X-Git-Url: http://git.megacz.com/?p=ghc-hetmet.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=compiler%2FsimplCore%2FSimplUtils.lhs;h=56b07c480481a5b3f15d47cd52b577da3eafe843;hp=c541096c40a39752865d1ffcd7af464510891677;hb=a263737bbf44050a7b5ecbe267ddf85d410b73e5;hpb=545cdeb52fc4feea3fa9668706e05ad75041f8b0 diff --git a/compiler/simplCore/SimplUtils.lhs b/compiler/simplCore/SimplUtils.lhs index c541096..56b07c4 100644 --- a/compiler/simplCore/SimplUtils.lhs +++ b/compiler/simplCore/SimplUtils.lhs @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ Inlining is controlled partly by the SimplifierMode switch. This has two settings: SimplGently (a) Simplifying before specialiser/full laziness - (b) Simplifiying inside INLINE pragma + (b) Simplifiying inside InlineRules (c) Simplifying the LHS of a rule (d) Simplifying a GHCi expression or Template Haskell splice @@ -431,11 +431,11 @@ running it, we don't want to use -O2. Indeed, we don't want to inline anything, because the byte-code interpreter might get confused about unboxed tuples and suchlike. -INLINE pragmas -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -We don't simplify inside InlineRules (which come from INLINE pragmas). -It really is important to switch off inlinings inside such -expressions. Consider the following example +Note [Simplifying gently inside InlineRules] +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +We don't do much simplification inside InlineRules (which come from +INLINE pragmas). It really is important to switch off inlinings +inside such expressions. Consider the following example let f = \pq -> BIG in @@ -444,16 +444,14 @@ expressions. Consider the following example in ...g...g...g...g...g... Now, if that's the ONLY occurrence of f, it will be inlined inside g, -and thence copied multiple times when g is inlined. +and thence copied multiple times when g is inlined. - -This function may be inlinined in other modules, so we -don't want to remove (by inlining) calls to functions that have -specialisations, or that may have transformation rules in an importing -scope. +This function may be inlinined in other modules, so we don't want to +remove (by inlining) calls to functions that have specialisations, or +that may have transformation rules in an importing scope. E.g. {-# INLINE f #-} - f x = ...g... + f x = ...g... and suppose that g is strict *and* has specialisations. If we inline g's wrapper, we deny f the chance of getting the specialised version @@ -471,15 +469,14 @@ continuation. That's why the keep_inline predicate returns True for ArgOf continuations. It shouldn't do any harm not to dissolve the inline-me note under these circumstances. -Note that the result is that we do very little simplification -inside an InlineMe. +Although we do very little simplification inside an InlineRule, +the RHS is simplified as normal. For example: all xs = foldr (&&) True xs any p = all . map p {-# INLINE any #-} -Problem: any won't get deforested, and so if it's exported and the -importer doesn't use the inlining, (eg passes it as an arg) then we -won't get deforestation at all. We havn't solved this problem yet! +The RHS of 'any' will get optimised and deforested; but the InlineRule +will still mention the original RHS. preInlineUnconditionally