X-Git-Url: http://git.megacz.com/?p=ghc-hetmet.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=docs%2Fusers_guide%2Fglasgow_exts.xml;h=43e84394c085b4b308f3bf210fdbb589d81dba87;hp=31206017e7b76cc6b7ff0fa4b12e0de7fee36ddf;hb=58521c72cec262496dabf5fffb057d25ab17a0f7;hpb=5eb2190d2aebc6e1a11780a43d31cbc7e831dd78
diff --git a/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml b/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml
index 3120601..43e8439 100644
--- a/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml
+++ b/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ While you really can use this stuff to write fast code,
All these primitive data types and operations are exported by the
library GHC.Prim, for which there is
-detailed online documentation.
+detailed online documentation.
(This documentation is generated from the file compiler/prelude/primops.txt.pp.)
@@ -210,22 +210,20 @@ in a top-level binding.
in a recursive binding.
You may bind unboxed variables in a (non-recursive,
-non-top-level) pattern binding, but any such variable causes the entire
-pattern-match
-to become strict. For example:
+non-top-level) pattern binding, but you must make any such pattern-match
+strict. For example, rather than:
data Foo = Foo Int Int#
f x = let (Foo a b, w) = ..rhs.. in ..body..
-Since b has type Int#, the entire pattern
-match
-is strict, and the program behaves as if you had written
+you must write:
data Foo = Foo Int Int#
- f x = case ..rhs.. of { (Foo a b, w) -> ..body.. }
+ f x = let !(Foo a b, w) = ..rhs.. in ..body..
+since b has type Int#.
@@ -876,7 +874,7 @@ As you can guess justOnes will evaluate to Just [1,1
-The Control.Monad.Fix library introduces the MonadFix class. It's definition is:
+The Control.Monad.Fix library introduces the MonadFix class. Its definition is:
class Monad m => MonadFix m where
@@ -1003,11 +1001,12 @@ This name is not supported by GHC.
Generalised list comprehensions are a further enhancement to the
- list comprehension syntatic sugar to allow operations such as sorting
+ list comprehension syntactic sugar to allow operations such as sorting
and grouping which are familiar from SQL. They are fully described in the
paper
Comprehensive comprehensions: comprehensions with "order by" and "group by",
except that the syntax we use differs slightly from the paper.
+The extension is enabled with the flag .Here is an example:
employees = [ ("Simon", "MS", 80)
@@ -1043,7 +1042,7 @@ then f
This statement requires that f have the type
- forall a. [a] -> [a]. You can see an example of it's use in the
+ forall a. [a] -> [a]. You can see an example of its use in the
motivating example, as this form is used to apply take 5.
@@ -1270,6 +1269,44 @@ definitions; you must define such a function in prefix form.
+
+Tuple sections
+
+
+ The flag enables Python-style partially applied
+ tuple constructors. For example, the following program
+
+ (, True)
+
+ is considered to be an alternative notation for the more unwieldy alternative
+
+ \x -> (x, True)
+
+You can omit any combination of arguments to the tuple, as in the following
+
+ (, "I", , , "Love", , 1337)
+
+which translates to
+
+ \a b c d -> (a, "I", b, c, "Love", d, 1337)
+
+
+
+
+ If you have unboxed tuples enabled, tuple sections
+ will also be available for them, like so
+
+ (# , True #)
+
+Because there is no unboxed unit tuple, the following expression
+
+ (# #)
+
+continues to stand for the unboxed singleton tuple data constructor.
+
+
+
+
Record field disambiguation
@@ -2353,16 +2390,46 @@ otherwise is a generalised data type (
+As with other type signatures, you can give a single signature for several data constructors.
+In this example we give a single signature for T1 and T2:
+
+ data T a where
+ T1,T2 :: a -> T a
+ T3 :: T a
+
+
+
+
The type signature of
each constructor is independent, and is implicitly universally quantified as usual.
-Different constructors may have different universally-quantified type variables
-and different type-class constraints.
-For example, this is fine:
+In particular, the type variable(s) in the "data T a where" header
+have no scope, and different constructors may have different universally-quantified type variables:
+
+ data T a where -- The 'a' has no scope
+ T1,T2 :: b -> T b -- Means forall b. b -> T b
+ T3 :: T a -- Means forall a. T a
+
+
+
+
+A constructor signature may mention type class constraints, which can differ for
+different constructors. For example, this is fine:
data T a where
- T1 :: Eq b => b -> T b
+ T1 :: Eq b => b -> b -> T b
T2 :: (Show c, Ix c) => c -> [c] -> T c
+When patten matching, these constraints are made available to discharge constraints
+in the body of the match. For example:
+
+ f :: T a -> String
+ f (T1 x y) | x==y = "yes"
+ | otherwise = "no"
+ f (T2 a b) = show a
+
+Note that f is not overloaded; the Eq constraint arising
+from the use of == is discharged by the pattern match on T1
+and similarly the Show constraint arising from the use of show.
@@ -2374,12 +2441,12 @@ have no scope. Indeed, one can write a kind signature instead:
or even a mixture of the two:
- data Foo a :: (* -> *) -> * where ...
+ data Bar a :: (* -> *) -> * where ...
The type variables (if given) may be explicitly kinded, so we could also write the header for Foo
like this:
- data Foo a (b :: * -> *) where ...
+ data Bar a (b :: * -> *) where ...
@@ -2410,27 +2477,48 @@ declaration. For example, these two declarations are equivalent
+The type signature may have quantified type variables that do not appear
+in the result type:
+
+ data Foo where
+ MkFoo :: a -> (a->Bool) -> Foo
+ Nil :: Foo
+
+Here the type variable a does not appear in the result type
+of either constructor.
+Although it is universally quantified in the type of the constructor, such
+a type variable is often called "existential".
+Indeed, the above declaration declares precisely the same type as
+the data Foo in .
+
+The type may contain a class context too, of course:
+
+ data Showable where
+ MkShowable :: Show a => a -> Showable
+
+
+
+
You can use record syntax on a GADT-style data type declaration:
data Person where
- Adult { name :: String, children :: [Person] } :: Person
- Child { name :: String } :: Person
+ Adult :: { name :: String, children :: [Person] } -> Person
+ Child :: Show a => { name :: !String, funny :: a } -> Person
As usual, for every constructor that has a field f, the type of
field f must be the same (modulo alpha conversion).
-
-
-At the moment, record updates are not yet possible with GADT-style declarations,
-so support is limited to record construction, selection and pattern matching.
-For example
-
- aPerson = Adult { name = "Fred", children = [] }
+The Child constructor above shows that the signature
+may have a context, existentially-quantified variables, and strictness annotations,
+just as in the non-record case. (NB: the "type" that follows the double-colon
+is not really a type, because of the record syntax and strictness annotations.
+A "type" of this form can appear only in a constructor signature.)
+
- shortName :: Person -> Bool
- hasChildren (Adult { children = kids }) = not (null kids)
- hasChildren (Child {}) = False
-
+
+Record updates are allowed with GADT-style declarations,
+only fields that have the following property: the type of the field
+mentions no existential type variables.
@@ -2529,7 +2617,7 @@ constructor).
-It's is permitted to declare an ordinary algebraic data type using GADT-style syntax.
+It is permitted to declare an ordinary algebraic data type using GADT-style syntax.
What makes a GADT into a GADT is not the syntax, but rather the presence of data constructors
whose result type is not just T a b.
@@ -4248,7 +4336,7 @@ type family Elem c
example, consider the following declaration:
type family F a b :: * -> * -- F's arity is 2,
- -- although it's overall kind is * -> * -> * -> *
+ -- although its overall kind is * -> * -> * -> *
Given this declaration the following are examples of well-formed and
malformed types:
@@ -5853,6 +5941,8 @@ Wiki page.
an expression; the spliced expression must
have type Q Exp
+ an type; the spliced expression must
+ have type Q Typ a list of top-level declarations; the spliced expression must have type Q [Dec]
@@ -5901,7 +5991,7 @@ Wiki page.
(Compared to the original paper, there are many differences of detail.
The syntax for a declaration splice uses "$" not "splice".
The type of the enclosed expression must be Q [Dec], not [Q Dec].
-Type splices are not implemented, and neither are pattern splices or quotations.
+Pattern splices and quotations are not implemented.)