X-Git-Url: http://git.megacz.com/?p=ghc-hetmet.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=compiler%2Ftypecheck%2FTcSimplify.lhs;h=57ff63649afb8cda884ff02a445c55ebc997826f;hp=0012b1ea5b7fef841cfc0b86270b6c80be4dbe35;hb=224ef3094189bc9a33f23285b5dccbffdd8d7de0;hpb=fdf8656855d26105ff36bdd24d41827b05037b91 diff --git a/compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs b/compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs index 0012b1e..57ff636 100644 --- a/compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs +++ b/compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ simplifyTop :: WantedConstraints -> TcM (Bag EvBind) -- but when there is nothing to quantify we don't wrap -- in a degenerate implication, so we do that here instead simplifyTop wanteds - = simplifyCheck SimplCheck wanteds + = simplifyCheck (SimplCheck (ptext (sLit "top level"))) wanteds ------------------ simplifyInteractive :: WantedConstraints -> TcM (Bag EvBind) @@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ simplifyDefault :: ThetaType -- Wanted; has no type variables in it -> TcM () -- Succeeds iff the constraint is soluble simplifyDefault theta = do { wanted <- newFlatWanteds DefaultOrigin theta - ; _ignored_ev_binds <- simplifyCheck SimplCheck (mkFlatWC wanted) + ; _ignored_ev_binds <- simplifyCheck (SimplCheck (ptext (sLit "defaults"))) + (mkFlatWC wanted) ; return () } \end{code} @@ -77,13 +78,14 @@ simplifyDefault theta \begin{code} simplifyDeriv :: CtOrigin - -> [TyVar] - -> ThetaType -- Wanted - -> TcM ThetaType -- Needed + -> PredType + -> [TyVar] + -> ThetaType -- Wanted + -> TcM ThetaType -- Needed -- Given instance (wanted) => C inst_ty -- Simplify 'wanted' as much as possibles -- Fail if not possible -simplifyDeriv orig tvs theta +simplifyDeriv orig pred tvs theta = do { tvs_skols <- tcInstSkolTyVars tvs -- Skolemize -- The constraint solving machinery -- expects *TcTyVars* not TyVars. @@ -92,12 +94,13 @@ simplifyDeriv orig tvs theta ; let skol_subst = zipTopTvSubst tvs $ map mkTyVarTy tvs_skols subst_skol = zipTopTvSubst tvs_skols $ map mkTyVarTy tvs + doc = parens $ ptext (sLit "deriving") <+> parens (ppr pred) ; wanted <- newFlatWanteds orig (substTheta skol_subst theta) ; traceTc "simplifyDeriv" (ppr tvs $$ ppr theta $$ ppr wanted) ; (residual_wanted, _binds) - <- runTcS SimplInfer NoUntouchables $ + <- runTcS (SimplInfer doc) NoUntouchables $ solveWanteds emptyInert (mkFlatWC wanted) ; let (good, bad) = partitionBagWith get_good (wc_flat residual_wanted) @@ -249,7 +252,7 @@ simplifyInfer top_lvl apply_mr name_taus wanteds -- Step 2 -- Now simplify the possibly-bound constraints ; (simpl_results, tc_binds0) - <- runTcS SimplInfer NoUntouchables $ + <- runTcS (SimplInfer (ppr (map fst name_taus))) NoUntouchables $ simplifyWithApprox (zonked_wanteds { wc_flat = perhaps_bound }) ; when (insolubleWC simpl_results) -- Fail fast if there is an insoluble constraint @@ -549,7 +552,7 @@ simplifyRule name tv_bndrs lhs_wanted rhs_wanted -- variables; hence *no untouchables* ; (lhs_results, lhs_binds) - <- runTcS SimplRuleLhs untch $ + <- runTcS (SimplRuleLhs name) untch $ solveWanteds emptyInert zonked_lhs ; traceTc "simplifyRule" $ @@ -591,7 +594,8 @@ simplifyRule name tv_bndrs lhs_wanted rhs_wanted -- Hence the rather painful ad-hoc treatement here ; rhs_binds_var@(EvBindsVar evb_ref _) <- newTcEvBinds - ; rhs_binds1 <- simplifyCheck SimplCheck $ + ; let doc = ptext (sLit "rhs of rule") <+> doubleQuotes (ftext name) + ; rhs_binds1 <- simplifyCheck (SimplCheck doc) $ WC { wc_flat = emptyBag , wc_insol = emptyBag , wc_impl = unitBag $