From 8aa44328884efa12ef22999ec01ebf368bd7bca2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Marlow Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:44:15 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] rollback "accounting wibble: we were missing an alloc_blocks .. " I misread the code, now added a comment to explain why it isn't necessary --- rts/sm/Storage.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/rts/sm/Storage.c b/rts/sm/Storage.c index eb29b2d..34284e5 100644 --- a/rts/sm/Storage.c +++ b/rts/sm/Storage.c @@ -663,7 +663,9 @@ allocateLocal (Capability *cap, nat n) bd->gen_no = 0; bd->step = cap->r.rNursery; bd->flags = 0; - alloc_blocks++; + // NO: alloc_blocks++; + // calcAllocated() uses the size of the nursery, and we've + // already bumpted nursery->n_blocks above. } else { // we have a block in the nursery: take it and put // it at the *front* of the nursery list, and use it -- 1.7.10.4