\begin{code}
module TcTyFuns (
- tcNormaliseFamInst,
+ -- type normalisation wrt to toplevel equalities only
+ tcNormaliseFamInst,
- normaliseGivenEqs, normaliseGivenDicts,
- normaliseWantedEqs, normaliseWantedDicts,
- solveWantedEqs,
- substEqInDictInsts,
-
- -- errors
- eqInstMisMatch, misMatchMsg,
- ) where
+ -- instance normalisation wrt to equalities
+ tcReduceEqs,
+
+ -- errors
+ misMatchMsg, failWithMisMatch,
+
+) where
#include "HsVersions.h"
import TypeRep ( Type(..) )
import TyCon
import HsSyn
+import Id
import VarEnv
+import VarSet
import Var
import Name
import Bag
import Outputable
import SrcLoc ( Located(..) )
import Maybes
+import FastString
-- standard
import Data.List
-import Control.Monad (liftM)
+import Control.Monad
\end{code}
%************************************************************************
%* *
- Normalisation of types
+ Normalisation of types wrt toplevel equality schemata
%* *
%************************************************************************
mkTyConApp coe_tc tys')
where
tys' = rep_tys ++ restTys
- coe_tc = expectJust "TcTyFun.tcUnfoldSynFamInst"
+ coe_tc = expectJust "TcTyFuns.tcUnfoldSynFamInst"
(tyConFamilyCoercion_maybe rep_tc)
}
where
then co : ty ~ ty'
\begin{code}
+-- |Normalise the given type as far as possible with toplevel equalities.
+-- This results in a coercion witnessing the type equality, in addition to the
+-- normalised type.
+--
tcNormaliseFamInst :: TcType -> TcM (CoercionI, TcType)
tcNormaliseFamInst = tcGenericNormaliseFamInst tcUnfoldSynFamInst
-
-tcNormaliseFamInstPred :: TcPredType -> TcM (CoercionI, TcPredType)
-tcNormaliseFamInstPred = tcGenericNormaliseFamInstPred tcUnfoldSynFamInst
-\end{code}
-
-Normalise a type relative to the rewrite rule implied by one EqInst or an
-already unpacked EqInst (ie, an equality rewrite rule).
-
-\begin{code}
--- Rewrite by EqInst
-tcEqInstNormaliseFamInst :: Inst -> TcType -> TcM (CoercionI, Type)
-tcEqInstNormaliseFamInst inst =
- ASSERT( isEqInst inst )
- tcEqRuleNormaliseFamInst (pat, rhs, co)
- where
- pat = eqInstLeftTy inst
- rhs = eqInstRightTy inst
- co = eqInstType inst
-
--- Rewrite by equality rewrite rule
-tcEqRuleNormaliseFamInst :: (TcType, -- rewrite rule lhs
- TcType, -- rewrite rule rhs
- TcType) -- coercion witnessing the rewrite rule
- -> TcType -- type to rewrite
- -> TcM (CoercionI, Type)
-tcEqRuleNormaliseFamInst (pat, rhs, co) ty
- = tcGenericNormaliseFamInst matchEqRule ty
- where
- matchEqRule sty | pat `tcEqType` sty = return $ Just (rhs, co)
- | otherwise = return $ Nothing
\end{code}
Generic normalisation of 'Type's and 'PredType's; ie, walk the type term and
= do { (coi,nty1) <- tcGenericNormaliseFamInst fun ty1
; return (mkForAllTyCoI tyvar coi, mkForAllTy tyvar nty1)
}
-tcGenericNormaliseFamInst fun (NoteTy note ty1)
- = do { (coi,nty1) <- tcGenericNormaliseFamInst fun ty1
- ; return (mkNoteTyCoI note coi, NoteTy note nty1)
- }
tcGenericNormaliseFamInst fun ty@(TyVarTy tv)
| isTcTyVar tv
= do { traceTc (text "tcGenericNormaliseFamInst" <+> ppr ty)
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\section{Normalisation of equality constraints}
+ Normalisation of instances wrt to equalities
%* *
%************************************************************************
-Note [Inconsistencies in equality constraints]
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-We guarantee that we raise an error if we discover any inconsistencies (i.e.,
-equalities that if presented to the unifer in TcUnify would result in an
-error) during normalisation of wanted constraints. This is especially so that
-we don't solve wanted constraints under an inconsistent given set. In
-particular, we don't want to permit signatures, such as
-
- bad :: (Int ~ Bool => Int) -> a -> a
-
\begin{code}
-normaliseGivenEqs :: [Inst] -> TcM ([Inst], TcM ())
-normaliseGivenEqs givens
- = do { traceTc (text "normaliseGivenEqs <-" <+> ppr givens)
- ; (result, deSkolem) <-
- rewriteToFixedPoint (Just ("(SkolemOccurs)", skolemOccurs))
- [ ("(ZONK)", dontRerun $ zonkInsts)
- , ("(TRIVIAL)", dontRerun $ trivialRule)
- , ("(DECOMP)", decompRule)
- , ("(TOP)", topRule)
- , ("(SUBST)", substRule) -- incl. occurs check
- ] givens
- ; traceTc (text "normaliseGivenEqs ->" <+> ppr result)
- ; return (result, deSkolem)
- }
-\end{code}
-
-\begin{code}
-normaliseWantedEqs :: [Inst] -> TcM [Inst]
-normaliseWantedEqs insts
- = do { traceTc (text "normaliseWantedEqs <-" <+> ppr insts)
- ; result <- liftM fst $ rewriteToFixedPoint Nothing
- [ ("(ZONK)", dontRerun $ zonkInsts)
- , ("(TRIVIAL)", dontRerun $ trivialRule)
- , ("(DECOMP)", decompRule)
- , ("(TOP)", topRule)
- , ("(UNIFY)", unifyMetaRule) -- incl. occurs check
- , ("(SUBST)", substRule) -- incl. occurs check
- ] insts
- ; traceTc (text "normaliseWantedEqs ->" <+> ppr result)
- ; return result
+tcReduceEqs :: [Inst] -- locals
+ -> [Inst] -- wanteds
+ -> TcM ([Inst], -- normalised locals (w/o equalities)
+ [Inst], -- normalised wanteds (including equalities)
+ TcDictBinds, -- bindings for all simplified dictionaries
+ Bool) -- whether any flexibles where instantiated
+tcReduceEqs locals wanteds
+ = do { let (local_eqs , local_dicts) = partition isEqInst locals
+ (wanteds_eqs, wanteds_dicts) = partition isEqInst wanteds
+ ; eqCfg1 <- normaliseEqs (local_eqs ++ wanteds_eqs)
+ ; eqCfg2 <- normaliseDicts False local_dicts
+ ; eqCfg3 <- normaliseDicts True wanteds_dicts
+ ; eqCfg <- propagateEqs (eqCfg1 `unionEqConfig` eqCfg2
+ `unionEqConfig` eqCfg3)
+ ; finaliseEqsAndDicts eqCfg
}
\end{code}
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\section{Solving of wanted constraints with respect to a given set}
+ Equality Configurations
%* *
%************************************************************************
-The set of given equalities must have been normalised already.
+We maintain normalised equalities together with the skolems introduced as
+intermediates during flattening of equalities as well as
+
+!!!TODO: We probably now can do without the skolem set. It's not used during
+finalisation in the current code.
\begin{code}
-solveWantedEqs :: [Inst] -- givens
- -> [Inst] -- wanteds
- -> TcM [Inst] -- irreducible wanteds
-solveWantedEqs givens wanteds
- = do { traceTc $ text "solveWantedEqs <-" <+> ppr wanteds <+> text "with" <+>
- ppr givens
- ; result <- liftM fst $ rewriteToFixedPoint Nothing
- [ ("(ZONK)", dontRerun $ zonkInsts)
- , ("(TRIVIAL)", dontRerun $ trivialRule)
- , ("(DECOMP)", decompRule)
- , ("(TOP)", topRule)
- , ("(GIVEN)", substGivens givens) -- incl. occurs check
- , ("(UNIFY)", unifyMetaRule) -- incl. occurs check
- ] wanteds
- ; traceTc (text "solveWantedEqs ->" <+> ppr result)
- ; return result
- }
- where
- -- Use `substInst' with every given on all the wanteds.
- substGivens :: [Inst] -> [Inst] -> TcM ([Inst], Bool)
- substGivens [] wanteds = return (wanteds, False)
- substGivens (g:gs) wanteds
- = do { (wanteds1, changed1) <- substGivens gs wanteds
- ; (wanteds2, changed2) <- substInst g wanteds1
- ; return (wanteds2, changed1 || changed2)
- }
+-- |Configuration of normalised equalities used during solving.
+--
+data EqConfig = EqConfig { eqs :: [RewriteInst] -- all equalities
+ , locals :: [Inst] -- given dicts
+ , wanteds :: [Inst] -- wanted dicts
+ , binds :: TcDictBinds -- bindings
+ , skolems :: TyVarSet -- flattening skolems
+ }
+
+addSkolems :: EqConfig -> TyVarSet -> EqConfig
+addSkolems eqCfg newSkolems
+ = eqCfg {skolems = skolems eqCfg `unionVarSet` newSkolems}
+
+addEq :: EqConfig -> RewriteInst -> EqConfig
+addEq eqCfg eq = eqCfg {eqs = eq : eqs eqCfg}
+
+unionEqConfig :: EqConfig -> EqConfig -> EqConfig
+unionEqConfig eqc1 eqc2 = EqConfig
+ { eqs = eqs eqc1 ++ eqs eqc2
+ , locals = locals eqc1 ++ locals eqc2
+ , wanteds = wanteds eqc1 ++ wanteds eqc2
+ , binds = binds eqc1 `unionBags` binds eqc2
+ , skolems = skolems eqc1 `unionVarSet` skolems eqc2
+ }
+
+emptyEqConfig :: EqConfig
+emptyEqConfig = EqConfig
+ { eqs = []
+ , locals = []
+ , wanteds = []
+ , binds = emptyBag
+ , skolems = emptyVarSet
+ }
+
+instance Outputable EqConfig where
+ ppr (EqConfig {eqs = eqs, locals = locals, wanteds = wanteds, binds = binds})
+ = vcat [ppr eqs, ppr locals, ppr wanteds, ppr binds]
\end{code}
-
-%************************************************************************
-%* *
-\section{Normalisation of non-equality dictionaries}
-%* *
-%************************************************************************
+The set of operations on an equality configuration. We obtain the initialise
+configuration by normalisation ('normaliseEqs'), solve the equalities by
+propagation ('propagateEqs'), and eventually finalise the configuration when
+no further propoagation is possible.
\begin{code}
-normaliseGivenDicts, normaliseWantedDicts
- :: [Inst] -- given equations
- -> [Inst] -- dictionaries
- -> TcM ([Inst],TcDictBinds)
-
-normaliseGivenDicts eqs dicts = normalise_dicts eqs dicts False
-normaliseWantedDicts eqs dicts = normalise_dicts eqs dicts True
-
-normalise_dicts
- :: [Inst] -- given equations
- -> [Inst] -- dictionaries
- -> Bool -- True <=> the dicts are wanted
- -- Fals <=> they are given
- -> TcM ([Inst],TcDictBinds)
-normalise_dicts given_eqs dicts is_wanted
- = do { traceTc $ text "normalise???Dicts <-" <+> ppr dicts <+>
- text "with" <+> ppr given_eqs
- ; (dicts0, binds0) <- normaliseInsts is_wanted dicts
- ; (dicts1, binds1) <- substEqInDictInsts given_eqs dicts0
- ; let binds01 = binds0 `unionBags` binds1
- ; if isEmptyBag binds1
- then return (dicts1, binds01)
- else do { (dicts2, binds2) <- normaliseGivenDicts given_eqs dicts1
- ; return (dicts2, binds01 `unionBags` binds2) } }
+-- |Turn a set of equalities into an equality configuration for solving.
+--
+-- Precondition: The Insts are zonked.
+--
+normaliseEqs :: [Inst] -> TcM EqConfig
+normaliseEqs eqs
+ = do { ASSERTM2( allM isValidWantedEqInst eqs, ppr eqs )
+ ; traceTc $ ptext (sLit "Entering normaliseEqs")
+
+ ; (eqss, skolemss) <- mapAndUnzipM normEqInst eqs
+ ; return $ emptyEqConfig { eqs = concat eqss
+ , skolems = unionVarSets skolemss
+ }
+ }
+
+-- |Flatten the type arguments of all dictionaries, returning the result as a
+-- equality configuration. The dictionaries go into the 'wanted' component if
+-- the second argument is 'True'.
+--
+-- Precondition: The Insts are zonked.
+--
+normaliseDicts :: Bool -> [Inst] -> TcM EqConfig
+normaliseDicts isWanted insts
+ = do { traceTc $ ptext (sLit "Entering normaliseDicts") <+>
+ ptext (if isWanted then sLit "[Wanted]" else sLit "[Local]")
+ ; (insts', eqss, bindss, skolemss) <- mapAndUnzip4M (normDict isWanted)
+ insts
+ ; return $ emptyEqConfig { eqs = concat eqss
+ , locals = if isWanted then [] else insts'
+ , wanteds = if isWanted then insts' else []
+ , binds = unionManyBags bindss
+ , skolems = unionVarSets skolemss
+ }
+ }
+
+-- |Solves the equalities as far as possible by applying propagation rules.
+--
+propagateEqs :: EqConfig -> TcM EqConfig
+propagateEqs eqCfg@(EqConfig {eqs = todoEqs})
+ = do { traceTc $ hang (ptext (sLit "Entering propagateEqs:"))
+ 4 (ppr eqCfg)
+
+ ; propagate todoEqs (eqCfg {eqs = []})
+ }
+
+-- |Finalise a set of equalities and associated dictionaries after
+-- propagation. The returned Boolean value is `True' iff any flexible
+-- variables, except those introduced by flattening (i.e., those in the
+-- `skolems' component of the argument) where instantiated. The first returned
+-- set of instances are the locals (without equalities) and the second set are
+-- all residual wanteds, including equalities.
+--
+-- Remove all identity dictinary bindings (i.e., those whose source and target
+-- dictionary are the same). This is important for termination, as
+-- TcSimplify.reduceContext takes the presence of dictionary bindings as an
+-- indicator that there was some improvement.
+--
+finaliseEqsAndDicts :: EqConfig
+ -> TcM ([Inst], [Inst], TcDictBinds, Bool)
+finaliseEqsAndDicts (EqConfig { eqs = eqs
+ , locals = locals
+ , wanteds = wanteds
+ , binds = binds
+ })
+ = do { traceTc $ ptext (sLit "finaliseEqsAndDicts")
+ ; (eqs', subst_binds, locals', wanteds') <- substitute eqs locals wanteds
+ ; (eqs'', improved) <- instantiateAndExtract eqs'
+ ; final_binds <- filterM nonTrivialDictBind $
+ bagToList (subst_binds `unionBags` binds)
+
+ ; ASSERTM2( allM isValidWantedEqInst eqs'', ppr eqs'' )
+ ; return (locals', eqs'' ++ wanteds', listToBag final_binds, improved)
+ }
+ where
+ nonTrivialDictBind (L _ (VarBind { var_id = ide1
+ , var_rhs = L _ (HsWrap _ (HsVar ide2))}))
+ = do { ty1 <- zonkTcType (idType ide1)
+ ; ty2 <- zonkTcType (idType ide2)
+ ; return $ not (ty1 `tcEqType` ty2)
+ }
+ nonTrivialDictBind _ = return True
\end{code}
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\section{Normalisation rules and iterative rule application}
+ Normalisation of equalities
%* *
%************************************************************************
-We have three kinds of normalising rewrite rules:
-
-(1) Normalisation rules that rewrite a set of insts and return a flag indicating
- whether any changes occurred during rewriting that necessitate re-running
- the current rule set.
+A normal equality is a properly oriented equality with associated coercion
+that contains at most one family equality (in its left-hand side) is oriented
+such that it may be used as a reqrite rule. It has one of the following two
+forms:
-(2) Precondition rules that rewrite a set of insts and return a monadic action
- that reverts the effect of preconditioning.
+(1) co :: F t1..tn ~ t (family equalities)
+(2) co :: x ~ t (variable equalities)
-(3) Idempotent normalisation rules that never require re-running the rule set.
+Variable equalities fall again in two classes:
-\begin{code}
-type RewriteRule = [Inst] -> TcM ([Inst], Bool) -- rewrite, maybe re-run
-type PrecondRule = [Inst] -> TcM ([Inst], TcM ()) -- rewrite, revertable
-type IdemRewriteRule = [Inst] -> TcM [Inst] -- rewrite, don't re-run
+(2a) co :: x ~ t, where t is *not* a variable, or
+(2b) co :: x ~ y, where x > y.
-type NamedRule = (String, RewriteRule) -- rule with description
-type NamedPreRule = (String, PrecondRule) -- precond with desc
-\end{code}
+The types t, t1, ..., tn may not contain any occurrences of synonym
+families. Moreover, in Forms (2) & (3), the left-hand side may not occur in
+the right-hand side, and the relation x > y is an arbitrary, but total order
+on type variables
-Template lifting idempotent rules to full rules (which can be put into a rule
-set).
+!!!TODO: We may need to keep track of swapping for error messages (and to
+re-orient on finilisation).
\begin{code}
-dontRerun :: IdemRewriteRule -> RewriteRule
-dontRerun rule insts = liftM addFalse $ rule insts
+data RewriteInst
+ = RewriteVar -- Form (2) above
+ { rwi_var :: TyVar -- may be rigid or flexible
+ , rwi_right :: TcType -- contains no synonym family applications
+ , rwi_co :: EqInstCo -- the wanted or given coercion
+ , rwi_loc :: InstLoc
+ , rwi_name :: Name -- no semantic significance (cf. TcRnTypes.EqInst)
+ , rwi_swapped :: Bool -- swapped orientation of original EqInst
+ }
+ | RewriteFam -- Forms (1) above
+ { rwi_fam :: TyCon -- synonym family tycon
+ , rwi_args :: [Type] -- contain no synonym family applications
+ , rwi_right :: TcType -- contains no synonym family applications
+ , rwi_co :: EqInstCo -- the wanted or given coercion
+ , rwi_loc :: InstLoc
+ , rwi_name :: Name -- no semantic significance (cf. TcRnTypes.EqInst)
+ , rwi_swapped :: Bool -- swapped orientation of original EqInst
+ }
+
+isWantedRewriteInst :: RewriteInst -> Bool
+isWantedRewriteInst = isWantedCo . rwi_co
+
+rewriteInstToInst :: RewriteInst -> TcM Inst
+rewriteInstToInst eq@(RewriteVar {rwi_var = tv})
+ = deriveEqInst eq (mkTyVarTy tv) (rwi_right eq) (rwi_co eq)
+rewriteInstToInst eq@(RewriteFam {rwi_fam = fam, rwi_args = args})
+ = deriveEqInst eq (mkTyConApp fam args) (rwi_right eq) (rwi_co eq)
+
+-- Derive an EqInst based from a RewriteInst, possibly swapping the types
+-- around.
+--
+deriveEqInst :: RewriteInst -> TcType -> TcType -> EqInstCo -> TcM Inst
+deriveEqInst rewrite ty1 ty2 co
+ = do { co_adjusted <- if not swapped then return co
+ else mkSymEqInstCo co (ty2, ty1)
+ ; return $ EqInst
+ { tci_left = left
+ , tci_right = right
+ , tci_co = co_adjusted
+ , tci_loc = rwi_loc rewrite
+ , tci_name = rwi_name rewrite
+ }
+ }
where
- addFalse x = (x, False)
+ swapped = rwi_swapped rewrite
+ (left, right) = if not swapped then (ty1, ty2) else (ty2, ty1)
+
+instance Outputable RewriteInst where
+ ppr (RewriteFam {rwi_fam = fam, rwi_args = args, rwi_right = rhs, rwi_co =co})
+ = hsep [ pprEqInstCo co <+> text "::"
+ , ppr (mkTyConApp fam args)
+ , text "~>"
+ , ppr rhs
+ ]
+ ppr (RewriteVar {rwi_var = tv, rwi_right = rhs, rwi_co =co})
+ = hsep [ pprEqInstCo co <+> text "::"
+ , ppr tv
+ , text "~>"
+ , ppr rhs
+ ]
+
+pprEqInstCo :: EqInstCo -> SDoc
+pprEqInstCo (Left cotv) = ptext (sLit "Wanted") <+> ppr cotv
+pprEqInstCo (Right co) = ptext (sLit "Local") <+> ppr co
\end{code}
-The following function applies a set of rewrite rules until a fixed point is
-reached; i.e., none of the `RewriteRule's require re-running the rule set.
-Optionally, there may be a pre-conditing rule that is applied before any other
-rules are applied and before the rule set is re-run.
+The following functions turn an arbitrary equality into a set of normal
+equalities. This implements the WFlat and LFlat rules of the paper in one
+sweep. However, we use flexible variables for both locals and wanteds, and
+avoid to carry around the unflattening substitution \Sigma (for locals) by
+already updating the skolems for locals with the family application that they
+represent - i.e., they will turn into that family application on the next
+zonking (which only happens after finalisation).
+
+In a corresponding manner, normDict normalises class dictionaries by
+extracting any synonym family applications and generation appropriate normal
+equalities.
-The result is the set of rewritten (i.e., normalised) insts and, in case of a
-pre-conditing rule, a monadic action that reverts the effects of
-pre-conditioning - specifically, this is removing introduced skolems.
+Whenever we encounter a loopy equality (of the form a ~ T .. (F ...a...) ...),
+we drop that equality and raise an error if it is a wanted or a warning if it
+is a local.
\begin{code}
-rewriteToFixedPoint :: Maybe NamedPreRule -- optional preconditioning rule
- -> [NamedRule] -- rule set
- -> [Inst] -- insts to rewrite
- -> TcM ([Inst], TcM ())
-rewriteToFixedPoint precondRule rules insts
- = completeRewrite (return ()) precondRule insts
+normEqInst :: Inst -> TcM ([RewriteInst], TyVarSet)
+-- Normalise one equality.
+normEqInst inst
+ = ASSERT( isEqInst inst )
+ go ty1 ty2 (eqInstCoercion inst)
where
- completeRewrite :: TcM () -> Maybe NamedPreRule -> [Inst]
- -> TcM ([Inst], TcM ())
- completeRewrite dePrecond (Just (precondName, precond)) insts
- = do { traceTc $ text precondName <+> text " <- " <+> ppr insts
- ; (insts', dePrecond') <- precond insts
- ; traceTc $ text precondName <+> text " -> " <+> ppr insts'
- ; tryRules (dePrecond >> dePrecond') rules insts'
- }
- completeRewrite dePrecond Nothing insts
- = tryRules dePrecond rules insts
-
- tryRules dePrecond _ [] = return ([] , dePrecond)
- tryRules dePrecond [] insts = return (insts, dePrecond)
- tryRules dePrecond ((name, rule):rules) insts
- = do { traceTc $ text name <+> text " <- " <+> ppr insts
- ; (insts', rerun) <- rule insts
- ; traceTc $ text name <+> text " -> " <+> ppr insts'
- ; if rerun then completeRewrite dePrecond precondRule insts'
- else tryRules dePrecond rules insts'
- }
-\end{code}
+ (ty1, ty2) = eqInstTys inst
+ -- look through synonyms
+ go ty1 ty2 co | Just ty1' <- tcView ty1 = go ty1' ty2 co
+ go ty1 ty2 co | Just ty2' <- tcView ty2 = go ty1 ty2' co
-%************************************************************************
-%* *
-\section{Different forms of Inst rewrite rules}
-%* *
-%************************************************************************
+ -- left-to-right rule with type family head
+ go (TyConApp con args) ty2 co
+ | isOpenSynTyCon con
+ = mkRewriteFam False con args ty2 co
-Splitting of non-terminating given constraints: skolemOccurs
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-This is a preconditioning rule exclusively applied to given constraints.
-Moreover, its rewriting is only temporary, as it is undone by way of
-side-effecting mutable type variables after simplification and constraint
-entailment has been completed.
+ -- right-to-left rule with type family head
+ go ty1 ty2@(TyConApp con args) co
+ | isOpenSynTyCon con
+ = do { co' <- mkSymEqInstCo co (ty2, ty1)
+ ; mkRewriteFam True con args ty1 co'
+ }
-This version is an (attempt at, yet unproven, an) *unflattened* version of
-the SubstL-Ev completion rule.
+ -- no outermost family
+ go ty1 ty2 co
+ = do { (ty1', co1, ty1_eqs, ty1_skolems) <- flattenType inst ty1
+ ; (ty2', co2, ty2_eqs, ty2_skolems) <- flattenType inst ty2
+ ; let ty12_eqs = ty1_eqs ++ ty2_eqs
+ sym_co2 = mkSymCoercion co2
+ eqTys = (ty1', ty2')
+ ; (co', ty12_eqs') <- adjustCoercions co co1 sym_co2 eqTys ty12_eqs
+ ; eqs <- checkOrientation ty1' ty2' co' inst
+ ; if isLoopyEquality eqs ty12_eqs'
+ then do { if isWantedCo (tci_co inst)
+ then
+ addErrCtxt (ptext (sLit "Rejecting loopy equality")) $
+ eqInstMisMatch inst
+ else
+ warnDroppingLoopyEquality ty1 ty2
+ ; return ([], emptyVarSet) -- drop the equality
+ }
+ else
+ return (eqs ++ ty12_eqs',
+ ty1_skolems `unionVarSet` ty2_skolems)
+ }
-The above rule is essential to catch non-terminating rules that cannot be
-oriented properly, like
+ mkRewriteFam swapped con args ty2 co
+ = do { (args', cargs, args_eqss, args_skolemss)
+ <- mapAndUnzip4M (flattenType inst) args
+ ; (ty2', co2, ty2_eqs, ty2_skolems) <- flattenType inst ty2
+ ; let co1 = mkTyConApp con cargs
+ sym_co2 = mkSymCoercion co2
+ all_eqs = concat args_eqss ++ ty2_eqs
+ eqTys = (mkTyConApp con args', ty2')
+ ; (co', all_eqs') <- adjustCoercions co co1 sym_co2 eqTys all_eqs
+ ; let thisRewriteFam = RewriteFam
+ { rwi_fam = con
+ , rwi_args = args'
+ , rwi_right = ty2'
+ , rwi_co = co'
+ , rwi_loc = tci_loc inst
+ , rwi_name = tci_name inst
+ , rwi_swapped = swapped
+ }
+ ; return $ (thisRewriteFam : all_eqs',
+ unionVarSets (ty2_skolems:args_skolemss))
+ }
- F a ~ [G (F a)]
- or even
- a ~ [G a]
+ -- If the original equality has the form a ~ T .. (F ...a...) ..., we will
+ -- have a variable equality with 'a' on the lhs as the first equality.
+ -- Then, check whether 'a' occurs in the lhs of any family equality
+ -- generated by flattening.
+ isLoopyEquality (RewriteVar {rwi_var = tv}:_) eqs
+ = any inRewriteFam eqs
+ where
+ inRewriteFam (RewriteFam {rwi_args = args})
+ = tv `elemVarSet` tyVarsOfTypes args
+ inRewriteFam _ = False
+ isLoopyEquality _ _ = False
+
+normDict :: Bool -> Inst -> TcM (Inst, [RewriteInst], TcDictBinds, TyVarSet)
+-- Normalise one dictionary or IP constraint.
+normDict isWanted inst@(Dict {tci_pred = ClassP clas args})
+ = do { (args', cargs, args_eqss, args_skolemss)
+ <- mapAndUnzip4M (flattenType inst) args
+ ; let rewriteCo = PredTy $ ClassP clas cargs
+ eqs = concat args_eqss
+ pred' = ClassP clas args'
+ ; if null eqs
+ then -- don't generate a binding if there is nothing to flatten
+ return (inst, [], emptyBag, emptyVarSet)
+ else do {
+ ; (inst', bind) <- mkDictBind inst isWanted rewriteCo pred'
+ ; eqs' <- if isWanted then return eqs else mapM wantedToLocal eqs
+ ; return (inst', eqs', bind, unionVarSets args_skolemss)
+ }}
+normDict _isWanted inst
+ = return (inst, [], emptyBag, emptyVarSet)
+-- !!!TODO: Still need to normalise IP constraints.
+
+checkOrientation :: Type -> Type -> EqInstCo -> Inst -> TcM [RewriteInst]
+-- Performs the occurs check, decomposition, and proper orientation
+-- (returns a singleton, or an empty list in case of a trivial equality)
+-- NB: We cannot assume that the two types already have outermost type
+-- synonyms expanded due to the recursion in the case of type applications.
+checkOrientation ty1 ty2 co inst
+ = do { traceTc $ ptext (sLit "checkOrientation of ") <+>
+ pprEqInstCo co <+> text "::" <+>
+ ppr ty1 <+> text "~" <+> ppr ty2
+ ; eqs <- go ty1 ty2
+ ; traceTc $ ptext (sLit "checkOrientation returns") <+> ppr eqs
+ ; return eqs
+ }
+ where
+ -- look through synonyms
+ go ty1 ty2 | Just ty1' <- tcView ty1 = go ty1' ty2
+ go ty1 ty2 | Just ty2' <- tcView ty2 = go ty1 ty2'
+
+ -- identical types => trivial
+ go ty1 ty2
+ | ty1 `tcEqType` ty2
+ = do { mkIdEqInstCo co ty1
+ ; return []
+ }
-The left-to-right orientiation is not suitable because it does not
-terminate. The right-to-left orientation is not suitable because it
-does not have a type-function on the left. This is undesirable because
-it would hide information. E.g. assume
+ -- two tvs, left greater => unchanged
+ go ty1@(TyVarTy tv1) ty2@(TyVarTy tv2)
+ | tv1 > tv2
+ = mkRewriteVar False tv1 ty2 co
- instance C [x]
+ -- two tvs, right greater => swap
+ | otherwise
+ = do { co' <- mkSymEqInstCo co (ty2, ty1)
+ ; mkRewriteVar True tv2 ty1 co'
+ }
-then rewriting C [G (F a)] to C (F a) is bad because we cannot now
-see that the C [x] instance applies.
+ -- only lhs is a tv => unchanged
+ go ty1@(TyVarTy tv1) ty2
+ | ty1 `tcPartOfType` ty2 -- occurs check!
+ = occurCheckErr ty1 ty2
+ | otherwise
+ = mkRewriteVar False tv1 ty2 co
+
+ -- only rhs is a tv => swap
+ go ty1 ty2@(TyVarTy tv2)
+ | ty2 `tcPartOfType` ty1 -- occurs check!
+ = occurCheckErr ty2 ty1
+ | otherwise
+ = do { co' <- mkSymEqInstCo co (ty2, ty1)
+ ; mkRewriteVar True tv2 ty1 co'
+ }
-The rule also caters for badly-oriented rules of the form:
+ -- type applications => decompose
+ go ty1 ty2
+ | Just (ty1_l, ty1_r) <- repSplitAppTy_maybe ty1 -- won't split fam apps
+ , Just (ty2_l, ty2_r) <- repSplitAppTy_maybe ty2
+ = do { (co_l, co_r) <- mkAppEqInstCo co (ty1_l, ty2_l) (ty1_r, ty2_r)
+ ; eqs_l <- checkOrientation ty1_l ty2_l co_l inst
+ ; eqs_r <- checkOrientation ty1_r ty2_r co_r inst
+ ; return $ eqs_l ++ eqs_r
+ }
+-- !!!TODO: would be more efficient to handle the FunApp and the data
+-- constructor application explicitly.
+
+ -- inconsistency => type error
+ go ty1 ty2
+ = ASSERT( (not . isForAllTy $ ty1) && (not . isForAllTy $ ty2) )
+ eqInstMisMatch inst
+
+ mkRewriteVar swapped tv ty co = return [RewriteVar
+ { rwi_var = tv
+ , rwi_right = ty
+ , rwi_co = co
+ , rwi_loc = tci_loc inst
+ , rwi_name = tci_name inst
+ , rwi_swapped = swapped
+ }]
+
+flattenType :: Inst -- context to get location & name
+ -> Type -- the type to flatten
+ -> TcM (Type, -- the flattened type
+ Coercion, -- coercion witness of flattening wanteds
+ [RewriteInst], -- extra equalities
+ TyVarSet) -- new intermediate skolems
+-- Removes all family synonyms from a type by moving them into extra equalities
+flattenType inst ty
+ = go ty
+ where
+ -- look through synonyms
+ go ty | Just ty' <- tcView ty
+ = do { (ty_flat, co, eqs, skolems) <- go ty'
+ ; if null eqs
+ then -- unchanged, keep the old type with folded synonyms
+ return (ty, ty, [], emptyVarSet)
+ else
+ return (ty_flat, co, eqs, skolems)
+ }
- F a ~ G (F a)
+ -- type variable => nothing to do
+ go ty@(TyVarTy _)
+ = return (ty, ty, [] , emptyVarSet)
-for which other solutions are possible, but this one will do too.
+ -- type family application
+ -- => flatten to "gamma :: F t1'..tn' ~ alpha" (alpha & gamma fresh)
+ go ty@(TyConApp con args)
+ | isOpenSynTyCon con
+ = do { (args', cargs, args_eqss, args_skolemss) <- mapAndUnzip4M go args
+ ; alpha <- newFlexiTyVar (typeKind ty)
+ ; let alphaTy = mkTyVarTy alpha
+ ; cotv <- newMetaCoVar (mkTyConApp con args') alphaTy
+ ; let thisRewriteFam = RewriteFam
+ { rwi_fam = con
+ , rwi_args = args'
+ , rwi_right = alphaTy
+ , rwi_co = mkWantedCo cotv
+ , rwi_loc = tci_loc inst
+ , rwi_name = tci_name inst
+ , rwi_swapped = True
+ }
+ ; return (alphaTy,
+ mkTyConApp con cargs `mkTransCoercion` mkTyVarTy cotv,
+ thisRewriteFam : concat args_eqss,
+ unionVarSets args_skolemss `extendVarSet` alpha)
+ } -- adding new unflatten var inst
+
+ -- data constructor application => flatten subtypes
+ -- NB: Special cased for efficiency - could be handled as type application
+ go ty@(TyConApp con args)
+ = do { (args', cargs, args_eqss, args_skolemss) <- mapAndUnzip4M go args
+ ; if null args_eqss
+ then -- unchanged, keep the old type with folded synonyms
+ return (ty, ty, [], emptyVarSet)
+ else
+ return (mkTyConApp con args',
+ mkTyConApp con cargs,
+ concat args_eqss,
+ unionVarSets args_skolemss)
+ }
+
+ -- function type => flatten subtypes
+ -- NB: Special cased for efficiency - could be handled as type application
+ go ty@(FunTy ty_l ty_r)
+ = do { (ty_l', co_l, eqs_l, skolems_l) <- go ty_l
+ ; (ty_r', co_r, eqs_r, skolems_r) <- go ty_r
+ ; if null eqs_l && null eqs_r
+ then -- unchanged, keep the old type with folded synonyms
+ return (ty, ty, [], emptyVarSet)
+ else
+ return (mkFunTy ty_l' ty_r',
+ mkFunTy co_l co_r,
+ eqs_l ++ eqs_r,
+ skolems_l `unionVarSet` skolems_r)
+ }
-It's behavior is:
+ -- type application => flatten subtypes
+ go ty@(AppTy ty_l ty_r)
+ = do { (ty_l', co_l, eqs_l, skolems_l) <- go ty_l
+ ; (ty_r', co_r, eqs_r, skolems_r) <- go ty_r
+ ; if null eqs_l && null eqs_r
+ then -- unchanged, keep the old type with folded synonyms
+ return (ty, ty, [], emptyVarSet)
+ else
+ return (mkAppTy ty_l' ty_r',
+ mkAppTy co_l co_r,
+ eqs_l ++ eqs_r,
+ skolems_l `unionVarSet` skolems_r)
+ }
+
+ -- forall type => panic if the body contains a type family
+ -- !!!TODO: As long as the family does not contain a quantified variable
+ -- we might pull it out, but what if it does contain a quantified
+ -- variable???
+ go ty@(ForAllTy _ body)
+ | null (tyFamInsts body)
+ = return (ty, ty, [] , emptyVarSet)
+ | otherwise
+ = panic "TcTyFuns.flattenType: synonym family in a rank-n type"
+
+ -- we should never see a predicate type
+ go (PredTy _)
+ = panic "TcTyFuns.flattenType: unexpected PredType"
+
+adjustCoercions :: EqInstCo -- coercion of original equality
+ -> Coercion -- coercion witnessing the left rewrite
+ -> Coercion -- coercion witnessing the right rewrite
+ -> (Type, Type) -- types of flattened equality
+ -> [RewriteInst] -- equalities from flattening
+ -> TcM (EqInstCo, -- coercion for flattened equality
+ [RewriteInst]) -- final equalities from flattening
+-- Depending on whether we flattened a local or wanted equality, that equality's
+-- coercion and that of the new equalities produced during flattening are
+-- adjusted .
+adjustCoercions (Left cotv) co1 co2 (ty_l, ty_r) all_eqs
+ -- wanted => generate a fresh coercion variable for the flattened equality
+ = do { cotv' <- newMetaCoVar ty_l ty_r
+ ; writeMetaTyVar cotv $
+ (co1 `mkTransCoercion` TyVarTy cotv' `mkTransCoercion` co2)
+ ; return (Left cotv', all_eqs)
+ }
- co : ty1 ~ ty2{F ty1}
- >-->
- co : ty1 ~ ty2{b}
- sym (F co) : F ty2{b} ~ b
- where b is a fresh skolem variable
+adjustCoercions co@(Right _) _co1 _co2 _eqTys all_eqs
+ -- local => turn all new equalities into locals and update (but not zonk)
+ -- the skolem
+ = do { all_eqs' <- mapM wantedToLocal all_eqs
+ ; return (co, all_eqs')
+ }
-We also cater for the symmetric situation *if* the rule cannot be used as a
-left-to-right rewrite rule.
+mkDictBind :: Inst -- original instance
+ -> Bool -- is this a wanted contraint?
+ -> Coercion -- coercion witnessing the rewrite
+ -> PredType -- coerced predicate
+ -> TcM (Inst, -- new inst
+ TcDictBinds) -- binding for coerced dictionary
+mkDictBind dict isWanted rewriteCo pred
+ = do { dict' <- newDictBndr loc pred
+ -- relate the old inst to the new one
+ -- target_dict = source_dict `cast` st_co
+ ; let (target_dict, source_dict, st_co)
+ | isWanted = (dict, dict', mkSymCoercion rewriteCo)
+ | otherwise = (dict', dict, rewriteCo)
+ -- we have
+ -- co :: dict ~ dict'
+ -- hence, if isWanted
+ -- dict = dict' `cast` sym co
+ -- else
+ -- dict' = dict `cast` co
+ expr = HsVar $ instToId source_dict
+ cast_expr = HsWrap (WpCast st_co) expr
+ rhs = L (instLocSpan loc) cast_expr
+ binds = instToDictBind target_dict rhs
+ ; return (dict', binds)
+ }
+ where
+ loc = tci_loc dict
+
+-- gamma :: Fam args ~ alpha
+-- => alpha :: Fam args ~ alpha, with alpha := Fam args
+-- (the update of alpha will not be apparent during propagation, as we
+-- never follow the indirections of meta variables; it will be revealed
+-- when the equality is zonked)
+wantedToLocal :: RewriteInst -> TcM RewriteInst
+wantedToLocal eq@(RewriteFam {rwi_fam = fam,
+ rwi_args = args,
+ rwi_right = alphaTy@(TyVarTy alpha)})
+ = do { writeMetaTyVar alpha (mkTyConApp fam args)
+ ; return $ eq {rwi_co = mkGivenCo alphaTy}
+ }
+wantedToLocal _ = panic "TcTyFuns.wantedToLocal"
+\end{code}
-We also return an action (b := ty1) which is used to eliminate b
-after the dust of normalisation with the completed rewrite system
-has settled.
-A subtle point of this transformation is that both coercions in the results
-are strictly speaking incorrect. However, they are correct again after the
-action {B := ty1} has removed the skolem again. This happens immediately
-after constraint entailment has been checked; ie, code outside of the
-simplification and entailment checking framework will never see these
-temporarily incorrect coercions.
+%************************************************************************
+%* *
+ Propagation of equalities
+%* *
+%************************************************************************
-NB: We perform this transformation for multiple occurences of ty1 under one
- or multiple family applications on the left-hand side at once (ie, the
- rule doesn't need to be applied multiple times at a single inst). As a
- result we can get two or more insts back.
+Apply the propagation rules exhaustively.
\begin{code}
-skolemOccurs :: PrecondRule
-skolemOccurs insts
- = do { (instss, undoSkolems) <- mapAndUnzipM oneSkolemOccurs insts
- ; return (concat instss, sequence_ undoSkolems)
+propagate :: [RewriteInst] -> EqConfig -> TcM EqConfig
+propagate [] eqCfg = return eqCfg
+propagate (eq:eqs) eqCfg
+ = do { optEqs <- applyTop eq
+ ; case optEqs of
+
+ -- Top applied to 'eq' => retry with new equalities
+ Just (eqs2, skolems2)
+ -> propagate (eqs2 ++ eqs) (eqCfg `addSkolems` skolems2)
+
+ -- Top doesn't apply => try subst rules with all other
+ -- equalities, after that 'eq' can go into the residual list
+ Nothing
+ -> do { (eqs', eqCfg') <- applySubstRules eq eqs eqCfg
+ ; propagate eqs' (eqCfg' `addEq` eq)
+ }
+ }
+
+applySubstRules :: RewriteInst -- currently considered eq
+ -> [RewriteInst] -- todo eqs list
+ -> EqConfig -- residual
+ -> TcM ([RewriteInst], EqConfig) -- new todo & residual
+applySubstRules eq todoEqs (eqConfig@EqConfig {eqs = resEqs})
+ = do { (newEqs_t, unchangedEqs_t, skolems_t) <- mapSubstRules eq todoEqs
+ ; (newEqs_r, unchangedEqs_r, skolems_r) <- mapSubstRules eq resEqs
+ ; return (newEqs_t ++ newEqs_r ++ unchangedEqs_t,
+ eqConfig {eqs = unchangedEqs_r}
+ `addSkolems` (skolems_t `unionVarSet` skolems_r))
}
- where
- oneSkolemOccurs inst
- = ASSERT( isEqInst inst )
- isRewriteRule (eqInstLeftTy inst) (eqInstRightTy inst)
- where
-
- -- look through synonyms
- isRewriteRule ty1 ty2 | Just ty1' <- tcView ty1 = isRewriteRule ty1' ty2
- isRewriteRule ty1 ty2 | Just ty2' <- tcView ty2 = isRewriteRule ty1 ty2'
- -- left-to-right rule with type family head
- isRewriteRule ty1@(TyConApp con _) ty2
- | isOpenSynTyCon con
- = breakRecursion ty1 ty2 False -- not swapped
+mapSubstRules :: RewriteInst -- try substituting this equality
+ -> [RewriteInst] -- into these equalities
+ -> TcM ([RewriteInst], [RewriteInst], TyVarSet)
+mapSubstRules eq eqs
+ = do { (newEqss, unchangedEqss, skolemss) <- mapAndUnzip3M (substRules eq) eqs
+ ; return (concat newEqss, concat unchangedEqss, unionVarSets skolemss)
+ }
+ where
+ substRules eq1 eq2
+ = do { -- try the SubstFam rule
+ optEqs <- applySubstFam eq1 eq2
+ ; case optEqs of
+ Just (eqs, skolems) -> return (eqs, [], skolems)
+ Nothing -> do
+ { -- try the SubstVarVar rule
+ optEqs <- applySubstVarVar eq1 eq2
+ ; case optEqs of
+ Just (eqs, skolems) -> return (eqs, [], skolems)
+ Nothing -> do
+ { -- try the SubstVarFam rule
+ optEqs <- applySubstVarFam eq1 eq2
+ ; case optEqs of
+ Just eq -> return ([eq], [], emptyVarSet)
+ Nothing -> return ([], [eq2], emptyVarSet)
+ -- if no rule matches, we return the equlity we tried to
+ -- substitute into unchanged
+ }}}
+\end{code}
- -- left-to-right rule with type variable head
- isRewriteRule ty1@(TyVarTy _) ty2
- = breakRecursion ty1 ty2 False -- not swapped
+Attempt to apply the Top rule. The rule is
- -- right-to-left rule with type family head
- isRewriteRule ty1 ty2@(TyConApp con _)
- | isOpenSynTyCon con
- = breakRecursion ty2 ty1 True -- swapped
+ co :: F t1..tn ~ t
+ =(Top)=>
+ co' :: [s1/x1, .., sm/xm]s ~ t with co = g s1..sm |> co'
- -- right-to-left rule with type variable head
- isRewriteRule ty1 ty2@(TyVarTy _)
- = breakRecursion ty2 ty1 True -- swapped
+where g :: forall x1..xm. F u1..um ~ s and [s1/x1, .., sm/xm]u1 == t1.
- -- this equality is not a rewrite rule => ignore
- isRewriteRule _ _ = return ([inst], return ())
+Returns Nothing if the rule could not be applied. Otherwise, the resulting
+equality is normalised and a list of the normal equalities is returned.
+\begin{code}
+applyTop :: RewriteInst -> TcM (Maybe ([RewriteInst], TyVarSet))
- breakRecursion pat body swapped
- | null tysToLiftOut
- = return ([inst], return ())
- | otherwise
- = do { skTvs <- mapM (newMetaTyVar TauTv . typeKind) tysToLiftOut
- ; let skTvs_tysTLO = zip skTvs tysToLiftOut
- insertSkolems = return . replace skTvs_tysTLO
- ; (_, body') <- tcGenericNormaliseFamInst insertSkolems body
- ; inst' <- if swapped then mkEqInst (EqPred body' pat) co
- else mkEqInst (EqPred pat body') co
- -- ensure to reconstruct the inst in the
- -- original orientation
- ; (insts, undoSk) <- mapAndUnzipM (mkSkolemInst inst')
- skTvs_tysTLO
- ; return (inst':insts, sequence_ undoSk)
- }
- where
- co = eqInstCoercion inst
-
- -- all subtypes that are (1) type family instances and (2) contain
- -- the lhs type as part of the type arguments of the type family
- -- constructor
- tysToLiftOut = [mkTyConApp tc tys | (tc, tys) <- tyFamInsts body
- , any (pat `tcPartOfType`) tys]
-
- replace :: [(TcTyVar, Type)] -> Type -> Maybe (Type, Coercion)
- replace [] _ = Nothing
- replace ((skTv, tyTLO):rest) ty
- | tyTLO `tcEqType` ty = Just (mkTyVarTy skTv, undefined)
- | otherwise = replace rest ty
-
- -- create the EqInst for the equality determining the skolem and a
- -- TcM action undoing the skolem introduction
- mkSkolemInst inst' (skTv, tyTLO)
- = do { (co, tyLiftedOut) <- tcEqInstNormaliseFamInst inst' tyTLO
- ; inst <- mkEqInst (EqPred tyLiftedOut (mkTyVarTy skTv))
- (mkGivenCo $ mkSymCoercion (fromACo co))
- ; return (inst, writeMetaTyVar skTv tyTLO)
+applyTop eq@(RewriteFam {rwi_fam = fam, rwi_args = args})
+ = do { optTyCo <- tcUnfoldSynFamInst (TyConApp fam args)
+ ; case optTyCo of
+ Nothing -> return Nothing
+ Just (lhs, rewrite_co)
+ -> do { co' <- mkRightTransEqInstCo co rewrite_co (lhs, rhs)
+ ; eq' <- deriveEqInst eq lhs rhs co'
+ ; liftM Just $ normEqInst eq'
}
+ }
+ where
+ co = rwi_co eq
+ rhs = rwi_right eq
+
+applyTop _ = return Nothing
\end{code}
+Attempt to apply the SubstFam rule. The rule is
-Removal of trivial equalities: trivialRule
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-The following rules exploits the reflexivity of equality:
+ co1 :: F t1..tn ~ t & co2 :: F t1..tn ~ s
+ =(SubstFam)=>
+ co1 :: F t1..tn ~ t & co2' :: t ~ s with co2 = co1 |> co2'
- (Trivial)
- g1 : t ~ t
- >-->
- g1 := t
+where co1 may be a wanted only if co2 is a wanted, too.
+
+Returns Nothing if the rule could not be applied. Otherwise, the equality
+co2' is normalised and a list of the normal equalities is returned. (The
+equality co1 is not returned as it remain unaltered.)
\begin{code}
-trivialRule :: IdemRewriteRule
-trivialRule insts
- = liftM catMaybes $ mappM trivial insts
+applySubstFam :: RewriteInst
+ -> RewriteInst
+ -> TcM (Maybe ([RewriteInst], TyVarSet))
+applySubstFam eq1@(RewriteFam {rwi_fam = fam1, rwi_args = args1})
+ eq2@(RewriteFam {rwi_fam = fam2, rwi_args = args2})
+ | fam1 == fam2 && tcEqTypes args1 args2 &&
+ (isWantedRewriteInst eq2 || not (isWantedRewriteInst eq1))
+-- !!!TODO: tcEqTypes is insufficient as it does not look through type synonyms
+-- !!!Check whether anything breaks by making tcEqTypes look through synonyms.
+-- !!!Should be ok and we don't want three type equalities.
+ = do { co2' <- mkRightTransEqInstCo co2 co1 (lhs, rhs)
+ ; eq2' <- deriveEqInst eq2 lhs rhs co2'
+ ; liftM Just $ normEqInst eq2'
+ }
where
- trivial inst
- | ASSERT( isEqInst inst )
- ty1 `tcEqType` ty2
- = do { eitherEqInst inst
- (\cotv -> writeMetaTyVar cotv ty1)
- (\_ -> return ())
- ; return Nothing
- }
- | otherwise
- = return $ Just inst
- where
- ty1 = eqInstLeftTy inst
- ty2 = eqInstRightTy inst
+ lhs = rwi_right eq1
+ rhs = rwi_right eq2
+ co1 = eqInstCoType (rwi_co eq1)
+ co2 = rwi_co eq2
+applySubstFam _ _ = return Nothing
\end{code}
+Attempt to apply the SubstVarVar rule. The rule is
-Decomposition of data type constructors: decompRule
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-Whenever, the same *data* constructors occurs on both sides of an equality, we
-can decompose as in standard unification.
-
- (Decomp)
- g1 : T cs ~ T ds
- >-->
- g21 : c1 ~ d1, ..., g2n : cn ~ dn
- g1 := T g2s
+ co1 :: x ~ t & co2 :: x ~ s
+ =(SubstVarVar)=>
+ co1 :: x ~ t & co2' :: t ~ s with co2 = co1 |> co2'
-Works also for the case where T is actually an application of a type family
-constructor to a set of types, provided the applications on both sides of the
-~ are identical; see also Note [OpenSynTyCon app] in TcUnify.
+where co1 may be a wanted only if co2 is a wanted, too.
-We guarantee to raise an error for any inconsistent equalities;
-cf Note [Inconsistencies in equality constraints].
+Returns Nothing if the rule could not be applied. Otherwise, the equality
+co2' is normalised and a list of the normal equalities is returned. (The
+equality co1 is not returned as it remain unaltered.)
\begin{code}
-decompRule :: RewriteRule
-decompRule insts
- = do { (insts, changed) <- mapAndUnzipM decomp insts
- ; return (concat insts, or changed)
+applySubstVarVar :: RewriteInst
+ -> RewriteInst
+ -> TcM (Maybe ([RewriteInst], TyVarSet))
+applySubstVarVar eq1@(RewriteVar {rwi_var = tv1})
+ eq2@(RewriteVar {rwi_var = tv2})
+ | tv1 == tv2 &&
+ (isWantedRewriteInst eq2 || not (isWantedRewriteInst eq1))
+ = do { co2' <- mkRightTransEqInstCo co2 co1 (lhs, rhs)
+ ; eq2' <- deriveEqInst eq2 lhs rhs co2'
+ ; liftM Just $ normEqInst eq2'
}
where
- decomp inst
- = ASSERT( isEqInst inst )
- go (eqInstLeftTy inst) (eqInstRightTy inst)
- where
- go ty1 ty2
- | Just ty1' <- tcView ty1 = go ty1' ty2
- | Just ty2' <- tcView ty2 = go ty1 ty2'
-
- go (TyConApp con1 tys1) (TyConApp con2 tys2)
- | con1 == con2 && identicalHead
- = mkArgInsts (mkTyConApp con1) tys1 tys2
-
- | con1 /= con2 && not (isOpenSynTyCon con1 || isOpenSynTyCon con2)
- -- not matching data constructors (of any flavour) are bad news
- = eqInstMisMatch inst
- where
- n = tyConArity con1
- (idxTys1, _) = splitAt n tys1
- (idxTys2, _) = splitAt n tys2
- identicalHead = not (isOpenSynTyCon con1) ||
- idxTys1 `tcEqTypes` idxTys2
-
- go (FunTy fun1 arg1) (FunTy fun2 arg2)
- = mkArgInsts (\[funCo, argCo] -> mkFunTy funCo argCo) [fun1, arg1]
- [fun2, arg2]
-
- -- Applications need a bit of care!
- -- They can match FunTy and TyConApp, so use splitAppTy_maybe
- go (AppTy s1 t1) ty2
- | Just (s2, t2) <- tcSplitAppTy_maybe ty2
- = mkArgInsts (\[s, t] -> mkAppTy s t) [s1, t1] [s2, t2]
-
- -- Symmetric case
- go ty1 (AppTy s2 t2)
- | Just (s1, t1) <- tcSplitAppTy_maybe ty1
- = mkArgInsts (\[s, t] -> mkAppTy s t) [s1, t1] [s2, t2]
-
- -- We already covered all the consistent cases of rigid types on both
- -- sides; so, if we see two rigid types here, we discovered an
- -- inconsistency.
- go ty1 ty2
- | isRigid ty1 && isRigid ty2
- = eqInstMisMatch inst
-
- -- We can neither assert consistency nor inconsistency => defer
- go _ _ = return ([inst], False)
-
- isRigid (TyConApp con _) = not (isOpenSynTyCon con)
- isRigid (FunTy _ _) = True
- isRigid (AppTy _ _) = True
- isRigid _ = False
-
- -- Create insts for matching argument positions (ie, the bit after
- -- '>-->' in the rule description above)
- mkArgInsts con tys1 tys2
- = do { cos <- eitherEqInst inst
- -- old_co := Con1 cos
- (\old_covar ->
- do { cotvs <- zipWithM newMetaCoVar tys1 tys2
- ; let cos = map mkTyVarTy cotvs
- ; writeMetaTyVar old_covar (con cos)
- ; return $ map mkWantedCo cotvs
- })
- -- co_i := Con_i old_co
- (\old_co ->
- return $ map mkGivenCo $
- mkRightCoercions (length tys1) old_co)
- ; insts <- zipWithM mkEqInst (zipWith EqPred tys1 tys2) cos
- ; traceTc (text "decomp identicalHead" <+> ppr insts)
- ; return (insts, not $ null insts)
- }
+ lhs = rwi_right eq1
+ rhs = rwi_right eq2
+ co1 = eqInstCoType (rwi_co eq1)
+ co2 = rwi_co eq2
+applySubstVarVar _ _ = return Nothing
\end{code}
+Attempt to apply the SubstVarFam rule. The rule is
+
+ co1 :: x ~ t & co2 :: F s1..sn ~ s
+ =(SubstVarFam)=>
+ co1 :: x ~ t & co2' :: [t/x](F s1..sn) ~ s
+ with co2 = [co1/x](F s1..sn) |> co2'
-Rewriting with type instances: topRule
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-We use (toplevel) type instances to normalise both sides of equalities.
+where x occurs in F s1..sn. (co1 may be local or wanted.)
- (Top)
- g1 : t ~ s
- >--> co1 :: t ~ t' / co2 :: s ~ s'
- g2 : t' ~ s'
- g1 := co1 * g2 * sym co2
+Returns Nothing if the rule could not be applied. Otherwise, the equality
+co2' is returned. (The equality co1 is not returned as it remain unaltered.)
\begin{code}
-topRule :: RewriteRule
-topRule insts
- = do { (insts, changed) <- mapAndUnzipM top insts
- ; return (insts, or changed)
- }
+applySubstVarFam :: RewriteInst -> RewriteInst -> TcM (Maybe RewriteInst)
+applySubstVarFam eq1@(RewriteVar {rwi_var = tv1})
+ eq2@(RewriteFam {rwi_fam = fam2, rwi_args = args2})
+ | tv1 `elemVarSet` tyVarsOfTypes args2
+ = do { let co1Subst = substTyWith [tv1] [co1] (mkTyConApp fam2 args2)
+ args2' = substTysWith [tv1] [rhs1] args2
+ lhs2 = mkTyConApp fam2 args2'
+ ; co2' <- mkRightTransEqInstCo co2 co1Subst (lhs2, rhs2)
+ ; return $ Just (eq2 {rwi_args = args2', rwi_co = co2'})
+ }
where
- top inst
- = ASSERT( isEqInst inst )
- do { (coi1, ty1') <- tcNormaliseFamInst ty1
- ; (coi2, ty2') <- tcNormaliseFamInst ty2
- ; case (coi1, coi2) of
- (IdCo, IdCo) -> return (inst, False)
- _ ->
- do { wg_co <-
- eitherEqInst inst
- -- old_co = co1 * new_co * sym co2
- (\old_covar ->
- do { new_cotv <- newMetaCoVar ty1' ty2'
- ; let new_co = mkTyVarTy new_cotv
- old_coi = coi1 `mkTransCoI`
- ACo new_co `mkTransCoI`
- (mkSymCoI coi2)
- ; writeMetaTyVar old_covar (fromACo old_coi)
- ; return $ mkWantedCo new_cotv
- })
- -- new_co = sym co1 * old_co * co2
- (\old_co ->
- return $
- mkGivenCo $
- fromACo $
- mkSymCoI coi1 `mkTransCoI`
- ACo old_co `mkTransCoI` coi2)
- ; new_inst <- mkEqInst (EqPred ty1' ty2') wg_co
- ; return (new_inst, True)
- }
- }
- where
- ty1 = eqInstLeftTy inst
- ty2 = eqInstRightTy inst
+ rhs1 = rwi_right eq1
+ rhs2 = rwi_right eq2
+ co1 = eqInstCoType (rwi_co eq1)
+ co2 = rwi_co eq2
+applySubstVarFam _ _ = return Nothing
\end{code}
-Rewriting with equalities: substRule
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-From a set of insts, use all insts that can be read as rewrite rules to
-rewrite the types in all other insts.
-
- (Subst)
- g : F c ~ t,
- forall g1 : s1{F c} ~ s2{F c}
- >-->
- g2 : s1{t} ~ s2{t}
- g1 := s1{g} * g2 * sym s2{g} <=> g2 := sym s1{g} * g1 * s2{g}
+%************************************************************************
+%* *
+ Finalisation of equalities
+%* *
+%************************************************************************
-Alternatively, the rewrite rule may have the form (g : a ~ t).
+Exhaustive substitution of all variable equalities of the form co :: x ~ t
+(both local and wanted) into the left-hand sides of all other equalities. This
+may lead to recursive equalities; i.e., (1) we need to apply the substitution
+implied by one variable equality exhaustively before turning to the next and
+(2) we need an occurs check.
-To avoid having to swap rules of the form (g : t ~ F c) and (g : t ~ a),
-where t is neither a variable nor a type family application, we use them for
-rewriting from right-to-left. However, it is crucial to only apply rules
-from right-to-left if they cannot be used left-to-right.
+We also apply the same substitutions to the local and wanted class and IP
+dictionaries.
-The workhorse is substInst, which performs an occurs check before actually
-using an equality for rewriting. If the type pattern occurs in the type we
-substitute for the pattern, normalisation would diverge.
+NB: Given that we apply the substitution corresponding to a single equality
+exhaustively, before turning to the next, and because we eliminate recursive
+equalities, all opportunities for subtitution will have been exhausted after
+we have considered each equality once.
\begin{code}
-substRule :: RewriteRule
-substRule insts = tryAllInsts insts []
+substitute :: [RewriteInst] -- equalities
+ -> [Inst] -- local class dictionaries
+ -> [Inst] -- wanted class dictionaries
+ -> TcM ([RewriteInst], -- equalities after substitution
+ TcDictBinds, -- all newly generated dictionary bindings
+ [Inst], -- local dictionaries after substitution
+ [Inst]) -- wanted dictionaries after substitution
+substitute eqs locals wanteds = subst eqs [] emptyBag locals wanteds
where
- -- for every inst check whether it can be used to rewrite the others
- -- (we make an effort to keep the insts in order; it makes debugging
- -- easier)
- tryAllInsts [] triedInsts = return (reverse triedInsts, False)
- tryAllInsts (inst:insts) triedInsts
- = do { (insts', changed) <- substInst inst (reverse triedInsts ++ insts)
- ; if changed then return (insertAt (length triedInsts) inst insts',
- True)
- else tryAllInsts insts (inst:triedInsts)
+ subst [] res binds locals wanteds
+ = return (res, binds, locals, wanteds)
+ subst (eq@(RewriteVar {rwi_var = tv, rwi_right = ty, rwi_co = co}):eqs)
+ res binds locals wanteds
+ = do { traceTc $ ptext (sLit "TcTyFuns.substitute:") <+> ppr eq
+ ; let coSubst = zipOpenTvSubst [tv] [eqInstCoType co]
+ tySubst = zipOpenTvSubst [tv] [ty]
+ ; eqs' <- mapM (substEq eq coSubst tySubst) eqs
+ ; res' <- mapM (substEq eq coSubst tySubst) res
+ ; (lbinds, locals') <- mapAndUnzipM
+ (substDict eq coSubst tySubst False)
+ locals
+ ; (wbinds, wanteds') <- mapAndUnzipM
+ (substDict eq coSubst tySubst True)
+ wanteds
+ ; let binds' = unionManyBags $ binds : lbinds ++ wbinds
+ ; subst eqs' (eq:res') binds' locals' wanteds'
+ }
+ subst (eq:eqs) res binds locals wanteds
+ = subst eqs (eq:res) binds locals wanteds
+
+ -- We have, co :: tv ~ ty
+ -- => apply [ty/tv] to right-hand side of eq2
+ -- (but only if tv actually occurs in the right-hand side of eq2)
+ substEq (RewriteVar {rwi_var = tv, rwi_right = ty})
+ coSubst tySubst eq2
+ | tv `elemVarSet` tyVarsOfType (rwi_right eq2)
+ = do { let co1Subst = mkSymCoercion $ substTy coSubst (rwi_right eq2)
+ right2' = substTy tySubst (rwi_right eq2)
+ left2 = case eq2 of
+ RewriteVar {rwi_var = tv2} -> mkTyVarTy tv2
+ RewriteFam {rwi_fam = fam,
+ rwi_args = args} ->mkTyConApp fam args
+ ; co2' <- mkLeftTransEqInstCo (rwi_co eq2) co1Subst (left2, right2')
+ ; case eq2 of
+ RewriteVar {rwi_var = tv2} | tv2 `elemVarSet` tyVarsOfType ty
+ -> occurCheckErr left2 right2'
+ _ -> return $ eq2 {rwi_right = right2', rwi_co = co2'}
}
- where
- insertAt n x xs = let (xs1, xs2) = splitAt n xs
- in xs1 ++ [x] ++ xs2
-
--- Use the given inst as a rewrite rule to normalise the insts in the second
--- argument. Don't do anything if the inst cannot be used as a rewrite rule,
--- but do apply it right-to-left, if possible, and if it cannot be used
--- left-to-right.
---
-substInst :: Inst -> [Inst] -> TcM ([Inst], Bool)
-substInst inst insts
- = ASSERT( isEqInst inst )
- go (eqInstLeftTy inst) (eqInstRightTy inst) (eqInstType inst)
- where
- -- look through synonyms
- go ty1 ty2 co | Just ty1' <- tcView ty1 = go ty1' ty2 co
- go ty1 ty2 co | Just ty2' <- tcView ty2 = go ty1 ty2' co
-
- -- rewrite type family applications
- go ty1@(TyConApp con _) ty2 co
- | isOpenSynTyCon con
- = substEquality (ty1, ty2, co) insts
-
- -- rewrite skolems
- go ty1@(TyVarTy tv) ty2 co
- | isSkolemTyVar tv
- = substEquality (ty1, ty2, co) insts
- -- rewrite type family applications from right-to-left, only after
- -- having checked whether we can work left-to-right
- go ty1 ty2@(TyConApp con _) co
- | isOpenSynTyCon con
- = substEquality (ty2, ty1, mkSymCoercion co) insts
-
- -- rewrite skolems from right-to-left, only after having checked
- -- whether we can work left-to-right
- go ty1 ty2@(TyVarTy tv) co
- | isSkolemTyVar tv
- = substEquality (ty2, ty1, mkSymCoercion co) insts
-
- go _ _ _ = return (insts, False)
-
- substEquality :: (TcType, -- rewrite rule lhs
- TcType, -- rewrite rule rhs
- TcType) -- coercion witnessing the rewrite rule
- -> [Inst] -- insts to rewrite
- -> TcM ([Inst], Bool)
- substEquality eqRule@(pat, rhs, _) insts
- | pat `tcPartOfType` rhs -- occurs check!
- = occurCheckErr pat rhs
- | otherwise
- = do { (insts', changed) <- mapAndUnzipM substOne insts
- ; return (insts', or changed)
+ -- unchanged
+ substEq _ _ _ eq2
+ = return eq2
+
+ -- We have, co :: tv ~ ty
+ -- => apply [ty/tv] to dictionary predicate
+ -- (but only if tv actually occurs in the predicate)
+ substDict (RewriteVar {rwi_var = tv})
+ coSubst tySubst isWanted dict
+ | isClassDict dict
+ , tv `elemVarSet` tyVarsOfPred (tci_pred dict)
+ = do { let co1Subst = PredTy (substPred coSubst (tci_pred dict))
+ pred' = substPred tySubst (tci_pred dict)
+ ; (dict', binds) <- mkDictBind dict isWanted co1Subst pred'
+ ; return (binds, dict')
}
- where
- substOne inst
- = ASSERT( isEqInst inst )
- do { (coi1, ty1') <- tcEqRuleNormaliseFamInst eqRule ty1
- ; (coi2, ty2') <- tcEqRuleNormaliseFamInst eqRule ty2
- ; case (coi1, coi2) of
- (IdCo, IdCo) -> return (inst, False)
- _ ->
- do { gw_co <-
- eitherEqInst inst
- -- old_co := co1 * new_co * sym co2
- (\old_covar ->
- do { new_cotv <- newMetaCoVar ty1' ty2'
- ; let new_co = mkTyVarTy new_cotv
- old_coi = coi1 `mkTransCoI`
- ACo new_co `mkTransCoI`
- (mkSymCoI coi2)
- ; writeMetaTyVar old_covar (fromACo old_coi)
- ; return $ mkWantedCo new_cotv
- })
- -- new_co := sym co1 * old_co * co2
- (\old_co ->
- return $
- mkGivenCo $
- fromACo $
- mkSymCoI coi1 `mkTransCoI`
- ACo old_co `mkTransCoI` coi2)
- ; new_inst <- mkEqInst (EqPred ty1' ty2') gw_co
- ; return (new_inst, True)
- }
- }
- where
- ty1 = eqInstLeftTy inst
- ty2 = eqInstRightTy inst
+
+ -- unchanged
+ substDict _ _ _ _ dict
+ = return (emptyBag, dict)
+-- !!!TODO: Still need to substitute into IP constraints.
\end{code}
+For any *wanted* variable equality of the form co :: alpha ~ t or co :: a ~
+alpha, we instantiate alpha with t or a, respectively, and set co := id.
+Return all remaining wanted equalities. The Boolean result component is True
+if at least one instantiation of a flexible was performed.
-Instantiate meta variables: unifyMetaRule
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-If an equality equates a meta type variable with a type, we simply instantiate
-the meta variable.
+\begin{code}
+instantiateAndExtract :: [RewriteInst] -> TcM ([Inst], Bool)
+instantiateAndExtract eqs
+ = do { let wanteds = filter (isWantedCo . rwi_co) eqs
+ ; wanteds' <- mapM inst wanteds
+ ; let residuals = catMaybes wanteds'
+ improved = length wanteds /= length residuals
+ ; residuals' <- mapM rewriteInstToInst residuals
+ ; return (residuals', improved)
+ }
+ where
+ inst eq@(RewriteVar {rwi_var = tv1, rwi_right = ty2, rwi_co = co})
- (UnifyMeta)
- g : alpha ~ t
- >-->
- alpha := t
- g := t
+ -- co :: alpha ~ t
+ | isMetaTyVar tv1
+ = doInst (rwi_swapped eq) tv1 ty2 co eq
-Meta variables can only appear in wanted constraints, and this rule should
-only be applied to wanted constraints. We also know that t definitely is
-distinct from alpha (as the trivialRule) has been run on the insts beforehand.
+ -- co :: a ~ alpha
+ | Just tv2 <- tcGetTyVar_maybe ty2
+ , isMetaTyVar tv2
+ = doInst (not $ rwi_swapped eq) tv2 (mkTyVarTy tv1) co eq
-NB: We cannot assume that meta tyvars are empty. They may have been updated
-by another inst in the currently processed wanted list. We need to be very
-careful when updateing type variables (see TcUnify.uUnfilledVar), but at least
-we know that we have no boxes. It's unclear that it would be an advantage to
-common up the code in TcUnify and the code below. Firstly, we don't want
-calls to TcUnify.defer_unification here, and secondly, TcUnify import the
-current module, so we would have to move everything here (Yuk!) or to
-TcMType. Besides, the code here is much simpler due to the lack of boxes.
+ inst eq = return $ Just eq
-\begin{code}
-unifyMetaRule :: RewriteRule
-unifyMetaRule insts
- = do { (insts', changed) <- mapAndUnzipM unifyMeta insts
- ; return (concat insts', or changed)
- }
- where
- unifyMeta inst
- = ASSERT( isEqInst inst )
- go (eqInstLeftTy inst) (eqInstRightTy inst)
- (fromWantedCo "unifyMetaRule" $ eqInstCoercion inst)
+ doInst _swapped _tv _ty (Right ty) _eq
+ = pprPanic "TcTyFuns.doInst: local eq: " (ppr ty)
+ doInst swapped tv ty (Left cotv) eq
+ = do { lookupTV <- lookupTcTyVar tv
+ ; uMeta swapped tv lookupTV ty cotv
+ }
where
- go ty1 ty2 cotv
- | Just ty1' <- tcView ty1 = go ty1' ty2 cotv
- | Just ty2' <- tcView ty2 = go ty1 ty2' cotv
-
- | TyVarTy tv1 <- ty1
- , isMetaTyVar tv1 = do { lookupTV <- lookupTcTyVar tv1
- ; uMeta False tv1 lookupTV ty2 cotv
- }
- | TyVarTy tv2 <- ty2
- , isMetaTyVar tv2 = do { lookupTV <- lookupTcTyVar tv2
- ; uMeta True tv2 lookupTV ty1 cotv
- }
- | otherwise = return ([inst], False)
-
-- meta variable has been filled already
- -- => ignore this inst (we'll come around again, after zonking)
+ -- => ignore (must be a skolem that was introduced by flattening locals)
uMeta _swapped _tv (IndirectTv _) _ty _cotv
- = return ([inst], False)
-
- -- signature skolem meets non-variable type
- -- => cannot update!
- uMeta _swapped _tv (DoneTv (MetaTv (SigTv _) _)) ty _cotv
- | not $ isTyVarTy ty
- = return ([inst], False)
+ = return Nothing
-- type variable meets type variable
-- => check that tv2 hasn't been updated yet and choose which to update
- uMeta swapped tv1 (DoneTv details1) (TyVarTy tv2) cotv
- = do { lookupTV2 <- lookupTcTyVar tv2
+ uMeta swapped tv1 (DoneTv details1) (TyVarTy tv2) cotv
+ | tv1 == tv2
+ = panic "TcTyFuns.uMeta: normalisation shouldn't allow x ~ x"
+
+ | otherwise
+ = do { lookupTV2 <- lookupTcTyVar tv2
; case lookupTV2 of
- IndirectTv ty -> uMeta swapped tv1 (DoneTv details1) ty cotv
+ IndirectTv ty ->
+ uMeta swapped tv1 (DoneTv details1) ty cotv
DoneTv details2 ->
uMetaVar swapped tv1 details1 tv2 details2 cotv
- }
+ }
+
+ ------ Beyond this point we know that ty2 is not a type variable
+
+ -- signature skolem meets non-variable type
+ -- => cannot update (retain the equality)!
+ uMeta _swapped _tv (DoneTv (MetaTv (SigTv _) _)) _non_tv_ty _cotv
+ = return $ Just eq
-- updatable meta variable meets non-variable type
-- => occurs check, monotype check, and kinds match check, then update
- uMeta swapped tv (DoneTv (MetaTv _ ref)) ty cotv
- = do { mb_ty' <- checkTauTvUpdate tv ty -- occurs + monotype check
+ uMeta swapped tv (DoneTv (MetaTv _ ref)) non_tv_ty cotv
+ = do { -- occurs + monotype check
+ ; mb_ty' <- checkTauTvUpdate tv non_tv_ty
+
; case mb_ty' of
- Nothing -> return ([inst], False) -- tv occurs in faminst
+ Nothing ->
+ -- normalisation shouldn't leave families in non_tv_ty
+ panic "TcTyFuns.uMeta: unexpected synonym family"
Just ty' ->
do { checkUpdateMeta swapped tv ref ty' -- update meta var
- ; writeMetaTyVar cotv ty' -- update co var
- ; return ([], True)
+ ; writeMetaTyVar cotv ty' -- update co var
+ ; return Nothing
}
- }
+ }
- uMeta _ _ _ _ _ = panic "uMeta"
+ uMeta _ _ _ _ _ = panic "TcTyFuns.uMeta"
+ -- uMetaVar: unify two type variables
-- meta variable meets skolem
-- => just update
uMetaVar swapped tv1 (MetaTv _ ref) tv2 (SkolemTv _) cotv
= do { checkUpdateMeta swapped tv1 ref (mkTyVarTy tv2)
- ; writeMetaTyVar cotv (mkTyVarTy tv2)
- ; return ([], True)
- }
+ ; writeMetaTyVar cotv (mkTyVarTy tv2)
+ ; return Nothing
+ }
-- meta variable meets meta variable
-- => be clever about which of the two to update
-- The "nicer to" part only applies if the two kinds are the same,
-- so we can choose which to do.
- ; writeMetaTyVar cotv (mkTyVarTy tv2)
- ; return ([], True)
+ ; writeMetaTyVar cotv (mkTyVarTy tv2)
+ ; return Nothing
}
where
-- Kinds should be guaranteed ok at this point
%************************************************************************
%* *
-\section{Normalisation of Insts}
-%* *
-%************************************************************************
-
-Normalises a set of dictionaries relative to a set of given equalities (which
-are interpreted as rewrite rules). We only consider given equalities of the
-form
-
- F ts ~ t or a ~ t
-
-where F is a type family.
-
-\begin{code}
-substEqInDictInsts :: [Inst] -- given equalities (used as rewrite rules)
- -> [Inst] -- dictinaries to be normalised
- -> TcM ([Inst], TcDictBinds)
-substEqInDictInsts eqInsts dictInsts
- = do { traceTc (text "substEqInDictInst <-" <+> ppr dictInsts)
- ; dictInsts' <-
- foldlM rewriteWithOneEquality (dictInsts, emptyBag) eqInsts
- ; traceTc (text "substEqInDictInst ->" <+> ppr dictInsts')
- ; return dictInsts'
- }
- where
- -- (1) Given equality of form 'F ts ~ t' or 'a ~ t': use for rewriting
- rewriteWithOneEquality (dictInsts, dictBinds)
- eqInst@(EqInst {tci_left = pattern,
- tci_right = target})
- | isOpenSynTyConApp pattern || isTyVarTy pattern
- = do { (dictInsts', moreDictBinds) <-
- genericNormaliseInsts True {- wanted -} applyThisEq dictInsts
- ; return (dictInsts', dictBinds `unionBags` moreDictBinds)
- }
- where
- applyThisEq = tcGenericNormaliseFamInstPred (return . matchResult)
-
- -- rewrite in case of an exact match
- matchResult ty | tcEqType pattern ty = Just (target, eqInstType eqInst)
- | otherwise = Nothing
-
- -- (2) Given equality has the wrong form: ignore
- rewriteWithOneEquality (dictInsts, dictBinds) _not_a_rewrite_rule
- = return (dictInsts, dictBinds)
-\end{code}
-
-
-Take a bunch of Insts (not EqInsts), and normalise them wrt the top-level
-type-function equations, where
-
- (norm_insts, binds) = normaliseInsts is_wanted insts
-
-If 'is_wanted'
- = True, (binds + norm_insts) defines insts (wanteds)
- = False, (binds + insts) defines norm_insts (givens)
-
-Ie, in the case of normalising wanted dictionaries, we use the normalised
-dictionaries to define the originally wanted ones. However, in the case of
-given dictionaries, we use the originally given ones to define the normalised
-ones.
-
-\begin{code}
-normaliseInsts :: Bool -- True <=> wanted insts
- -> [Inst] -- wanted or given insts
- -> TcM ([Inst], TcDictBinds) -- normalised insts and bindings
-normaliseInsts isWanted insts
- = genericNormaliseInsts isWanted tcNormaliseFamInstPred insts
-
-genericNormaliseInsts :: Bool -- True <=> wanted insts
- -> (TcPredType -> TcM (CoercionI, TcPredType))
- -- how to normalise
- -> [Inst] -- wanted or given insts
- -> TcM ([Inst], TcDictBinds) -- normalised insts & binds
-genericNormaliseInsts isWanted fun insts
- = do { (insts', binds) <- mapAndUnzipM (normaliseOneInst isWanted fun) insts
- ; return (insts', unionManyBags binds)
- }
- where
- normaliseOneInst isWanted fun
- dict@(Dict {tci_pred = pred,
- tci_loc = loc})
- = do { traceTc $ text "genericNormaliseInst <-" <+> ppr dict
- ; (coi, pred') <- fun pred
-
- ; case coi of
- IdCo ->
- do { traceTc $ text "genericNormaliseInst ->" <+> ppr dict
- ; return (dict, emptyBag)
- }
- -- don't use pred' in this case; otherwise, we get
- -- more unfolded closed type synonyms in error messages
- ACo co ->
- do { -- an inst for the new pred
- ; dict' <- newDictBndr loc pred'
- -- relate the old inst to the new one
- -- target_dict = source_dict `cast` st_co
- ; let (target_dict, source_dict, st_co)
- | isWanted = (dict, dict', mkSymCoercion co)
- | otherwise = (dict', dict, co)
- -- we have
- -- co :: dict ~ dict'
- -- hence, if isWanted
- -- dict = dict' `cast` sym co
- -- else
- -- dict' = dict `cast` co
- expr = HsVar $ instToId source_dict
- cast_expr = HsWrap (WpCo st_co) expr
- rhs = L (instLocSpan loc) cast_expr
- binds = instToDictBind target_dict rhs
- -- return the new inst
- ; traceTc $ text "genericNormaliseInst ->" <+> ppr dict'
- ; return (dict', binds)
- }
- }
-
- -- TOMDO: What do we have to do about ImplicInst, Method, and LitInst??
- normaliseOneInst _isWanted _fun inst
- = do { inst' <- zonkInst inst
- ; return (inst', emptyBag)
- }
-\end{code}
-
-
-%************************************************************************
-%* *
\section{Errors}
%* *
%************************************************************************
eqInstMisMatch :: Inst -> TcM a
eqInstMisMatch inst
= ASSERT( isEqInst inst )
- do { (env, msg) <- misMatchMsg ty_act ty_exp
- ; setErrCtxt ctxt $
- failWithTcM (env, msg)
- }
+ setErrCtxt ctxt $ failWithMisMatch ty_act ty_exp
where
- ty_act = eqInstLeftTy inst
- ty_exp = eqInstRightTy inst
- InstLoc _ _ ctxt = instLoc inst
+ (ty_act, ty_exp) = eqInstTys inst
+ InstLoc _ _ ctxt = instLoc inst
-----------------------
-misMatchMsg :: TcType -> TcType -> TcM (TidyEnv, SDoc)
+failWithMisMatch :: TcType -> TcType -> TcM a
-- Generate the message when two types fail to match,
-- going to some trouble to make it helpful.
-- The argument order is: actual type, expected type
-misMatchMsg ty_act ty_exp
+failWithMisMatch ty_act ty_exp
= do { env0 <- tcInitTidyEnv
; ty_exp <- zonkTcType ty_exp
; ty_act <- zonkTcType ty_act
- ; (env1, pp_exp, extra_exp) <- ppr_ty env0 ty_exp
- ; (env2, pp_act, extra_act) <- ppr_ty env1 ty_act
- ; return (env2,
- sep [sep [ptext SLIT("Couldn't match expected type") <+> pp_exp,
- nest 7 $
- ptext SLIT("against inferred type") <+> pp_act],
- nest 2 (extra_exp $$ extra_act)]) }
-
-ppr_ty :: TidyEnv -> TcType -> TcM (TidyEnv, SDoc, SDoc)
-ppr_ty env ty
- = do { let (env1, tidy_ty) = tidyOpenType env ty
- ; (env2, extra) <- ppr_extra env1 tidy_ty
- ; return (env2, quotes (ppr tidy_ty), extra) }
-
--- (ppr_extra env ty) shows extra info about 'ty'
-ppr_extra :: TidyEnv -> Type -> TcM (TidyEnv, SDoc)
-ppr_extra env (TyVarTy tv)
- | isSkolemTyVar tv || isSigTyVar tv
- = return (env1, pprSkolTvBinding tv1)
+ ; failWithTcM (misMatchMsg env0 (ty_act, ty_exp))
+ }
+
+misMatchMsg :: TidyEnv -> (TcType, TcType) -> (TidyEnv, SDoc)
+misMatchMsg env0 (ty_act, ty_exp)
+ = let (env1, pp_exp, extra_exp) = ppr_ty env0 ty_exp
+ (env2, pp_act, extra_act) = ppr_ty env1 ty_act
+ msg = sep [sep [ptext (sLit "Couldn't match expected type") <+> pp_exp,
+ nest 7 $
+ ptext (sLit "against inferred type") <+> pp_act],
+ nest 2 (extra_exp $$ extra_act)]
+ in
+ (env2, msg)
+
where
- (env1, tv1) = tidySkolemTyVar env tv
+ ppr_ty :: TidyEnv -> TcType -> (TidyEnv, SDoc, SDoc)
+ ppr_ty env ty
+ = let (env1, tidy_ty) = tidyOpenType env ty
+ (env2, extra) = ppr_extra env1 tidy_ty
+ in
+ (env2, quotes (ppr tidy_ty), extra)
+
+ -- (ppr_extra env ty) shows extra info about 'ty'
+ ppr_extra :: TidyEnv -> Type -> (TidyEnv, SDoc)
+ ppr_extra env (TyVarTy tv)
+ | isTcTyVar tv && (isSkolemTyVar tv || isSigTyVar tv) && not (isUnk tv)
+ = (env1, pprSkolTvBinding tv1)
+ where
+ (env1, tv1) = tidySkolemTyVar env tv
+
+ ppr_extra env _ty = (env, empty) -- Normal case
+\end{code}
-ppr_extra env _ty = return (env, empty) -- Normal case
+Warn of loopy local equalities that were dropped.
+
+\begin{code}
+warnDroppingLoopyEquality :: TcType -> TcType -> TcM ()
+warnDroppingLoopyEquality ty1 ty2
+ = do { env0 <- tcInitTidyEnv
+ ; ty1 <- zonkTcType ty1
+ ; ty2 <- zonkTcType ty2
+ ; let (env1 , tidy_ty1) = tidyOpenType env0 ty1
+ (_env2, tidy_ty2) = tidyOpenType env1 ty2
+ ; addWarnTc $ hang (ptext (sLit "Dropping loopy given equality"))
+ 2 (quotes (ppr tidy_ty1 <+> text "~" <+> ppr tidy_ty2))
+ }
\end{code}
projects / ghc-hetmet.git / blobdiff