From: simonpj@microsoft.com <unknown>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:32:05 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Fix flag name -XDisambiguateRecordFields
X-Git-Url: http://git.megacz.com/?p=ghc-hetmet.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=ead1eed0b8ba1a7818ddc36f07e57b794e91483d

Fix flag name -XDisambiguateRecordFields
---

diff --git a/docs/users_guide/flags.xml b/docs/users_guide/flags.xml
index c8eedd2..540230d 100644
--- a/docs/users_guide/flags.xml
+++ b/docs/users_guide/flags.xml
@@ -659,11 +659,11 @@
 	      <entry><option>-XNoArrows</option></entry>
 	    </row>
 	    <row>
-	      <entry><option>-fdisambiguate-record-fields</option></entry>
+	      <entry><option>-XDisambiguateRecordFields</option></entry>
 	      <entry>Enable <link linkend="disambiguate-fields">record 
 	      field disambiguation</link></entry>
 	      <entry>dynamic</entry>
-	      <entry><option>-fno-disambiguate-record-fields</option></entry>
+	      <entry><option>-XNoDisambiguateRecordFields</option></entry>
 	    </row>
 	    <row>
 	      <entry><option>-XForeignFunctionInterface</option></entry>
diff --git a/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml b/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml
index 2883757..9da3253 100644
--- a/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml
+++ b/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml
@@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ it is not clear which of the two types is intended.
 </para>
 <para>
 Haskell 98 regards all four as ambiguous, but with the
-<option>-fdisambiguate-record-fields</option> flag, GHC will accept
+<option>-XDisambiguateRecordFields</option> flag, GHC will accept
 the former two.  The rules are precisely the same as those for instance
 declarations in Haskell 98, where the method names on the left-hand side 
 of the method bindings in an instance declaration refer unambiguously