checkpoint
authoradam <adam@megacz.com>
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 08:49:21 +0000 (03:49 -0500)
committeradam <adam@megacz.com>
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 08:49:21 +0000 (03:49 -0500)
darcs-hash:20060104084921-5007d-efe171e31561d14c8c2458e3973294ec21cdc443.gz

src/edu/berkeley/sbp/GSS.java

index 4970936..26b6448 100644 (file)
@@ -215,15 +215,10 @@ class GSS {
 
             /** FIXME */
             public void queueEmptyReductions() {
-                if (reducing) {
-                    for(Parser.Table.Reduction r : token==null ? state.getEofReductions() : state.getReductions(token)) {
-                        if (r.numPop==0) {
-                            //r.reduce(this, null, this.phase, r.zero());
-                            Reduct red = new Reduct(this, null, r);
-                            red.go();   /* ALLOC */
-                        }
-                    }
-                }
+                if (reducing)
+                    for(Parser.Table.Reduction r : token==null ? state.getEofReductions() : state.getReductions(token))
+                        if (r.numPop==0)
+                            r.reduce(this, null, this.phase, r.zero());
             }
 
             private Node(Node parent, Forest pending, Parser.Table.State state, Phase start) {
@@ -270,6 +265,7 @@ class GSS {
                 reductions.add(this);
                 pendingReduct.addFirst(this);
                 pendingReductions++;
+                //if (reducing) go();
             }
 
             /** perform the reduction */
@@ -279,9 +275,20 @@ class GSS {
                 pendingReduct.remove(this);
                 pendingReductions--;
 
-                if (r==null)
+                if (r==null) {
                     for(Parser.Table.Reduction r : token==null ? n.state.getEofReductions() : n.state.getReductions(token)) {
                         
+                        // UGLY HACK
+                        // The problem here is that a "reduction of length 1"
+                        // performed twice with different values of n2 needs
+                        // to only create a *single* new result, but must add
+                        // multiple parents to the node holding that result.
+                        // The current reducer doesn't differentiate between
+                        // the next node of an n-pop reduction and the
+                        // ultimate parent of the last pop, so we need to
+                        // cache instances here as a way of avoiding
+                        // recreating them.
+
                         // currently we have this weird problem where we
                         // have to do an individual reduct for each child
                         // when the reduction length is one (ie the
@@ -289,34 +296,17 @@ class GSS {
                         // created node rather than part of the popped
                         // sequence
                         
-                        if (r.numPop == 1) new Reduct(n, n2, r)/*.go()*/;
+                        if (r.numPop == 1) {
+                            Forest ret = n.cache().get(r);
+                            if (ret != null) r.reduce(n, n2, n.phase, ret);
+                            else n.cache().put(r, r.reduce(n, n2, n.phase, null));
+                        }
                     }
-
-
-                // FIXME: explain this
-                if (r==null) {
                     for(Parser.Table.Reduction r : token==null ? n.state.getEofReductions() : n.state.getReductions(token)) {
                         if (r.numPop <= 1) continue;
                         r.reduce(n, n2, Phase.this, null);
                     }
-                } else if (r.numPop==0) { r.reduce(n, n2, n.phase, r.zero());
-                } else if (r.numPop==1) {
-                    // UGLY HACK
-                    // The problem here is that a "reduction of length 1"
-                    // performed twice with different values of n2 needs
-                    // to only create a *single* new result, but must add
-                    // multiple parents to the node holding that result.
-                    // The current reducer doesn't differentiate between
-                    // the next node of an n-pop reduction and the
-                    // ultimate parent of the last pop, so we need to
-                    // cache instances here as a way of avoiding
-                    // recreating them.
-                    
-                    Forest ret = n.cache().get(r);
-                    if (ret != null) r.reduce(n, n2, n.phase, ret);
-                    else n.cache().put(r, r.reduce(n, n2, n.phase, null));
-                    
-                } else {
+                } else if (r.numPop != 1) {
                     r.reduce(n, n2, Phase.this, null);
                 }
             }