X-Git-Url: http://git.megacz.com/?p=sbp.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=TODO;h=1e53bb83803c4c468679d4feecd2e18fc61b6032;hp=78baf0190bfcc2c917c6ac3e0a612001155201a8;hb=f22d53e6ae3581e6c2dc096fd0cf93c18e2d2538;hpb=ea5d0a5e3dffb5ba0143179fd28608c2de8046e0 diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index 78baf01..1e53bb8 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -1,29 +1,57 @@ - -______________________________________________________________________________ +_____________________________________________________________________________ Immediately - - switch maximal to not-followed-by (~/~) +- If a top-level rule has labels but no head-tag, like this + Foo = a:Bar b:Baz + then infer the name of the rule it belongs to + +create( $c:{...}, class ) = + return create($c:{...}) + +create( h:{...}, class ) = + +create( , String) + +create( _:{...}, String) = treat as char[] +create( _:{...}, c[] ) = { create(.,c), create(.,c), ... } - - should Union.add() be there? - - should Atom.top() be there? +create( $c:{...} ) = - - fix the location stuff, it's broken - - decent/better error messages + - better ambiguity debugging tools / visualization + + - ParseFailed, GSS, Walk, Parser, Sequence, Forest + + - Fix the metagrammar (really?) + - evil problems with (x y? z /ws) + + - copyright notices + - documentation + +______________________________________________________________________________ +v1.1 + + - finalize metagrammar and rdp-op's - write some grammars - Java grammar - TeX (math?) - URL (RFC) - RFC2822 (email message/headers) - - Wiki grammar + - clean up the whole Walk situation (?) + + - what if Tree<> could unwrap itself? + ______________________________________________________________________________ Soon - - clean up the whole Walk situation + - serialization of parse tables - - cleaner solution to "maximal"? + - "ambiguity modulo dropped fragments"? + - can this be checked statically? + - eliminated statically? + - substring parsing for better error messages - "lift" cases: - right now I can only lift the last child in a forest... begs the question of what the right representation for Forests is @@ -33,9 +61,18 @@ Soon - "Regular Right Part" grammars (NP Chapman, etc) - Attribute unification + - inference of rejections for literals + - "prefer whitespace higher up" (?) + + - Labeled edges on trees (associate a label with each slot in the + child array in Forest.Body? might make equality tough) -- + equivalent to Feature Structures. Colon-labeling. + ______________________________________________________________________________ Later + - Partly-Linear-PATR? (O(n^6) unification grammar) + - Implement a k-token peek buffer (for each state, see if it "dead ends" during the next k Phases based solely on state -- ignoring result SPPF) @@ -47,11 +84,6 @@ Later nodes which are transient in the sense that they have only one eligible reduction? - - Implement "GLR syntactic predicates" -- the ability to do - arbitrary lookahead (ie "followed-by" and "not-followed-by" for - arbitrary patterns). This enables generalized longest-match and - lets us drop the Maximal hack. - - Re-read Rekers, particularly the stuff on optimal sharing - Isolate the Element objects from Parse.Table/GSS so we can move @@ -108,3 +140,23 @@ Later - implement Johnstone's algorithm for "reduced, resolved LR tables" to eliminate superfluous reductions on epsilon-transitions. + +______________________________________________________________________________ +Neat Ideas + + - Rekers & Koorn note that GLR Substring Parsing can be used to do + really elegant and generalized "autocompletion". + + +______________________________________________________________________________ +Ideas for the Future + +- Incremental parse table construction +- "lazy GLR" and "lazy trees" -> language with first-class CF matching + - perhaps linear boolean grammars instead? (linear time, quad space) +- Forest parsing => chained parsers +- unification parsing, attributes, etc +- RRP grammars? +- Take another stab at maximal-match? Nonterminal not-followed-by is + too strong. +- Error recovery based on substring parsing