import SimplEnv
import SimplUtils
import MkId ( rUNTIME_ERROR_ID )
+import FamInstEnv ( FamInstEnv )
import Id
import Var
import IdInfo
-> SimplM SimplEnv
simplNonRecX env bndr new_rhs
+ | isDeadBinder bndr -- Not uncommon; e.g. case (a,b) of b { (p,q) -> p }
+ = return env -- Here b is dead, and we avoid creating
+ | otherwise -- the binding b = (a,b)
= do { (env', bndr') <- simplBinder env bndr
; completeNonRecX env' (isStrictId bndr) bndr bndr' new_rhs }
%* *
%************************************************************************
-Blob of helper functions for the "case-of-something-else" situation.
+Note [Case elimination]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+The case-elimination transformation discards redundant case expressions.
+Start with a simple situation:
+
+ case x# of ===> e[x#/y#]
+ y# -> e
+
+(when x#, y# are of primitive type, of course). We can't (in general)
+do this for algebraic cases, because we might turn bottom into
+non-bottom!
+
+The code in SimplUtils.prepareAlts has the effect of generalise this
+idea to look for a case where we're scrutinising a variable, and we
+know that only the default case can match. For example:
+
+ case x of
+ 0# -> ...
+ DEFAULT -> ...(case x of
+ 0# -> ...
+ DEFAULT -> ...) ...
+
+Here the inner case is first trimmed to have only one alternative, the
+DEFAULT, after which it's an instance of the previous case. This
+really only shows up in eliminating error-checking code.
+
+We also make sure that we deal with this very common case:
+
+ case e of
+ x -> ...x...
+
+Here we are using the case as a strict let; if x is used only once
+then we want to inline it. We have to be careful that this doesn't
+make the program terminate when it would have diverged before, so we
+check that
+ - e is already evaluated (it may so if e is a variable)
+ - x is used strictly, or
+
+Lastly, the code in SimplUtils.mkCase combines identical RHSs. So
+
+ case e of ===> case e of DEFAULT -> r
+ True -> r
+ False -> r
+
+Now again the case may be elminated by the CaseElim transformation.
+
+
+Further notes about case elimination
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Consider: test :: Integer -> IO ()
+ test = print
+
+Turns out that this compiles to:
+ Print.test
+ = \ eta :: Integer
+ eta1 :: State# RealWorld ->
+ case PrelNum.< eta PrelNum.zeroInteger of wild { __DEFAULT ->
+ case hPutStr stdout
+ (PrelNum.jtos eta ($w[] @ Char))
+ eta1
+ of wild1 { (# new_s, a4 #) -> PrelIO.lvl23 new_s }}
+
+Notice the strange '<' which has no effect at all. This is a funny one.
+It started like this:
+
+f x y = if x < 0 then jtos x
+ else if y==0 then "" else jtos x
+
+At a particular call site we have (f v 1). So we inline to get
+
+ if v < 0 then jtos x
+ else if 1==0 then "" else jtos x
+
+Now simplify the 1==0 conditional:
+
+ if v<0 then jtos v else jtos v
+
+Now common-up the two branches of the case:
+
+ case (v<0) of DEFAULT -> jtos v
+
+Why don't we drop the case? Because it's strict in v. It's technically
+wrong to drop even unnecessary evaluations, and in practice they
+may be a result of 'seq' so we *definitely* don't want to drop those.
+I don't really know how to improve this situation.
\begin{code}
---------------------------------------------------------
rebuildCase env scrut case_bndr [(_, bndrs, rhs)] cont
-- See if we can get rid of the case altogether
- -- See the extensive notes on case-elimination above
+ -- See Note [Case eliminiation]
-- mkCase made sure that if all the alternatives are equal,
-- then there is now only one (DEFAULT) rhs
| all isDeadBinder bndrs -- bndrs are [InId]
way, there's a chance that v will now only be used once, and hence
inlined.
-Note [no-case-of-case]
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-We *used* to suppress the binder-swap in case expressoins when
--fno-case-of-case is on. Old remarks:
- "This happens in the first simplifier pass,
- and enhances full laziness. Here's the bad case:
- f = \ y -> ...(case x of I# v -> ...(case x of ...) ... )
- If we eliminate the inner case, we trap it inside the I# v -> arm,
- which might prevent some full laziness happening. I've seen this
- in action in spectral/cichelli/Prog.hs:
- [(m,n) | m <- [1..max], n <- [1..max]]
- Hence the check for NoCaseOfCase."
-However, now the full-laziness pass itself reverses the binder-swap, so this
-check is no longer necessary.
-
-Note [Suppressing the case binder-swap]
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-There is another situation when it might make sense to suppress the
-case-expression binde-swap. If we have
-
- case x of w1 { DEFAULT -> case x of w2 { A -> e1; B -> e2 }
- ...other cases .... }
-
-We'll perform the binder-swap for the outer case, giving
-
- case x of w1 { DEFAULT -> case w1 of w2 { A -> e1; B -> e2 }
- ...other cases .... }
-
-But there is no point in doing it for the inner case, because w1 can't
-be inlined anyway. Furthermore, doing the case-swapping involves
-zapping w2's occurrence info (see paragraphs that follow), and that
-forces us to bind w2 when doing case merging. So we get
-
- case x of w1 { A -> let w2 = w1 in e1
- B -> let w2 = w1 in e2
- ...other cases .... }
-
-This is plain silly in the common case where w2 is dead.
-
-Even so, I can't see a good way to implement this idea. I tried
-not doing the binder-swap if the scrutinee was already evaluated
-but that failed big-time:
-
- data T = MkT !Int
-
- case v of w { MkT x ->
- case x of x1 { I# y1 ->
- case x of x2 { I# y2 -> ...
-
-Notice that because MkT is strict, x is marked "evaluated". But to
-eliminate the last case, we must either make sure that x (as well as
-x1) has unfolding MkT y1. THe straightforward thing to do is to do
-the binder-swap. So this whole note is a no-op.
+Historical note: we use to do the "case binder swap" in the Simplifier
+so there were additional complications if the scrutinee was a variable.
+Now the binder-swap stuff is done in the occurrence analyer; see
+OccurAnal Note [Binder swap].
Note [zapOccInfo]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-If we replace the scrutinee, v, by tbe case binder, then we have to nuke
-any occurrence info (eg IAmDead) in the case binder, because the
-case-binder now effectively occurs whenever v does. AND we have to do
-the same for the pattern-bound variables! Example:
-
- (case x of { (a,b) -> a }) (case x of { (p,q) -> q })
-
-Here, b and p are dead. But when we move the argment inside the first
-case RHS, and eliminate the second case, we get
-
- case x of { (a,b) -> a b }
-
-Urk! b is alive! Reason: the scrutinee was a variable, and case elimination
-happened.
-
-Indeed, this can happen anytime the case binder isn't dead:
+If the case binder is not dead, then neither are the pattern bound
+variables:
case <any> of x { (a,b) ->
case x of { (p,q) -> p } }
Here (a,b) both look dead, but come alive after the inner case is eliminated.
after the outer case, and that makes (a,b) alive. At least we do unless
the case binder is guaranteed dead.
-Note [Case of cast]
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-Consider case (v `cast` co) of x { I# ->
- ... (case (v `cast` co) of {...}) ...
-We'd like to eliminate the inner case. We can get this neatly by
-arranging that inside the outer case we add the unfolding
- v |-> x `cast` (sym co)
-to v. Then we should inline v at the inner case, cancel the casts, and away we go
-
Note [Improving seq]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider
(Otherwise, there's a danger that we'll simply drop the 'seq' altogether, before
LiberateCase gets to see it.)
-Note [Case elimination]
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-The case-elimination transformation discards redundant case expressions.
-Start with a simple situation:
-
- case x# of ===> e[x#/y#]
- y# -> e
-
-(when x#, y# are of primitive type, of course). We can't (in general)
-do this for algebraic cases, because we might turn bottom into
-non-bottom!
-
-The code in SimplUtils.prepareAlts has the effect of generalise this
-idea to look for a case where we're scrutinising a variable, and we
-know that only the default case can match. For example:
-
- case x of
- 0# -> ...
- DEFAULT -> ...(case x of
- 0# -> ...
- DEFAULT -> ...) ...
-
-Here the inner case is first trimmed to have only one alternative, the
-DEFAULT, after which it's an instance of the previous case. This
-really only shows up in eliminating error-checking code.
-
-We also make sure that we deal with this very common case:
-
- case e of
- x -> ...x...
-
-Here we are using the case as a strict let; if x is used only once
-then we want to inline it. We have to be careful that this doesn't
-make the program terminate when it would have diverged before, so we
-check that
- - e is already evaluated (it may so if e is a variable)
- - x is used strictly, or
-
-Lastly, the code in SimplUtils.mkCase combines identical RHSs. So
-
- case e of ===> case e of DEFAULT -> r
- True -> r
- False -> r
-
-Now again the case may be elminated by the CaseElim transformation.
+Historical note [no-case-of-case]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+We *used* to suppress the binder-swap in case expressoins when
+-fno-case-of-case is on. Old remarks:
+ "This happens in the first simplifier pass,
+ and enhances full laziness. Here's the bad case:
+ f = \ y -> ...(case x of I# v -> ...(case x of ...) ... )
+ If we eliminate the inner case, we trap it inside the I# v -> arm,
+ which might prevent some full laziness happening. I've seen this
+ in action in spectral/cichelli/Prog.hs:
+ [(m,n) | m <- [1..max], n <- [1..max]]
+ Hence the check for NoCaseOfCase."
+However, now the full-laziness pass itself reverses the binder-swap, so this
+check is no longer necessary.
-Further notes about case elimination
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-Consider: test :: Integer -> IO ()
- test = print
+Historical note [Suppressing the case binder-swap]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+There is another situation when it might make sense to suppress the
+case-expression binde-swap. If we have
-Turns out that this compiles to:
- Print.test
- = \ eta :: Integer
- eta1 :: State# RealWorld ->
- case PrelNum.< eta PrelNum.zeroInteger of wild { __DEFAULT ->
- case hPutStr stdout
- (PrelNum.jtos eta ($w[] @ Char))
- eta1
- of wild1 { (# new_s, a4 #) -> PrelIO.lvl23 new_s }}
+ case x of w1 { DEFAULT -> case x of w2 { A -> e1; B -> e2 }
+ ...other cases .... }
-Notice the strange '<' which has no effect at all. This is a funny one.
-It started like this:
+We'll perform the binder-swap for the outer case, giving
-f x y = if x < 0 then jtos x
- else if y==0 then "" else jtos x
+ case x of w1 { DEFAULT -> case w1 of w2 { A -> e1; B -> e2 }
+ ...other cases .... }
-At a particular call site we have (f v 1). So we inline to get
+But there is no point in doing it for the inner case, because w1 can't
+be inlined anyway. Furthermore, doing the case-swapping involves
+zapping w2's occurrence info (see paragraphs that follow), and that
+forces us to bind w2 when doing case merging. So we get
- if v < 0 then jtos x
- else if 1==0 then "" else jtos x
+ case x of w1 { A -> let w2 = w1 in e1
+ B -> let w2 = w1 in e2
+ ...other cases .... }
-Now simplify the 1==0 conditional:
+This is plain silly in the common case where w2 is dead.
- if v<0 then jtos v else jtos v
+Even so, I can't see a good way to implement this idea. I tried
+not doing the binder-swap if the scrutinee was already evaluated
+but that failed big-time:
-Now common-up the two branches of the case:
+ data T = MkT !Int
- case (v<0) of DEFAULT -> jtos v
+ case v of w { MkT x ->
+ case x of x1 { I# y1 ->
+ case x of x2 { I# y2 -> ...
-Why don't we drop the case? Because it's strict in v. It's technically
-wrong to drop even unnecessary evaluations, and in practice they
-may be a result of 'seq' so we *definitely* don't want to drop those.
-I don't really know how to improve this situation.
+Notice that because MkT is strict, x is marked "evaluated". But to
+eliminate the last case, we must either make sure that x (as well as
+x1) has unfolding MkT y1. THe straightforward thing to do is to do
+the binder-swap. So this whole note is a no-op.
\begin{code}
-simplCaseBinder :: SimplEnv -> OutExpr -> OutId -> [InAlt]
- -> SimplM (SimplEnv, OutExpr, OutId)
-simplCaseBinder env0 scrut0 case_bndr0 alts
- = do { (env1, case_bndr1) <- simplBinder env0 case_bndr0
-
- ; fam_envs <- getFamEnvs
- ; (env2, scrut2, case_bndr2) <- improve_seq fam_envs env1 scrut0
- case_bndr0 case_bndr1 alts
- -- Note [Improving seq]
-
- ; let (env3, case_bndr3) = improve_case_bndr env2 scrut2 case_bndr2
- -- Note [Case of cast]
-
- ; return (env3, scrut2, case_bndr3) }
- where
-
- improve_seq fam_envs env scrut case_bndr case_bndr1 [(DEFAULT,_,_)]
- | Just (co, ty2) <- topNormaliseType fam_envs (idType case_bndr1)
- = do { case_bndr2 <- newId (fsLit "nt") ty2
- ; let rhs = DoneEx (Var case_bndr2 `Cast` mkSymCoercion co)
- env2 = extendIdSubst env case_bndr rhs
- ; return (env2, scrut `Cast` co, case_bndr2) }
-
- improve_seq _ env scrut _ case_bndr1 _
- = return (env, scrut, case_bndr1)
-
-
+improveSeq :: (FamInstEnv, FamInstEnv) -> SimplEnv
+ -> OutExpr -> InId -> OutId -> [InAlt]
+ -> SimplM (SimplEnv, OutExpr, OutId)
+-- Note [Improving seq]
+improveSeq fam_envs env scrut case_bndr case_bndr1 [(DEFAULT,_,_)]
+ | Just (co, ty2) <- topNormaliseType fam_envs (idType case_bndr1)
+ = do { case_bndr2 <- newId (fsLit "nt") ty2
+ ; let rhs = DoneEx (Var case_bndr2 `Cast` mkSymCoercion co)
+ env2 = extendIdSubst env case_bndr rhs
+ ; return (env2, scrut `Cast` co, case_bndr2) }
+
+improveSeq _ env scrut _ case_bndr1 _
+ = return (env, scrut, case_bndr1)
+
+{-
improve_case_bndr env scrut case_bndr
-- See Note [no-case-of-case]
-- | switchIsOn (getSwitchChecker env) NoCaseOfCase
_ -> (env, case_bndr)
where
- case_bndr' = zapOccInfo case_bndr
+ case_bndr' = zapIdOccInfo case_bndr
env1 = modifyInScope env case_bndr case_bndr'
-
-
-zapOccInfo :: InId -> InId -- See Note [zapOccInfo]
-zapOccInfo b = b `setIdOccInfo` NoOccInfo
+-}
\end{code}
simplAlts env scrut case_bndr alts cont'
= -- pprTrace "simplAlts" (ppr alts $$ ppr (seIdSubst env)) $
- do { let alt_env = zapFloats env
- ; (alt_env', scrut', case_bndr') <- simplCaseBinder alt_env scrut case_bndr alts
+ do { let env0 = zapFloats env
+
+ ; (env1, case_bndr1) <- simplBinder env0 case_bndr
+
+ ; fam_envs <- getFamEnvs
+ ; (alt_env', scrut', case_bndr') <- improveSeq fam_envs env1 scrut
+ case_bndr case_bndr1 alts
- ; (imposs_deflt_cons, in_alts) <- prepareAlts alt_env' scrut case_bndr' alts
+ ; (imposs_deflt_cons, in_alts) <- prepareAlts alt_env' scrut' case_bndr' alts
; alts' <- mapM (simplAlt alt_env' imposs_deflt_cons case_bndr' cont') in_alts
; return (scrut', case_bndr', alts') }
evald_v = zapped_v `setIdUnfolding` evaldUnfolding
go _ _ = pprPanic "cat_evals" (ppr con $$ ppr vs $$ ppr the_strs)
+ -- See Note [zapOccInfo]
-- zap_occ_info: if the case binder is alive, then we add the unfolding
-- case_bndr = C vs
-- to the envt; so vs are now very much alive
-- ==> case e of t { (a,b) -> ...(a)... }
-- Look, Ma, a is alive now.
zap_occ_info | isDeadBinder case_bndr' = \ident -> ident
- | otherwise = zapOccInfo
+ | otherwise = zapIdOccInfo
addBinderUnfolding :: SimplEnv -> Id -> CoreExpr -> SimplEnv
addBinderUnfolding env bndr rhs
- = modifyInScope env bndr (bndr `setIdUnfolding` mkUnfolding False rhs)
+ = modifyInScope env (bndr `setIdUnfolding` mkUnfolding False rhs)
addBinderOtherCon :: SimplEnv -> Id -> [AltCon] -> SimplEnv
addBinderOtherCon env bndr cons
- = modifyInScope env bndr (bndr `setIdUnfolding` mkOtherCon cons)
+ = modifyInScope env (bndr `setIdUnfolding` mkOtherCon cons)
\end{code}
-- args are aready OutExprs, but bs are InIds
; env'' <- simplNonRecX env' bndr bndr_rhs
- ; -- pprTrace "knownCon2" (ppr bs $$ ppr rhs $$ ppr (seIdSubst env'')) $
- simplExprF env'' rhs cont }
+ ; simplExprF env'' rhs cont }
where
-- Ugh!
bind_args env' _ [] _ = return env'
bind_args env' dead_bndr (b:bs') (arg : args)
= ASSERT( isId b )
- do { let b' = if dead_bndr then b else zapOccInfo b
+ do { let b' = if dead_bndr then b else zapIdOccInfo b
-- Note that the binder might be "dead", because it doesn't
-- occur in the RHS; and simplNonRecX may therefore discard
-- it via postInlineUnconditionally.
projects / ghc-hetmet.git / blobdiff