-> SimplM SimplEnv
simplLazyBind env top_lvl is_rec bndr bndr1 rhs rhs_se
- = do { let rhs_env = rhs_se `setInScope` env
+ = -- pprTrace "simplLazyBind" ((ppr bndr <+> ppr bndr1) $$ ppr rhs $$ ppr (seIdSubst rhs_se)) $
+ do { let rhs_env = rhs_se `setInScope` env
(tvs, body) = case collectTyBinders rhs of
(tvs, body) | not_lam body -> (tvs,body)
| otherwise -> ([], rhs)
completeNonRecX top_lvl env is_strict old_bndr new_bndr new_rhs
= do { (env1, rhs1) <- prepareRhs top_lvl (zapFloats env) new_bndr new_rhs
- ; (env2, rhs2) <-
+ ; (env2, rhs2) <-
if doFloatFromRhs NotTopLevel NonRecursive is_strict rhs1 env1
then do { tick LetFloatFromLet
; return (addFloats env env1, rhs1) } -- Add the floats to the main env
= do { uniq <- getUniqueM
; let name = mkSystemVarName uniq (fsLit "a")
var = mkLocalIdWithInfo name expr_ty info
- ; env' <- completeNonRecX top_lvl env False var var expr
+ ; env' <- completeNonRecX top_lvl env False var var expr
; expr' <- simplVar env' var
; return (env', expr') }
-- The simplVar is needed becase we're constructing a new binding
where
act = idInlineActivation id
rule_env = updMode (updModeForInlineRules act) env
- -- See Note [Simplifying gently inside InlineRules] in SimplUtils
+ -- See Note [Simplifying inside InlineRules] in SimplUtils
simplUnfolding _ top_lvl id _occ_info new_rhs _
= return (mkUnfolding InlineRhs (isTopLevel top_lvl) (isBottomingId id) new_rhs)
| otherwise
= -- If case-of-case is off, simply simplify the case expression
-- in a vanilla Stop context, and rebuild the result around it
- do { case_expr' <- simplExprC env scrut case_cont
+ do { case_expr' <- simplExprC env scrut
+ (Select NoDup bndr alts env mkBoringStop)
; rebuild env case_expr' cont }
- where
- case_cont = Select NoDup bndr alts env mkBoringStop
simplExprF' env (Let (Rec pairs) body) cont
= do { env' <- simplRecBndrs env (map fst pairs)
StrictArg info _ cont -> rebuildCall env (info `addArgTo` expr) cont
StrictBind b bs body se cont -> do { env' <- simplNonRecX (se `setFloats` env) b expr
; simplLam env' bs body cont }
- ApplyTo _ arg se cont -> do { arg' <- simplExpr (se `setInScope` env) arg
+ ApplyTo dup_flag arg se cont -- See Note [Avoid redundant simplification]
+ | isSimplified dup_flag -> rebuild env (App expr arg) cont
+ | otherwise -> do { arg' <- simplExpr (se `setInScope` env) arg
; rebuild env (App expr arg') cont }
\end{code}
simplNonRecE env bndr (rhs, rhs_se) (bndrs, body) cont
| preInlineUnconditionally env NotTopLevel bndr rhs
= do { tick (PreInlineUnconditionally bndr)
- ; simplLam (extendIdSubst env bndr (mkContEx rhs_se rhs)) bndrs body cont }
+ ; -- pprTrace "preInlineUncond" (ppr bndr <+> ppr rhs) $
+ simplLam (extendIdSubst env bndr (mkContEx rhs_se rhs)) bndrs body cont }
| isStrictId bndr
= do { simplExprF (rhs_se `setFloats` env) rhs
rebuildCall env info@(ArgInfo { ai_encl = encl_rules
, ai_strs = str:strs, ai_discs = disc:discs })
- (ApplyTo _ arg arg_se cont)
+ (ApplyTo dup_flag arg arg_se cont)
+ | isSimplified dup_flag -- See Note [Avoid redundant simplification]
+ = rebuildCall env (addArgTo info' arg) cont
+
| str -- Strict argument
= -- pprTrace "Strict Arg" (ppr arg $$ ppr (seIdSubst env) $$ ppr (seInScope env)) $
simplExprF (arg_se `setFloats` env) arg
; mb_rule <- tryRules env rules fun args cont
; case mb_rule of {
Just (n_args, rule_rhs) -> simplExprF env' rule_rhs $
- pushArgs env' (drop n_args args) cont ;
+ pushSimplifiedArgs env' (drop n_args args) cont ;
-- n_args says how many args the rule consumed
; Nothing -> rebuild env (mkApps (Var fun) args) cont -- No rules
} }
It's very desirable to try RULES once the arguments have been simplified, because
doing so ensures that rule cascades work in one pass. Consider
{-# RULES g (h x) = k x
- f (k x) = x #-}
+ f (k x) = x #-}
...f (g (h x))...
Then we want to rewrite (g (h x)) to (k x) and only then try f's rules. If
we match f's rules against the un-simplified RHS, it won't match. This
op ($p1 ($p2 (df d)))
We want all this to unravel in one sweeep.
+Note [Avoid redundant simplification]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Because RULES apply to simplified arguments, there's a danger of repeatedly
+simplifying already-simplified arguments. An important example is that of
+ (>>=) d e1 e2
+Here e1, e2 are simplified before the rule is applied, but don't really
+participate in the rule firing. So we mark them as Simplified to avoid
+re-simplifying them.
+
Note [Shadowing]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This part of the simplifier may break the no-shadowing invariant
projects / ghc-hetmet.git / blobdiff