From 90bbfd9f775c1018d6d5c4a9df7c3b277bb89e3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Lynagh Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:59:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix comment/code inconsistency spotted by Bulat Ziganshin I'm not sure if this is the example that was intended, but it's at least now consistent. --- docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml b/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml index afb4447..f8ea3c7 100644 --- a/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml +++ b/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml @@ -3360,7 +3360,7 @@ signature. For example: -- f and g assume that 'a' is already in scope - f = \(x::Int, y) -> x + f = \(x::Int, y::a) -> x g (x::a) = x h ((x,y) :: (Int,Bool)) = (y,x) -- 1.7.10.4