[project @ 2003-07-28 15:57:40 by simonmar]

TICK_UPD_CON_IN_NEW() in the update code is wrong now, because it
could be a PAP, not just a CON.

diff --git a/ghc/rts/Updates.hc b/ghc/rts/Updates.hc
index b47b7c6..5965ea9 100644 (file)
--- a/ghc/rts/Updates.hc
+++ b/ghc/rts/Updates.hc
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- * $Id: Updates.hc,v 1.40 2003/05/14 09:14:00 simonmar Exp $
+ * $Id: Updates.hc,v 1.41 2003/07/28 15:57:40 simonmar Exp $
  *
  * (c) The GHC Team, 1998-2002
  *
@@ -56,9 +56,7 @@
          /* remove the update frame from the stack */                  \
          Sp += sizeofW(StgUpdateFrame);                                \
                                                                        \
-         /* Tick - it must be a con, all the paps are handled          \
-          * in stg_upd_PAP and PAP_entry below                         \
-          */                                                           \
+         /* ToDo: it might be a PAP, so we should check... */          \
          TICK_UPD_CON_IN_NEW(sizeW_fromITBL(get_itbl(updatee)));       \
                                                                        \
          UPD_SPEC_IND(updatee, ind_info, R1.cl, JMP_(ret));            \