-- The "deriv_pred" is a LHsType to take account of the fact that for
-- newtype deriving we allow deriving (forall a. C [a]).
; mkEqnHelp DerivOrigin (tvs++deriv_tvs) cls cls_tys tc_app } }
+deriveTyData (deriv_pred, other_decl)
+ = panic "derivTyData" -- Caller ensures that only TyData can happen
------------------------------------------------------------------
mkEqnHelp orig tvs cls cls_tys tc_app
| isProductTyCon rep_tc = Nothing
| otherwise = Just why
where
- why = (pprSourceTyCon rep_tc) <+>
+ why = quotes (pprSourceTyCon rep_tc) <+>
ptext SLIT("has more than one constructor")
cond_typeableOK :: Condition
where
why = ptext SLIT("You need -fglasgow-exts to derive an instance for this class")
-std_class gla_exts clas
- = key `elem` derivableClassKeys
- || (gla_exts && (key == typeableClassKey || key == dataClassKey))
- where
- key = classKey clas
-
std_class_via_iso clas -- These standard classes can be derived for a newtype
-- using the isomorphism trick *even if no -fglasgow-exts*
= classKey clas `elem` [eqClassKey, ordClassKey, ixClassKey, boundedClassKey]
new_dfun_name clas tycon -- Just a simple wrapper
- = newDFunName clas [mkTyConApp tycon []] (getSrcLoc tycon)
+ = newDFunName clas [mkTyConApp tycon []] (getSrcSpan tycon)
-- The type passed to newDFunName is only used to generate
-- a suitable string; hence the empty type arg list
\end{code}
tycon tc_args
rep_tycon rep_tc_args
| can_derive_via_isomorphism && (gla_exts || std_class_via_iso cls)
- = do { traceTc (text "newtype deriving:" <+> ppr tycon <+> ppr rep_tys)
- ; -- Go ahead and use the isomorphism
- dfun_name <- new_dfun_name cls tycon
- ; return (Nothing, Just (InstInfo { iSpec = mk_inst_spec dfun_name,
- iBinds = NewTypeDerived ntd_info })) }
- | std_class gla_exts cls
- = mkDataTypeEqn orig gla_exts tvs cls cls_tys tycon tc_args rep_tycon rep_tc_args -- Go via bale-out route
-
- -- Otherwise its a non-standard instance
+ = do { traceTc (text "newtype deriving:" <+> ppr tycon <+> ppr rep_tys)
+ ; -- Go ahead and use the isomorphism
+ dfun_name <- new_dfun_name cls tycon
+ ; return (Nothing, Just (InstInfo { iSpec = mk_inst_spec dfun_name,
+ iBinds = NewTypeDerived ntd_info })) }
+
+ | isNothing mb_std_err -- Use the standard H98 method
+ = do { loc <- getSrcSpanM
+ ; eqn <- mk_data_eqn loc orig tvs cls tycon tc_args rep_tycon rep_tc_args
+ ; return (Just eqn, Nothing) }
+
+ -- Otherwise we can't derive
| gla_exts = baleOut cant_derive_err -- Too hard
- | otherwise = baleOut non_std_err -- Just complain about being a non-std instance
+ | otherwise = baleOut std_err -- Just complain about being a non-std instance
where
+ mb_std_err = checkSideConditions gla_exts cls cls_tys rep_tycon
+ std_err = derivingThingErr cls cls_tys tc_app $
+ vcat [fromJust mb_std_err,
+ ptext SLIT("Try -fglasgow-exts for GHC's newtype-deriving extension")]
+
-- Here is the plan for newtype derivings. We see
-- newtype T a1...an = MkT (t ak+1...an) deriving (.., C s1 .. sm, ...)
-- where t is a type,
cant_derive_err = derivingThingErr cls cls_tys tc_app
(vcat [ptext SLIT("even with cunning newtype deriving:"),
if isRecursiveTyCon tycon then
- ptext SLIT("the newtype is recursive")
+ ptext SLIT("the newtype may be recursive")
else empty,
if not right_arity then
quotes (ppr (mkClassPred cls cls_tys)) <+> ptext SLIT("does not have arity 1")
ptext SLIT("the eta-reduction property does not hold")
else empty
])
-
- non_std_err = derivingThingErr cls cls_tys tc_app
- (vcat [non_std_why cls,
- ptext SLIT("Try -fglasgow-exts for GHC's newtype-deriving extension")])
\end{code}
; setGblEnv env' thing_inside }
\end{code}
+Note [Deriving context]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+With -fglasgow-exts, we allow things like (C Int a) in the simplified
+context for a derived instance declaration, because at a use of this
+instance, we might know that a=Bool, and have an instance for (C Int
+Bool)
+
+We nevertheless insist that each predicate meets the termination
+conditions. If not, the deriving mechanism generates larger and larger
+constraints. Example:
+ data Succ a = S a
+ data Seq a = Cons a (Seq (Succ a)) | Nil deriving Show
+
+Note the lack of a Show instance for Succ. First we'll generate
+ instance (Show (Succ a), Show a) => Show (Seq a)
+and then
+ instance (Show (Succ (Succ a)), Show (Succ a), Show a) => Show (Seq a)
+and so on. Instead we want to complain of no instance for (Show (Succ a)).
+
+
%************************************************************************
%* *
\subsection[TcDeriv-normal-binds]{Bindings for the various classes}
nest 2 (ptext SLIT("Offending constraint:") <+> ppr pred)]
\end{code}
+
projects / ghc-hetmet.git / blobdiff