-
---------------------
-splitInlineCont :: SimplCont -> Maybe (SimplCont, SimplCont)
--- Returns Nothing if the continuation should dissolve an InlineMe Note
--- Return Just (c1,c2) otherwise,
--- where c1 is the continuation to put inside the InlineMe
--- and c2 outside
-
--- Example: (__inline_me__ (/\a. e)) ty
--- Here we want to do the beta-redex without dissolving the InlineMe
--- See test simpl017 (and Trac #1627) for a good example of why this is important
-
-splitInlineCont (ApplyTo dup (Type ty) se c)
- | Just (c1, c2) <- splitInlineCont c = Just (ApplyTo dup (Type ty) se c1, c2)
-splitInlineCont cont@(Stop {}) = Just (mkBoringStop, cont)
-splitInlineCont cont@(StrictBind {}) = Just (mkBoringStop, cont)
-splitInlineCont _ = Nothing
- -- NB: we dissolve an InlineMe in any strict context,
- -- not just function aplication.
- -- E.g. foldr k z (__inline_me (case x of p -> build ...))
- -- Here we want to get rid of the __inline_me__ so we
- -- can float the case, and see foldr/build
- --
- -- However *not* in a strict RHS, else we get
- -- let f = __inline_me__ (\x. e) in ...f...
- -- Now if f is guaranteed to be called, hence a strict binding
- -- we don't thereby want to dissolve the __inline_me__; for
- -- example, 'f' might be a wrapper, so we'd inline the worker
-\end{code}
-
-
-\begin{code}
-interestingArg :: OutExpr -> Bool
- -- An argument is interesting if it has *some* structure
- -- We are here trying to avoid unfolding a function that
- -- is applied only to variables that have no unfolding
- -- (i.e. they are probably lambda bound): f x y z
- -- There is little point in inlining f here.
-interestingArg (Var v) = hasSomeUnfolding (idUnfolding v)
- -- Was: isValueUnfolding (idUnfolding v')
- -- But that seems over-pessimistic
- || isDataConWorkId v
- -- This accounts for an argument like
- -- () or [], which is definitely interesting
-interestingArg (Type _) = False
-interestingArg (App fn (Type _)) = interestingArg fn
-interestingArg (Note _ a) = interestingArg a
-
--- Idea (from Sam B); I'm not sure if it's a good idea, so commented out for now
--- interestingArg expr | isUnLiftedType (exprType expr)
--- -- Unlifted args are only ever interesting if we know what they are
--- = case expr of
--- Lit lit -> True
--- _ -> False
-
-interestingArg _ = True
- -- Consider let x = 3 in f x
- -- The substitution will contain (x -> ContEx 3), and we want to
- -- to say that x is an interesting argument.
- -- But consider also (\x. f x y) y
- -- The substitution will contain (x -> ContEx y), and we want to say
- -- that x is not interesting (assuming y has no unfolding)
projects / ghc-hetmet.git / blobdiff