From 949499484225617839916e6aba414f9f3b38aab1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "simonpj@microsoft.com" Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:16:02 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix the DPH/profiled make thing (again) --- ghc.mk | 24 ++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/ghc.mk b/ghc.mk index 9a52105..3214c65 100644 --- a/ghc.mk +++ b/ghc.mk @@ -349,20 +349,28 @@ $(eval $(call addPackage,haskeline)) $(foreach pkg,$(EXTRA_PACKAGES),$(eval $(call addPackage,$(pkg)))) -ifneq "$(BootingFromHc)" "YES" -ifneq "$(GhcProfiled)" "YES" -# DPH uses Template Haskell, and Template Haskell doesn't work -# with a profiled compiler. So if stage-2 is profile, don't build DPH -PACKAGES_STAGE2 += \ - dph/dph-base \ +# ------------------- Adding DPH packaes --------------- +DPH_PACKAGES = dph/dph-base \ dph/dph-prim-interface \ dph/dph-prim-seq \ dph/dph-prim-par \ dph/dph-seq \ dph/dph-par -endif -endif +ifneq "$(BootingFromHc)" "YES" +ifeq "$(CLEANING)" "YES" +# If we are cleaning we must add DPH packages regardless, +# for reasons we now forget +PACKAGES_STAGE2 += $(DPH_PACKAGES) +else # not CLEANING +ifneq "$(GhcProfiled)" "YES" +# DPH uses Template Haskell, and Template Haskell doesn't work +# with a profiled compiler. So if stage-2 is profile, don't build DPH +PACKAGES_STAGE2 += $(DPH_PACKAGES) +endif # GhcProfiled +endif # Cleaning +endif # BootingFromHc +# ------------------------------------------------------- # We assume that the stage0 compiler has a suitable bytestring package, # so we don't have to include it below. -- 1.7.10.4