From 8480d7688a773d54c4776aeae1138b6b18f0736b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: simonmar <unknown>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:57:40 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] [project @ 2003-07-28 15:57:40 by simonmar]
 TICK_UPD_CON_IN_NEW() in the update code is wrong now,
 because it could be a PAP, not just a CON.

---
 ghc/rts/Updates.hc |    6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ghc/rts/Updates.hc b/ghc/rts/Updates.hc
index b47b7c6..5965ea9 100644
--- a/ghc/rts/Updates.hc
+++ b/ghc/rts/Updates.hc
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- * $Id: Updates.hc,v 1.40 2003/05/14 09:14:00 simonmar Exp $
+ * $Id: Updates.hc,v 1.41 2003/07/28 15:57:40 simonmar Exp $
  *
  * (c) The GHC Team, 1998-2002
  *
@@ -56,9 +56,7 @@
 	  /* remove the update frame from the stack */			\
 	  Sp += sizeofW(StgUpdateFrame);				\
 									\
-	  /* Tick - it must be a con, all the paps are handled		\
-	   * in stg_upd_PAP and PAP_entry below				\
-	   */								\
+	  /* ToDo: it might be a PAP, so we should check... */		\
 	  TICK_UPD_CON_IN_NEW(sizeW_fromITBL(get_itbl(updatee)));	\
 									\
 	  UPD_SPEC_IND(updatee, ind_info, R1.cl, JMP_(ret));		\
-- 
1.7.10.4