the type of the thing inside the opaque is
-map Just [[1,1],[2,2]] :: [Maybe [Integer]]
-
-NOTE: (Num t) contexts have been manually replaced by Integer for clarity
--}
projects / ghc-hetmet.git / blobdiff