[project @ 2003-09-11 13:41:38 by simonpj]

Undo bogus claim that
	_scc_ "foo" x  ==  x

This just isn't right in general, for example when x is a
top-level function.

diff --git a/ghc/compiler/coreSyn/CoreUtils.lhs b/ghc/compiler/coreSyn/CoreUtils.lhs
index 7e5fbb4..5c26e0d 100644 (file)
--- a/ghc/compiler/coreSyn/CoreUtils.lhs
+++ b/ghc/compiler/coreSyn/CoreUtils.lhs
@@ -214,12 +214,7 @@ mkCoerce2 to_ty from_ty expr
 mkSCC :: CostCentre -> Expr b -> Expr b
        -- Note: Nested SCC's *are* preserved for the benefit of
        --       cost centre stack profiling
-       -- Note2: We throw away an SCC on a single variable.  If the
-       --       variable is a value, then there is no work to do in
-       --       evaluating it, and if it is a thunk, then it will be
-       --       attributed to its own CCS anyhow.
 mkSCC cc (Lit lit)         = Lit lit
-mkSCC cc (Var v)           = Var v
 mkSCC cc (Lam x e)         = Lam x (mkSCC cc e)  -- Move _scc_ inside lambda
 mkSCC cc (Note (SCC cc') e) = Note (SCC cc) (Note (SCC cc') e)
 mkSCC cc (Note n e)        = Note n (mkSCC cc e) -- Move _scc_ inside notes