Fix flag name -XDisambiguateRecordFields
authorsimonpj@microsoft.com <unknown>
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:32:05 +0000 (12:32 +0000)
committersimonpj@microsoft.com <unknown>
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:32:05 +0000 (12:32 +0000)
docs/users_guide/flags.xml
docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.xml

index c8eedd2..540230d 100644 (file)
              <entry><option>-XNoArrows</option></entry>
            </row>
            <row>
-             <entry><option>-fdisambiguate-record-fields</option></entry>
+             <entry><option>-XDisambiguateRecordFields</option></entry>
              <entry>Enable <link linkend="disambiguate-fields">record 
              field disambiguation</link></entry>
              <entry>dynamic</entry>
-             <entry><option>-fno-disambiguate-record-fields</option></entry>
+             <entry><option>-XNoDisambiguateRecordFields</option></entry>
            </row>
            <row>
              <entry><option>-XForeignFunctionInterface</option></entry>
index 2883757..9da3253 100644 (file)
@@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ it is not clear which of the two types is intended.
 </para>
 <para>
 Haskell 98 regards all four as ambiguous, but with the
-<option>-fdisambiguate-record-fields</option> flag, GHC will accept
+<option>-XDisambiguateRecordFields</option> flag, GHC will accept
 the former two.  The rules are precisely the same as those for instance
 declarations in Haskell 98, where the method names on the left-hand side 
 of the method bindings in an instance declaration refer unambiguously