<varlistentry>
<term>
- <option>-g</option><replaceable>threads</replaceable>
- <indexterm><primary><option>-g</option></primary><secondary>RTS option</secondary></indexterm>
+ <option>-q1</option>
+ <indexterm><primary><option>-q1</option><secondary>RTS
+ option</secondary></primary></indexterm>
</term>
<listitem>
- <para>[Default: 1] [new in GHC 6.10] Set the number
- of threads to use for garbage collection. This option is
- only accepted when the program was linked with the
- <option>-threaded</option> option; see <xref
- linkend="options-linker" />.</para>
-
- <para>The garbage collector is able to work in parallel when
- given more than one OS thread. Experiments have shown
- that this usually results in a performance improvement
- given 3 cores or more; with 2 cores it may or may not be
- beneficial, depending on the workload. Bigger heaps work
- better with parallel GC, so set your <option>-H</option>
- value high (3 or more times the maximum residency). Look
- at the timing stats with <option>+RTS -s</option> to
- see whether you're getting any benefit from parallel GC or
- not. If you find parallel GC is
- significantly <emphasis>slower</emphasis> (in elapsed
- time) than sequential GC, please report it as a
- bug.</para>
-
- <para>This value is set automatically when the
- <option>-N</option> option is used, so the only reason to
- use <option>-g</option> would be if you wanted to use a
- different number of threads for GC than for execution.
- For example, if your program is strictly single-threaded
- but you still want to benefit from parallel GC, then it
- might make sense to use <option>-g</option> rather than
- <option>-N</option>.</para>
+ <para>[New in GHC 6.12.1] Disable the parallel GC.
+ The parallel GC is turned on automatically when parallel
+ execution is enabled with the <option>-N</option> option;
+ this option is available to turn it off if
+ necessary.</para>
+
+ <para>Experiments have shown that parallel GC usually
+ results in a performance improvement given 3 cores or
+ more; with 2 cores it may or may not be beneficial,
+ depending on the workload. Bigger heaps work better with
+ parallel GC, so set your <option>-H</option> value high (3
+ or more times the maximum residency). Look at the timing
+ stats with <option>+RTS -s</option> to see whether you're
+ getting any benefit from parallel GC or not. If you find
+ parallel GC is significantly <emphasis>slower</emphasis>
+ (in elapsed time) than sequential GC, please report it as
+ a bug.</para>
+
+ <para>In GHC 6.10.1 it was possible to use a different
+ number of threads for GC than for execution, because the GC
+ used its own pool of threads. Now, the GC uses the same
+ threads as the mutator (for executing the program).</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term>
+ <option>-qg<replaceable>n</replaceable></option>
+ <indexterm><primary><option>-qg</option><secondary>RTS
+ option</secondary></primary></indexterm>
+ </term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ [Default: 1] [New in GHC 6.12.1]
+ Enable the parallel GC only in
+ generation <replaceable>n</replaceable> and greater.
+ Parallel GC is often not worthwhile for collections in
+ generation 0 (the young generation), so it is enabled by
+ default only for collections in generation 1 (and higher,
+ if applicable).
+ </para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<option>-S</option><optional><replaceable>file</replaceable></optional>
<indexterm><primary><option>-S</option></primary><secondary>RTS option</secondary></indexterm>
</term>
+ <term>
+ <option>--machine-readable</option>
+ <indexterm><primary><option>--machine-readable</option></primary><secondary>RTS option</secondary></indexterm>
+ </term>
<listitem>
<para>These options produce runtime-system statistics, such
as the amount of time spent executing the program and in the
</itemizedlist>
<para>
+ You can also get this in a more future-proof, machine readable
+ format, with <literal>-t --machine-readable</literal>:
+ </para>
+
+<programlisting>
+ [("bytes allocated", "36169392")
+ ,("num_GCs", "69")
+ ,("average_bytes_used", "603392")
+ ,("max_bytes_used", "1065272")
+ ,("num_byte_usage_samples", "2")
+ ,("peak_megabytes_allocated", "3")
+ ,("init_cpu_seconds", "0.00")
+ ,("init_wall_seconds", "0.00")
+ ,("mutator_cpu_seconds", "0.02")
+ ,("mutator_wall_seconds", "0.02")
+ ,("GC_cpu_seconds", "0.07")
+ ,("GC_wall_seconds", "0.07")
+ ]
+</programlisting>
+
+ <para>
If you use the <literal>-s</literal> flag then, when your
program finishes, you will see something like this (the exact
details will vary depending on what sort of RTS you have, e.g.
]
</screen>
<para>The information is formatted such that it can be read as a
- of type <literal>[(String, String)]</literal>.</para>
+ of type <literal>[(String, String)]</literal>. Currently the following
+ fields are present:</para>
+
+ <variablelist>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>GHC RTS</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Is this program linked against the GHC RTS? (Currently
+ the answer is always yes.)</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>GHC version</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>The version of GHC used to compile this program.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>RTS way</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>The variant (“way”) of the runtime. Possible
+ values are <literal>rts</literal> (vanilla),
+ <literal>rts_thr</literal> (threaded runtime, i.e. linked using the
+ <literal>-threaded</literal> option) and <literal>rts_p</literal>
+ (profiling runtime, i.e. linked using the <literal>-prof</literal>
+ option). Other variants include <literal>t</literal>
+ (ticky-ticky profiling) and <literal>dyn</literal> (the RTS is
+ linked in dynamically, i.e. a shared library, rather than statically
+ linked into the executable itself).</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>Target platform</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>This is the platform the program is compiled to run on.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>Build platform</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>This is the platform where the program was compiled
+ from. (That is, the target platform of GHC itself.) Ordinarily
+ this is identical to the target platform. (It could potentially
+ be different if cross-compiling.)</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>Host platform</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>This is the platform where GHC itself was compiled.
+ Again, this would normally be identical to the build and
+ target platforms.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>Compiler unregistered</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Was this program compiled with an “unregistered”
+ version of GHC? (I.e., a version of GHC that has no platform-specific
+ optimisations compiled in, usually because this is a currently
+ unsupported platform.) This value will usually be no, unless you're
+ using an experimental build of GHC.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><literal>Tables next to code</literal></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Putting info tables directly next to entry code is a useful
+ performance optimisation that is not available on all platforms.
+ This field tells you whether the program has been compiled with
+ this optimisation. (Usually yes, except on unusual platforms.)</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ </variablelist>
+
</sect2>
</sect1>
projects / ghc-hetmet.git / blobdiff