Finish #3439: -ticky implies -debug at link time; the ticky "way" has gone

[ghc-hetmet.git] / compiler / main / DynFlags.hs

diff --git a/compiler/main/DynFlags.hs b/compiler/main/DynFlags.hs
index f7a5d4a..ab9d821 100644 (file)
--- a/compiler/main/DynFlags.hs
+++ b/compiler/main/DynFlags.hs
@@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ data DynFlags = DynFlags {
   maxSimplIterations    :: Int,         -- ^ Max simplifier iterations
   shouldDumpSimplPhase  :: SimplifierMode -> Bool,
   ruleCheck             :: Maybe String,
+  strictnessBefore      :: [Int],       -- ^ Additional demand analysis
 
   specConstrThreshold   :: Maybe Int,   -- ^ Threshold for SpecConstr
   specConstrCount       :: Maybe Int,   -- ^ Max number of specialisations for any one function
@@ -545,7 +546,9 @@ isNoLink _      = False
 -- Is it worth evaluating this Bool and caching it in the DynFlags value
 -- during initDynFlags?
 doingTickyProfiling :: DynFlags -> Bool
-doingTickyProfiling dflags = WayTicky `elem` wayNames dflags
+doingTickyProfiling _ = opt_Ticky
+  -- XXX -ticky is a static flag, because it implies -debug which is also
+  -- static.  If the way flags were made dynamic, we could fix this.
 
 data PackageFlag
   = ExposePackage  String
@@ -606,6 +609,8 @@ defaultDynFlags =
         specConstrThreshold     = Just 200,
         specConstrCount         = Just 3,
         liberateCaseThreshold   = Just 200,
+        strictnessBefore        = [],
+
 #ifndef OMIT_NATIVE_CODEGEN
         targetPlatform          = defaultTargetPlatform,
 #endif
@@ -1066,9 +1071,13 @@ getCoreToDo dflags
 
     maybe_rule_check phase = runMaybe rule_check (CoreDoRuleCheck phase)
 
+    maybe_strictness_before phase
+      = runWhen (phase `elem` strictnessBefore dflags) CoreDoStrictness
+
     simpl_phase phase names iter
       = CoreDoPasses
-          [ CoreDoSimplify (SimplPhase phase names) [
+          [ maybe_strictness_before phase,
+            CoreDoSimplify (SimplPhase phase names) [
               MaxSimplifierIterations iter
             ],
             maybe_rule_check phase
@@ -1559,6 +1568,10 @@ dynamic_flags = [
          (IntSuffix $ \n -> upd $ \dfs -> dfs{ ctxtStkDepth = n })
          Supported
 
+  , Flag "fstrictness-before"
+         (IntSuffix (\n -> upd (\dfs -> dfs{ strictnessBefore = n : strictnessBefore dfs })))
+         Supported
+
         ------ Profiling ----------------------------------------------------
 
   -- XXX Should the -f* flags be deprecated?
@@ -1800,7 +1813,8 @@ xFlags = [
   ( "LiberalTypeSynonyms",              Opt_LiberalTypeSynonyms, const Supported ),
   ( "Rank2Types",                       Opt_Rank2Types, const Supported ),
   ( "RankNTypes",                       Opt_RankNTypes, const Supported ),
-  ( "ImpredicativeTypes",               Opt_ImpredicativeTypes, const Supported ),
+  ( "ImpredicativeTypes",               Opt_ImpredicativeTypes, 
+        const $ Deprecated "impredicative polymorphism will be simplified or removed in GHC 6.14" ),
   ( "TypeOperators",                    Opt_TypeOperators, const Supported ),
   ( "RecursiveDo",                      Opt_RecursiveDo,
     deprecatedForLanguage "DoRec"),