From 678086d0d26108713d1c361ab07d5ae12e24f363 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "simonpj@microsoft.com" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:46:24 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Spelling in comment only --- compiler/typecheck/TcInstDcls.lhs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/compiler/typecheck/TcInstDcls.lhs b/compiler/typecheck/TcInstDcls.lhs index 7d3b012..eab7748 100644 --- a/compiler/typecheck/TcInstDcls.lhs +++ b/compiler/typecheck/TcInstDcls.lhs @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ Running example: inline df_i in it, and that in turn means that (since it'll be a loop-breaker because df_i isn't), op1_i will ironically never be inlined. We need to fix this somehow -- perhaps allowing inlining - of INLINE funcitons inside other INLINE functions. + of INLINE functions inside other INLINE functions. Note [Subtle interaction of recursion and overlap] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- 1.7.10.4