From ead1eed0b8ba1a7818ddc36f07e57b794e91483d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "simonpj@microsoft.com" Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:32:05 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix flag name -XDisambiguateRecordFields --- docs/users_guide/flags.xml | 4 ++-- docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/users_guide/flags.xml b/docs/users_guide/flags.xml index c8eedd2..540230d 100644 --- a/docs/users_guide/flags.xml +++ b/docs/users_guide/flags.xml @@ -659,11 +659,11 @@ - + Enable record field disambiguation dynamic - + diff --git a/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml b/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml index 2883757..9da3253 100644 --- a/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml +++ b/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml @@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ it is not clear which of the two types is intended. Haskell 98 regards all four as ambiguous, but with the - flag, GHC will accept + flag, GHC will accept the former two. The rules are precisely the same as those for instance declarations in Haskell 98, where the method names on the left-hand side of the method bindings in an instance declaration refer unambiguously -- 1.7.10.4